Love to help a brother out. Are you new to Q?
Title for SEO. You know the drill. We bring you a message of peace and popcorn.
Love to help a brother out. Are you new to Q?
Title for SEO. You know the drill. We bring you a message of peace and popcorn.
No more corset controls on the banks since 1979/80. Goodhart pre-empted it.
Now they loan to things that don’t boost GDP including mortgages.
It’s included in debt to GDP though.
Boosted in addition to the retarded notion of a crumbling hovel being a “retirement” fund.
Funds and other assets don’t depreciate.
Don’t bail out bad property investors, they’re idiots.
You wanted the reward, the risk is also ALL yours.
The ‘competition and credit control’ reforms, which removed direct controls on bank
lending, had been introduced in September 1971 and a dramatic surge in bank
intermediation, leading to broad money growth rates in excess of 25%, had resulted in
1972 and 1973. The conclusion drawn by policy makers in 1973 was that the only
option was to supplement monetary targets with direct controls on banks through
Supplementary Special Deposits known as ‘the Corset’ (See Zawadzki, 1981).
Modest interest rate changes seemed powerless in the face of this monetary expansion
and the previously stable money demand function seemed to have broken down. This
was clear well before 1975, but Goodhart (1975b) was a summary of the current
problems of monetary management, as the title suggests.
So Labour want rent controls but not bank controls.
I wonder (((why))).
Goodhart’s Law is the statement missing from the square brackets in the quotation
above. It says: “Ignoring Goodhart’s law, that any observed statistical regularity
will tend to collapse once pressure is placed upon it for control purposes”.
“Houses as Collateral”
“First were the removal of exchange controls in 1979 and the direct control of bank lending (“the corset”) in 1980″
“The abolition of exchange controls in 1979 and the abolition of the last of the quantitative controls on bank lending heralded a period of rapid deregulation and increased competition in British banking during the 1980s”
They weren’t more productive in the 80s, they stole from the future (you).
And this, from an Out of Africa theorist.
Especially more than a thousand years ago, come on. What percentage of your DNA is theirs?
One generation ago is 50%….
It should be illegal under privacy laws. You have no right to sell (and sell you do) your relative’s DNA to a company.
Professor Hayes, an expert in ancient ancestry, human origins in Africa and the impact of ancient DNA variation on modern human disease, shared her perspectives on the limitations of different types of testing and the contribution of genetic research to the accuracy of ancestry tests.
Professor Hayes says, “The clear value of these online tests is that they are creating public awareness and debate into the use of genomics as we enter an era of precision medicine, where one’s individual DNA profile will be used to inform one’s medical care.
None of those words are good.
However, the information learned from these tests is only as accurate or informative as the data available.”
translation: They aren’t accurate.
Insurance companies want them.
So do biotech. They’re allowed to patent nature (reverse this).
This is the genetic gold rush.
There’s gold in them thar veins!
You’re all Henrietta Lacks.
So they can come up with a drug worth billions from your DNA and you paid them to do it.
While selling out your relatives for a bullshit questionnaire “result” page that might as well have come from Buzzfeed.
The police can access their database to place you at a crime scene (or plant your DNA at one) and juries are dumb enough to think being somewhere, alive, is the mark of a criminal. (CSI effect)
[only in rape cases, so few rapists nowadays deny any sexual acts took place, as they used to)
You’re only as smart as your dumbest, vainest relation.
They couldn’t get you to sign up to clinical trials willing, plus all the ones applying your code to would add up, so they tricked you into paying them to use you like a guinea pig.
“The majority of these tests to date interrogate no more than 0.02% of our DNA code, which includes over 6 billion ‘letters’. While this is certainly sufficient to determine direct family relatedness,
Who is your daddy?
making further assumptions on complex ancestral structure and more importantly complex diseases, raises serious concerns.”
She adds, “In a research setting our studies require a lengthy process of ethics approval, participant consent, individual de-identification, freedom for study withdraw and highest level of data security, for the very reasons and concerns raised by participants during the SBS insight DNA Surprises.”
Not specifically vegan in some studies but close. They daren’t do direct studies.
Already shown you this
“Researchers in the United States have found a link between a low-fat dairy diet and increased risk of anovulatory infertility.”
“Seven of nine women in the vegetarian group became anovulatory.”
For the many obese vegans:
“In young women being overweight appears to be one of the major and still neglected causes of subfertility. Not only the excessive amount but also the distribution of body fat is clearly related to loss of fertility.”
We already knew it causes subfertility in men.
“These high concentrations of androgen and insulin in turn are important factors in the preferential abnormal localization of body fat.”
aka Unhealthy women have boy hips and no waist.
(Actually, I’d pay good money to see a subfertility study in Asians, especially considering all the GMO soybean products).
“in addition, have a higher rate of miscarriages”
forcing pregnancy means sickly babies, a miscarriage where not stress-based is just rejecting the genome that would be an infant mortality statistic anyway
If they aren’t responsible for their body, why are they allowed a baby?
