Could death stump Trump?

“The news comes as Britain was revealed to be among the countries which are “high on the target list” for aggression from the group, the European Union’s law enforcement body warned.”

What? But there’s a Muslim mayor? If zero Muslims end up in the casualties, then forewarning must spread through all mosques in London. Good enough reason to shut them down.

I’ve seen comments of this flavour for a long time now.

“Trumps’ first act should be to destroy Mecca.”

Israel would be pleased.

Let’s say Islamic State (call a thing by its name) DO manage to take out Trump.

What would happen?

They really think Trump is the bad guy, that this is a movie and there’s just one guy laughing. Nope. His power-plays are out in the open (see the genius masterstroke of him v China recently, why should they profit from disemploying Americans?). You know where you stand with Trump. He’s the open guy. The nice guy. He’ll screw you but he’ll warn you first.


What if Trump were assassinated?

I saw this theory first going round on tumblr, probably because I spread it. Anon boxes are gravy.
Why did Trump take so long to announce his VP? He hardly seems the indecisive type, does he?


Here’s /pol since I love luring tumblrinas onto /pol.


Meanwhile, India is dealing with its Muslim problem using some kind of registry system. We’ve had that for years, it’s called a census. Biding, waiting to act upon it. Why else record religion, seriously? India wants to deport them. As if they’re going to flee resources easily. It would be better to pretend there are no more resources.

Maybe Trump can plant some Tradescantia, where Mecca once stood.

EU-cucks hate their own families too

I bet he’ll double down and keep on cucking.

And normies wonder why these people sicken me.

I knew it I'm surrounded by assholes

Mundane people are saying well done police, like we’re going to see more charges.

No. Don’t you see?
They only found this one because she’s the daughter of someone important.
To the machine.
That covers up rape and murder etc.


Every European is important, every victim, especially in their homeland.

I wonder how many rape kits have gone missing. On barenakedislam I was reading about one Muslim who raped his dog to death and then kept raping its corpse. Those people are hardly human, are they?
While America is bitching about comedy, pay attention overseas.
This would’ve been your tomorrow under Hillary.

White skin privilege

“In reality, they had plenty, and not just in Europe. ‘White slavery’ today means the international trafficking of women for prostitution. Back then, it meant the provisioning of the Muslim world with European concubines, who were valued for their white skin (Lewis, 1990, pp. 11-13, 56, 72). This trade was considerable in Muslim Spain:”

Slavery has always (9/10) been about sex.
Which color of woman has been most ‘popular’ sexually?

Old sexist adverts again – this time re men


A picture is worth a thousand strawmans. I’ve included ‘problematic’ implications.

>Implying men are worthless without a fat wallet. Come on, we know what ambition means.
>Implying bravado is the only true masculinity.
>Implying malnourishment (look it up) makes you less human.
>Implying men are useless if they do not take up an effete hobby.
>Implying married men do no work around the house and are all lazy bums.
>Implying men are some strange hog-like creature which can be lured and trapped with fatty food.
>Implying ugly men are silly, socially clownish and don’t deserve respect.
>Implying men are addicted, useless layabouts who need to be poisoned for the good of the family.
>Implying male sexuality is shameful, in your own marriage, like a schoolboy.

