Basically, Roosh is trying to cuck the Right

He recently denounced his PUA status actually, because he senses the winds of K-shift blowing (see all the immigration articles?), he’s trying to distance himself from his own degeneracy. It’s like the Little Red Hen, or the Ant and the Grasshopper, don’t let him swoop in near the finish line and take your hard-earned belongings. His largely brown followers (most PUA is non-white) will come right in after him and trash the place like Cologne on New Year’s. Too soon? Well that’s what happens when you let them in, they can’t run their own countries or even be men and defend them, why do you think they’re worthy enough to walk amongst you? Why do you let them walk right in and call it home? After the EU mess, really?

He’s trying to sweep his PUA stuff under the rug to pass for respectable. He may be non-PC, but that doesn’t make him correct, nor Right wing, and never respectable. The way he conducts himself demonstrates this much. He’s a far-left liberal (who refuses to give his ‘notch count’ btw, white women as tokens) based on his sexual history (which you cannot hide or lie about) who sees an opportunity to make a quick buck and he’ll say whatever he thinks you wanna hear to do it.

Roosh is trying to cuck the Right wing and traditional ideas.

“Presumably, he’s embraced far-right ideas because it’s hip right now to do so. [DS: YES] He obviously isn’t a White nationalist, because he isn’t White. He also promotes weird serial-sex behavior which doesn’t really fit with a traditional society, at all.” [it poisons it]
“Regarding all these arguments about “should we support Roosh????”
“no, you obviously shouldn’t support a Moslem guy who promotes pointless serial-sex (even if he is apparently promoting that less than he used to) and whichever other weirdness. If he’s putting out good material, fine. Just say “some of this material is good, but I don’t support the man overall.”

You’re only as strong as your weakest link. If you drop the bar for him to step over (that’s how low it’ll need to be), you’re done. Once you say a brown Muslim opportunist liar can boss native White Europeans around and tell them what’s masculine and how to run the West, it’s over. You’ve been cucked. Install the Caliphate he clearly wants already, praising Islam when he happily lives in all the places it’s NOT. Remember taqiyya. He’s signalling to you guys, it’s false. If he really believed that stuff, he’d have been practicing it his entire life. You should expel him from Europe at least and limit the damage his ilk are doing, it’s antisocial predation at best and rape/coercive sex jihad at worst. He’s doing the same things as the rapefugees, advocating the same things (using white women as free whores), we need to send a strong defensive message: Europe is not your brothel. 

He’s like that obnoxious fence-sitter who tries to say they’re socially liberal but economically conservative. No, you can’t play both sides in politics, you have to choose. He profits for a living from the worst dregs of society, he repeatedly states how he’s proud of it and he should be ashamed of it (if he truly leaned rightward). Instead, he’s trying to expand and profit from the Right too. He’s a con artist. Wake up, people.

He wants to play both sides, don’t let him.

n.b. Men aren’t animals, they can no more excuse their behaviour with ‘muh evolution’ (which he doesn’t believe in) than women theirs. In fact, for most of history, women were thought to be the more libidinous sex and the Bible supports this so if you maintain that pseudologic, sluts are A-OK and should be encouraged because naturalistic fallacy.

Don’t be taken in by this worm, you don’t need his followers, they know where we are and they don’t read us.
He doesn’t even have that much support anyway, most people hate-read him. If those meetings had gone ahead, a few dozen might’ve showed up, maybe a few hundred. And they’re all low-status plebs to turn to his twisted Self Help in the first place (lie about your STDs, refuse to wear a condom, get her blackout drunk and force her=called LMR in PUA lingo). They’re just as vindictive toward Patriarchs (they see as spoiling their entitled fun blocking access to ‘their’ women and making up law to protect women from harm) as they are to women (even and especially the ones who don’t sleep around, who they still defame by calling them sluts and whores).

If you’re a traditional person considering sympathy for such a beast, look no further than the things he has actually written, completely seriously. Refuses to retract. Note the things he doesn’t do, like removing his PUA books from sale if he’s really over it when he’s doing the equivalent of throwing his hands up saying I’m not a PUA! I just practice it, teach it and have literally written the books on it! I’m not a rapist! I just wrote an article with that literal title and teach men not to take No for an answer!

