‘I refuse to believe you’re actually female’

a woman! with opinions!

wide-eye-omg-shock-gents

shutitdown.gif

we all know there are no women on the internet, unless you mean porn?

Redpill tactics in one gif

toast tone:

redpillwoman

 

someone shared a post of mine to a normie news site and they got into a bitchfit about this
you act like that’s, like, my problem

womanelizabeth
it’s a vague tits or gtfo
isn’t it

womaninsultme

this is why we go anon people
this is why the hoodies and the masks
hiding secondary characteristics of sex
you’d think all the bitching and snark would at least qualify me as homosexual
no they’ll happily listen to a gay man’s opinion of good women, rather than an actual woman
whatiswrongwiththeWest.jpg
people with no experience or skin in the game, let’s take advice from them
sure they’re plugging books but they have our best interests at heart
it’s so transparent
few men know the first thing about make-up and fashion
like, few people in this century can actually read
they skim but they don’t understand me

nod-uhuh-yeah-sure-moriarty
what do they imply with the appeal to incredulity?
something to do with having a logical point under all the humour
therefore, not female

I don’t have to prove myself to strangers on the internet, and this disturbs them. Furthermore, I refuse to use my sexuality in service of a point. I start on everyone if they’re acting stupid.

gravesmagic
My whole style is one of effortless deflection. Look at this, compare/contrast to that. It appears like wholesale rejection to normalfags.

think about this:-

the so-called ‘redpills’ won’t touch me, i dunno what to feel
I was here before them, it’s been in the banner since two-thousand and fucking TEN

they can’t outsignal me as ‘edgelord supreme’ and it triggers them to balls
they come here to read me, tho

and i love you random citizen

I see you on my traffic, fag, WP logs IP addresses.

anyway, the likes of

>dailystormer avoids me
>as does the guardian set
literally the only blog that openly questions both

Doesn’t that seem strange to anyone? I’m not blankly signalling here. It’s a fact. I’m listed in very, very few places. My affiliation is questionable at best. Doesn’t that sound odd, given the online media climate? #defineme Considering the network concentration of blogs?
like, the returnofkings set is scared of me, they just ignore me totally now
well, okay, not without reason on that one bad example
Roosh’s ego has been K/O since the dox, it’s a poor analogy
nothing to do with me

but you can tell a lot about a person by who hates them so much they are ignored
attention is a form of approval, they infight with their online boyfriends constantly for ad traffic
meanwhile I’m here, sniping at everyone and nobody fights back
no face, no name, no advertisements (use adblocker, adblocker game strong)
the medium is the message etc etc.

and they seriously think I give a single solid gold shit that somebody questions the reality of biological sex?

oh noes someone disapproved of me
my fragile ego and esteem is destroyed for eva
whateva will I do
maybe knit feminist vulvas

reputation is based on what you stand for
not looking good while doing it

look-

either it’s true or it’s not
quit the cult of personality business, it’s snake oil supplements with juice bro

if that’s your level, fine

but i have a higher design here as you can tell by the fact i keep being right about stuff
over time
so fine
insult me all you like
Nobody important will believe you. If I had to prove myself to anyone, it would be in the content. I won’t qualify myself on matters of identity.
that won’t alter reality
the internet is not your safe space

if you really need to do it for you ego, bro

happy bateman

i’m dangerous bc i don’t give a shit
i’ll destroy all your sacred idols and dance in the rubble

don’t have a cow, man

or i’ll come for it and make milkshakes

well fuck off gary oldman

it’s so funny to me that people take a deliberately shitty hobby as blogging seriously

there is a real life beyond this

we’re the political tumblr
with better taste in deviancy

New Yorker: Trump as literally Hitler

hahaha fuck you

http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/philip-k-dicks-intellectual-vision-for-living-in-a-fascist-america

drive-by bitching today

“plausible” – they keep using that word a lot…..

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

“reverse the New Deal,” correct me if i’m wrong, …but that sucked?

