UK race audit ordered

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37194207

dis gonna be good anticipation pull up a chair listen watch

She included Whites as a racial group and the White Working Class specifically.

Prime Minister Theresa May has ordered a review into how ethnic minorities and white working class people are treated by public services such as the NHS, schools, police and the courts.

Equal treatment in practice.
If found lacking, the entire premise of that legal section is disputable.

The audit is aimed at highlighting racial and socio-economic disparities and showing how outcomes differ due to background, class, gender and income.

I hope they control for sample factors e.g. size.

The prime minister said the findings would “shine a light on injustices”.

The information, which will be published within a year and updated annually after that, will cover health, education, employment, welfare, skills and criminal justice.

The SJWs won’t be able to lie anymore and pine for data, there’ll be official statistics, and they’ll include the downtrod white people and poor people as a potential victim group of the system.

‘Difficult truths’

The evaluation will also look into the disadvantages experienced by white working class boys in the school and university system as well as inequalities linked to geographical location, such as inner cities and coastal towns.

No MRA lies!

chaplin joy confetti happy lol

Men are being examined for inequality as much as women and any issues also addressed.
She’s bringing down the system by putting equal treatment into full, equal practice – which in the long run, is effectively impossible.

“The government I lead will stand up for you and your family against injustice and inequality,” Mrs May said. “This audit will reveal difficult truths but we should not be apologetic about shining a light on injustices as never before. It is only by doing so we can make this country work for everyone not just a privileged few.”

Including the currently protected groups over the rest of us.

When the preferential treatment comes out, an answer will be demanded. No more hiding.

Why do white people brag about being infertile?

Seriously, it’s so weird.

W.E.I.R.D. too. It’s like impotence is a status symbol?

How dare a person want the future to contain their genetic legacy, that’s so colonial. /sarc

I decided I haven’t ragged on the genuine white trash like these people in… a while so here goes, unabashed shitpost central.

… Are they seriously expecting congratulations?

This seems like a trend of competition when all their peers are being congratulated for conceiving.

If they’re jealous, they know what to do.

Kinda like BF/GF anniversaries, when the term means absolutely nothing (congratulated on being used and insufficient for commitment) to try and (fail to) compete with wedding anniversaries.

Next they’ll want a high-five after sex. Or internet feedback. Then again, there was a brief trend of after-sex selfies.

~shudder~

eyeroll jessica jones omg wtf shut up

This must seem so bizarre to any sane culture that isn’t suicidal/anti-natal.

On one hand I’m glad these idiots aren’t breeding but we shouldn’t be expected to reward them with attention – like babies. Many of them are actually infertile from all the STDs – player men don’t need a vasectomy (which can re-heal or leak and still get a woman pregnant, especially if he has sex a LOT) because pelvic inflammation is a common side effect of common infections among the promiscuous, from gonorrhea (now sex-positive culture has created the super variant too) to chlamydia. This has the effect of blocking the tubes in both men and women.

It’s like the recent finding that a man’s urethra also has a microbiome aka it isn’t sterile or empty. Well duh, how do you think they pass on STDs? Does it hop? Women’s STD side effects have only been studied so much because we carry children, but the manosphere doesn’t ask that science researches anything that might make them take responsibility or anything that might hurt their feelings, so while it might literally save their slutty fertility for when they mudshark Yellow Fever Edition before a brutal divorce once she has her precious mixed babies, a common pattern with those women, they refuse to admit there’s even a transmission issue, let alone giving a damn about low time preference issues. They just expect it’s easy to conceive when you’re older, fuck biology and mutation load.

When their children have health conditions, they’ll probably blame the woman.

That type of lovely individual.

Coldly, you don’t want the person, you want their genetic material.
Nobody wants sex. Nobody wants another person. We want babies and healthy ones at that. Anyone bragging about their hypersexuality better understand they can’t signal the false and countersignal the real without looking terrible.

Back to the original theme of weird white men (and a lot of very slutty women too, that tend to join in rather than mention it upfront) –

It’s so weird to see men brag about how impotent they are like “I’ve had seventeen girlfriends and never got them pregnant”.
Like, your body doesn’t crave the sex, it craves the babies. From a biological perspective you are a catastrophic failure. Hundreds to thousands of attempts and nothing to show. Genetically speaking, it’d be better if you were a virgin. The ancient emphasis on sex as virility and masculinity wasn’t based on the sex – it was based on the fertility. I’ve mentioned before that phrase they kept using “the embrace of a God is always fertile”. The cultures these fools look up to thought nothing of sex, it was all about the children and providing for the family, you know, classical masculinity? The Patriarch? You can’t be a Patriarch without children, I don’t care how much you claim to lift, preening Calhoun rat. Men are the physically protective sex (hence any man in MRA comments complaining about soldier deaths has marked himself as unfit, hence his constant failure with women, he cannot provide as a coward) and women are the physically generative sex (not the phallus, which produces nothing and the woman must still nurture the child for a few years and provide milk).Humans are the only species to use contraception to never conceive. Other animals do rarely use natural versions but only to prevent conception when it would be unwise e.g. dangerous to survival. Nature culled the ones who took the plant Pill to avoid parenthood. Nice one, Nature.

