We knew it was coming. We knew.
I refuse to make a joke out of this.
A cop has already died. Does anybody know if he voted in Obama?
We knew it was coming. We knew.
I refuse to make a joke out of this.
A cop has already died. Does anybody know if he voted in Obama?
Bet he was ugly. Very bitter about it too. I was repulsed by him in text, actually nauseated, imagine the face!
Well, it was more like an essay arguing that women are subhuman and all men should be free to rape all women at any time. It’s so extreme I considered it might be a feminist fake, but they aren’t that creative in stupidity.
He’s probably a reddit sperg. Definitely not white, and hates white people. Maybe a fake MGTOW aka VirginTOW. Certainly an omega, the lowest a human can sink. He’s like the sexual equivalent of a gold-digger, he’ll die in the collapse thankfully. There were some interesting implications to this train of thought that I’m still laughing over (misogynists can’t stand a woman being happy and laughing).
Women don’t have property rights – over our own body (the only way property rights make any logical sense, you know, it begins with your body and then you stake a claim on things beyond it).
Women can’t have jobs. Women aren’t good at any work ever. Women can’t be smart. And apparently, even female scientists aren’t “real” scientists. And even if a woman had a job, like being a Grade A doctor for example, she could refuse to treat someone medically, but not refuse rape?
Women aren’t equal humans with the right to consent (and conversely, deny that consent).
Humans aren’t social beings which require certain social norms to be observed (such as respect and no crimes like rape) for any form of human group to function without chaos.
There is no family loyalty or friendship bond which would form a protection cartel.
Beauty is a literal commodity and you must pay other humans for what is God-given/genetic, including from your father (can you guess how).
No idea just how viciously a woman can resist an attempted rape. He’d get bitten and cry home to Mommy about it. Freud was right about the disturbing connection between these lowest of the low, and their mothers, who are almost like Madonna figures.
No mention of homosexuals or bisexuals.
What gets me about these r-type losers is the entitlement.
R-types’ irrationality: Sex is all we want, we place the highest value on it of anything in the whole world. Give it to us for free with no strings or requirements or duties placed on us because our mother didn’t abort us like she should’ve done.
Even obtaining a real object like food is layered by complex social rules and requirements. Essentially, he was condoning female slavery. Do you remember how that worked out for Jabba? Do you remember how he died? Even peasant revolts are a thing and you’re only taking their grain, you want to treat a human with unique thoughts and a right to existence equal to (probably greater) than you own, like a Fleshlight and you think they won’t brutally murder you? How retarded can one loser be?
The world doesn’t owe you anything. Ever. At all. The world owes you NOTHING.
This applies to men, women, human, animal. We are entitled to nothing. You don’t even get a gold sticker for being born.
In a primitive environment, they’d have been bludgeoned to death by their own mother for trying it on with their own sister (or possibly, their own mother). A few years ago, I’d pity this type, I’d try to reason with it and help it. Now I’ve fully transitioned to K-selection, I can laugh heartily, mock/amygdala hijack the poor sap, and remind myself he wouldn’t last 2 minutes in a fight with a real man. Let alone dare speak to a reasonably attractive woman like me in public. You can see his rant in the link above, here’s my reply;
Foreveralone, wow, I’ve seen all your memes. And when gay men want to rape you, since they’re men and only their desires matter, that’s their right, as you said. Because you can’t deny consent to a man. 🙂
It would backfire on nancy boys like you. Don’t drop the soap.
And might I remind everyone that it still counts as rape with other objects e.g. a stick, a cactus or a wide piece of metal pipe. So the women could rape him too.
With the global eradication of polio drawing nigh, some researchers are directing their attention to the small fraction of immunodeficient people who can carry strains of the virus derived from the live attenuated vaccine. These “prolonged excreters” can shed the virus in their stool for years without ever becoming sick. One man has been shedding the virus since he was vaccinated nearly 30 years ago, researchers reported yesterday (August 27) in PLOS Pathogens. This is the longest that the virus has ever been found to remain in a person who received the live attenuated vaccine.
Because for once, they looked!
