How can a genius be born to normal parents?

http://iqpersonalitygenius.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/how-are-highly-intelligent-people.html

Low mutative load.

It’s one possible explanation and I like it.

Advice;

You’d need to test telomere lengths for longevity, endocrine function (an oft-overlooked metric of fitness with an effect on brain function) and morphological symmetry, this last being the easiest of the lot and readily observable.

Symmetry is a quantifiable metric of beauty too. Paper: Intelligence and Physical Attractiveness. Full PDF here.

The ‘Red Pill’ and ‘Game’ of workplaces and careers

Patriactionary

Any of you out there job-hunting?

Of course you are. If not, chances are, you will be in the future.

ElectricAngel brought my attention to this woman and her writings. (Just so you’re aware: You may not be able to see links to all of her posts – up to 174 as of this writing – on one single screen unless you have a membership there and are logged in, and in fact, I’m not sure if you can see them with just a free membership or if you need a premium one – right now, I’m doing the one month free trial of the premium membership. Anyway, I know that in my other browser, in which I’m not logged in, I can only see a handful of them.)

My mind is blown.

Finally, someone who gets that the system is broken, and understands how and why that is so –…

View original post 197 more words

Telegony studies and the future of sperm-paternity studies

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.12373/abstract

Newly discovered non-genetic mechanisms break the link between genes and inheritance, thereby also raising the possibility that previous mating partners could influence traits in offspring sired by subsequent males that mate with the same female (‘telegony’). In the fly Telostylinus angusticollis, males transmit their environmentally acquired condition via paternal effects on offspring body size. We manipulated male condition, and mated females to two males in high or low condition in a fully crossed design. Although the second male sired a large majority of offspring, offspring body size was influenced by the condition of the first male. This effect was not observed when females were exposed to the first male without mating, implicating semen-mediated effects rather than female differential allocation based on pre-mating assessment of male quality. Our results reveal a novel type of transgenerational effect with potential implications for the evolution of reproductive strategies.

Full PDF here: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.12373/pdf

Could this be the arbiter of female hypergamy? The reason women consistently underestimate their partner count? The reason for the classical association with purity in chaste women?
Certainly there is a new direction in studying maternal quality, we know for a fact that pregnant women receive stem cells from the foetus, and these usually include crossing the blood-brain barrier and becoming brain cells.

This study of blood finds male cells where they shouldn’t be in a mother, with such a heavy impact on its host it might impact organ donation.

In conclusion, we show for the first time functional evidence for transmaternal cell flow resulting in Ag-specific T-cell priming and resulting in microchimerism in mother’s offspring.

This is called fetomaternal microchimerism, where a new organism (in this case, baby) pollutes the purity of the mother’s cells (unkind metaphor but apt). The record for how long this phenomena has lasted in its host, this ‘new lineage’, is 27 years. Fertility window time.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC40117/

The future direction is clear, there is a biological basis for slut shaming. As these studies scale up, the prospect of transfer is almost guaranteed, given these findings across species. For example, human trials have only included fertilizations (foetuses) thus far as previous acceptable (testable) material and not simple sperm or RNA presence, which would involve taking samples from all of a woman’s previous lovers. The lack of experiment with modern computing of samples has left the subject wide open to speculation again. Consider the societal implications, whatever the actual transfer percentage.

It might be a few errant proteins, the odd specific DNA fragments, but do you really think men won’t care?

Article: Transgender is a mental illness of assumption

– that biology is wrong.

http://newobserveronline.com/transgender-is-a-mental-illness-and-should-be-treated-as-such-former-johns-hopkins-chief-psychiatrist/

Dr. McHugh, who is the author of six books and at least 125 peer-reviewed medical articles, made his remarks in an article in the Wall Street Journal titled “Transgender Surgery Isn’t the Solution”, in which he explained that transgender surgery is not the solution for people who suffer a “disorder of ‘assumption’”—the notion that their maleness or femaleness is different than what nature assigned to them biologically.

In support of his opinion, he pointed to a recent study which showed that the suicide rate among “transgendered” people who had reassignment surgery is 20 times higher than the suicide rate among normal people.