Pick-up scams are also old hat. There are much older ads that gave advice on how to talk, a coded phrase.
>Implying the only thing a man cares about is women.
>Implying (all) men are desperate.
>Implying men value themselves based on how they please random people.
>Implying without sex, men are nothing.
>Implying you married a dog. Who sides with an advert over their wife?
>Implying you’re doing sex wrong, whatever you’re doing, according to the male equivalents of spinsters, the bachelor. A random, single man knows your genitals and how to please your wife better than you do.
>Implying no conscious woman would willingly go out with you.
>Implying men must be ready and willing to have sex with anything at all times, like a pogo stick you can just hop on anytime the wife wants. Fuck consent, apparently.
>Implying love is a weakness, loneliness is a virtue, creepiness is male and men are users, sexual exploiters who don’t need women for anything like companionship.
>Implying any man who takes pride in his appearance must be vain and well, gay.
>Implying men are only valuable in marriage for their money.
>Implying a tie will keep your woman in line for when you inevitably fail to. A tie is more persuasive than you.
>Implying men are weak-willed and deviant.
>Implying the only way to teach men anything is to beat it into them.
>Implying domestic abuse is discipline, because a real man needs to strike a woman to lead her.
>Implying a hat is brain food and men will buy this to be smarter. No, it literally uses the term brain-food.
>Implying cleanliness is for sissies.
>Implying emotions are terrible. Feel shame.
>Implying men need to be sedated.
>Implying men are superficial and cannot appreciate personality and other invisible assets. Also, rather simple and visual, like a dog. About as much loyalty.
>Implying a man who wants alone time is deficient in something, probably sex.
>Implying sagging mustaches are the male equivalent of sagging breasts.
>Implying … something about cavemen. I’m amazed that Juice Bro guy hasn’t tried to bring it back.

One Jew out, bitching in

It’s a funny old world. The Liberals (Lib Dems) are celebrating booting a Jew out of office (and a Goldsmith at that) while refusing to understand what citizenship is (undivided loyalty).

non-British citizens who have made the UK their home, has told the home secretary it would take the Home Office 47 years to process applications from EU citizens for permanent residency (PR).”

non-British, non-citizen of Britain
the linguistic trickery of CM is very real
when you have a home to go back to, it’s called a vacation
made – sounds like right of conquest to me
if it would take 47 years, surely that is a reason alone to deport them, since they can’t have been let in to any standard?
nope, they seem to believe the emotional appeal is the way they’ll remain, because IQ isn’t real but their SAT scores are legit

give us, today, guarantees that all EU citizens living legally in the UK will be able to exercise their right to remain before the UK leaves the EU.”


You are nothing to us. We owe you nothing. This is not your home.
Gimmedats are the reason people hate you. Whose pocket pays for you?

What is ‘legally’ too.
If your application hasn’t been processed, as you just admitted, you are not fully legal.
What right to remain.
If I go to Donald Trump’s house and sit in his living room, do I have a right to remain? No?
The UK has never joined the EU, we joined the EEC.
What do they think Brexit was about? Having anchor babies won’t keep you safe, they’ll get deported with you.
Or sold to a Tory pedophile ring. (I hate to slam the Tories since it’s popular but these are 80s Tories)

“I travel about 20 times a year and I have been here for 18 years. It is ridiculous.”

Why are you still here? You aren’t even really here then, are you?

“If the government requires all non-Britons to join the non-EU immigrants in the permanent residency queue, up to 1 million could face deportation the day the UK leaves the EU.”

Didn’t they say that’s never going to happen? Isn’t there a legal case?

“The Home Office said there had been “no change to the rights and status of EU nationals in the UK as a result of the referendum””

They’ll regret that.
What do they think the vote was about? Local competition.

“As such there is no requirement to register for documentation to confirm their status,” a spokesperson said.”

That was clever.
In legalese, requirement is tricksy.
It isn’t a requirement you breathe to live, but it’s advisable.
It is advisable to fill in the paperwork and get in the queue. Brits love our queues.

As such, to confirm their status for welfare purposes, the Lefty would also complain we’re registering them a la Final Solution. Hey, you built a surveillance state with Labour, we just inherited it.

They have some other article with a smiling white blonde woman saying how she feels “betrayed” by the Brexit vote. Why? We aren’t your people. You have somewhere to run when this goes ‘tits up’. We owe you sweet FA. If this were Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory, you’d get nothing.
What should they be concerned about?
We all smell a red herring.

There won’t be an EU to get back to.
They know this, deep down.
The people aren’t putting up with it anymore. No more cultural cuckoldry.
The brainwashing train is stronger than ever.



I like Goldsmith, he’s an alright bloke. Based AF.

Also, as far as kebab is concerned, we did it first and better. Spitroast hog is the superior flesh on a skewer and our cultural tradition.