A group of scientists at the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control in Hertfordshire, U.K., have analyzed 185 stool samples from the man over the last two decades. They estimated that the pathogen has circulated in the male patient for 28 years using a molecular clock based on a viral capsid gene sequence; the researchers tracked mutations that may have enabled the virus to diverge from its once avirulent state, according to Live Science. However, this strain does not seem to pose a threat to vaccinated individuals because antibody levels in the blood of immunized people were sufficient to kill the virus, the researchers showed.
And which group of immunized people, specifically? One dose, two, full, scheduled, childhood, adult, post-illness? What? I always get suspicious of vague immunologists. They’re sneaky bastards that’ll skip town in the dead of night before sending you a note reading: btw you might have Black Death. Like, thanks guys, could have used this information earlier?
In their paper, the authors noted that there may be other long-term asymptomatic shedders of the virus and that sewage monitoring and antivirals could help prevent disease spread from virus shed by prolonged excreters. “Currently no effective strategy to treat these patients,” they wrote.
I’m bored of this.
I”m bored of findings like this coming out, which were theoretically plausible, yet anybody questioning the Mighty Vaccine is supposed to be anti-science?
Here we have a disease problem, public health risk, caused by vaccines, undeniably, and where is the media attention? The BBC and Guardian are trying to fob it off.
There is no enjoying the decline in this area.
The hedonic treadmill is burning them out, until they’re empty husks of people incapable of love. (The manosphere ignores weakened pair bonding ability occurs in men too).
The problems are twofold. The problem with the women is obvious – if you’re cheap, you’re treated as cheap.
The problem with the men is barely discussed – immaturity. Those are not men. They act like teenage boys, complete with video games and lad culture. Part of the low fertility rate is refusing to settle for these manboys, they can’t even take care of themselves, let alone others or lead a family.
Game won’t work forever, it’s emerged in response to extreme r-type decline in the sexual marketplace. What will these boys do? Curl up and die, in all probability, so conditioned to do the easy thing over the right thing.
A fragment from a blog of a Russian man who went on a business trip to South Africa, translated for your convenience.
Me and my friend had to spend roughly 10 hours in Johannesburg. We asked Mikhail and he convinced some kamikaze driver to take us on a tour through the city center. We, the two retards, thought that they were exaggerating about the danger just to frighten us. We thought that we’d get to the center, take a long good stroll through it and show everyone that Russians aren’t afraid of anything.
We ended up not even coming close to doing any of these things.
We nearly shat ourselves….
It’s brutal redpill. It’s a pure crimson, with a strong bitterness.
It terrifies Russians.
I had to. It also applies to the Calais crisis.
And then there’s a taste of that resource restriction AC keeps warning us about;
The hunters (May-May) asked food at the woman of Chef Kitumba. The women told they did not have food. The hunters then demanded that they roast their children for them to eat. source
I’m in a pub mood. Story time.
Disclaimer: This is about bringing together a lot of ideas in a correct way, instead of the misconceptions from multiple angles that wear blinkers and assume the tip of the iceberg is the whole thing. It’s difficult for me to put into words because I’ve never had to explain it before, so bear with me.
There is a connection.
The concept of a lovemap was invented by a paedophile sexologist but it’s somewhat accurate, he simply gave it a name. A better way to think of it is as a set collection of impressions and beliefs regarding sex and the courting of the sexes similar to a schema. Everything from fairytales, to comic books, to the Bible, to family stories, urban legends, town gossip and so on. A big puddle of information related to the topic, from a genetic perspective this is priority #1, hence the strength of this lovemap/template/schemata.
The most valuable resource on this topic is the written projection of the Female Lovemap General onto paper, billions of times over. I’m referring, of course, to romance novels. Consider the almost monomythic similiarity between these stories. That’s the Romance Lovemap of Women. There is no choice, all women are aware and affected by it to some extent. There is a probably a parallel for men too. I dunno about that.
What does this schema call for?
In essence, a submissive beautiful woman clashes with dominant noble man.
(n.b. This is not “tingles” or other infantile descriptions of lust by the manosphere that make women cringe in disgust, it would be like calling male lust the Flow for the blood movement; this is a purely psychological phenomena of attraction which is sexual, but only to the extent that it requires both the sexes, one man and one woman, it has nothing to do with sexual congress per se).