Goddamn it people, look, I did the research for you. 


We haven’t even begun on the cosmetic surgery to pass for more White. That’s one hell of a honker.

If you thought I was exaggerating about the anti-white racism and active profiling, here’s a taster.

rooshv anti-white

How dare he badmouth another race like that, especially one he is so eager to exploit. How is that NOT racist? Note, to escape these terrible white devils, he went… to Europe.

Read the degenerate post where I mostly quote him. It’s so, so much worse. I wanted to throw up.

Simple test: will he do something non-profit? No money, no attention? Never in a million years. It’s all about him, he’s using you.

He seems to be the type to keep a spreadsheet of targets and their attributes. We know he deliberately targets women based on their race, he seeks out White women specifically and that’s why he keeps living among us in Europe. Worse, he’s teaching others to do the same.
A far better metric of his ‘success’ with women would be to ask for Total Notch Count and Total Amount Expended Obtaining It.
Is the average cheaper than a hooker?
I mean, this is how calculating he is about it. Like a predator.
For another interesting article see:

It’s been said elsewhere in far more eloquent prose that feminism is an ugly girl’s excuse. Roosh and his PUA fuckboys are selling the same delusion to ugly or loser males. A man needs a woman like a fish needs a bicycle.

The more you dig on him, the worse it gets. Moving into the realm of speculation here but I wouldn’t be shocked.
This post apparently outs Roosh V as a sex tourist and there are other posts discussing the various evidence. There are several other allegations he has never publicly denounced, in fact I’ve never heard of them before e.g. “He is also on several public security lists in USA. There are suspicions he might be engaging in more serious stuff like pedophile.” I find it strange he has never addressed these, you’d think he’d bring that up?
It’s easy to have a dig at SF’s expense (many people do) but it’s just a site, less edgy than the chans, and considering how much the SJWs hate them, how much worse must this aged likely-diseased slut be?

They get this right, the reason everyone wants a European: “Europeans are cute because men selected cute women and women selected handsome men.” The Ice Age was very good for us.

9 responses to “Basically, Roosh is trying to cuck the Right

  1. This dick has a mighty high opinion of himself. But isn’t he quite ugly to be making such claims?

    Maybe I’m not the best source for beauty appraisal, but he seems too ugly for the southern belles I know to have anything to do with. Condom or not.

    • Hence I find it very intriguing he refuses to give his count. If you look at Aurini’s comment below (they’re friends) you can see the “I’m not the cuck, You’re the cuck!” mindset in action. What are the cuckoos of the alt right supposed to be cuck-ing? He didn’t say. But Roosh fits the bill of trying to squeeze into a place he doesn’t belong all too well, hence this post. I have no trouble with him staying in the manosphere however, since he seems to belong there.

  2. Cucking isn’t something that’s done to you; it’s something that you do to yourself. If Roosh is cucking the alt right, it’s only because the alt right is full of cucks. Their obsession over another man’s dick suggests that that might just be the case.

    Something something latent homoeroticism.

    • No. You’re describing a fetish, not actual cuckoldry.
      Just look at non-human examples of cuckoldry to see it’s something done *to* you. Birds, for instance, the reason for its name.
      “the alt right is full of cucks” well that’s a mighty bold claim even if hypothetical and it’s that outgrouping I was trying to point out, how exactly would that work? and if so, why does he want to join them so badly?
      No the “you don’t like something you must secretly like it” rationale for homophobia isn’t real. There are plenty of valid reasons for vocally disliking someone’s sexual habits, especially when those are antisocial (socially destructive) and in some cases, possibly illegal. If a slut writes a blog going into great detail about how much of a slut they are, they are giving permission for people to judge them. It’s called a private life for a reason and he eschewed that option as a choice. Male slut, female slut, same principle.

      • I’m not describing a fetish, I’m describing cuckolds I’ve actually known. Their wife’s infidelity was a result of their own decisions, their neediness, their controlling behaviour; it was because of their own patheity, and the false narcissistic shell they originally used to seduce (in the most literal sense – se+ducere, to lead astray) their wives, that their wives ultimately left them.

