You may have heard a while back about the Italian woman knocked out, given a C-section and having had her child kidnapped.
Italians were rightly outraged. This is part of a process called a forced adoption.
It seems this is a much bigger problem than I’d thought. The people who allowed Rotherham among many other unreported cases to happen, and since MW is covering Rotherham abuses of power extensively, I decided to look into their operations. It is chilling and disturbing viewing.
Secret courts. That’s how this happens.
Watch the whole thing, listen to the teenage boy assert his human rights and be pinned down painfully by adult men, handcuffed despite committing no crime and screaming. Tell me there’s nothing wrong with the system.
The targets exist, brought in under Blair, yet I have seen them deny this elsewhere despite evidence. Who sets them and why doesn’t matter, fact is they get paid to traffic children and this acts as incentive for corruption.
Notice the way the social worker (they’re all SJWs and simply get pushed to another council when caught out) smiles when she says about the extreme of taking children for no good reason.
Here, in the first minute of secret filming, they admit to leaving children homeless out in the cold to sleep on a park bench.
A judge himself admits people could be forgiven for thinking the family courts (secret courts) are “neither compassionate nor humane”.
“Maggie Mellon who is the Deputy Chair of the British Association of Social Workers said:
“The policy imperative towards more and quicker forced adoption means we may well look back at this period in horror as we do now to the forcible removal of thousands of children to Australia in the 1930s, forties and fifties without their parents’ knowledge and consent. That was done because it was felt it was the right thing but now we think how on earth could we possibly have done that?””
Already covering themselves as the victims under We Didn’t Know! As they write the reports to make it happen.
They don’t like to be filmed because it makes perjury harder.
Technically, supposedly, they cannot commit perjury, as there is no jury in these secret courts and they aren’t lying in public to the judge.
“Information presented was at best mistaken and at worst complete fabrication.’
Sheriff McFarlane also said that an unnamed social worker may have committed perjury.”
Note: The entryism and punishment for critical thought for the honest people who try to take up the career. They are routinely denied promotion or fired for refusing to acquiescence to their superior’s demands, regardless of the child’s best interests. “Risk of harm” is as reliable as a horoscope, guesswork wide open to deception, there is a risk of harm to anyone walking in a public street, day or night. Must we adults be locked up for our own safety? The Court of Protection even confines the elderly, by calling them a danger to themselves (strangely, they get control of the elder’s finances, which I’m sure presents no motive).
No less evidence presented than to Parliament itself, those in charge are fully aware of this and do nothing.
“I have several judgements showing the building of fake evidence at a ridiculous level without even any care for making this fake evidence looking true. It is brutal to say this but social workers perjury, administration cover-up and mock trials are dominating family courts. No wonder why they don’t want the press to see this. In COA I have seen a judge who is now in the House of Lords justifying to a father the removal of his son that way : You show that you could probably be a good father but you will raise your son in the dislike of the professionals (social workers) involved in your life.”
How can the failure to act be explained?
Well, there are plenty of allegations of elite pedophile rings in the UK and this would make powerful people easy to blackmail and control.
It begs the question: Where do they get these children?