These people are moral retards, to borrow Vox Day’s phrase. They’re doing the unnatural equivalent of shooting themselves in the face. How ironic many claim to believe in evolution? LOL.

I can’t help but wonder if their own parents would’ve saved all that money and aborted them if they’d known these idiots would’ve been so inconsiderate as to brag about not only their excessive sexual appetites (never a mark of a great person, see all of human history), but their core seething hatred of humanity and its continuation?

Bragging about planned childlessness requires a deep self-loathing, as a behaviour it’s ideal for people who hate themselves but don’t want to kill themselves.

Everyone that ever became a parent did it with one expectation – to become grandparents.

I don’t think these people would even exist if their ancestors could see what would become of their line.

Sex isn’t a form of consumption yet it’s being treated exactly as that, people talk like it’s a Starbucks order and then they turn around and dare complain about the consequences. …Did you consent or not? You can’t complain about getting an STD when you barebacked it with a stranger in a club toilet. Sorry, no. When you consent to sex, you take on two risks: the risk of pregnancy (but it isn’t a disease) and the risk of catching an infection (and yes, if you consented to that physical contact you deserve to be ashamed for recklessness).

I won’t go into how emotionally damaged they are, there are studies about age at first sex and psychiatric conditions. Plenty of manwhorish men also reported dysfunction after their father walked out, it affects both sexes. Men sleep with far more women when they identify too much with their mother (stupidly called emotional incest) or when their father repeatedly cheated on their mother (and they try to normalize the humiliation at not being enough themselves). This is the reason they always spiral, get worse and burnout. Recovery is a myth.

I mention both these groups indulging in the same postmodern habit (I’m good enough to get sex, but too good to reproduce) because we have an odd case where it’s contaminating the right wing as well.
You’d expect this level of spite (i.e. not getting sterilized on purpose then acting like pregnancy was an ‘accident’ as an excuse to abort, repeatedly) from the Left but libertarians (mostly left socially) have carried this over into conservative circles.

Conserving what? It certainly isn’t dignity.

Their self-awareness fails on this, they don’t know what terrible mates they sound like and if there’s anything a woman will tell you, sexual reputations stick, for life. The majority of slander claims used to be brought by women (rarely men) accused of sleeping around before marriage, sexual reputation is the most salient in society, it affects your marriage prospects. Women acknowledge the sex-baby link and admit we generally want the babies, not the sex per se. A man bragging that he’s 1. a cheating risk, 2. an easy quitter, 3. probably infected, 4. probably infertile and 5. probably the type to murder his own children because he celebrates not conceiving (who does that?!) is not making himself more attractive. Even to other sluts, who might be eyeing him as a baby daddy.

You know it’s bad when the other sluts back off.

It’s part of pathological altruism to celebrate the death of your own family line (future potential). It suggests there is something wrong with reproduction, the most natural thing our species was designed for (by evolution or God). At the very least, they expose a hatred for the nuclear family and for this, the self-styled conservatives espousing this deserve to be shunned like the most ardent Democrat sex blogger.

(Nowadays, most sex blogs are run by men and fictional, post-SATC).

Such ‘jokes’ ring of self-hatred and not a small amount of Cultural Marxist brainwashing ( ug ug babies bad and smelly, family a millstone, woman shrew like on TV show, I will be strong independent sexual creature and make my mark on the world with memes and internet pacifiers, I’m so mature look at my haircut and my useless body).

Seriously, they are trash. In the trash-heap of humanity, they’re that crust of dried fluid at the bottom that the flies won’t touch. History will mark them as lower than Calhoun’s rats, an unnatural example of sexuality without humanity. They forget, they were children once and they owe their existence to their parents’ sacrifice and in hindsight, poorer decision. They feel entitled to their very cushioned existence and see no duties to family or country, but they’ll expect that country to pay out a free no-strings pension with other people’s kids. They’ll send other people’s kids off to die in pointless war and happily vote to screw over other people’s kids. Society requires you do certain things – for a reason. If you abstain by choice, you are outcast – for a reason. Not only do they waste space, air and other natural resources but they drag down the rest of us by requiring us to fund their lifestyle via taxation, when they already add to national debt that our children will be paying for. But we should pretend not to care? Enable it? Stay out of their bedroom?

Fuck that, if they make this a public topic, we have right of reply.

