Link: Mutation accumulation and sexual pathology

http://iqpersonalitygenius.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/mutation-accumulation-and-modern.html

TLDR: man-woman, fecund, is the only true sexuality, the rest is really fetish. Sexuality is productive and you can forge a society with it. There is also a pathology towards sterility in people who would balk at State-imposed for eugenics, as if they can’t be persuaded it was their own freely made choice.
I think of this as Slag Lag = we allow the r=types, naturally culled, to flourish under maladaptive conditions. Their surviving inferior genes drag the rest of us down, including financially and socially (extra taxes to pay for low IQ Timmy) and the novel selection pressures are applied to the quality e.g. higher education, more childcare cost.
mean girls regina george that's really interesting sarcasm

Link: You wanted it, you got it

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/if-that-it-what-you-want-ok-have-it-see.html

…The fact is, we need to be destroyed. And we have decided to do the job ourselves. And we are being allowed to do it.

*

Even after decades of self-inflicted decline, modern Man is too powerful – because we consistently abuse all the power we have, and every new power.

Supposing the world was still full of scientific geniuses, and that people were still as intelligent, educated and self-motivated as they used-to be? –  Supposing we still made major technical breakthroughs? – What would we use them for? – Supposing there were still great composers, writers, philosophers? – What kind of beliefs would they be inspiring in us? …

Ouch.

…And the whole process is concealed by our rooted cultural preference for dishonesty and delusion. Another choice with consequences.

 

End Mancrimination Posters

http://www.buzzfeed.com/regajha/dont-mancriminate#.qjgPlx17Wn

I don’t know whether to laugh that they’re accurate or cry that they’re necessary.

clapping in a snazzy suit

I know the men’s rights movement get a bad rep, but would you reject any legal favours they win for you? Exactly.

Civilization required feminised men

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2015/06/22/early-humans-feminine-culture/

I suppose they had to stop killing each other at some point and start building together.

I have always wondered why our species Homo sapiens, that evolved in Africa about 200,000 years ago, seemed to do nothing special for the first 150,000 years. Because it is not until about 50,000 years ago that the first sign of creative thinking emerged with beautiful cave paintings found in Spain, France and Indonesia.

hmm uhuh o rlly really ah sure thing
Yes, because those are the same.

But these changes weren’t just cosmetic. Two recent papers throw some light on how the revolutionary development of smaller and more fine-boned humans influenced the growth of cooperative culture, the birth of agriculture and human dominance of the planet….

Tribe to village.
Less rape and pillage.