Black activists call for the lynching of white people

We knew it was coming. We knew.

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/08/28/black-activists-called-for-lynching-and-hanging-of-white-people-and-cops/

I refuse to make a joke out of this.

A cop has already died. Does anybody know if he voted in Obama?

http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/the-coming-race-war-wiil-begin-with-cops/

Everytime I see genetics and brain studies

I just got a comment from a real misogynist

Bet he was ugly. Very bitter about it too. I was repulsed by him in text, actually nauseated, imagine the face!

Well, it was more like an essay arguing that women are subhuman and all men should be free to rape all women at any time. It’s so extreme I considered it might be a feminist fake, but they aren’t that creative in stupidity.

He’s probably a reddit sperg. Definitely not white, and hates white people. Maybe a fake MGTOW aka VirginTOW. Certainly an omega, the lowest a human can sink. He’s like the sexual equivalent of a gold-digger, he’ll die in the collapse thankfully. There were some interesting implications to this train of thought that I’m still laughing over (misogynists can’t stand a woman being happy and laughing).

Women don’t have property rights – over our own body (the only way property rights make any logical sense, you know, it begins with your body and then you stake a claim on things beyond it).
Women can’t have jobs. Women aren’t good at any work ever. Women can’t be smart. And apparently, even female scientists aren’t “real” scientists. And even if a woman had a job, like being a Grade A doctor for example, she could refuse to treat someone medically, but not refuse rape?
Women aren’t equal humans with the right to consent (and conversely, deny that consent).
Humans aren’t social beings which require certain social norms to be observed (such as respect and no crimes like rape) for any form of human group to function without chaos.
There is no family loyalty or friendship bond which would form a protection cartel.
Beauty is a literal commodity and you must pay other humans for what is God-given/genetic, including from your father (can you guess how).
No idea just how viciously a woman can resist an attempted rape. He’d get bitten and cry home to Mommy about it. Freud was right about the disturbing connection between these lowest of the low, and their mothers, who are almost like Madonna figures.
No mention of homosexuals or bisexuals.

What gets me about these r-type losers is the entitlement.

R-types’ irrationality: Sex is all we want, we place the highest value on it of anything in the whole world. Give it to us for free with no strings or requirements or duties placed on us because our mother didn’t abort us like she should’ve done. 

Even obtaining a real object like food is layered by complex social rules and requirements. Essentially, he was condoning female slavery. Do you remember how that worked out for Jabba? Do you remember how he died? Even peasant revolts are a thing and you’re only taking their grain, you want to treat a human with unique thoughts and a right to existence equal to (probably greater) than you own, like a Fleshlight and you think they won’t brutally murder you? How retarded can one loser be?

The world doesn’t owe you anything. Ever. At all. The world owes you NOTHING.
This applies to men, women, human, animal. We are entitled to nothing. You don’t even get a gold sticker for being born. 

In a primitive environment, they’d have been bludgeoned to death by their own mother for trying it on with their own sister (or possibly, their own mother). A few years ago, I’d pity this type, I’d try to reason with it and help it. Now I’ve fully transitioned to K-selection, I can laugh heartily, mock/amygdala hijack the poor sap, and remind myself he wouldn’t last 2 minutes in a fight with a real man. Let alone dare speak to a reasonably attractive woman like me in public. You can see his rant in the link above, here’s my reply;

Foreveralone, wow, I’ve seen all your memes. And when gay men want to rape you, since they’re men and only their desires matter, that’s their right, as you said. Because you can’t deny consent to a man. 🙂

It would backfire on nancy boys like you. Don’t drop the soap.
And might I remind everyone that it still counts as rape with other objects e.g. a stick, a cactus or a wide piece of metal pipe. So the women could rape him too.