The course of true love and all that jazz (Shakespeare merely noticed this).
By being submissive, the woman conquers the strong man in a way even other men cannot. This is how women win. Feminine wiles and control from the King’s ear. Various stories aimed at men are based on warning them about the potential for this, it’s likely part of their Lovemap and the moral of the story is in choosing a (non-crazy, good) woman who will at least guide you in a prosperous direction for you both (behind every good man…).
It isn’t twisted logic that you may be strong by being ostensibly weak when you realize the sexes are unequal but complimentary. It reminds me of a passage of Taoism, by Laozi naturally;
In the world there is nothing more submissive and weak than water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong nothing can surpass it. This is because there is nothing that can take its place.
The manosphere, and MGTOW especially, would do well to meditate on this symbol on a daily basis.
Women are not the enemy. Modernity is.
No man would exist without a woman to birth him.
What explains the above examples of seemingly irrational behaviour? (Irrational if you are a simple man who prefers to look for the easiest possible solution to feel better about himself instead of the correct one).
Their lovemap is being damaged. Something has gone wrong. Just like women nag a man to do a DIY project they’ve left for weeks with increasing irritation, as the man isn’t pulling his weight on the gender scales, this becomes a central issue in their mind long-term.
[Also yes, that’s why. Women keep the nest and men guard it in one piece. When pieces start breaking it becomes their job but happens to be on our primary territory.]
How does this hypothesis match up, case by case?
*deep intake of breath*
A simple introduction but I hope you will permit me to end it there for now.
I’m sure you can apply these concepts to your own observations.
Listening to Shake it Off.
I wonder which generation this could be (mainly).
The number of millionaires in the UK has shot up by 41% over the past five years, with one in 65 adults now classed as having a seven-figure fortune thanks to booming house prices and stock market gains.
The stock market thing is usually a fluke, real estate is the prime moneymaker.
There are now 715,000 millionaires living in Britain compared with 508,000 in 2010, data from Barclays UK shows. Nearly half (48%) of all new millionaires since 2010 live outside London and the south-east.
The bank’s prosperity index found that Reading, Cambridge and Birmingham are the most affluent cities outside of London, and the east of England is the third most prosperous area.
Surging property prices and big returns in equity markets in recent years have combined with higher wages and employment rates to create more millionaires as the UK economy gets back on track.
It isn’t back on track but OK.
The research shows that every UK region is now more affluent than it was five years ago, with measures including household wealth, gross domestic product (GDP), exam results, charitable donations and entrepreneurship taken into account.
QE does that.
They mean NGOs, not charities. A lot of embezzlement.
According to the Office for National Statistics, the richest 10% of households own 44% of household wealth.
And which age group are they? Pray tell.
Akshaya Bhargava, chief executive of Barclays Wealth and Investment Management, said: “The UK is becoming more prosperous, with every region having grown in affluence since 2010. It is also encouraging to see that regions and cities are starting to close the gap with London in terms of prosperity, with the north-east, for example, seeing business growth rates behind only London.”
London and the south-east remain the most prosperous regions, and the capital boasts the most millionaires, up 48% in the past five years to 191,000 – more than the combined millionaire population of Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and northern England.
The east of England comes in third behind these two, as rising house prices push more wealthy Britons outside of London, with 23,000 more millionaires calling the eastern region their home.
Reading is listed second for prosperity in the UK, according to the index, with average earnings of £30,562. Growing numbers of entrepreneurs in the UK is also seen as a factor in increasing wealth, with Cambridge emerging as a startup hub and ranking third.
The north-east and Newcastle fall low on the prosperity index. But the study showed the highest rate of growth in millionaires was in the north-east and Wales, both up 50% since 2010. The study said northern regions “may be on the cusp of change, with the north-east leading the way”.
Despite the jump in wealthy Britons over the past five years, the research said growth in millionaires was expected to return to more normal levels over the long term, with a 9% increase in the UK expected by 2025, in line with GDP growth.
Almost like they brought in a new tax on BTL (buy to letters).
If we go back to before the Boomer panic of the Guardian, to 2011: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2011/feb/28/baby-boomers-secret-millionaires
The inadvertent burden baby boomers have bequeathed the young is sending Britain broke.