        They were boys playing at a game for men. I see precisely the same sort of narcissistic jealousy emanating out of those who denounce Roosh.

        Roosh circa 2012 (let’s pretend he hasn’t grown or changed over the years) was engaged in venal sins; never anything foul such as pride or envy. Anybody approaching from a morally superior position would feel pity for him – his obsession over notches would prevent him from experiencing true intimacy.

        That’s not what I’ve seen.

        I’ve seen 20 year old virgin anons jealousy denouncing Roosh for ‘ruining their women’ (excuse me? Women have free choice, you retards – you don’t just put a wedding right on one, and then ignore her for the next forty years). I’ve seen irrelevant 1488s attack him out of a desperate thirst for attention (fact: anybody cosplaying in a nazi uniform is cucking themselves as surely as a furry). These weenies have made cucks out of themselves; though you profess to agree with them, if you met them in person you’d be filled with sexual loathing.

        The are failed men, and while I’m opposed to infidelity as a Catholic, there would certainly be a genetic argument for you cuckolding them. Failed genes should be left to fail.

        Never attack the right. This guy gets it; you should read his piece:

      • The cuckold is oblivious, hence its pull as an insult and the paranoia of husbands (and rarely, wives) down through history.
        What you describe is a version of a fetish for roleplay, which happens to draw on that scenario, but any other on the same themes would also suffice for the paraphiliac. It is no more true cuckoldry than a woman in a maid uniform is actually there to clean your house. Don’t try to tell me one of my topics, I don’t tell you about yours. You’re guessing based on pop psychology books, and poorly. Cut it out. It works on other people less well read but not on me, and likely not my readers either.
        Oh, the classic refrain “They hate me, they must be jealous!” No. That’s literally never true. It’s a non-seq.
        There does need to be advice for husbands – from successful husbands, men in old age (60+). Not the cads who’d steal their wives from under them.
        What’s this about Nazi uniforms? The Asians love those things, it’s the anime. In the case of clothing, it’s mostly the aesthetics of a cultural motif, in this case the clean German lines and professional minimalism.
        It isn’t personal, stop trying to tell me my reaction that’s called gaslighting and I don’t loathe those of inferior status. There is more than one cultural enemy (it isn’t a case of side with Roosh or the MSM, that’s a loaded q, both can be in error at once) and while he certainly has a fine place set up in the manosphere and should stay there, his sense of entitlement to the right wing in any shape is a deformed expectation given his actions. That he continues privately and continues to publicly profit from.
        You aren’t opposed to infidelity in your private life, though. Which makes your opinion on the subject quite futile. Actions always weigh heavier than any verbal signalling.
        ROK is as right-wing as Jezebel. They both post how to fuck around until the end of time with anything that stays still long enough and allay guilts over doing so.
        Failed genes do fail. There are plenty of culling events that filter for types of trait purity. Like the coming economic troubles.

  3. “He’s like that obnoxious fence-sitter who tries to say they’re socially liberal but economically conservative. No, you can’t play both sides in politics, you have to choose.”

    Those types of fence sitters are more than obnoxious, they are cowards, rather like the types of people who say “I’m personally pro-life, but I wouldn’t impose my morals on other people.” As you Brits are fond of saying, “Bollocks.” Our (meaning Western) entire legal system is based on the “imposition” of someone’s morals. And increasingly, it is based on the complete lack of morals, or a shared moral compass. But getting back to “social liberal/economic conservative” stupidity. When social liberals support laws/policies that destabilize marriage, it creates economic problems. Children often become less productive in school, flunk out and become less productive economically. And that’s if society is lucky.

    Encourage young people to have “no strings attached” sex that causes economic problems. There is no such thing as strings attached sex. The strings attached are the consequences. STDs don’t get treated by themselves, somebody has to pay for them. And those somebodies are the taxpayers. The children growing up without fathers become sluts, criminals and other assorted miscreants. Those jails don’t build themselves, and criminals’ daily accommodations and upkeep aren’t free. This doesn’t even begin to quantify the further loss of economic output and the ruined lives that contribute to despair, which leads to a lack of motivation to thrive in a nihilistic civilization.