What about stay out of our wallets with your Pills, abortion money and STD tests?
What about you don’t get that support from the spoils of others (childrearing) when you scorned the practice as inferior to you?

I keep seeing signalling white people (including some with pathetic attempts to claim edgy Alt Right status despite obvious, happy conscience-less degeneracy) who hate everything that made them – including the fact they were made.

They don’t just hate themselves, which would be logical.
They hate everyone. You, me, their families, race, nations, societies. They don’t deserve the life they have, denied to so many others.

This is pathological. This is a cultural meme disease. This is not healthy.
People shouldn’t ever think like this, let alone its expression encouraged.
It’s dyscivic and anti-civilizational and those people cannot complain if they’re prematurely culled from the population by, say, famine. Hedons are a net drain on a society. Hey, what’s dying a few decades earlier? It isn’t as if they were gonna leave anything important behind. They can’t claim their life matters. Considering the number claiming to be atheist, when they’re dead, they will truly be gone. Self-cleansing from this earth. Good riddance. I wave a handkerchief in sarcasm at your departure, you won’t be missed – your own family will hate you your ingratitude. Karma and self-fulfilling prophecies are a bitch.

Side point: Atheists always want funerals? Why? I say throw them to hungry dogs. After all, not believing in the sanctity of humans as a species or religious rites, it’s what they would’ve wanted…

hm impressed jaqen nice ok

At least as puppy chow they get to live on as something people actually love?

I don’t mind that they’re hopeless, I don’t mind that they believe in nothing, I care they’re casually insulting the very people who will keep them in comfort in the retirement home, having been selfish their whole life, the beneficiary of other’s kindness when they’ll probably let their own parents/grandparents suffer. If you truly believed in nothing, you’d expect nothing in return.

Generally this trend annoyed me for a sex-based reason.

There’s bro culture (really Gangster Culture) telling men Don’t Reproduce (women are bitches) and it’s celebrated and somehow the female hasn’t picked up this anti-family streak (you can’t override a certain level of common sense). The women who wait until marriage to have children (better for the children, not a leech on society) but have them as early as possible (healthier, happier children, more time with parents) are waiting for the men to propose, so all the propagandists need to do is get to the dumbfuck men. And they have. By promising free sex. Nothing is free. Sex isn’t even a right (requiring another’s body). They’re meant to be the logical ones. They’re usually caught reading evolution and biology books. Why can’t they see this? Their bodies do not want sex, they crave sex as a means to reproduce. It’s a simple hormonal trigger to a glandular muscle mechanism. They’re fucking themselves.

They are so retarded they’re thinking exactly like a feminist (I can have all the sex I want – do you really want it though or simply believe after being told you wanted to be a slut from kindergarten up – and will never be burdened by evil children and families that will ruin my life). What life? One of the biggest regrets among the middle aged and elderly is never starting a family. It’s basically top of the list. Do you really think a few bottles at a club and false friends there for the good times were worth wasting their life on pointless shit until their credit card ran out and suddenly Pop Culture abandoned them, unable to milk any more currency from their debt-ridden carcasses?

We’re encouraged by short-term politicians to grow the economy now, not the next generation. We all know who will be replacing us on that front.

It’s so transparent once you look. Models are usually fired after conceiving, regardless of whether they keep their figure, and many of them look/are underage, so either infertile by size, low weight stopping their periods or being a literal child themselves. And this is pushed as sexy when men admit they don’t like the editorial look. Why is it pushed then?

Casually this bragging thing is getting out of hand. ‘Hook-up culture’ (threesome and orgy ‘culture’, like LGBT pozzing ‘culture’) is screwing up the participants who won’t be able to commit and pair bond, let alone have a family later. It’s like emotional sterilization. They’re being encouraged to see people as sex toys. We’re taking the worst lessons from society and these expectations were pilot tested among the gays, and we know how well they’re doing.

~cough HIV, cough domestic abuse, cough depression/suicide~

Yet women are forced to endure men bragging about much they love one thing completely oblivious to how they actually love another thing they claim to hate. This is like the male “Is butter a carb?” moment.

i don't even whatever

See, I am equally hard on white people. Perhaps harder.

No other race is encouraged to see anal as preferable to fertile sex (inb4 herp derp “it’s just better” guys who know logically it’s worse in every medical and objective way yet refuse to see homosexual man sex… as homosexual) and every time you see a threesome (portrayed as normal, like two ‘parents’ of the same sex because fuck Darwin) it’s always at least one white girl, usually two and usually portrayed as pushing for it more than the man. Hey, pre-fall Ancient Rome wants its decadent orgies back, we don’t even have the lead poisoning excuse.

This is going to be ruinous.