Live attenuated vaccine sheds after 28 years

http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/43865/title/Vaccine-Virus-Sticks-Around/

With the global eradication of polio drawing nigh, some researchers are directing their attention to the small fraction of immunodeficient people who can carry strains of the virus derived from the live attenuated vaccine. These prolonged excreters” can shed the virus in their stool for years without ever becoming sick. One man has been shedding the virus since he was vaccinated nearly 30 years ago, researchers reported yesterday (August 27) in PLOS Pathogens. This is the longest that the virus has ever been found to remain in a person who received the live attenuated vaccine.

So far.
Because for once, they looked!

A group of scientists at the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control in Hertfordshire, U.K., have analyzed 185 stool samples from the man over the last two decades. They estimated that the pathogen has circulated in the male patient for 28 years using a molecular clock based on a viral capsid gene sequence; the researchers tracked mutations that may have enabled the virus to diverge from its once avirulent state, according to Live Science. However, this strain does not seem to pose a threat to vaccinated individuals because antibody levels in the blood of immunized people were sufficient to kill the virus, the researchers showed.

Seem.
Keyword there.
Seem.
And which group of immunized people, specifically? One dose, two, full, scheduled, childhood, adult, post-illness? What? I always get suspicious of vague immunologists. They’re sneaky bastards that’ll skip town in the dead of night before sending you a note reading: btw you might have Black Death. Like, thanks guys, could have used this information earlier?

In their paper, the authors noted that there may be other long-term asymptomatic shedders of the virus and that sewage monitoring and antivirals could help prevent disease spread from virus shed by prolonged excreters. “Currently no effective strategy to treat these patients,” they wrote.

I’m bored of this.
I”m bored of findings like this coming out, which were theoretically plausible, yet anybody questioning the Mighty Vaccine is supposed to be anti-science? 

cool nothing shocks me scientist indiana jones calm haha amused

Here we have a disease problem, public health risk, caused by vaccines, undeniably, and where is the media attention? The BBC and Guardian are trying to fob it off.

Link: Sluts, Game and stupid decisions

There is no enjoying the decline in this area.
The hedonic treadmill is burning them out, until they’re empty husks of people incapable of love. (The manosphere ignores weakened pair bonding ability occurs in men too).

http://freenortherner.com/2015/08/16/sexual-liberation/

The problems are twofold. The problem with the women is obvious – if you’re cheap, you’re treated as cheap.

The problem with the men is barely discussed – immaturity. Those are not men. They act like teenage boys, complete with video games and lad culture. Part of the low fertility rate is refusing to settle for these manboys, they can’t even take care of themselves, let alone others or lead a family.

Game won’t work forever, it’s emerged in response to extreme r-type decline in the sexual marketplace. What will these boys do? Curl up and die, in all probability, so conditioned to do the easy thing over the right thing.

Darwin wins.

Video: Italy’s solution to African invaders (2011)

At the end you have the usual sob story which misses one crucial point: they don’t need to be there. They chose to be there and continue to choose it.

However, I made a gif of this ‘advice to Arab men’ to be passed around.

 

Fucked-up Fairytales: How ruin came to Johannesburg

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/34393400/

A fragment from a blog of a Russian man who went on a business trip to South Africa, translated for your convenience.

Me and my friend had to spend roughly 10 hours in Johannesburg. We asked Mikhail and he convinced some kamikaze driver to take us on a tour through the city center. We, the two retards, thought that they were exaggerating about the danger just to frighten us. We thought that we’d get to the center, take a long good stroll through it and show everyone that Russians aren’t afraid of anything.

We ended up not even coming close to doing any of these things.

Reason?

We nearly shat ourselves….

It’s brutal redpill. It’s a pure crimson, with a strong bitterness.
It terrifies Russians.
RUSSIANS.

shock horror wtf omg no denial signs

I had to. It also applies to the Calais crisis.

this is our home now

And then there’s a taste of that resource restriction AC keeps warning us about;

The hunters (May-May) asked food at the woman of Chef Kitumba. The women told they did not have food. The hunters then demanded that they roast their children for them to eat. source

Love/hate “drama” and the romance lovemap

I’m in a pub mood. Story time.

