“I don’t expect you to vote, I expect you to lie.”
It’s a tragedy of the commons for the useful idiots.
They keep getting worse and worse off because of the net drain effect of their stupid decisions and continue to blame everyone else. You can’t trick the low IQ into voting like their betters (who see past the current cycle).
There is no such thing as a hyphen Muslim. You cannot integrate the Barbarian.
Immigration is invasion where the ground troops arrive before the weapons.
Sub-human behaviour requires appropriate punishment.
I suppose children are fair game for the coming civil war, meanwhile we pay for their whole broods.
Worst part? This was planned. This evil thing must have taken the job with this goal in mind. It is clear the females deserve as much wrath as the males.
Note the sad MGTOW comments justifying their failure with women as the fault OF women and extolling Thai brides.
They can’t read.
They surveyed rich women and tested for shallowness. The women weren’t shallow, they didn’t want a handsome man if he failed as a provider, as a man, knowing looks fade anyway.
Rich people are acutely aware of gold diggers, of course rich women were raised to avoid men with nothing to offer. (You didn’t earn your looks).
Salary is often a reliable proxy for intelligence. If you’re somewhat intelligent, you should be able to make more money than average. This isn’t hard to understand. Higher IQs contribute more to the economy. It’s a reliable indicator.
The only thing they proved is the importance of class. Idiotic Americans.
You don’t get to play out of your league as a man. How is that worth bragging about as a mark of superiority? Oh, these rich women would’ve rejected you for having nothing to offer while you coast on looks, aren’t they terrible? Women have a narrow window but not by much, one or two levels higher, tops.
Their Muh Hypergamy doesn’t apply when the woman is more valuable, does it, dipshits?
The manosphere hypergamy is not what the studies show, the true meaning of the term requires marriage, and the studies also show hypergamy doesn’t apply to the 21st century, numbers dropped like a rock. If hypergamy were this evil thing giving women all the power, you’d expect they’d know this. Are they happy? Never.
I’ve met happier feminists than these guys.
Now it’s just getting sad.
Let me put this in a way they’ll understand: no body part looks good on camera. Not a one. Male body parts are especially unsightly, male nude sculptures deliberately make those areas as small as possible because even other men didn’t like looking at them. I think men are more turned on by the idea of being sent nude pictures from a woman (he’s in with a shot) than they are the actual image itself (which is always less flattering and never impressive, unlike if the person were standing before you).
There is an issue with bringing in this standard. The new Muslim family down the road with 5 kids would have the most realistic opinion (it presumes monogamy). And if having children is required to possess a low time preference (correlation yes but what about young people, too poor to afford a family, being responsible?), we must rope men into it too, since they’re usually the most politically tuned in and run for most office.
If a man is a bachelor, his political opinion on the future must be irrelevant. There is some truth to this because, as he says, with no children, the person has no stake and on the contrary, betrays a lack of faith in the system as a whole. This is why there used to be such a thing as a bachelor tax, by no less than the mighty, manly Spartans, because they drain the system without paying back in with future workers/soldiers (and tried to make good wives become adulteresses). Women classically control the purse strings because women buy the food, clothes and other rarely considered aspects, like kitchen appliances, that the family needs. The man fills the purse, he doesn’t control it, and advertisers know this.
If the experience of women is so important, go with the most experienced: wives and mothers.
“That’s why we need to include housewives in the equation. I want them in aprons, too. Feminists will say wearing kitchen clothes and being on a first-name basis is demeaning, and that is because they’ve been brainwashed by Notorious RBG to think the kitchen is a jail cell. It’s not. An apron is a badge of honor. You don’t use it to get men fired or censored as childless women in the workforce (SJWs, some are male) seem so determined to do. You use it to create sustenance for the people you love. It’s a cape that’s on backwards. To be a “kept woman” means a man is keeping you—as opposed to throwing you away when you start looking old so he can go fuck someone else. Modern feminism is perfect for men because it’s all about getting the milk for free as they go from cow to cow.”
A+ and men don’t throw women away, boys do, since they don’t appreciate what they’ve got.
Feminism has handed men all the sex-based chips and they love it. Women are holding nothing, having lost the innate SMP advantage thanks to sluts (see the ‘economics of sex’). Men are responsible for the demise of women, as every generation, every century prior has protected us, yet this lot contribute to the problem of ruining them. And then they complain Where have all the good women gone? They were good prospects… until you Pump and Dumped them, dummies. You can’t make hos and complain about the paucity of housewives. Now players are caving and marrying up/breeding with sluts and frankly, they deserve each other.
There isn’t a study of the sexual partner count of men against divorce risk, they’re scared to gather the data, since most of the repeat divorces pushing the overall figure up are by men (Trump being a prime example) but they assure us as they manwhore around it can’t possibly affect their brain’s ability to pair bond, despite neurological evidence presented in books like Hooked, where the pair bonding ability (or lack thereof) operates the same in men and women (or, for the sluts, doesn’t). Would you want to marry someone who can’t love you? Who cannot physically draw the loyal connection required and stay when it’s tough? Oh, they can lust, but that’s all they can do, that novelty will wear off. And they’ll lust after others too. Does that sound like a good marriage prospect? They’re that playa with a side ho who lies and calls her GF so she can’t cheat too, but apparently cheating is fine? That’s the trashy mindset. R-types are rejected from the social consideration of marriage due to their deserved reputation. Bragging about it only draws in like, leave them to it.
n.b. Not that all housework is automatically Woman’s Work. That is a feminist myth. Men used to do appropriate work we now call DIY. Yeah, still housework. Working on the car? At the house. Fixing the appliances? At the house. Opening the jar? In the kitchen. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, spouses used to divide labour equally, the main difference being the forced required for those tasks. Yes, women tended to cook, but men still made tea as well as carrying things. It wasn’t a case of women being suited to Woman’s Work, but men being suited to the stuff requiring physical strength, Man’s Work.
In the UK at least, as I covered in the universal suffrage post, women swing elections and swing them conservative. If we’re being as obtuse as to pit one half of the family unit against the other (a house divided…), the woman is more right wing. The average working class husband tended to vote Labour/Left because they promised higher wages, every time, higher wages. Sadly, this gambit worked. When you think Social Conservative, a man doesn’t spring to mind, does it?
American women don’t seem to trust Hillary (especially her support of Bill). They voted in the Affirmative Action candidate last time and look what happened. Trump should have Palin as VP, it’d be great.
I wanted to help a special someone out by handing them information they’re too proud to ask for.
It makes you perceive neutral stimuli as negative.
Explains a lot.
Speaking of physical causes of psychiatric matters, I bring you from the cutting edge…
There is also evidence to suggest that cholecystokinin may have a role in anxiety and panic disorders. This is an effect of cholecystokinin released in the brain, not an effect of secretion from other parts of the body.
The brain is a strange organ.
I proffer a starring role in treatment-resistant PTSD. Think about it, when the brain is cured, the gut link is still damaged, re-affecting the brain by proxy. I have a …. gut feeling…. (sorry).