“Drugs increasing insulin sensitivity also improve spontaneous ovulation and fertility in obese women but still need to be tested in larger controlled trials.”
Why don’t you listen to Mother Nature and stop trying to force babies?
At least do a follow-up study on their own health risks to show the practice is safe.
Fertility is not an entitlement.
Obese people are not healthy.
Agriculturally pushed carbs are the culprit, not meat or dairy
“Vegans take more pride in their diets than do vegetarians.”
Yeah, we know they do.
“Vegans view their diets as more central to their identity than do vegetarians.”
Isn’t that a mental illness? Orthorexia?
“had more positive feelings toward their dietary in-group (higher private regard)”
so vegans are racist?
“evaluated out-group dieters more negatively (lower out-group regard)”
yep, most meat-eaters in the world aren’t white…
Veganism was invented in 1944 in England, so clearly it’s racist.
“A retrospective review indicated that vegans should ensure adequate intake of a few nutrients.”
Supplements are either animal derived or tested on animals.
“”We found that some of these nutrients, which can have implications in neurologic disorders, anemia, bone strength and other health concerns, can be deficient in poorly planned vegan diets,”
“The study points out that some vegans rely heavily on processed foods and may not eat a sufficient variety of fruits, vegetables and whole grains.”
They also tend to consume non-organic coffee that’s been sprayed with fungicides, herbicides and pesticides.
“In some cases, iron and zinc status of vegans may also be of concern because of the limited bioavailability of these minerals.”
Things you need to live. Really?
Vegans dosing b12 probably don’t get it
“Approximately 85% of participants categorized as having low vitamin B-12 were taking vitamin B-12 supplements at doses in excess of the Recommended Dietary Allowance, which suggests that more research is needed to determine breast-milk adequacy values.”
again, women suffer more from stupid fad dieting, as the sex with a more complex body that’s intended to support another body in the form of a fetus
it suggests since their body isn’t adsorbing it that they’re still suffering brain shrinkage and also logically so too would the baby
You’d think that would be an important study to do.
Racial confound but okay
“4.5% lower body fat in vegan women”
thinner isn’t better, it isn’t healthier, especially for women
women need a higher body fat %
doesn’t control for source of meat
“Patterns of differences by diet group were similar in white men.”
Thinner men is also bad.
“In the Indian population, compared with meat eaters, vegetarian women were shorter (−1.1 cm) and had lower lean mass (−0.5 kg), and both vegetarian women and men had lower grip strength (−1.3 and −1.4 kg, respectively).”
This suggests an Asian subfertility study must be done.
They also had less lean mass… hmm….
“Differences in anthropometric and physiologic characteristics were observed across diet groups in white participants, but fewer differences were observed in British Indian participants.”
Diet is more important for white people who evolved to eat more meat during the Ice Age.
Water is wet.
And the word you use from the passport doesn’t count medically. They are not British, they are their bodies – Indian.
British Indian makes it sound like they belong to the Empire, technically they do. They can’t medically blend with their passport, they’ll never be British. Ever. They missed the local evolutionary events as we missed theirs.
Someone tell them a passport is actually a license to draft. Including stupid dual passport holders thinking that places like Singapore don’t have any legal hold over them.
It isn’t a golden ticket. You’d have to have a permanently slow group IQ to think that.
Actually, diet x IQ study? Why no?
You have to scroll for the real findings.
“In contrast, both lacto-ovo-vegetarian and vegan females do not seem to have a lower risk of mortality from cardiovascular diseases. Not so clear patterns are observed for cancer outcomes. While lacto-ovo-vegetarians have lower risk of cancer of the gastrointestinal tract, vegans experience a higher risk for cancer of the urinary tract. For other-cancer sites, the risk is slightly but not significantly lower for both lacto-ovo-vegetarians and vegans compared to non-vegetarians. Subsequent reports with longer follow-up time and more cancer cases will help clarify the role of specific vegetarian diets with cancer outcomes.”
Little to no difference, especially for women.
Some cancer rates higher.
Any benefits are largely not being obese. If properly controlled for, that suggests cancer may be higher risk.
“In the EPIC-Oxford study , vegans had 30% higher fracture rates than meat-eaters. ”
“Vitamin B12 deficiency may increase CVD risk factors , and is associated for a wide range of neurological disorders . In addition, for those following a vegan diet, optimizing intakes of n-3 fatty acids is highly recommended ”
reconcile absorption study above
the lower cardio risk is an assumption based on supplementation, not the dietary fact per se
“large randomized dietary intervention trials on vegan and lacto-ovo-vegetarian patterns are warranted to duplicate the findings and further investigate the health effects of these diets.”
They’re mainly studying religious people, not the typical atheist vegan.
“The research on the health effects of vegan diets and chronic diseases have mostly derived from observational studies of Adventist and Oxford vegetarians cohorts”
That isn’t generalisable.
“In general, the protective effects of vegetarian diets are stronger in men than in women.”