At risk of repeating myself, on the topic of illusory anal superiority, if you have a willing woman in front of you and you don’t go for the female orifice, you are gay. You are totally gay and merely denying it. It’s literally the same act as if you’re screwing a man and that aversion to the natural self-lubricating one is a key feature in the homosexual psyche, except you learned it in your formative years with porn abuse.
The reason women avoid men obsessed with anal, we don’t want an unexpected announcement of your boyfriend Hernando in 30 years after investing everything and giving 3 kids. Plus HIV and other vastly increased disease risks. Would they also brag about sores? Probably.

Reminder: women can still get pregnant from anal, it isn’t contraceptive. It’s called dripping. Any semen near or on the vulva can find its way home. Nature… finds a way.

Yet this type of trash to brag about their porn star impotence (yeah those guys also have HIV, sure that’s a coincidence) is also the kind to openly speak about how much anal they get, possibly going into detail about the physical sensations and positions involved, but if you mention how that’s basically like two men you hear “that’s disgusting, you’re disgusting”….

no what I don't believe it can't be true disbelief pushing daisies

From the people doing it.

The very reason I don’t pity them: stupid, arrogant – and deliberately nauseating casual acquaintances like the worst of boors. You don’t discuss politics because it hurts feelings, you don’t discuss sex because it’s sickening to look someone in the eye after that. Result?

Despite thinking it will make them more popular, I have news. Anecdotal, but conclusive for what it is.

They are always shunned. Even among liberals, there is TMI and OTT and PLEASE STOPs.

Perhaps not immediately, but slowly phased out for being disgusting, which might be acceptable, but causing others to picture it and die with the knowledge that Chad goes about 7 inches deep into a shit-bacteria infected over-stretched hole.

That level of No Personal Boundaries. Non-existent.

That detail was one of the mildest I have heard, I spared you others but I needed to convey the point. Without even seeing this guy, you instinctively recoiled.

If someone wants to know your sex life’s details, it’s probably because they want to have sex with you. If you want to tell them, it would be better to show them. Do not tell third parties, rule for life. It’s the adult equivalent of that toddler who brags about pooping. Actually these people probably brag about pubic hair and other bodily functions so scratch that as metaphor, they were exactly that kid.

The women, on the other hand, are the type to complain about trigger warnings, as they tell you about their sex life without asking if you want to hear first (and getting offended if you say No).

Trash.

Hommes au ordures. 

Modern advertising = The opposite of this.

The Right Wing has finally forgotten that the natural, expected result of sex is pregnancy, NOT an orgasm. 

Neither sex needs an orgasm to become parents. Men release sperm before they complete and women push out any previous competition, neither are strictly necessary.

When a woman falls pregnant, that’s what’s supposed to happen, when you have sex.
Grown adults ‘forgetting’ 12yo biology, as an excuse to fuck up.

The definition of insanity, fucking for infertility.

Now go read your magazines about 53 Ways To Make Him Come and 4 Positions That Will Drive Her Wild.
I’m sure that was the intended purpose of your existence, to futiley, impotently pump into Nietzsche’s abyss until you shrivel up and die.

Treasonous fascists’ opinions > Millions of votes

http://uk.businessinsider.com/gina-miller-article-50-brexit-eu-supreme-court-2016-8

Treason

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_treason_in_the_United_Kingdom

“adhering to the sovereign’s enemies”

This country is not the EU. It never has been because the previous vote was about the EEC.

Telling the Monarch they can’t do something is treasonous, it questions their power.

Who the fuck are you?

Fascist is quite easy to define: anti-democracy, anti-freedom and controlling (domination).

Often uses the law.

Look how proud she is of herself.

Look past the pleasant language and look at the ideas.

e.g. first question she claims to be neutral party, only to push a load of Remainiac bile.

She wants to make a name for herself, hence these interviews. She is proud of this.

Here’s the qualifications.

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/ginamillerscm

Aside from being involved in EU law and making a fortune out of their politics, and misrepresenting our law (it doesn’t solely work from precendent and we do have Bills).

http://www.wearethecity.com/inspirational-women-gina-miller-founder-miller-philanthropy/

She’s also foreign. Is anybody surprised?

Gratingly, she does some good work on pensions.

She complains that people are boycotting her company (their right) but is apparently pro-consumer choice.

“As I said before, I’m an adrenaline junkie but also a petrol head.”
She wants to make a name. Oh, she will.

Then you get people in the industry thinking they’ve always been…. dodgy.

http://moneyweek.com/interview-the-turncoat-fund-manager-alan-gina-miller-60934/

“It turns out that Gina (who has a history of starting businesses) pushed him into it in the first place.”

“Before working with Alan, Gina had carved out a successful career in events and marketing with BMW and Legal & General. She also started, and later sold, her own financial services marketing agency, SWAY Marketing. SCM – of which she is the chief executive – is the seventh business she has either founded or co-founded.”