I was taught at school it basically saved the West and these same textbooks were wrong on plenty of other stuff once you read around them, as almost nobody did.

“decades later, the world is ruled by fascist powers.”
unlike the EU
“A year later, the show’s second season has arrived amid a resurgence of real-life white nationalism”
[citation needed]
“As a man with a vocal admiration for authoritarian leaders is about to be sworn into the White House”
if the words hurt them, imagine the guy who comes after Trump
the force of the full pendulum swing might kill them
Pence is the real Republican and Trump knew he’d be competition in a future election, the man is not dumb, he pretends to be, like a less cuddly Boris Johnson, better thought of as the snake of Westminster. 
>The past is not the present, this reality is not sci-fi. Stop.
you must be new here
These people are academics??????
ffs this is why they lost
everything is Hitler, shares in Hitler memes, buy buy buy
they tried really hard to make the nazis look bad in that show, like – they have cameras
but the modern internet is worse so…. nah
no crime, no disease, but they have cameras, goys
“non-Aryan people, and their culture, have been eradicated”
I am a lady and I won’t rise to that bait.
omg why no facepalm god ugh wut
The urbanites really hate the idea they’ve been replaced, huh?
Your politics are not relevant, guy in a studio apartment.
You can tell they’ve been getting their politics from comedians for too long.
“shows Americans adapting to fascism with an alarming smoothness” idiots
implying all americans are white and xian
true, but idiots
shooting themselves in the foot
like in every white man, a Hitler crouches, waiting to spring out
….like, I wish they had at least one ball…
anything but a weeb, basically
Hitler is really just this century’s Napoleon anyway.
“Tuesdays, they burn cripples, the terminally ill,” he says. “Drags on the state.”
…..this person either knows nothing about communist state murder or chooses to ignore it
and if they’re terminally ill, that’s euthanasia, which they support
#factsarehard
“For those not targeted for elimination, the show suggests—for nice young white men like Joe Blake in particular—the American Reich would not be terrifying at all. It might, in fact, look a lot like the America we already know.”
youliar
I demand 50 privilege points for this gif.
Harry is the epitome of white privilege, he is literally magic and saves the world with Saviour Complex.
the 2nd season was just banal, tepid, so-so
the death potion scene in fantastic beasts was fucking disturbing and that’s a kid’s film
“Yet it becomes worryingly easy to overlook his atrocious misdeeds,”
>heroes must be spotless jesus figures, implies the jew
they dropped the brackets trend pretty quickly when it revealed their power levels, didn’t they?
“an expert emotional manipulator who terrorized subordinates and innocents alike” 
that's enough stop please karen will and grace
-all the judgemental stares for that vacuous comment-
a competent, intelligent white man with no vices is now satan
how far has popular culture sunk
even superman is killing illegal aliens
if Trump turns out to be milquetoast, all bluster, will they hate him more, or less?
” In another year, the show’s insistence on humanizing fascists might have seemed like a provocative choice”
…….lolwut
dehumanizing people IS fascism
fascists are people, human and capable of love cos this isn’t a fucking disney story, it’s reality
“when it is more urgent than ever to distinguish right from wrong, real news from fake, and differences of political opinion from the dangerous undermining of democracy”
things the vatican would say for $200
“the dangerous undermining of democracy”
people voting for someone we don’t like, this undermines my right to win, somehow
still think trump is controlled opposition
the jewish line is too hard and pushed too hard
the resistance to socialism is often full of shitty people, they can’t be both pro-state and rebels, these bloody signallers
“moral desperation, a loss of faith in anything but self-destructive violence”
r/atheism
“unavoidable complicity of living “normally” under empire”
bull-shit, son
nobody has a choice there, it’s live or die, until you can vote in someone new
the hero never has a family, cos he wouldn’t risk them for his ego
“a novelist—an eccentric inventor of alt-histories who served as a stand-in for Dick himself”
is that an allusion to alt-right
is this like the new voldemort
you don’t pronounce the T, it’s silent, so it’s really alt-rye. we are big on gluten.
all-aryan heritage grains, really, which is germinatedly superior
artists step out of the politically correct because it’s morally wrong
*mic drop*

You can see why it’s called the Jew Yorker, can’t you?
well if white identity politics is morally wrong, in a time of relativism, and jews are white, and not a race*, and up is down, every jewish person is literally hitler? #sjwlogic

blackadder I know sarcastic

*implies Israel/Judea is not anybody’s homeland, because those exist for races, not religions

Did Christianity kill the Divine Feminine?

