Link: The liberal case against identity politics

You wanted it, you got it, toots.

https://www.vox.com/2017/8/15/16089286/identity-politics-liberalism-republicans-democrats-trump-clinton

They’re right in that it’s good for the right and bad for the left, since the left is all about diversity and identity unifies and homogenizes. Nature is conservative and red in tooth and claw.

They cannot think their own policies through to its logical consequences and the unintended ones are farcical.

We’re the same!

Wait, no! We’re different!

We’re somewhat the same but totally equal!

Then there’s all the inequalities!

Hail Science! Unless it’s fake!

Praise the Faith of Liberal Creationism!

It’s totally 100% completely genetic!

Unless there’s engineering tech in the works!

We need immigrants!

We hate robots!

We’re futurists!

We love tests! 

Academia is racist!

The Lord made our enemies ridiculous.

Socialists in science trying to avoid being scientific

http://quillette.com/2017/07/06/social-sciences-undergoing-purity-spiral/

You picked the wrong fucking field to have feelings.
Especially if those feelings involve censorship of facts you disagree with.
Do you know how many people continue to object to evolution?
Still true. We can see a fetus undergo the stages of evolution in real time.
It’ll never not be true.
We’ve found plenty of Missing Links, and Creationists move the goalposts.
That’s crazy, like suppressing crime and IQ data.

Scientism isn’t real, whatever your false idols tell you. They’re false by nature.

Nurture, as you call it, is mostly measurement error.

You are wrong in MATHS.

Only now, at the end, do they understand.

The multicultural experiment (official media term) was always going to fail because their core premise was that human nature itself could be controlled and experimentally manipulated.

Yeah… people rebel against that.

And it was just colonialism in reverse, instead of going to the poor people to feel superior (missions), they come crawling to you.

“What’s interesting about Haidt’s alternative interpretation of the liberal progress narrative is that he mentions two elements central to the narrative—private property and nations. And what has happened to a large extent is that as the failures of communism have become increasingly apparent many on the left—including social scientists—have shifted their activism away from opposing private property and towards other aspects, for example globalism.”

There’s no such thing as globalism, it’s a void of values. Like there’s no one language, a single language would be the starting point.
Empires unite nations, that’s why the British Empire taught everyone English.
It’s the best language, so you’re still using it.
Globalization has failed because the East has outcompeted the West. A world without white people will not be dumb enough to hand the enemy in various wars your very factories for slightly cheaper Nikes.
In real terms, they bred more, we paid for it and called it ‘aid’ and the future belongs to them barring famine.
Accept your death began with manufacturing. You gave away future prosperity, that’s gonna affect the birth rates.

“But how do we know a similarly disastrous thing is not going to happen with globalism as happened with communism? What if some form of national and ethnic affiliation is a deep-seated part of human nature, and that trying to forcefully suppress it will eventually lead to a disastrous counter-reaction? What if nations don’t create conflict, but alleviate it? What if a decentralised structure is the best way for human society to function?”

…If?

IF.

jesus my sides

genophilia is a dictionary word

ingroup preference is a well-studied phenomena

genetic diaspora exist, ask HBD chick

they’re so close to the pendulum of r/K, aren’t they?

nations formed of genetic tribes to alleviate conflict when weaponry advanced and made mass slaughter possible but, duh, undesirable, ask a forensic anthro or any evo biologist

hell, ask sacred cow Dawkins if supranationalism, the true name for globalism, is even genetically possible
chimps can’t do it, softy peaceable chimpanzee frequently murder one another for literally no reason than territory
it’s been filmed, I’ve seen it

“What if the type of mass-scale immigration

dictionary definition of invasion met but ok

even without weapons, you can ‘rape’ a nation’s women and state coffers (“economic migrants” literally invaders) and that is their intention

search weapons cache European mosque or something like it
happens all over
just the ones we find

currently occurring in Europe,

meanwhile, Christian genocide in MENA too

Look! A distraction!

containing relatively large amounts of people with different nationalities, cultures, and religions, is going against some of the core features of human nature?

Show me one place multiculturalism in history hasn’t involved a genocide at some point.
ONE.
Look up Neanderthals, it’s now in our blood because it’s the reason we’re here and they’re not.

Maybe it isn’t, but if it is, do we have to wait until after the fact to say ‘well, globalism doesn’t work’, as we did with communism? Surely there is a better way.”

Picking up a fucking history book?

The burden of proof was on the pushers. They never did. Not even in their neighbourhoods or schools. The People never consented. When asked (see Brexit), they reject it.

Like the Unis in general, the social sciences only have a shit reputation now liberals are running it.

Coincidence, this is not.

Iceland doing open eugenics

Well, there’s no such thing as non-eugenic abortion, yeah.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/down-syndrome-iceland/

At the very least, it reduces the fertility of people unfit to be parents.

So it’s a genetic cull, is it?

Of those with mutations that reduce fitness?

Of those with medical conditions?

Wasn’t…. wasn’t homosexuality a medical condition for a long, long time?

What about when they start aborting gay kids?
Isn’t that genetic too?

