Demographics and social conservatism

Social liberalism = Cultural Marxism, for our purposes.

http://conservativewoman.co.uk/andrew-cadman-demographic-change-will-revive-social-conservatism/

The great concern for society is whether economic and social progress is sustainable as the large number of people now in their 40s and 50s move towards retirement age, where, due to substantial increase in longevity, they will have to be sustained for decades by the numerically smaller generations that follow.

I believe the word you seek is Ponzi. There won’t be pensions for Gen Y. There is stirring discontent for funding Boomers, by the time we get to Gen X, it will be a dull roar. When we discover we shall have no such reward for a lifetime of servitude, we’ll vote out those supposed “entitlements”. Compounding the issue is the racial composition of the young. Mostly Muslim males. You think they’ll work? Let alone at the level of white men? You think they’ll work harder or be shamed into it because the society their parents moved to “needs them”? They have no loyalty to us. What about the inevitable war? Will they fight for the West? No, they’ll loot us and flee. And the demographic problem will be even worse. Plus they’ll be killing off the few white men left. Can we send the Cultural Marxists out there too as a peace offering? Make the best of a bad situation.

Lestat laughter lol lmao haha IWTV film

add to this, white people becoming a racial minority will make us more conservative; http://mic.com/articles/87439/how-white-people-react-to-losing-their-majority-status-in-America

Surprise! Fear of losing their majority status actually makes Americans more conservative. At least, that’s the conclusion of a new study by two psychologists at Northwestern University investigating how white people react to the possibility of losing their majoritarian status. 

“possibility”?

While researching for “On the Precipice of a ‘Majority-Minority’ America: Perceived Status Threat from the Racial Demographic Shift Affects White Americans’ Political Ideology,” psychologists Maureen A. Craig and Jennifer A. Richeson conducted four experiments to assess how people who identify as white reacted to racial demographic changes regarding three different population sets. The first study showed that making Californians aware of the shift in demographics led “politically unaffiliated white Americans to lean more toward the Republican party and express greater political conservatism.” The other experiments showed similar results.

If the effect holds moderately for Californians, imagine how strong it is for normal people.

In other words, when the majority — here the still-existing racial majority of “white” Americans — perceives, even if not statistically factual, that they have become the minority, their psychological response is fear and loathing. Fear at the prospect of having to actually consider one’s race as not inhabiting the dominant position; loathing for having to realize that they live in a multiracial world, and that they have effectively become “othered.”

The Overton Window naturally shifts to self-preservation. The genetics are dying (% compared to sum) and their (birthright) resources are being stolen, yes that’s the ticket.

sexy hairtoss wind dorian gray look at me dismissive I know I look pretty

How many times must I repeat the cyclical nature of politics? It’s more apparent than economics. Boom and bust. Conservative liberty and prosperity and Leftist over-reaching and debt.

Pause to consider the non-white feeding frenzy over the slimming minority of remaining White Funds. Greedy little piggies around the Gub’mint trough. If that doesn’t jar them awake that these are not your countrymen, they are parasites who happen to live among you, then nothing will. A dwindling pool, overflowing with increasing demands upon it by people who refuse to curb the number of children they have. It won’t be pretty. There will come a crunch time and I don’t want to live in a vibrant area when that happens. House prices are a reflection of peaceable reality – white is alright. Low crime, better schools, even healthcare facilities. You want to be in one of those places, because the decline will include increasing crimes, some more justifiable than others (theft of food versus violent rape), and you don’t want to live somewhere with high levels and crucially low social trust to begin with.

If a man could have a sexbot, why would he want a woman?

http://www.reaxxion.com/9735/how-virtual-reality-could-destroy-western-society

Blatantly obvious question to a person with common sense.

Men primarily desire sex, women primarily desire emotional comfort.

You can see women awakening to this discrepancy in their reaction to male sex toys. Oh, theirs are “empowering” but men’s are “gross”….

no what I don't believe it can't be true disbelief pushing daisies

Futurists are sci-fi psychics. If they ever had any prognostic powers, they’d be designing and inventing what they foresaw. It’s highly pop-culture-based guesswork, they slavishly follow trends.

Men on the whole do not desire a woman for reproduction until a certain age or unless they’re broody by character (rather rare and commendable) – they want the appearance of it, the sex act itself, like women want the appearance of a high-quality Alpha (and rarely consider genetic fitness). Evolution is deceptive. It tells us we want A because it is the means to acquire B. Evopsych studies the divide between what we want as an organism and how our mind tricks us into getting it against our better judgement.

The brain is an organ dedicated to self-deception.

Look no further than optical illusions for demonstrations.

Women presume their true value to men (fecundity) compels their desire. In some men, perhaps this is true. On the whole, men are driven by the same superficial concerns as women – the mating markets are designed to make snap judgements so as not to lose opportunity (all those studies about how quickly we assess mate potential, it isn’t the conscious mind doing it in split seconds, is it?)

Too many men

I have seen this painting, it has quite a fascinating story behind it. You can look it up, I’m not an art historian.

http://www.evoandproud.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/young-male-and-single.html

It’s a return to the state of nature, where MOST men do not pass on their genes. It sucks but the overall fertility rate is too low in Europe as well so women aren’t exactly living it up either. But eggs will always be worth more than sperm, and we are the walking clone machines, there is bodily value too. Men need to compete for opportunity, same old story.

