MRA/MGTOW/PUA bingo

They’re pretty much the same people, let’s be honest.
You’d have trouble distinguishing them based on rhetoric alone.

mrabingo mrabingo2

Corrections:
Feminists are a female supremacy cult.
MGTOW specifically is a male supremacy cult.
Nobody sane argues that rape isn’t evil. However, consent is a tricky legal concept (you need proof positive, the assumption being it isn’t granted).
Muh freedom! West is Best!/Let’s ban women from XYZ.

Also, points deserving of squares;
The Venn diagram of Muh evolution and Muh dick

Evolution says pedophilia (sex with a minor) isn’t wrong.
Evolution says teenagers find balding fat middle-aged leches hot.
Evolution says there are no smart women hahaha.
Evolution says cheating is good when men do it. Our white male impulse control above the other races magically disappears.
Evolution says rape is a fair strategy because women shouldn’t be allowed to reject me us.

No. It doesn’t.

Actually, the opposite of all these things, and I’ve posted proof before.
Short versions:
Minors have birth defects and miscarriages and die in childbirth because they aren’t biologically ready. Periods do not equal ready anymore than an 11-year old boy producing sperm is capable of supporting a family.
Assortative mating/matching hypothesis uber alles. Unless you marry a gold digger and happen to be rich, but in that case, you won’t be married for long and they’re still cashing in on erotic capital. Marriage is based on reciprocation, nobody wins the lottery.
Psychometrics says there are more male retards by far so if we’re playing the odds in the average comment section… prejudice, spite and ad hominem don’t bode well….
Parental investment theory proves monogamy is mathematically superior due to mammal gestation times, mate security/guarding, tribal parenting/protection and infant helplessness.
The men rejected are often weaker than the average woman, they should be rejected, and rape makes women infertile by injury and/or miscarry, sometimes by STD. The stress can also cause amenhorrhea, nobody enjoys rape in the same way that people enjoy swimming but nobody enjoys drowning. It is possible to conceive but unlikely, especially in gang rape, because the shape of the penis drags out competing semen. #evolution
Not to mention abortions and probable murder of the ‘father’. I shouldn’t need to explain why rape is wrong but this is the world we live in.

Truth hurts. Their ignorance of history is the funniest part.
Bandage your triggered amygdala and look up the data before spouting off.

A grain of self-awareness.

Or you’ll be that guy.

“Why won’t these degenerate whores marry me? I’m such a catch!”

Advertisements

10 responses to “MRA/MGTOW/PUA bingo

  1. >Truth hurts. Their ignorance of history is the funniest part.
    >Bandage your triggered amygdala and look up the data before spouting off.

    You claim that “they” are ignorant of history. Do “they” have names? Is Roger Devlin ignorant of history?

    You tell people to “look up the data.”

    What journals have published the “data”? Can you cite these journals?

    Bonus question – if you are a “scholar,” as the name of this blog suggests – in what academic fields do you hold degrees?

    • A grain of self-awareness….
      This is how you sound:
      You say a thing that hurts my feelings, that was mocking the way everything hurts my feelings, can you give me a rope to hang you by rhetorically? I know you implored people to do their own research, but I refuse because I’m an entitled little bitch and equate refuting one paper to refuting a concept. I know you’re right and being a member of atheistkult to give me a sense of purpose, cannot put forward any opposing argument, so let’s finish up with ad hominem. Man, I’m such a smart manly man, I really showed you, Imma go and tell people on reddit.- Le Secret King, Autiste Extraordinaire.
      Go ahead and kill yourself then, genetic suicide. It’ll be no loss to the world if you think that SJW-based rhetoric is gonna fly here.

      • So, you’re not going to commit to a position on whether or not F. Roger Devlin is ignorant of history.

        And apparently you’re not willing to answer a question about your field of scholarship.

        As for doing my own research, I’m not a biologist, but I’ve done enough research to take some positions on biology. If you’re willing to cite some textbooks or peer-reviewed journals on biology, that might be a starting point.

        If you’re not willing to debate like a scholar, I’m going to assume that I can’t interact with you as I would interact with other scholars.

      • It must be so unfair that I’m not falling for your obvious trap. No, I’m not gonna specifically slander anyone, least of all a target of your choice so you can go tell on me, go cry about it on reddit or something.

      • >No, I’m not gonna specifically slander anyone,

        I suppose that you are already aware that F. Roger Devlin doesn’t mind having his academic essays criticized by scholars. You don’t have to attack Devlin as a person; you can just argue against his abstract, scholarly ideas.

        I presume that, because you are a scholar, you are already in the habit of writing (and perhaps publishing) technical arguments, full of abstractions and footnotes.

        I presume that although you’re a “disenchanted scholar,” you are disenchanted with something other than scholarship itself. I presume that you have degree of regard for ideals such as the scientific method and peer review.

      • Are you gonna pay me for any of that work? You know, scientific research? No? Then why should I do free work for you, normalfag? What makes you special?
        Muh peer review, still proving the reddit rhetoric post correct….

      • >Are you gonna pay me for any of that work?

        You are refusing to answer questions such as “Do you have an academic degree.”

        Consultants who get paid customarily provide a lot of information up front before they ask for payment.

      • “You are refusing to answer questions” Who the fuck do you think you are, you little cunt? Vee haff vays of making yew talk? You’re a nobody on the internet, we don’t owe you a reply, you aren’t owed engagement. Go bitch on your own blog if you have so many feels.

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s