Dr. McHugh also pointed out studies from Vanderbilt University and London’s Portman Clinic of children who had expressed transgender feelings but for whom, over time, 70–80 percent “spontaneously lost those feelings”—implying that a lot of this “transgenderism” was in fact twisted adults projecting these feelings onto children.

after puberty hormones kicked in and reminded them what they truly are, no coincidence

“This intensely felt sense of being transgendered constitutes a mental disorder in two respects. The first is that the idea of sex misalignment is simply mistaken—it does not correspond with physical reality. The second is that it can lead to grim psychological outcomes.”

And biological ones like HIV explosions in the demographic.

It is a disorder similar to a “dangerously thin” person suffering anorexia who looks in the mirror and thinks they are “overweight,” said Dr. McHugh.

This assumption, that one’s gender is only in the mind regardless of anatomical reality, has led some transgendered people to push for social acceptance and affirmation of their own subjective “personal truth,” said Dr. McHugh.

I cannot wait until the SJWs start defending otherkin.
He believes he is an elf, then he is an elf!

Dr. McHugh also reported that there are “misguided doctors” who, working with very young children who seem to imitate the opposite sex, will administer “puberty-delaying hormones to render later sex-change surgeries less onerous—even though the drugs stunt the children’s growth and risk causing sterility.”

Such action comes “close to child abuse,” said Dr. McHugh.

He misses out an important point.
Indulgence of fetish. There is always a sexually stimulating component to it. What better for a mentally ill narcissist than to become the object of their desire? Or suppress homosexuality by claiming it’s their body that is the ‘wrong’ sex, instead of their urges?
It opens a damaging precedent for indulging a temporary sexual desire with permanent surgery.

Article: Aristocratic dysgenics in a multiracial society

http://therightstuff.biz/2014/11/24/aristocratic-dysgenics-in-a-multiracial-society/

What if the melting pot of multiculturalism was never supposed to combine? As oil and water?

Marxism is an academic artifact. They despise the native working class who never rose up, but the unskilled immigrant class might. 

  It represents a concerted effort by Marxist-spectrum supremacists to destabilize and generate class conflict where it hadn’t existed before by proxy of fomenting natural racial strife through immigration itself.

Taking the civilized out of Western civilization.

Why would they need to destroy the white races when all they need to do is slowly remove the greatness within the societies that protect them?

This explains barbaric excuses for modern culture.

Even the left-wing comedians are pointing it out;

A better explanation, I think, using racial divides to stir up the ultimate class war.
Some of those white first world genes could be useful to keep society actually running. Like a weakened slave class or something…

How to find out if your Facebook friends are Far-Left supporters

http://nopenothope.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/how-to-find-out-if-your-facebook.html

– But how can you tell if your Facebook friends burn literature, physically attack people for their views and violently disrupt political meetings they don’t agree with?

To help our supporters, you can use the links below to find out if you have anyone on your friends list who supports Hope not Hate, Unite Against Fascism, AntiFa or the Labour Party.

To find friends who like Hope not Hate –
https://www.facebook.com/browse/friended_fans_of/?page_id=91897231853

To find friends who like UAF –
https://www.facebook.com/browse/friended_fans_of/?page_id=101124430813

To find friends who like AntiFa –
https://www.facebook.com/browse/friended_fans_of/?page_id=37315363535

To find friends who like the Socialist Workers Party –
https://www.facebook.com/browse/friended_fans_of/?page_id=132633832928

To find friends who like ‘Radical Independence Campaign’, the Scottish soap-dodgers –
https://www.facebook.com/browse/friended_fans_of/?page_id=566948540013005

To find friends who like ‘Left Unity’ –
https://www.facebook.com/browse/friended_fans_of/?page_id=327424650740809

To find friends who like the Labour Party –
https://www.facebook.com/browse/friended_fans_of/?page_id=25749647410

To find friends who hate music and like the band ‘One Direction’ –
https://www.facebook.com/browse/friended_fans_of/?page_id=121930497861753

We think that just about covers the most tiresome of the fascist, anti-free speech, pro-intolerance groups. If we’ve missed any off, please let us know and we’ll add them to the list.