TLDR: Yes, and that’s why the Church is doomed unless it appeals to women, who’ve proven their value objectively since the Industrial Revolution.

all this nonsense about banning suffrage (would also apply to most men) is based on the idea that with sub-human rights, women would flock back to the church
may as well expect a turkey to roast itself and walk to your dinner table

“But I didn’t have a reference point for an empowered and liberated feminine. As Marion Woodman has said, “[T]he feminine is so difficult … to talk about … because so few people have experienced it.”

http://www.astro.com/astrology/tma_article150407_e.htm
this concerns me

it would be ironic if the whole Vatican were going to Hell as false prophets
they have denied many gospels for political reasons
even though I see the societal benefits of Patriarchy, all the forms that worked in the past acknowledged and appreciated femininity, because without tacit female approval, it was doomed to fail

without a positive role in society, why would half of society go along with it?
also the reason we are, generationally, rejecting feminism, which also casts us as prostitutes and fakers like the days of yore (use make-up to look like a totally different person! and impress men!)
it’s also a problem to assume with either sex that their only function IS sex, that’s the mark of liar

the whole thing savours of projection
history without stories of either sex is empty and a seed without soil is nothing
naturally a group of virgin men are going to say women are the devil because of temptation but only an idiot would believe them, it’s as silly as comparing all men to hercules, all the stuff about providence disappeared only to credit women with vanity, lust and dying in childbirth …I wonder why God sent all those plagues…. it’s almost like they spent centuries murdering innocent women as witches…

applause clap clapping yes well done

it’s the white genocide even supposed ‘red-pills’ never, ever talk about

“Perkins was told that one of the roles of women — their most important job, on which the survival of the tribe depends — is “telling men when it is time to stop … [M]en hunt animals and cut trees even when there is enough meat and wood, unless women rein them in.” 31 Perkins tells of a Shuar shaman coming to visit the United States, asking, “Where are your women? Why are they not telling the men to stop?””

“Barstow reports that, as a legacy of the witch hunts, European women became afraid to speak up, and protested less: “From having, at the end of the Middle Ages, a reputation for being scolds and shrews, bawdy and aggressive, women began to change into the passive, submissive type that symbolized them by the mid-nineteenth century.”

why aren’t stupid women involved in politics, they ask.
Well, the last time we tried, you burnt us at the stake for predicting the weather and bringing down your fever with tea.

well leaves nope no go leaving

the most probable theory of rationale is a cull of the high intelligent women without a filter
we don’t have many Hypatias, do we? and how many monk scholars are known versus nuns?

you know if there was a male genocide calling them all Satan, we’d still be hearing about it

the most persuasive evidence? aside from the papacy’s history of lies

“Researcher Derek Murphy explains: “In the mysteries of Ephesus, the Goddess wore this symbol [Vesica Pisces] over her genital region, and in the Osiris story, the lost penis was swallowed by a fish which represented the vulva of Isis. Likewise, in many examples of Christian art, Jesus Christ is proceeding from this symbol, representing his birth from the Goddess.”38 Murphy goes on to show how the Christian fish symbol actually comes from the Vesica Pisces — which you can see in the center shape, plus the lines of the tail.”

I’ve already pointed out that it’s insane to worship a virgin’s sexuality. It’s so Freud, have your cake/eat it, keep your ego/feed your ego, Mother/Whore that I won’t touch it with a bargepole.

