Multiculturalism reversing, students are self-segregating

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10931854/Multiculturalism-in-reverse-as-teenagers-buck-the-trend-towards-integration.html

“The study, which analyses the social lives of almost 4,300 people from 13 to 80, shows that a clear trend towards each successive generation becoming more integrated than the one before breaks down when it comes to under-18s.

Despite growing up in more diverse society than ever before at a time when mass migration has transformed the make-up of Britain, today’s teenagers have almost 30 per cent fewer friends from other ethnic backgrounds than people in their 20s and early 30s.

Overall the analysis, designed by experimental psychologists at Oxford University, found that the current generation of teenagers show similar levels of social segregation as middle aged people.”

“This issue will not rectify itself, and requires urgent attention to promote better integration among young people when they are at a particularly formative moment in their development,” he said.”

Freedom of association?

““Today’s findings reveal a striking lack of mixing among the youngest in our society,” said Mr Taylor.

“This raises serious questions about the lack of integration in Britain’s education system, yet also suggests that certain institutions, such as higher education, have a positive effect on people’s propensity to mix.”

He said the aim of the study was not to support “social engineering” but find ways to “nudge” people to mix more closely.”

Start with the spoiled middle class feminists.

““But what we would also say is that because we believe integration is a good thing and because Britain is becoming more diverse by ethnicity, age, income and social class we need to look at what steps we might take to overcome that natural tendency.”

Show them the wonders of diversity, as their house is robbed and their daughters raped.

6 responses to “Multiculturalism reversing, students are self-segregating

  1. Reblogged this on Revolt of the Barbarians and commented:
    Newsflash! Young people are coming to the realization that they have the right to choose for themselves which people they will interact with:

    “Today’s findings reveal a striking lack of mixing among the youngest in our society,” said Mr Taylor.

    “This raises serious questions about the lack of integration in Britain’s education system, yet also suggests that certain institutions, such as higher education, have a positive effect on people’s propensity to mix.”

    He said the aim of the study was not to support “social engineering” but find ways to “nudge” people to mix more closely.”

    “But what we would also say is that because we believe integration is a good thing and because Britain is becoming more diverse by ethnicity, age, income and social class we need to look at what steps we might take to overcome that NATURAL TENDENCY.”

  2. I wonder if any British researchers have considered Shariah’s consequences to a segregated Muslim girl’s social life. I’m guessing she doesn’t have a Christian boyfriend – or a boyfriend of any religion, for that matter.

      • The last thing I want to do here at your blog is give the impression that I’m defending feminist advocacy, but your reply is so misguided (I hope), there just doesn’t appear to be any alternative.

        To begin, so-called honor killing of men is generally restricted to those men who become erotically involved with Muslim women, usually covertly. Such honor killings aren’t restricted to Muslims. In that regard, a man can, with some foresight, either avoid Muslim women, or prepare for physical violence. In the USA, then means a security system, handgun, and carry-and-conceal license, plus some basic situational awareness. I feel sorry for Brits, but even you folks have an opportunity to carry modest knives and learn unarmed combat techniques. As with all potentially sexual liaisons, notifying the family of the woman is generally advised and good etiquette. Getting killed by strangers protecting a female relative’s purported honor doesn’t usually happen to sexually circumspect men.

        As for FGM, there is a substantial difference between circumcision and infibulation. While I don’t advocate for circumcision except when medically necessary (and here I refer you to reasonable instances such as constriction or constraint of the glans for either men or women), I can contrast removing the clitoral hood to removing the labia minora, abrading the labia majora, excision of the clitoris – on whole or in part, depending on the anatomical education of the surgeon – and stitching the blood mess back together such that it constricts the vaginal opening and inhibits intercourse. Sure, elective circumcision of minors is immoral and unethical, but implying that circumcision of a man’s foreskin equates to infibulation is either ignorant or intentionally misleading.

      • I can’t remember where I got the m>f thing, but I recall it was a trusted source alas Brit-based. I don’t usually look into feminist talking points like that when they’re doing correction for us, it could be wrong.
        Although it goes beyond the clitoral circumcision, most studies are just that *basic* step. The advanced cases vary by religion, country of origin and even the family caste. The minimum involves the clitoris to ensure fidelity, and you cannot have FGM without female circumcision. Oh it does produce a variety of problems depending on extent inc fertility issues, but if the perps cared, and weren’t logically backward, they wouldn’t do it at all. Some cultures are inferior.

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s