Disney is piss-easy to analyse

That’s why children love it. And I don’t even have to make you sit through a lecture.

e.g.

This also explains non-Western maligned figures such as Kaali, scary mother who’d go to war for her children.

A coward would’ve seen the dragon, the power of women, and run away. He’d forever think of women as only Lilith – pure evil, because he was trying to trespass where he didn’t belong (as an unworthy suitor).

For a modern example, picture the ghetto scum who shout pornographic things at women and act surprised when they’re told to fuck off. They set the crude tone.

Every man alive knows the difference between saying “nice dress” and “nice tits”. They both mean the same thing, it’s a question of showing respect. If you don’t respect WHOEVER you speak to, why should they show respect to you?

It isn’t actually a compliment, to other men they don’t say ‘sexy’, they say “you look good”, they imply virtue. They give respect.

It reminds me of “give him a chance” …why? You date him if you want, women are not a lottery.

It’s bullshit when women say it about their fat friend and it’s dangerous when men say it about creeps. Men don’t have female creepdar.

I despise fake femininity because it suppresses the wrathful impulse to punish wrongdoing and protect the good. That side always comes out eventually. If it isn’t protective, it can turn abusive much like false masculinity’s aggression, made from buried passivity and resentment.

Misogynists see the wrathful side of every woman because the women sense it and are correctly punishing their misogyny. You are not entitled to kind treatment, it is earned. If you treat women like shit, don’t expect women to act like that’s acceptable. Men set societal standards in morality but women have the task to enforce them.

Feminism just thought it could fuck with evolutionary formula  because men dropped the standards for themselves and men changed the rules to evade paternal responsibilities (now the taxpaying man funds the deadbeat male).

Link: mixed race marriage and biological problems

http://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html

Parents do not give equal shares of genes to their child, this is a myth.

The party with more recessive genes e.g. white, will be less than 50% of a genetic parent to their mixed child.

“In evolutionary terms, one could argue that mixed-race marriages are maladaptive in that they reduce a person’s overall genetic fitness – i.e. passing on copies of one’s own genes.  In a multiracial marriage or relationship, one is showing altruism toward a partner who shares fewer genes than a co-ethnic would share.  A parent will also share fewer genes with a multiracial child than with a same-race child.”

Study the in/fertility of the mixed kids, that’s also a doozy.

If it’s well known their organs don’t work properly, that includes the gonads.

Cavalli-Sforza’s team compiled extraordinary tables depicting the “genetic distances” separating 2,000 different racial groups from each other. For example, assume the genetic distance between the English and the Danes is equal to 1.0. Then, Cavalli-Sforza has found, the separation between the English and the Italians would be about 2.5 times as large as the English-Danish difference. On this scale, the Iranians would be 9 times more distant genetically from the English than the Danish, and the Japanese 59 times greater. Finally, the gap between the English and the Bantus (the main group of sub-Saharan blacks) is 109 times as large as the distance between the English and the Danish.”

Hey sub-race, they still won’t discuss you.

Using the genetic distances outlined above, let’s look at two hypothetical multiracial marriages.

An English Man and a Japanese Woman:  As genetic distance figures above note, an English man would be around 59 times more closely related to a Dane than to his Japanese wife. 

aka the joke in this

Why would you willingly take on a genetic disability, to be trendy?

Bloody anti-white cucks. Well, at least they impair their own idiotic genetics.

Regarding the individual’s genetic investment in the second example above, Frank Salter (On Genetic Interests, pg. 261) writes:

“For a person of English ethnicity, choosing an English spouse over a Dane gains less than one percent fitness. But choosing an English spouse over a Bantu, one yields a fitness gain of 92 percent….  The same applies in reverse order, so that a Bantu who chooses another Bantu instead of someone of English ethnicity has 92% more of his or her genes in offspring as a result.  It is almost the equivalent to having twice the number of children with an English spouse.

Genetic preservation, also to be encouraged in other races.

If you want to annoy a Europhile, point out they’re pushing for the preservation of the white race.

Thus assortative mating by ethnicity can have large fitness benefits, the largest derived from choosing mates within geographic races.”

In other words and general terms, a white mother will be almost as twice as closely related to a child with a white father versus a child with a black father.  Because same-race parents share more genes,  each parent is likely to see more of his or her genes in the offspring even if they are not passed on directly.  For example, if the father has gene X and doesn’t pass it on directly to his son, there’s a good chance his same-race spouse will have gene X and pass it on, so the son will indirectly possess the father’s gene X.

Noting phenotype in mixed-race children, each parent would more closely resemble co-ethnics than their own child, especially the white mother, since whites tend to have recessive traits for appearance.  (A person only 1/16 black will often still have visible and prominent black features.)

And appearance does matter.  The fact that mixed-race children do not resemble the parents, esp. the fairer parent, seems to be an issue of concern, although not widely discussed.

Hey, you wanted attention. You got it.

it is unsurprising that mixed-race children suffer more problems of identity and health.  For instance, mixed-race people are less likely to survive organ transplants, especially bone marrow transplants.  In general, mixed-race people have more health problems. A study by J. Richard Udry notes:

“A new study that involved surveying 90,000 adolescent U.S. students showed that those who considered themselves to be of mixed race were more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains. Conducted by researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the National Institutes of Health, the investigation found that adolescents of mixed race were more likely to have other health problems as well.”