    Social liberals support another horrible outgrowth of their sexual revolution too, and their holy grail is abortion. They wring their hands over street violence, but don’t do any soul searching as to how this happens. There is a correlation between violence in the womb and violence in the streets. I read somewhere that the millenials are more pro-life than previous generations. I think they suspect this very thing.

    How many scientists out of the tens of millions who were “unwanted” (to use the heartless leftist word) who could have cured cancer have been aborted? How many who could have helped lead the way out of the darkness have been aborted? How many who would have grown to have more compassion for people than those who let them perish have been aborted? We shall never know. I once read a little booklet about a very devout and pious Italian nun who was believed by the Catholic Church to have had a conversation with God where He literally appeared to her to speak about the problems facing the world and He told her, “I sent people to help you, but you killed them, and now you’ll have to wait.”

    I think I remember you stating in a previous article that you’re an agnostic, and that’s OK by me, but the principle remains the same. When leftists encourage, support, and pass laws that encourage sterility (and abortion contributes to that), we don’t reproduce ourselves. That has a devastating impact on our economics. We don’t reproduce ourselves, we don’t survive. Who’s going to pay for current generations? We kill our babies, not only won’t survive, but don’t deserve to. That great economist Adam Smith said that capitalism could only survive under the stewardship of virtuous people. In societies with rampant dishonesty, this simply contributes to increased transaction costs. Our current economic malaise reflects this as we aren’t living under capitalism, but corporatism (to me a 50 dollar word for fascism). The personal is not the political, but the social is the economic.

    “Men aren’t animals, they can no more excuse their behaviour with ‘muh evolution’ (which he doesn’t believe in) than women theirs.”

    There were a lot of reasons for the Biblical command of “Thou shalt not commit adultery” as well as the off shoot ban on fornication, and this one of them. If we are created in the image and likeness of God (I believe we are), we are not animals. We are commanded to rise above the baser, animal part of our nature. Joseph Conrad was right that mankind was capable of every form of wickedness, but as the hundreds of canonized saints demonstrated (more important than speaking of these matters), we are also capable of boundless compassion and humane decency. I wonder if the “men” in the manuresphere ponder these things. WE ARE NOT ANIMALS.

    Can they answer why throughout history demons in Hell were and are portrayed as grotesque, hideous animal like creatures, but angels and saints are the sight of beauty? It’s because they made the choices that made them what they are. As a believing Catholic, I’m convinced that that is why Satan hates us so, it’s because it knows what we will be like in Heaven. And since Satan is the symbol of hate and envy, Satan wants to reduce humans to its level. Animals don’t have a sense of right and wrong, they have only an instinct for survival. If humans lived by the laws of the jungle, we would have died off long ago, just like the dinosaurs.

    There were other reasons for the above mentioned bans, and another one is that it can kill you, physically, spiritually, and emotionally. King Herod died with gangrene in his dick from his endless trysts. And that was thousands of years ago. Nothing has changed since those days. Millions have died because of AIDS (there are mutant strains resistant to anti viral drugs), gonorrhea is developing strains of antibiotic resistance.

    This should surprise nobody with even the IQ of a peanut.

    People far wiser, better and historically noteworthy than Roosh understood the devastating effects of hedonism and seduction from St Augustine to Casanova.

    “Save me O Lord, but not yet.” – St Augustine. At that time, he didn’t realize that the cried for help would not come at a moment and time of his choosing. Casanova died a bitter and lonely old man. He was lucky to have lived in his era.

    Now Neil Strauss, who kicked off The Game madness is learning the same things that others learned if he just picked up a book.

    Of course Roosh’s followers can’t help but take potshots at the competition.

    Interesting, isn’t it? LOL. My, my, my, the hypocrisy abounds.

    From the post after this one: In a traditional society he’d be in prison under seduction law.

    He often asked if he can do something, but never asked if he should. It’s not wrong to do something because it’s illegal, it’s illegal to do something because it’s wrong. It’s not the law that informs values, it’s values that inform the law. Enough said, and this comment is long enough, if not too long.

  4. Pingback: Some manospherians throw rattle from pram “the Alt Right is run by cucks now” | Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar

  5. Pingback: Roosh on the Alt Right in his own words | Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s