Why does an American immigrant think she can over-rule the British monarch?

The Queen IS sovereignty. This person plays dumb to the basics of our system while subverting it.

Ew, New Money.

I can’t find where these new charities direct their profits, which is odd, but I’ll bet you it’s the top social justice project, #1 refugees.

Conflict of interest? Like the courts will care, or a foreigner would’ve never been allowed to question our sovereignty in the first place.

These conceited people have no idea how enraged the population will be, millions of people, if they overturn a democratic result. This is why they were blocked from voting.
Parliament is also decided by that voting public.
The referendum was agreed in public before it was held, it already IS legal and Remainiacs like this didn’t stop it, thinking they’d win. They had the option to make a clause for a revote if it was close – nobody took this option, I watched the debates.
If Parliament dare betray the People, a constitutional crisis ensues because the MPs were allowed power by the same system (voting, a rarity in her homeland), and this woman will at best be deported for treason… or likely worse, since she pretends to have greater legitimacy in her opinion than the Monarch and Her people. If the courts had any sense, they’ll chuck this out and punish her. That is why, in centuries as she admits, this has never been questioned … because it’s treasonous. If the ‘Sovereign’ cannot overturn Acts of Parliament, there is no monarchy, there is no ‘Royal Assent’. She isn’t even a fascist of her own country and her own people but I guess you can take the girl from the corrupt Third World shithole, you can’t …etc etc.
It’s the lawyer Marie Antoinette, dumb as fuck in the face of an angry crowd with legitimate grievances, she thinks her opinion is worth more than dozens of MILLIONS of votes. Consider this. She thinks there are no repercussions, along with the others who filed and are now in the permanent public record – forever. Whichever politicians get in, in future. They have these records.
It’s no secret her ilk profit from ‘human rights’ from the EU, a conflict. But statute doesn’t give us rights, it merely enshrines them in law. Magna Carta pre-dates Parliament and can never be struck down, there’s no proof it’s even possible. Nobody can take away our rights as long as we are human, whatever the law says rights are innate, they exist without society. This is basic legal theory. She must know it but she lies.
This won’t block anything, these fools don’t understand, but it will galvanize the public against the Establishment and they’ll want blood, feeling their oppressed sentiments are justified.
The perceived invincibility of these classes is the exact problem, this arrogance of theirs “Oh yeah? what are you gonna do about it?”

Well, we all outnumber all of you.

So, a lot. Historically.

Study: Cross-cultural genetics of g (IQ) and selection

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886916308042

Highlights

•National fertility and country-level general intelligence (G) negatively correlate.
•The frequencies of 8 SNPs that predict IQ also negatively correlate with fertility.
•Both findings are associated with Jensen effects.
•The SNP metagene negatively predicts fertility, when controlled for HDI.
•Global G should decline due to selection by − 0.253 points per decade.

Genetics seem to be keeping K-families smaller than r-types’, enough to moderately provision each child with high investment parenting. However, the effect is mild, suggesting it prevents Malthusian exhaustion.

Boomers prove happy to screw the young farther

In fact, they don’t think it goes far enough!

All the Guardian readers who laughed at my posts on pensions have gone silent recently. They thought I was making it up.

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/aug/23/calls-for-more-pension-advice-after-study-raises-concerns-over-future-plans
They can’t rely on food banks either.
They abandoned their families, divorced their spouses and said they didn’t need the Church.
…We’ll see.

Comment “The stark truth is that no matter where people look to invest their pensions, they are (in essence) investing into the generations that follow.
In effect lending them money so to ensure that those generations will take care of them in the future.
In this sense it is not unlike a pyramid scheme and powered entirely by debt.
2008 wasn’t simply another financial crash or banking crisis. It was a total systemic failure where the unthinkable happened (which is why none of the economists, bankers or poiticiains saw it coming): All the banks in the world simultaneously ran out of money.
This is why in some circles 2008 is know as “A debt saturation point”.
In more simple terms, the income demands of the top third of the pyramid overcame the ability of the bottom two thirds to deliver it – and it began to collapse.”

People are retiring for decades. National debt goes up. Student loans go up. Wages are down thanks to immigration. Property is expensive thanks to same, over half the average wage. This cannot continue.
If it’s a public fund, you can’t trust it will be there. Pensions are not savings, as savings always go up in nominal value and they are privately owned (personal control). You save money to put IN to a pension, the pension is not saving but investment i.e. it can go down too.

Comment “Pensions are a con. You can save all your life, and then someone pillages the fund and takes it all away from you.”

The people childless and happy, as they told us, also want to parasite off their own generation too.
Most of them don’t ‘save’ enough to cover a 1/6 of what they’ll be ‘entitled’ to.