Be careful with your Born This Ways.

People might believe you.

You can be Unborn This Ways too.

I bet the state’s budget for HIV meds and STD shots is much higher than Downs.
The State only cares about more money for the state.

Statism is a vampire.

On the other hand,
comment
“China and India practice gender-selective abortion. Millions of unborn females have been aborted simply because of their gender. Abortion is evil.”
Isn’t that a genocide? It meets all the literal criteria. You know that’s what the MRAs would be calling it if the sexes were reversed? It’s one of the few times SJWs are factually accurate.
Asia generally doesn’t value the individual, let alone their rights. Then they bitch and colonize the West, everywhere actually, even Africa now because they don’t have anyone to marry off their shitty sons to…

History buff wades in
“The Nazis called it Lebensunwertes Leben, Life unworthy of life.”

Science nerd ruins everything
“Mewl all you want, bawl about murder and whatever god makes you cozy at night.
The future is coming through the implementation of CRISPR, and once that’s out of the bag, you can kiss goodbye forever such things as Down syndrome.
Everything will be edited at the genetic level. Imagine, if you will, you and your spouse have the free choice to have an edited child free of malady, gifted intellectually and physically.”
The everyone is equal thing doesn’t really work with genetic defects. An arms race of eugenic traits is going to ensue, with parents who don’t partake instantly at a fitness disadvantage. What if Hitler had DNA tests?
The question is only if we erase something important from the population with a superior group fitness advantage in a minority of cases e.g. genius. That’s why Asia is smart enough to research the genius DNA they don’t have before clipping it out before we know the full effects. That’s competitive…. on a racial level.

Based Bob says
“Is Iceland still boycotting Israel?”
There are genetic tests for being a Jew.
Reminder to all the biologists out there.
Amazingly, Israel developed these. The codes can be released online. Open science FTW.

Lefty tries to be edgy
“Trying to create a super race. Hey, what could possibly go wrong with that?
BTW, if medical science discovers the “gay gene” or the “trans-gender gene” and parents have the option of aborting the “defective” fetus, how will the cultural elites react? Will they be so quick to defend the mother’s right to choose? After all why raise imperfect children in this brave new world?”
Well, who are you to tell a person what to do with 18 years of their life and money?
Many parents want grandkids.
“You can’t end a person’s life because they have an illness or handicap.”
someone hasn’t followed the Trump-supported baby case
our State literally does that
every day
socialized healthcare
look up “care pathways”
AKA death pathways
children and the elderly placed on them
Then there’s this guy
“Now do the same thing with liberals…The world would be a great place!”
They already are, it’s genetically heritable. They’re aborting themselves.
“If we are all equal in the eyes of the creator, then the sick and disabled are no exception.”
Why would a God punish someone like that from conception?
And where is it in the Bible that someone God made to die shortly before or after birth should be intervened?
rare good point
“Simply a matter of religion, eh? Are you OK with capital punishment? After all, the person committing the capital crime made the free choice to do so.
I find it interesting that both sides of the abortion issue manage to take opposite sides on the capital punishment issue. Must be religion.”
Except it says in the Bible to enforce God’s law… by killing people, including adulterers.
Without modern medicine, I doubt most of those Downs fetuses would have survived, so it’s really a point of how much we should spend for the ego of the parents of the defective, who don’t want to pay for it themselves.
“Parents deserve a healthy baby, considering the substantial costs and sacrifices of parenting. To claim that some parents should be forced to raise a Downs child — that is a callous, cavalier observation. Make your own sacrifices. Leave others to decide theirs.”
However, I’ve heard of false negatives in every test and false positives.
They’re all based on probability.
“In cultures where infanticide was accepted (as opposed to outlawed, which is the case in all modern industrial nations), I’ve read that seriously deformed newborns were often caused to die by the parents not caring for them, or leaving them out in the open someplace away from the community. They did not have the resources to bear the burden of caring for them, and sometimes believed (wrongly) that these unfortunate babies were the work of some evil spirit.”
I wonder how many in the West would claim disability for themselves or a child if they couldn’t get paid for it.
Think of the incentives there. Many people who want to control and abuse someone need only prey on the vulnerable by taking those jobs, it’s like teaching as a profession that puts you in a position of trust, how is reducing the vulnerable a bad thing? You can also breed them at home, pedophiles have children for that reason.
“I thought this was what the right wanted…..people not to have babies they can’t take care of. sure, those on the high functioning end of the spectrum can be integrated, but the majority can’t be. and they will outlive their caregivers, who will die in poverty.”
The most interesting fact is that one of the key issues with Downs is in the amygdala.
Don’t liberals have an atrophied amygdala? Literally shrunken?
“The child has a defect that causes him to attack others and self harm.”
Then he should be in prison. Case closed. We have asylums for literally this reason. If you can’t behave.
“Not just with trisomy-21, but with all genetic diseases. Our short-sighted approach has created tens of thousands of new disabled people every year. We keep them alive and even allow them freedom to reproduce, adding hugely to total human suffering.”
Freedom to reproduce is also freedom to fail or to bear the consequences.
They don’t. They’re bred like cattle so government workers can claim more money.
“The same empathy that makes us want to help the poor baby on TV but ignore climate change makes us want to help the individual to the detriment of the whole. Empathy is irrational and evolved to help us predict the future actions of enemies and prey. The “mirror neurons” thought to be responsible for empathy have been found in another species – cats.”
A parent’s unconditional love can be irrational, it can be pathological altruism in abuse cases. Not to mention, whites show absurdly high-rates of ingroup compassion compared to others, it’s a weakness at this level.
Any time you see some whining bitch vomiting disease-positive claptrap all over you, search for the condition plus violence or abusive.
They’re often defending their abusers.
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=down+syndrome+violent+behavior

