Here’s my pragmatic definition.
Hate speech against the better interests of Western Civilization and the survival of the White race of peoples native to the European continent.
Hell, I say we keep that law on the books and simply apply it to them. We know they can’t keep their mouths shut.
Their ultimate aim is the progressive eradication of Western cultures and prosperous existence of White people. When questioned on this, they will engage in Race Denialism.
They make out their opponents are mentally ill (like all tyrants suppressing dissent) when they actively celebrate their own, far higher numbers of mental disease and encourage others into the same vices that studies have shown lead to poor life outcomes (promiscuity, drug use, abnormal sexualities and identities). Studies have shown they cheat, lie and donate less to charity than their opponents, yet claim to be their moral superiors. They use their cultural hegemony to impose their immoral authority on a trajectory of societal decadence and individual degeneracy. Nothing is too low.
They are fearful of the Ingroup (genophobia) in response to the natural innate genophilia and fearful of Christians (Christophobia) in their status as classical moral arbiters and intellectual judges. There is a case for a phobia of white people and heterosexuals. These would be called something like Europaphobia and heterophobia, respectively.
They stole the Enlightenment’s idea of equality (in abstract principle, as before the law, and as humans, nothing more) and perverted it into a whole new, impossible meaning. They want us to fail.
Shame, fear and intimacy are their enemies. They are immature in their psychology and deny agency when it is convenient to play dumb for a concealed purpose.
They are creatures consumed with greed, lust, avarice/envy, and murderous hatred of their opponents, who are often the more attractive and intelligent competition.
Social justice is, in fact, anti-social revenge.