If you can understand this STEM superiority chart, you don’t need it

article

To repeat the obvious: we can our stuff, and we can do your job better than you.

data visualization here
Non-STEM trans. = it’s very pretty.

It’s one of the things college students want to know more than anything else, but up to now, it has been one of the hardest things to figure out: If I get a college degree in physics—or biology, or psychology—what kind of work am I likely to end up doing?

Yesterday, the U.S. Census Bureau posted an interactive graphic that uses government data to link college majors to the occupational groups graduates eventually work in. It’s not as granular as one might wish, but it’s better than anything else we’re aware of. Just scroll over a category of college majors, and you will see what occupational groups those majors end up working in. The graphic shows, for example, that a lot of people with engineering degrees work—wait for it—either as engineers or with computers. No surprise. More surprising is that a very large number (it appears to be about half) work in jobs unrelated to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The graphic also covers non-STEM majors and occupational groups.

The results for some majors are startling: Only about a fifth (to maybe a quarter) of physical science majors work in STEM fields, the graphic shows—and of those, maybe a third (or less than 10% of all physical science majors) work in the physical sciences. Substantial fractions of physical science majors work as engineers, computer workers, and life scientists—and perhaps three-quarters work entirely outside of STEM. [what shortage?]

In the broad category of biological, agricultural, and environmental scientists, perhaps one in eight graduates with those majors end up working in any STEM field at all (although health care, which isn’t considered a STEM field by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, employs a very large chunk of those graduates).

It’s at least as much fun to look at it the other way: Scroll over an occupational group to see what majors feed those jobs. It’s surprising, for example, to learn that while physical science majors are the largest source of physical scientists, almost as many have majors in biological, environmental, and agricultural sciences.

We’re pushing liberal arts out of the only shit they’re qualified for.

lol laughing rdj tony stark heehee haha

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s