Antiaging interventions are needed to reduce the burden of disease and protect population productivity.
Translation: they want to work you like a dog until you die.
Young people are the most attractive targets for therapies to extend healthspan
How is that NOT eugenics? You can bet it would be enforced.
Covered here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-33409604
…The analysis showed that at the age of 38, the people’s biological ages ranged from the late-20s to those who were nearly 60.
Pretty huge variance.
“They look rough, they look lacking in vitality,” said Prof Terrie Moffitt from Duke University in the US.
The study said some people had almost stopped ageing during the period of the study, while others were gaining nearly three years of biological age for every twelve months that passed….
Wouldn’t it make more empirical sense to study the verifiable Dorian Grays of the group?
Could this be genetic load?
Epigenetics with environment?
Taken with other studies, such as caloric restriction, might the body have an optimum stressor rate, beyond which it begins to break down? What could affect this? Processed food, particulate matter (air pollution), toxins processed or physical exertions?
“Any area of life where we currently use chronological age is faulty, if we knew more about biological age we could be more fair and egalitarian.”
I don’t see how. Unless you shoot people for being too young.
She argued the retirement age may be unfair for those “working at their peak” who then had to retire.
Oh, the government wants another excuse not to pay your pension. Fantastic.
It’s also ironic I was writing today about how men have a Wall too. Deny this. We’ve all seen people from school who were late bloomers, as well as people who peaked at age 15.