Comment “The issue of having any form of assets and then being required to fund care does raise the slightly thorny issue of responsibility and planning though.
If one person were to carefully save, spending less on holidays and TV packages, then another person were to say “stuff that” and not bother, then person A ends up funding the costs not only for themselves but also person B (who can be in the same care home, in the room next door, with the council paying). So, where is the incentive to plan and save?”

No! You mean? Those mean conservatives have reasons?

They aren’t making policy …to be mean?

The middle ground classic liberals are finally getting it. When you align with people who parasite, they won’t stop for you. And what about the lack of trained people working in those places? Immigrants can’t do it, the NHS has scandals about undertrained staff. The IQ drop from inbred fertility in certain groups and foreigners from the EU taking University places mean we’ll have even more shortages in future.

Singapore has a better system, comment “The concept is that everybody effectively holds a government account, in which they accrue funds for their retirement, healthcare, housing, etc that come from payroll tax.

Private systems work better. Personally accountable? Private works better. No admin. Look at French healthcare. Private. Best in EU.

The government pension is therefore “fully funded”, removing the constant nibbling away at the economic prospects of the younger generations, by the baby boomers who are in power, and the pensioners who carry such clout as a voting bloc.
If we carry on with a system we have, where todays pensioners are being funded by todays taxpayers who have rapidly diminishing prospects as a consequence, the system will fail. “

Leave the world better than you found it. If you took inheritance, you should pass that on and more. Yet these people, already given everything and then voting in new stuff to get, are spending their inheritances too.
Spot the r-type, comment

“The LibDem Pensions Minister in the coalition,said he was quite happy for people to draw their pension money early and buy expensive Lamborghinis or whatever,never factoring in future care costs.This was reckless and should count as divestment if people knowingly spent up,expecting the taxpayer to step in and meet their future care costs.”

sensible chuckle

Oh, now they want people to be held responsible. When they lose out.

And Millennials/Gen Z/the hereafter?
https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/aug/14/uk-younger-generation-pensions-bill-report

Nothing.

“Caroline Abrahams, the charity director at Age UK, pointed out that 1.6 million older people live in poverty in the UK.”

They had decades to save. They spent it. Pathos, seriously?
Their families abandoned them. Who raised the families?

““‎In fact, you could say it is all the more important for young people to know they have a reasonable state pension to look forward to, given the uncertainty they face over jobs and housing, and given that the value of future private pensions will largely depend on investment growth, which is not guaranteed.””

Those last two words should ring like a horror film quartet.

Any Gen Y who can read will be saying WTF and FU to that. (We were chucked in the deep end with workplace pension schemes with zero choice, unlike X or Z).
Translation: Pay us or else and there’s a minute chance you’ll get a slither of it back at some point, but not really because haha you were in debt before you were born, suckers.

We don’t have the fertility levels to maintain this system. The Boomers didn’t have enough kids. Those kids will already be caring for their own elderly parents. Without going into the massive immigrant families expecting handouts from Whitey, when the children send money out the country in remittance and resent paying for the white elderly too.
The elderly will blame the bankers they bailed out to run their pension funds for the missing money.
Abolish the death tax and the fertility rate will fix itself (those children going on to pay into the system) because my lot could finally afford them. Look at all the articles about young people putting off kids, it’s a national crisis. Keep the death tax to fuel impossible state ‘pensions’ (bribes) and to spite the current children and we will spite you by making none. Having kids is just too expensive now unless you do it with others’ money so you’ll be getting a higher % of the dumb and lazy. You cannot replace the high IQ either with third-worlders, GDP is tied to national IQ.

The immigrants will move home where living is cheaper if the taxes are demanded. They will revoke citizenship and turn traitor when the country asks of them, we all know it, many said about jumping ship if we leave the EU. Short-term prosperity for long-term failure. The middle-aged and old have chosen this and voted for it. My generation, knowing we won’t see a penny, will correct this when in power.

Wonka moment. They get nothing!

As for the immigrants who took public funds their ancestors never paid into and expect to leave without paying the bill… trillions in international theft?

stop don't come back sarcasm no please go leave wonka

Can you spell Colonialism?
That welfare money was only legal to provide on the loophole they must remain citizens (and hence pay in the rest of their lives). It was not a gift. Otherwise, theft of one country from another, and imposition of genocidal conditions (limiting native fertility is one and taking up school/job/Uni spaces for natives plus taking their ancestors’ contribution alone meets it), constitute an act of war.

Anyone with proof otherwise, go ahead. I’ll wait.

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/aug/23/calls-for-more-pension-advice-after-study-raises-concerns-over-future-plans
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/savers-raiding-pension-pots-could-8631750

Who do my generation and thereabouts think is paying for this? Do you see anyone else around here? Like the refugees invited by a woman near death, the corrupt NGOs that rape children abroad with our taxes, and best of all, national debt to encourage the politicians betraying us, it’s all on us.