They must tell themselves their ‘baby’ is always the victim because they cannot hit back.

Sounds healthy.

Taylor Swift proves harassment still illegal

https://www.rightlyreport.com/breakingjury-finds-taylor-swift-told-the-truth/34380

Where did this idea come from that celebrities won’t sue?

WTF

ur kiddin, right?

They have the most incentive to sue.

Trespassing another’s body is still illegal.

And creepy if you think you’re sexually entitled enough to be allowed to touch anyone you want.

Illegal if a man, a woman or both does it!
Who thinks they can get away with this? Who is that dumb?

TSwift went up in my estimation, I’ll tell you.

Was Stormer hacked? [y/n]

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/daily-stormer-anonymous-hack-cyber-attack-nazi-charlottesville-virginia-godaddy-a7891836.html

Why would the real Anonymous attack DS? Have you seen what they post on the chans?

On the other hand, I highly doubt Stormer care about sympathy?

I guess it’ll remain a mystery.

“The Daily Stormer post in question denigrated Heather Heyer, 32, who was fatally struck by a car allegedly driven by a man with white nationalist views, for her physical appearance and what it said were anti-white male views.”

Seriously, suck less.

Killing women because they don’t trust men proves them right.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/opdomesticterrorism-hacktivist-group-anonymous-shuts-down-charlottesville-city-website-ddos-1634857

Meanwhile, real Anony-chan hacked the Charlottesville website.

You know, something actually useful.

Now all I want for Christmas is more pre-released GOT episodes to piss off the producers.

Lovebombing in romantic connections

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/reading-between-the-headlines/201703/the-manipulative-partners-most-devious-tactic

This isn’t news and I’ve mentioned it before.

The article mentions narcissists and sociopaths as typical predators who use this technique.

Yes, it’s also a PUA one.

However, many sociopaths are actually misdiagnosed borderlines and male borderlines try to control when their fear of abandonment kicks in. In effect, the lovebombing is a bribe – how can you leave me after all I did for you?

Sounds a little better when they re-tell it than:
I won’t let you leave!
We’ll be together forever!*

They miss out their long list of conditions, “*as long as you put up with my…..”.

That’s not love, folks.

It’s just a form of compulsive lying.

It uses romance (courtship gestures, that have requirements, they aren’t empty displays like Americans think) to get close to a person, in their head actually.

They’re the guys who went around claiming to be Nice, when they really mean – manipulating with flowers, like the classic deadbeat husband that buys flowers every time he cheats. It’s the reason women are suspect to ‘nice’ guys. If they’ve gotta tell ya… force that belief in through a wedge… our EQ kicks in.
Their defense is flawless, to other parties, the fault lies with you for rejecting their affection – what’s wrong with you? Society tells you these displays are always wanted, good and sincere. Well, Disney tells us that, it teaches us romance is guileless.

Ha.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/communication-success/201707/6-common-traits-narcissists-and-gaslighters

It’s a type of gaslighting, forcing certain beliefs into them.

i.e.

If they’re your soulmate, surely you don’t have to convince them?

If you have a long future to look forward to, then you’ll be around to plan it, you don’t need to keep mentioning it?

It’s cult behaviour but between two people.

You believe this, yes? You believe this because We believe this.

Note one party loses their identity but the other gets to retain their individuality, full freedoms and gain a newfound sense of control over the other…. that isn’t love, that’s slavery.

Link: What’s the problem with feminism?

Should say SJWism. Different beasts. One postmodern and actively irrational.

https://markmanson.net/whats-the-problem-with-feminism.

There is one classic distraction tactic: you have X, you should be happy. Don’t bother for Y or Z.

Well, fuck you, that isn’t how humans work. Rape is a bigger problem in Europe now than before, so his statistics are craptacular. It’s about protecting the vulnerable, including children.

Equality of opportunity = literally meritocracy. Everyone is behind that. Everyone.
Feminists used to be people you could respect, they just wanted the same respect for the same work.

Equality of whatever they feel like today that’s nice? BS.

Social justice is one gigantic distraction from class.

Whatever they do, they fuck the poor.

They fuck them over by buying foreign products and inviting policies that keep the lower orders down, beneath them.

They’re preserving their privilege. There is no privilege but class privilege.
The middle-class are claiming to speak for the bulk of society and openly reviling those opinions.