Lots more men than women are childless, and it has ever been thus, the researchers say. source

We’re returning to the natural pattern. No big deal. Like the old coots say — We need another war.

sexy hairtoss wind dorian gray look at me dismissive I know I look pretty

Having it All is a Middle Class Myth

http://conservativewoman.co.uk/louise-kirk-women-cannot-have-it-all-without-damaging-their-families-and-homes/

They don’t seem to have noticed how middle-class they are, these female authors telling us that we can have our children, a full-time job, and love it.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I am all for women having careers if they want to. We need female doctors, teachers, shopkeepers, cleaners, you name it, to keep our society human. Nor am I against the middle-class. I belong there myself. What I do object to is assuming that all women are the same, and that any woman can “have it all” without damage to family and home…

They outsource and have servants. There aren’t enough hours in the day. I’d rather be a poor worker than a poor mother. Mother is a valuable and crucial job itself. It should be respected.

uhuh hmm o really rlly doubt eyebrow flash lara croft

Forgive the dejected tone, I’ve had the stuffing knocked out of me by a combination of work duties, paperwork errors, EU bureaucracy including the CHR (long story), family complaints, friends attention-seeking because it’s summer, the police (not a bad thing), noisy neighbours currently blasting bad techno music, that SCOTUS rainbow crap on social media, a somewhat minor health quibble and another redpill writer channelling Freud at me. Within the past few days.  I am exhausted. I want to curl up in a darkened room and forget the world exists.

It used to be that all working class women were working mothers. They had to be. They’d scoff if told that was a choice or a good thing.

Link: Transgenderism, a pathogenic meme

http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/transgenderism-a-pathogenic-meme/16363

…A rare issue of a few men—both homosexual and heterosexual men, including some who sought sex-change surgery because they were erotically aroused by the thought or image of themselves as women—has spread to include women as well as men. Even young boys and girls have begun to present themselves as of the opposite sex. Over the last ten or fifteen years, this phenomenon has increased in prevalence, seemingly exponentially. Now, almost everyone has heard of or met such a person….

autogynephilia, my money’s on a porn addiction aetiology

At Johns Hopkins, after pioneering sex-change surgery, we demonstrated that the practice brought no important benefits. As a result, we stopped offering that form of treatment in the 1970s. Our efforts, though, had little influence on the emergence of this new idea about sex, or upon the expansion of the number of “transgendered” among young and old….

First, do no harm.

 The photograph of the posed, corseted, breast-boosted Bruce Jenner (a man in his mid-sixties, but flaunting himself as if a “pin-up” girl in her twenties or thirties) on the cover ofVanity Fair suggests that he may fit the behavioral mold that Ray Blanchard has dubbed an expression of “autogynephilia”—from gynephilia (attracted to women) and auto (in the form of oneself)….

oh shit damn fuck hell no give up dean winchester  shrug

But the meme—that your sex is a feeling, not a biological fact, and can change at any time—marches on through our society. In a way, it’s reminiscent of the Hans Christian Andersen tale, The Emperor’s New Clothes. In that tale, the Emperor, believing that he wore an outfit of special beauty imperceptible to the rude or uncultured, paraded naked through his town to the huzzahs of courtiers and citizens anxious about their reputations. Many onlookers to the contemporary transgender parade, knowing that a disfavored opinion is worse than bad taste today, similarly fear to identify it as a misapprehension.

Fear being the operative word.

I am ever trying to be the boy among the bystanders who points to what’s real. I do so not only because truth matters, but also because overlooked amid the hoopla—enhanced now by Bruce Jenner’s celebrity and Annie Leibovitz’s photography—stand many victims. Think, for example, of the parents whom no one—not doctors, schools, nor even churches—will help to rescue their children from these strange notions of being transgendered and the problematic lives these notions herald. These youngsters now far outnumber the Bruce Jenner type of transgender. Although they may be encouraged by his public reception, these children generally come to their ideas about their sex not through erotic interests but through a variety of youthful psychosocial conflicts and concerns…

This is how they recruit sexually. Trannies tend to sleep with one another (HIV rates, drug use). This is how they get plenty of fresh meat to sleep with in 10 years, when they’re nice and psychologically vulnerable. It’s sick.

First, though, let us address the basic assumption of the contemporary parade: the idea that exchange of one’s sex is possible. It, like the storied Emperor, is starkly, nakedly false. Transgendered men do not become women, nor do transgendered women become men. All (including Bruce Jenner) become feminized men or masculinized women, counterfeits or impersonators of the sex with which they “identify.” In that lies their problematic future.

When “the tumult and shouting dies,” it proves not easy nor wise to live in a counterfeit sexual garb. The most thorough follow-up of sex-reassigned people—extending over thirty years and conducted in Sweden, where the culture is strongly supportive of the transgendered—documents their lifelong mental unrest. Ten to fifteen years after surgical reassignment, the suicide rate of those who had undergone sex-reassignment surgery rose to twenty times that of comparable peers…..

Read the whole article, it’s top-shelf.

For all the hate I get about ‘hating’ them, I’m actually trying to save their lives.

Sex differences in the nervous system

http://www.neuroscientistnews.com/neuroinsights/neural-fundamentals-sex-differences-nervous-system

It’s a worthwhile article.


I see your feelings but science doesn’t care! 

It ends;

When Rhodes and Rubin examined sexual dimorphism in the CNS in the late 1990s, they had to create a whole new term. They defined diergism as functional or physiological differences, which is oftentimes a byproduct of sexual dimorphism. Rhodes and Rubin realized that the genetics underlying sexual differences in the CNS is more complex than just steroid-dependent mechanisms and the environment plays a role in sexual differentiation as well.  Current studies of dimorphism and diergism focus on furthering our understanding of the neurochemical basis of sexually dimorphic behavior and the mechanisms of disease.