Expose the rot.

red dwarf looking searching investigation

The Myth of Modern Art Markets

TLDR: The majority of people hate the style. Justly.

http://drawingacademy.com/contemporary-art-bubble?awt_l=9WmjM&awt_m=3vdcDndjTdpSnqq

Until the 15th century, fine art had sacral and utilitarian purpose. No artist was producing paintings for the pure aim of being admired as a subject itself. The church was the main and only client able to afford marvelous masterpieces intended to glorify the commissioner and religious faith. It was a status quo up to the time when Italian bankers and republic rulers came into play. With new money came a new agenda for fine art. No longer was art to be sacral, it was liberated to fulfill another meaning – to become an object of admiration, the measure of status.

Fine artists obliged with readiness. Before that, no artwork was created because an artist wanted to simply express himself, all works were commissioned and the client had his say on what and how to paint.

The Renaissance brought something new to the art marketplace. Sacral art turned into fine art. It became an object that could be valued accordingly to the fine artist’s talent. The value of the artwork stopped being measured by its size, amount of and price of art materials, and time spent by the artist.

The art became a commodity fetishism, it was idolized as the object itself, it was worshiped for the ‘power’ people assigned to it. Art workshops, run by professional fine artists, with the help of numerous apprentices, started to produce artworks that could be purchased not only by kings and church officials, but also by the middle class.

who ruin literally everything pure

The demand of those private citizens shaped the fine art market for the next 500 years. Art styles came and went, fashion was being changed from generation to generation by new consumers, but art managed to stay civilized and fulfill its primary purpose – to be a beautiful object that deserved to be admired, loved and worshiped.

There has been always progress in fine art. New generations of fine artists were coming and competing for the attention of clients. Those who were brave enough to reject old styles and create new ones left many ‘isms’ in the history of modern art: impressionist, cubism, modernism, supermatism, and so on. Seeking awareness by any means and making bold and revolutionary statements, brought many artists into the spotlight of the media. Somehow traditional art skills started to be replaced with creativity.

talent is equal, an overturned chair is equal to the Mona Lisa

After the Second World War, art had entered its contemporary phase. The market ideology was masterminded and financially fueled by those whose intention it was to use contemporary art as Cold War undercover propaganda weapon. Billions of dollars were invested into the promotion of contemporary art. Multiple private foundations became subsidized, funded and ruled by one governor – The Central Intelligence Agency of the United States federal government.

confirmed

These foundations were and still are actively advocating and pushing contemporary art to the public. The main objective of this activity is to destroy traditional ideals of fine art and superimpose new values and morals of life. The main strategy of achieving this goal is brainwashing the public via mass media and cultural events.

If they say long enough that a piece of garbage is art, then gradually people will start believing it. If someone buys that garbage for an insane sum of money, then it becomes officially confirmed as the greatest art ever created.

The price of artwork was no longer linked to the talents or skills an artist displayed. The price was created by inflated demand, fueled by PR and marketing efforts invested in the promotion of a particular artist. The contemporary art marketplace had shifted the focus of attention from a particular masterpiece to an artist’s name. The painting, drawing or sculpture itself becomes less important as the name of its creator….

cultural QE, reducing the value of real art

Contemporary artists in Europe were deprived of conventional fine art education – the vast majority of art students graduate having no classical drawing skills, whatsoever. Today, there is only handful of fine artists around Europe, who’ve developed their skills to the level equal or greater than a mediocre fine artist of the Renaissance.

a single tear michael fassbender crying

In fact, a new saying has developed: “He is not a contemporary artist, he can draw.”

There is a reason why new artists cannot draw. Their teachers have graduated a decade ago; they are not able to teach what they have not learned from their teachers who graduated two decades ago. Instead, they lecture how to be creative.

I cannot cover any more of this wonderful article, it’s too distressing.

Video: A word to left-wing students

in the model of Stepford Students.

http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9376232/free-speech-is-so-last-century-todays-students-want-the-right-to-be-comfortable/

Have you met the Stepford students? They’re everywhere. On campuses across the land. Sitting stony-eyed in lecture halls or surreptitiously policing beer-fuelled banter in the uni bar. They look like students, dress like students, smell like students. But their student brains have been replaced by brains bereft of critical faculties and programmed to conform. To the untrained eye, they seem like your average book-devouring, ideas-discussing, H&M-adorned youth, but anyone who’s spent more than five minutes in their company will know that these students are far more interested in shutting debate down than opening it up.