Symmetrical faces belong to the healthiest owners

Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11182573

calling a direct link to mutation load, also explains why better-looking people age slower and the high IQ, high attractiveness correlation

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26858521
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17238049

“There is a shared concept of what constitutes an “ideal” face. Anthropometric methods are preferable to cephalometric methods in determining the “ideal” face’s dimensions, since anthropometric methods are valid, three-dimensional, non-invasive, suitable for a great variety of purposes, and easy to implement
“distinguishing features make it extraordinarily beautiful. Such features make a female face appear both child like and mature as well as expressive.”

maybe it’s called the male gaze because it’s more objective? lucky for men

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25999883

“the results indicated that both beauty and cuteness were detectable in peripheral vision, but not in the same manner.”

https://brocku.ca/brock-news/2016/06/race-and-age-influence-judgment-of-facial-attractiveness-brock-research/

““This is the first study where we provide direct and strong evidence suggesting that our face recognition models are less refined for these unfamiliar face categories,” she says.”

my theory for yellow fever guys getting short-changed in SMV is correct
but they see us clearly

“Caucasian participants agreed more on the Caucasian faces they found attractive than on the Asian faces they rated as being attractive. Interestingly, Asian participants agreed equally on the attractiveness of both the Asian and Caucasian photos they rated.”

they’re getting screwed but not in the way they think

Trying to go back to the scholarly-type posts, for a little while.

a small breather from all the nonsense clogging the net tubes

book links, academic papers to trigger idiots, that sort of thing

like, at this point-
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12834020

“The last decade has witnessed an upsurge of interest in the research on facial attractiveness. The development of computer graphics has allowed to objectively investigate the conserved features of attractive faces. Averageness, symmetry and sex-specific traits have been associated with attractiveness.”

you’d have to be an idiot

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21650092
“I know you are beautiful even without looking at you: discrimination of facial beauty in peripheral vision.”

giggle-lol-haha

 

How did Trump happen?

You might’ve noticed I’ve been blackouting that fake news for the past few weeks.

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/01/trump-how-did-this-happen/

“Because you thought correcting people’s attitudes was more important than finding them jobs. Because you turned ‘white man’ from a description into an insult.
…Because you talked more about gender-neutral toilets than about home repossessions. Because you beatified Caitlyn Jenner. Because you policed people’s language, rubbished their parenting skills, took the piss out of their beliefs….
Because you cried when someone mocked the Koran but laughed when they mocked the Bible. Because you said criticising Islam is Islamophobia. Because you kept telling people, ‘You can’t think that, you can’t say that, you can’t do that.’
Because you turned politics from something done by and for people to something done to them, for their own good. Because you treated people like trash. And people don’t like being treated like trash. Trump happened because of you.”

the short answer is S.J.W.

comment

“Precisely.
But I’d add ….. because you smeared ordinary working people as bigots, racists and deplorables for simply having conservative values and wanting their communities and economic standard to be conserved.
For turning universities, which are supposed to be educational establishments where the status quo is challenged, into dictatorial, politically correct “safe spaces” where dissent from left-wing mantras is forbidden.
For automatically supporting every “minority” and ignoring the majority.”

virtue signalling leads to counter-signalling

Newton, bitch

blow-kiss

Rejected seek revenge

the idea that social rejection, by making us feel wounded and unwanted, triggers a need to repair our mood by whatever means available, including through the satisfaction of causing harm to those who have made us suffer. They found that aggression can indeed be a viable method of mood repair.

https://www.sott.net/article/339257-Is-vengeance-really-sweet-Researchers-uncover-the-mood-enhancing-effects-of-revenge

beware those who meddle

humans predate other humans as the apex predator

in this case, the minority seeks to usurp and punish the majority for their perceived diminished status

yes, social justice is anti-social revenge, it’s entirely destructive of the West, white people etc etc.

they may have strength in numbers but they don’t have smarts

look at me look at me

we are

you shouldn’t want us to be
with attention comes scrutiny

communismcomic

This aims to be a neat summary. Neat explanations are frequently superior.

Their rhetoric doesn’t even require examination to fall apart.
It’s sophomoric.