Disclaimer: This is about bringing together a lot of ideas in a correct way, instead of the misconceptions from multiple angles that wear blinkers and assume the tip of the iceberg is the whole thing. It’s difficult for me to put into words because I’ve never had to explain it before, so bear with me.

Common observations;

  • Why do women love “drama”? (Not a modern thing).
  • Why do women prefer so-called love-hate relationships to just… love?
  • Why aren’t they happy in an easy relationship? (n.b. This is often called hypergamy by the manosphere. This is wrong. The man isn’t actually anywhere near the centre of that problem, let alone a conveyor belt of them).
  • Finally, why do feminists and other moody women choose inferior status men only to blame the men for their later irritation?

There is a connection.

The concept of a lovemap was invented by a paedophile sexologist but it’s somewhat accurate, he simply gave it a name. A better way to think of it is as a set collection of impressions and beliefs regarding sex and the courting of the sexes similar to a schema. Everything from fairytales, to comic books, to the Bible, to family stories, urban legends, town gossip and so on. A big puddle of information related to the topic, from a genetic perspective this is priority #1, hence the strength of this lovemap/template/schemata.

The most valuable resource on this topic is the written projection of the Female Lovemap General onto paper, billions of times over. I’m referring, of course, to romance novels. Consider the almost monomythic similiarity between these stories. That’s the Romance Lovemap of Women. There is no choice, all women are aware and affected by it to some extent. There is a probably a parallel for men too. I dunno about that.

What does this schema call for?

In essence, a submissive beautiful woman clashes with dominant noble man.
(n.b. This is not “tingles” or other infantile descriptions of lust by the manosphere that make women cringe in disgust, it would be like calling male lust the Flow for the blood movement; this is a purely psychological phenomena of attraction which is sexual, but only to the extent that it requires both the sexes, one man and one woman, it has nothing to do with sexual congress per se).
The course of true love and all that jazz (Shakespeare merely noticed this).

By being submissive, the woman conquers the strong man in a way even other men cannot. This is how women win. Feminine wiles and control from the King’s ear. Various stories aimed at men are based on warning them about the potential for this, it’s likely part of their Lovemap and the moral of the story is in choosing a (non-crazy, good) woman who will at least guide you in a prosperous direction for you both (behind every good man…).
It isn’t twisted logic that you may be strong by being ostensibly weak when you realize the sexes are unequal but complimentary. It reminds me of a passage of Taoism, by Laozi naturally;

In the world there is nothing more submissive and weak than water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong nothing can surpass it. This is because there is nothing that can take its place.

The manosphere, and MGTOW especially, would do well to meditate on this symbol on a daily basis.

Women are not the enemy. Modernity is.
No man would exist without a woman to birth him.

I digress.

What explains the above examples of seemingly irrational behaviour? (Irrational if you are a simple man who prefers to look for the easiest possible solution to feel better about himself instead of the correct one).
Their lovemap is being damaged. Something has gone wrong. Just like women nag a man to do a DIY project they’ve left for weeks with increasing irritation, as the man isn’t pulling his weight on the gender scales, this becomes a central issue in their mind long-term.

[Also yes, that’s why. Women keep the nest and men guard it in one piece. When pieces start breaking it becomes their job but happens to be on our primary territory.]