Again, savings go up, we cannot save for pensions, you need to have no national debt to save; they were never saving, but investing, despite refusing to admit it’s gone down. They voted for QE and low interest for mortgages, this is the outcome. They devalued the currency and retired too early on too little. They’re already in debt personally. This is a national Marshmallow Test and they’ve failed. We don’t owe them any bailouts.

OT but not really.
The most pro-immigrant people I see are near retirement whites.
Honest question: why do they think / what proof do they have, that the people dodging paying for the elderly in their homeland, will ever pay for them? And with more people in the system and their extended families, do they not see it will crash the system even faster? Logically? I haven’t seen any proof and I have looked but it seems to be the seedcrop for their affronted maintenance that Immigrants Bring More Money Than They Take. Despite discounting remittance, social spending etc.

They cannot do maths.

The Guardian (a Boomer rag) seem to be appeasing the young by admitting a problem but blaming everyone but those at the top of the social pyramid.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/07/revealed-30-year-economic-betrayal-dragging-down-generation-y-income
Boomers are perma-victims, always the Real Victims Here TM.

comment “Until the, let them play Pokemon Go whilst looking at porn on their iPhone, in between whining over their Mocha frappuccini, and crying into their craft beer whilst combing their beards.”

Meanwhile, “As per the article the liabilities just of final salary pensions are at least £1.4tn, which is more than the official national debt. I don’t believe it is funded – if so where are all these funds held?”

The nail has been struck.

If the Government collapses, the People live.

And the entrepreneurs with their flat whites trying to boost the economy this side of China?http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/11174288/Self-employed-Youre-stumbling-into-pensions-nightmare.html

Their proposed solution is to tax/rob the rich. That can only happen ONCE. For a few short years. And then bust. When you take something, it doesn’t grow. Rabbit farms.
These people are too dense to notice their pensions are inflated by investment in the companies in the stock exchange ‘avoiding’ the taxes they say should affect the bottom line – and dividends. If taxed any more, those companies will go abroad and buyback those shares. They will lose more money.

“Does the fact that these old people’s pension payments go into questionable ponzi schemes on the stock exchange have any bearing on this ?”
Cookie for you, son.

reason on tuition
“Increasing tuition fees was a Tory policy.” (and Lib Dem in coalition)
“and introducing them in the first place was Labour policy”

owned

“How does ever rising immigration offer anything but a short term palliative? Who pays the pensions of the immigrants in due course, ever more immigrants? Exponentials have a nasty habit of blowing up.”

The immigrants are more fertile, they take far more even if part of their families reunite. One working, five aunts, uncles and grandparents needing care minimum, more like 15-50 if you look. No one is that productive.

sage comment

“Pensions are a myth”

They haven’t worked ‘all their lives’ or they wouldn’t need a pension. Average duration is two DECADES. Originally meant to be five years, tops.

More hatred for housewives and stay-at-home mothers
“No mention of the sex divide, women have paid far less into the system yet draw more (more likely to be getting housing and pension benefit) and for much longer than men. No one from this think tank is going to go there.”
Those women work at home. They did the right thing and raised the future workers paying for you. Not all forms of civilization-building work can be taxed. What’s worth more, a little tax boost temporarily and a burden in old age greater than that, or three kids that create a tax surplus over the untaxed parent? As the welfare state grows, the population must grow more. It’s Malthusian. This would always have snapped back, but the generation to introduce it are now happily dead, having gotten away with it.

back to Guardian comment bingo
“Is this the Sun or the Guardian?
Ageist and highly prejudicial What is happening in the Guardian
What happened to balanced fair reporting?
This article is promoting hate
Guardian editorial staff should be prosecuted for inciting violence against old people by using weasel worded articles like this
Disgraceful”
reply
“I’m sorry you’ve not saved a fraction of the pension you are forcing someone else to pay for unwillingly and you get upset if they talk about it.
You really are the worst generation ever. Truly hateful.”

applause clap clapping yes well done

The younger SJW set are finally talking back. On The Guardian itself. The cogs turn.

comment
“Personally speaking I’ve got no time whatsoever for this so-called “Intergenerational Foundation” – why does a liberal newspaper like The Guardian continue to offer a platform to a group of fascists advocating hatred of older people?”
reply “Ageism goes both ways – look at all the utter crap that gets written about Millenials and so on.”

thumbs up yes batman approval

Anyone who disagrees with me and other parasites is Fascist. But I want to control people and make them slave for me for life. This in the name of freedom and democracy.

Social justice was invented by these wankers. Merely applied by Gen Y students with Boomer teachers.

How about the radical idea of basing payments on the tax one has paid?
Oh, but then public sector workers are fucked, aren’t they?