Paleo makes no sense considering all the diseases men are at risk of most, are made worse by eating tons of red meat. If you won’t listen to science, you’ll have to talk to Mr Prostate Cancer.
Where’s the sex realism in dietary advice? No, men can’t get away with eating like women either. Almost like there are chemicals varying between the two.
And body builders have atrocious health. I’d like to see a study on how unhealthy gyms are. Exercising in those are the worst places you can exercise. I heard there’s HPV on the machines.
“Populations who have had a primarily vegetarian diet for generations were found to be far more likely to carry DNA which makes them susceptible to inflammation.”
That’s why Indians or Asians especially need to be vegetarian.
Their DNA is quite fragile.
“Scientists in the US believe that the mutation occurred to make it easier for vegetarians to absorb essential fatty acids from plants.
But it has the knock-on effect of boosting the production of arachidonic acid, which is linked to inflammatory disease and cancer.”
Vegetable oils are especially toxic for them (break out the ghee).
Congratulations, you fucked yourself with evolution.
You can’t outsmart Mother Nature. It’s the same with vaccines. The mutant strains are worse than the original problem! It’s like introducing snakes for a rat problem. Do-gooders are useless, pathological altruism is a form of abuse. I’m sure the extreme forms are a form of slow-burn serial killer like the Angels of Death, the guy who kills you but pretends to be your doctor first. They can get a thrill from both sides. The Red Cross people like “I bring you food – in exchange for rape”. It’s the adult candy van, don’t take the candy!
Snow White told you not to take the apple-shaped charity of strangers.
You strengthen the human beings, you cannot weaken a disease.
A disease is a property of human beings, numpties.
The people who use terms like “fight cancer” and “battle with cancer” ay, the lymphoma is squaring up in boxing mitts ya cunts.
Hope you brought plate armour and a noble steed.
Political correctness is deeply insulting. They feel powerless enough without being patronizingly compared to someone active while all they can do is lie there passively. Being pitied by smug cunts.
And now doctors and nurses can’t have really clean hands.
Because some smug admin with no days of work experience in their life insisted they use the gel they bought, like hospitals could ever be any less disease-ridden while full of sick people. Some of which were fatally sick people.
Sounds possible, if you’re totally simple.
They don’t even have clean air, the primary mode of transmission.
Nurses don’t wear face masks, and they go from person to person, examining the sick parts.
The door handles are no longer made of self-cleaning brass (the admin wanted to budget a yacht) but aluminium, which harbours disease and is a potent neurotoxin.
In a Keynesian stimulus, they’re knocking down perfectly good, old hospitals, to build new hospitals plus immigrant housing. Right next to each other. This will end well. That’s happening in the Queen’s back garden.
Within spitting distance of Ascot. Check on maps. It’s literally across the street.
“And now £90 million plans for a new hospital, as well as 250 homes, have been approved”
They don’t care about you. Or the value of local property. Or the crime rate predating on sick people. Or all the white people on the housing list for decades. Will the immigrants off the boat get gold taps too?
They’re embezzling to foreign ‘property developers’.
“The closure of the hospital in Ascot, Berkshire was first agreed in 2013 following a lengthy consultation, despite several campaign groups fighting against the plans.”
“But the project was finally approved almost four years later”
Four years they pushed, is that legal?
“The new hospital, which will be built on green belt land close to the current NHS building in London Road”
Traitors. It’s modern glass, that’ll all be demolished soon enough. Safety hazard. Saves them money on building materials to embezzle.
“250 homes will take the place of the current building to help part-fund the expensive new hospital.”
You already have 90m, nobody is buying pleading poverty.
The state pay for people to live in London, Zone 1, they’ll be able to charge extra for these houses (not apartments. rewarding genocide by replacement). That’s taxpayer theft, as far as I’m concerned.
This is why you must teach evolution in schools, or these idiots will continue to get promoted based on fake Christian feels. Feels that kill people.
It was Thou shalt not kill, not Thou shalt enable feels.
Virtue signalling is a vice.
Was giving entitled Boomer Tilly an extra two months worth killing all her great-grandkids?
You can think I’m paranoid to predict pandemic but
You might think sure but this won’t touch me.
You don’t have to be stupid, just a sizeable number of the population around you to take hold of the environment, the Typhoid Mary types with no symptoms.
For one disease, look at all the immigrants with latent TB.
Latent until they’re poorly.
Ancient borders were made of dead bodies.
Germ warfare was the enemy’s favourite type.
The American Indians deliberately incited the syphilitic whores of their tribes to fuck the European sailors and bring it back. It continues to ravage white people, even killed a few Kings.
The Muslims used to take their plague-dead and strategically leave them for Europeans to encounter, even if it required a trebuchet over a castle wall during siege.
So, so wrong.
Well, he is full of shit.
He’s the one-man argument against libertarianism because he couldn’t build a Roman road with a brick paving machine without fucking it up. Imagine the karma against this guy.
I have a pet theory he’s trying to bankrupt California so he can buy beach front orgy property. Like Lex Luthor.
Apart from circumcision.