This stuff trickles down to middle class whites (scale of oppression narrative). If anything, middle class people are afraid of commitment (literal fear) because of their ‘career’ or how they want to ‘travel’ or need to ‘find myself’ or some other BS. It’s all lies. It’s all one big excuse. Means “I don’t want to choose” (commitment phobia in a nutshell).
You wanted to be independent, now the men want independence too – from you. They’re saying ‘we’re not gonna wait on you’ (chivalry) and later, ‘we’re not gonna wait for you’ (when you’re past it, the peak). They don’t want to be second choice, good on them.
“Whilst poor, unskilled men have certainly lost out in the income stakes, many have received a bonus that matches that of any banker: it is a bonus paid in sex rather than money, and it’s not only women who are footing the bill, it is also hard working men paying their taxes – taxes which are being used to clear up the mess left by men who are not, like themselves, taking responsibility.”
Any ‘man’ calling for the Patriarchy needs to man up and wife up his last slut and settle down to a life of bland domesticity immediately and if he complains, he is just as entitled as the feminists. You can’t Have It All. You have to choose.
No such thing as a social liberal, economic conservative (man). There are parasites off the State (welfare for their bastard spawn, free STD clinics) who want to keep all their own money from paying into it. They have no conscience.
Or, as TRS refers to the likes of them;
PUSSYNERDPUAs (*Pick-Up Artists*), men who keenly-recognize the decay of modern human relationships, yet choose to contribute to the problem.
We never used to have a SMP in the first place. That’s the first problem in a long list. Whatever your opinions of evobio and the ‘natural’ functions of men and women, humans were never meant to be a functionally sterile species.
Enjoying the decline doesn’t screw over other people, yet these sociopaths would have you think otherwise.
You can be certain anyone bragging about how they’re gonna be poolside, isn’t.
I was rather shocked to hear from an American that some states (increasingly few) require a blood test (historically from the man, but now both parties) and a physical examination (of the man, historically) prior to granting a marriage certificate. I was shocked because 1. it’s a brilliant idea and 2. they’re phasing it out and 3. we have no equivalent in Europe…
One of my most popular posts was “Which laws kept marriage intact?” – found here. This information feeds into that topic.
Historically, all women would be presumed virgins before marriage (and in a time without ready contraception, not being pregnant was a reliable sign). However, men were presumed cads until proven otherwise (to the father of the bride too, the patriarch) and had to prove themselves – in a way they couldn’t lie. Sure beats a lie detector. It single-handedly eliminated public health risks before they began in the population. This kept women safe from the pain, suffering of what we now call STDs, miscarriage and probable death that VD could and continues to cause on a pregnancy, as well as checking Rh factors (when negative in a female but positive in the fetus, from the father, this incompatibility causes miscarriage). Rh factors were a latter addition in need of medical forewarning (all marriages being fertile) and the original reason was to check the man was as respectable as he claimed (illegal to deceive under False Light and Misrepresentation). I suppose it would make wicked court evidence. If he visited prostitutes or slept around, he would fail the test and the marriage would be cancelled. In this way, r-types were forbidden from tasting the benefits of K-partner marriage. Here here. It’s easy to speak of protecting women and a good woman’s place in a stable marriage – but hard for the all-talk crowd to come to the logical conclusion: this means protecting them from deceptive men. Which often includes themselves. #burn #partoftheproblem
In short, women weren’t the only ones expected to prove their virtue prior to marriage. That is a myth.
The manosphere manwhores don’t seem intent on covering this sort of information for some strange reason.
I did a little digging for UK information and all I could find in public domain was;
A few notes before I go on this paper.
Check this first line, the most vital point before we proceed.
1.1 To be valid, all marriages which take place in the United Kingdom must be: • Monogamous
Under s.12 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, a marriage celebrated on or after 31 July 1971 shall be voidable on the grounds that:…
at the time of the marriage the respondent was suffering from venereal disease in a communicable form;
Bad news, sluts!
It’s almost like the marriage laws are defined (as is marriage altogether) by the K-types who enter it and specifically written by the K-Patriarchs who wanted to protect their daughters from the likes of you. It isn’t all bad however, because a similar provision is made for the protection of fiances, their sons.
or at the time of the marriage the respondent was pregnant by some person other than the petitioner
Nope, a bitch about how the system supposedly favours women doesn’t fly. It’s a K-law that eliminates the r-type genes from the high investment pool of options. You’re inferior, you chose it, you made your bed. Lie in it.
We should look toward more of the same legal protections if we want to fix the broken modern system of marriage.
Smarter People Have Bigger Brain Structures (Thanks to their Genes)
A large network of neuroscientists and doctors that compared over 30,000 brain images with people’s DNA says it’s found several genes that appear to influence the size of brain structures involved in intelligence and memory, as well as the volume of the brain itself. __ More on genes and brain size
Revolutionary advances in brain imaging and genomics are allowing neuroscientists to confirm what students of HBD have been saying all along: Genes influence both brain sizes and human intelligence.
In one of the largest research undertakings of its kind, a team of geneticists and neuroscientists has uncovered a number of genetic variations that influence the size of some key brain structures, including the hippocampus and the putamen. The result may advance understanding of such devastating neurodegenerative diseases as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s.
Their findings, reported Wednesday in the journal…