From top link
“Those over the age of 65 have harvested fully two-thirds of that £2.7tn increase in national wealth.”
There’s your income inequality, Boomers.
They celebrated abortion and as others have said, our generation will be morally OK with euthanasia for the same reason: to reduce their suffering. We simply can’t afford to keep them and the few children.
The politicians have public sector pensions, a corrupt conflict of interest.
These people celebrated tuition hikes, when it’s less public-backed money for them. All the tax money is finite.
Problem covered, problem solved?

Young people have already hit their limit. Their primary luxury is FOOD FFS. You need it to LIVE. Literally!

To pay for this pension malarkey, comment “Student loans will have to be written off, no one voted for them therefore they were illegal”
True.
Forgiveness, like America.
But likely only for STEM and medical.

comment “Young people will have to pay for their own pensions, and the pensions of the elderly, and the trillion pound national debt (they didn’t run that up either) and they will never experience the level of home ownership, prosperity, employment or public services that we will not be able to afford (obviously, as the only way they could be afforded in the first place was through spending the pension pots and borrowing a trillion and counting). The unvarnished truth is that today’s pensioners lived through the absolute best of times, funded largely through spending the money of the younger generation. Sadly the people on basic state pensions are also poor.”

They lived like Kings – and pissed away a King’s fortune. They deserve to be poor.
That fortune was given not to them, but to the future. It was not meant to be spent, but preserved. It’s like the old saying about the new rich – it’s pissed away by the third generation, who deserved it least.
When they keep re-mortgaging their home for nude cruises to keep up their Viagra usage and record high STD rates, don’t be shocked when they’re homeless.

Gen Z will be more ruthless than us, I wouldn’t be shocked if they happily turned cannibal on Nana – they were taught society owes them, and they owe it nothing.

comment

“Why should younger generations contribute and pay for pensioners to have advantages we will never receive?”

– The forbidden question.

Social contracts are a bitch. We owe them nothing when they took everything – including our youth and future.

Do you want to know the tragedy in this?

If everything had gone as planned, today’s youth would be the most prosperous ever.
Which generation holds that title?
Baby Boomers.

If the wealth were preserved and passed on, with minimal pilfering like their parents and grandparents, and immigration/multikulti kept low, we’d have;

  • record high employment
  • record high wages
  • low inflation
  • more savings
  • less to no national debt
  • higher national IQ
  • more children
  • less corruption
  • lower crime
  • affordable property
  • more intact families
  • more consumer spending
  • less years in education becoming competitive
  • earlier retirement
  • assured pensions
  • stable NHS
  • higher trust
  • better transport
  • more STEM investment
  • lower taxes.

And more. It’s too depressing to go on listing. They are the biggest fuck-ups in recorded history and we shall report them as such.

If you use SJW tactics, you’re an SJW

and we will respond accordingly

note to the smoking crater of the manosphere

cool mocking shades yes peace

got a tip they might try to doxx me or at least some small libel like Fatty McManboobs tried (and no one swallowed)

mrw:-

laughing lol haha liar liar

r u sure

r u sure you want to even attempt this

please be sure because if someone fucks with me, you’ve given me full license to fuck back, morally

this is apparently based on pointing out the public, obvious facts about Mikey the Juice Guy – and laughing at him, daring to laugh at a stranger who makes a public spectacle of themselves on the internet
exhortation is a Christian duty, we note flaws regardless of your demo, that is fair and necessary where they misrepresent our values
we seek reason, not emotion, you made your own rope, not us

do you really want to fuck with the Alt Right little boys?
we are not brittle like your narcissism of small differences SJW fuck-up drama friends, in a massive circlejerk of pointing and shrieking about CNA YOU BELIEVE WHAT THEY DID triggering where you all get off on the attention and make shekels from patreon and ebooks
you are so far to the left of me with your drugs, drinking and sexual practices (whoring self and others) that it would really take the mask off for you to start going after people like me, you know, real traditional ones, as you claim to be the moral rulers of us, and signal as more respectful of tradition than the people who live it

I am not siding with the feminist, I had never seen this one before, simply agreeing that terrible people (by action) are terrible (by reputation). Whatever their signal to ingroup with the powerful for protection before the wind changes. I do not care what you call yourself, but how you behave.

this is clear in my writings, I have critiqued everyone, you are not special, snowflakes

here is a fact, aside from the titular one

you do not fuck with one traditional person, we have high trust and social bonds, you fuck with the whole family

are. you. quite. sure.

joker DC smile smirk evil grin lol haha

if you wanna go, I won’t tell you to stop

but I will not

and I am far more patient

bear in mind, the SJWs, with all their power, would rather shut down mentally and pretend I do not exist, than fuck with me

I’ll leave you with this demonstrable fact.

They’re too scared to even use my name.