It’s child abuse, if we’re honest.

For the parent’s fetish or vanity.

In other words, an argument could be made that mixed-race families are maladaptive — both for the parents and the children  — and undermine one’s genetic interests.

Hybrid weakness, it seems.

Book: The Jews among the Greeks and Romans

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/58245
Published by The Jewish Publication Society of America.
Isn’t that all of the publishers?

This is why you read the publication information.

Funny –

GREEK AND ROMAN CONCEPTS OF RACE

During the nineteenth century a peculiar rigidity was given to the conception of race through the application of somewhat hastily formed biological theories. One or another of the current hypotheses on heredity was deemed an adequate or even necessary explanation, and by any of them racial characteristics became determined, fixed: race was an unescapable limiting condition….

If by a peculiar rigidity you mean the concept of Darwinian evolution, sure.

Hastily formed biological theories is an oxymoron.

Theories are very well developed and Darwin used many species, all applied well on his taxonomy.

Now DNA (the ‘gene’ is a Darwinian theory) has been proven to exist so… he was right.

Genetic distance is very real, as real as concrete.

He theorized genes and now we can measure them.

There is no way to deny this without a gross denial of evolution itself.

“determined, fixed, limiting condition”

This is literally DARWINIAN INHERITANCE.

Biological determinism is 100% fact.

Two Asians cannot give birth to a European.

One Asian and one European cannot give birth to a European or an Asian. Their hybrid mongrel, much like a liger, will tend toward infertility and genetic disease. This includes psychiatric disease.

This even applies to cross-breeding plants and the associated fertility issues that entails. Former perennials can lose the ability to reproduce naturally. There is also a unique risk of weakness to disease and vitally, the parental unique DNA is lost.

You will not spontaneously mutate into a chimp.

http://pediaa.com/difference-between-cross-breeding-and-gmo/#Cross%20Breeding

“By the mating of two different breeds, a new organism can be produced with hybrid vigor. The hybrid vigor or heterosis is the tendency of the crossbred animal to exhibit the qualities superior to either parent. In animals, cross breeding is used to increase the production, longevity and fertility.”

False, a myth, even in dogs. Mongrels have many medical issues.

“exhibit the qualities superior to either parent”

Statistically false, due to regression to the mean.

We have extensively tested this in children, they are the mean of their parents.

https://www.nap.edu/read/10977/chapter/5

“This chapter explores the likelihood of unintended effects from diverse methods of genetic modification of plants and animals (see Operational Definitions in Chapter 1). Specifically, it discusses unexpected outcomes of breeding methods used to develop a food crop or strain and unexpected or unintended effects recorded in the scientific literature.”

BACKGROUND

Novel gene combinations arising from the genetic manipulation of existing genes through conventional breeding techniques may introduce unintended and unexpected effects. However, through the breeder’s selection process, the genetic lines that express undesirable characteristics are eliminated from further consideration, and only the best lines—those that express desirable characteristics with no additional undesirable agronomic characteristics, such as increased disease susceptibility or poor grain quality—are maintained for possible commercial release. Although plants and animals produced from conventional breeding methods are routinely evaluated for changes in productivity, reproductive efficiency, reactions to disease, and quality characteristics, they are not routinely evaluated for unintended effects at the molecular level. 

The clearing doesn’t happen in animals.

Cross breeding is known to be dangerous. If Hybrids had vigour they wouldn’t need that deliberate culling process.

In animals, their performance outcomes would be greater than the sum of their parents.

This never happens.

In humans, this would include IQ past both parents. Again, this never happens. We have plenty of negative evidence debunking this lie. At this point, it is a lie to make money.

They’re playing God.
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/special_issues/plant_genetic_breeding

https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/16922/why-are-hybrids-infertile

I guess if race doesn’t exist then the so-called Holocaust only happened to white people?

If they really want to claim there’s no such thing as race, there’s no such thing as a Jew.

So they have no group-level complaints.

http://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html

Being female online

This is not flirting.

I have to clarify.

Thankfully, this woman explains some of the posts and what’s wrong with them.

Flirting is consensual and not …. whatever pushy sexual weirdness this is.

I get the: “Why aren’t there more normal women online?”

Just having anything basic, you’ll bump into these creeps.

Creeps ruin the internet for everyone.

It isn’t worth it.

No woman wants to be treated like this.

Hollywood: the Devil made me do it

There’s no such thing as an impulse to degeneracy.

You cannot be drawn as a need to something that is not a need to live.

A deathstyle is easy to spot by the fact the agent denies their agency when questioned about it.

There is no high proof alcohol or potent cannabis in nature. A naturalistic fallacy fails.

Chewing a coca leaf is not what they want, they crave manmade cocaine.

Have you ever seen a person get so angry when you questioned their bad habits, they didn’t seem human?

I wouldn’t mind all drugs being legal to those over 21 if those dealing to the younger were shot and secondly, if they were allowed to die when they overdosed. Nobody else should pay for their addiction and that choice.

If you want to be edgy, don’t expect sympathy.

21 because key brain development has occurred by then.