How does this hypothesis match up, case by case?

well doctor

*deep intake of breath*

  • In romance novels, there is always an external social conflict in the plot i.e. “I want to be with you! -We can’t!” *swoon* This is usually family, protective fathers and clucky mothers, but may be as generic as a disparity in social class or later on, an occupational hierarchy. This introduces an element of taboo common to most relationships however innocent between the sexes before there was even a word for social mobility. Hence you get the same pattern repeating in literally all the bloody stories: humble girl/aristocrat, good girl/rebel (n.b. not for his damaging behaviours or Dark Triad psyche, but the taboo of socialization with him whatsoever), Teacher/Student and recently, Rich Man/Secretary Underling. The difference in social power adds a certain spice. When the gap is broached, and they overcome the difference, the attraction fizzles like a firework in April.
  • Love/hate relationships are tricky because it’s often a synonym for entirely different emotions and women certainly feel multiple emotions simultaneously in love (it isn’t crazy, it’s processing) so we give it the first relevant-ish word that pops into our head. Essentially we’re discussing the balance between positive and negative emotions. Every healthy relationship, platonic to sexual, has both, because needs are being met or unmet and desires exchanged and negotiated. A woman expects to play the role of woman deep in the subconscious, and this is largely Second in Command barring Special Conditions. It isn’t a bad thing, it’s like sitting with the popular kids at school, a kind of halo effect making you feel wanted and crucially, needed, which means you are worthy to be in the social proximity to this person, who needs and wants your company in turn. (Women compete socially, men compete sexually). A man who solely inspires lovey-dovies is going to make us pause and think Is he gay or something? [another topic of concern] Since we all know men like the chase more than the actual capture. If it’s too easy, there must be a bad reason, and we aren’t going to like it. He’s cheating behind your back and being sweet to keep the guilt at bay is among the most common, we’re totally out of his league and he tricked us into undervaluing ourselves is the runner-up. Others includes He’s totally fake and I fell for it, He doesn’t have a personality what am I doing and the ever-reliable He wants something I don’t care to give and he’s buttering me up as emotional blackmail. I believe this sense of “everything is easy, too easy” is part of supposed Woman’s Intuition. Since when did the course of true love run smooth? Therefore, it’s highly logical on our part to deduce that – It’s going smoothly – with, -It’s going to go wrong – or, – Something is wrong here. That’s totally rational.
  • The “easy” question somewhat relates to the point above with a difference. Few relationships today are marriages, and the only true relationship statuses, as men secretly know in their hearts, are single and married. That’s all folks. Marriages bring in clear responsibilities and duties which many modern nancyboys are allergic to (inc. the DIY). Replace easy with lazy and it’s obvious the problem resides in the unmet needs of a woman who may not be able to vocalize the problem or be heard on the issue, who also senses the man is phoning it in i.e. he communicates she is no longer worthy and the path to commitment she believed she had been building up is revealed to be yet another cruel trick. It’s like the female experience of a pricktease, it’s hard not to hate the entire sex for a while after it occurs. Every relationship has exchange requirements to be met, needs to be fulfilled and simply, both parties need to pull their weight or there is no relationship. Notice how the manosphere never mentions lazy husbands? Yet the mystery of female-instigated divorce goes unsolved…
    Obligations don’t end at the altar, they begin there. 
  • The last example is a basic transgression of the lovemap. The type of boy who will allow himself to be browbeaten by such a useless harpy is essentially the double negative image and type of the Lovemap template. In any other society in history he’d die without touching a boob, he isn’t a fit mate to any woman. You see, they, the feminist, consciously believed they could switch out the roles and take the (apparently) bigger and “better” one, because men and women are the same, right? /sarc Eventually, this schema truth from the lovemap rises and stirs from the slumber of the subconscious, shaking the woman out of the temporary thrill of being “boss”. It grows with each demonstration of the reverse expectation in the male chosen, from his behaviour, to his manner and his dress. She knows deep down she bought a lemon. She begins to doubt him because naturally, feminists never correct themselves on anything. This spirals into a deep resentment until the relationship fails or she checks out mentally to preserve her ego. The ‘men’ go along with this because they know it’s the only way they’ll get laid, subconsciously they know they are an unfit male, probably in total contradiction to any male Lovemap, and that’s how male feminists are born.

A simple introduction but I hope you will permit me to end it there for now.
I’m sure you can apply these concepts to your own observations.

friendly happy nice smile relaxed pretty