…Yet the accusation that boomers are protecting themselves at the expense of everyone else still stands, because relatively ordinary boomers will retire as millionaires, paid for by younger workers. Even the poorer over-50s need to recognise they are going to take out of society more than they put in….
Among other resources;
One British household in every 10 now has total assets exceeding £1m, according to a new book based on work at the London School of Economics published last week
Wealth in the UK crunched the findings from a comprehensive official survey that took place between 2008 and 2010, and found that 10% of households had total wealth of £967,200 or more….
…As lead author Professor John Hills explains: “It is not that there are millions of people with millions of pounds in the bank, but rather that London property prices and – for those lucky professionals who retain them – final salary pensions have quietly made technical millionaires out of many who would only consider themselves as solidly middle-class”….
…In addition, over-55s accounted for most of the 2.5m ‘millionaire households’, having benefited in particular from rising house prices. But there’s also a great wealth disparity among households in this age group….
Yet about 1 in 10 of those still managed to fail. Fail to save. Ever. Because magic money.
…The top 10pc in that age group own assets worth more than £1.46m, said Prof Hills, and the typical household had wealth of £431,000…..
…He also warns against the complacent temptation to regard the great surge in wealth at the top end as a “purely paper” phenomenon, arguing instead that it will have implications for social mobility for a long time to come…
translation: Gen Y are fucked.
The members of Britain’s baby boomer generation who are just starting to enter retirement have been called “the richest generation in history”. Yet, to a large extent, the British welfare state still treats age as a proxy for need, transferring large amounts of public money to all pensioners in the form of universal benefits, regardless of how wealthy they are.
Old goats for votes.
In order to help further the debate surrounding how Britain’s welfare state should be reformed as the population ages, IF undertook this study to discover how many members of the older generation live in households that have assets of more than £1 million, using data from the 2008/10 Household Wealth and Assets Survey.
The author estimates that in 2011, there were approximately 1.9 million over-60s living in households with asset wealth greater than £1 million, 1 million of whom were over-65 (above state pension age for both males and females). This finding should lead to increased debate about how the British welfare state treats pensioners who have large reserves of private asset wealth, and whether benefits should the distributed according to need rather than age.
Remember the Communist mantra?
…Pattern? What pattern?
In case you think I’m doom-mongering for Gen Y (Gen X got a mixed bag): http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3108441/Generation-Y-left-pick-6trillion-tab-Report-warns-children-born-1980-2000-face-apocalyptic-levels-debt-Government-spending.html
It begins (from this June);
Younger people are being left with ‘apocalyptic’ levels of debt, a report warns today.
So-called Generation Y, born between 1980 and 2000, will be forced to pick up the bill for decades of Government over-spending, it is claimed.
*throws K-selection confetti*
Analysis by the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) accused baby-boomers of making unfunded promises on pensions and benefits and then leaving their children to pick up the bill.
Coupled with unaffordable housing, university debts, poor pensions and a ‘rapidly retreating state pension age’, Generation Y now faces ‘a quality of life below that of their parents’.
The CPS accused politicians of ‘fawning over the baby-boomers and older pensioners’ as they were more inclined to vote. The think-tank says the state’s liabilities – including ‘off the books’ spending commitments – is £6trillion, or £221,000 per household.
In the report, Tory peer Lord Holmes of Richmond said people in their twenties and early thirties faced ‘a struggle not experienced by previous generations’ as they had been left to pick up ‘the tab’.
He said: ‘Why should you suffer a standard of living lower than your parents?’.
The think-tank said overall liabilities had risen by hundreds of millions in the last five years alone – despite the country supposedly living in an age of austerity.
The CPS said the bill would be picked up by today’s young people, so-called Generation Y.
Their parents and the so-called baby boomer generation born after the war have been protected by politicians unwilling to upset older generations who are more likely to vote.
…In a devastating analysis, the report’s author, Michael Johnson, says: ‘Baby-boomers have become masters at perpetrating inter-generational injustice, by making vast unfunded promises to themselves, notably in respect of pensions.
“democratizes drawing for kids and adults”
Yes, that’s all we need. Take one of the few skills that still requires hand-eye cerebellar coordination and dumb it down.