Rape threatening online abuser gets sent down

The woman took it too far with the posturing afterward but tbh, that stuff’s wrong.

“Please you cunts deserve to be taken back to the 50s were [sic] you wil learn to know your role and shut your damn mouth.

“Do me a favour go home and slap your mother obviously your father never did it enough.

“I’d rape you if you were better looking but I wouldn’t fuck you.”

The internet isn’t an excuse for verbal abuse, this is just a misogynist twist. Even if it was based on something chosen like occupation, it’s singling a person out and being purely vile with the defamatory ad hominem that makes harassment. The sexual element is worst and I think the judge didn’t go far enough, the obvious porn addict was clearly flirting with some type of incitement. If I threatened an American politician with assassination (murder being up there with rape) online they’d take it seriously, this is not a game. There is no exception because online does count.

People keep expecting me to go after SJWs but this manchild needed to learn the lives of these people already suck, don’t empower them by letting them drag you down. Generally, they don’t deserve correction. The unoriginal bland humour doesn’t impress anyone.

She isn’t a public figure, there was no need to humiliate her and he doubled down well before she did.

Have they gone through his browser history cos I’d bet a million Australian dollars he reads Return of Kings. Those are exactly the jokes they make.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jul/30/how-facebook-troll-came-undone

As in, not funny.

The same five lines about the kitchen, humiliation during sex, being worthless etc etc.

If you couldn’t shout those things following a person down the street without looking like the bad guy, don’t say them online.

If you have the facts, report those. He’s in this mess because he deserves to be, he gave his opinion and whined like a bitch when people listened to it.

He’s given the feminists exactly what they wanted, a fresh cadaver to jump over.

Brierley Newton told Guardian Australia the officer who called to tell her said Alchin was apologetic and had no prior convictions in what she took to be an attempt to convince her to abandon the charge.

Even if she were as right wing as Thatcher she should’ve gone through with it. She was in the right. He made her a target, he started it, he escalated it and goaded her into taking action. Sexual history reputation is the most vitriolic thing you can attack a woman with. That’s why they have it on the books, because abusive men will choose the nerve that hurts most, even if the woman herself has done nothing wrong, the mere rumour can affect her future prospects socially.

Fuck, you know these people are the scum of the earth when I side with the SJW.

Any type of monstering is wrong. White man holding a legal gun, white slut posting a Drake quote. We have to defend these freedoms for the people we don’t like. We have a rare case of a man monstering an SJW female.

After his arrest, Alchin admitted he had written the comments but told police he was drunk at the time and that they did not reflect “what he is about”.

Oh the Roosh V excuse.
“If I had a single drink, I can’t be held responsible for my dick because I have hypoagency all of a sudden, but the woman totally lacks the ability to give a valid No because the rules of consent are magically flipped for drunk bitches and if she’s drunk, she has more agency and No really means Yes.”

“He was internet trolling and was unaware it was a crime,” the police facts sheet stated.

That isn’t what trolling is, ignorance is no excuse. Trolling is subtle and based in truth. Volleying insults is not trolling. It’s verbal abuse.

Police put to him a specific comment he’d made, including that feminists “don’t get any action, so when you rape them it feels 100 times tighter”. Alchin said he had found it on an “anti-feminist website, to offend a group of feminists that were harassing me and my friends”.

AVFM was unavailable for comment.
These are not anti-feminists, they’re just misogynists. They never, ever go after the male feminists with power.

They hurt my friends, says the guy who sought out and targeted a complete stranger to mock to his friends.

Cowards.

You’re still responsible for your actions when drunk or DUIs wouldn’t exist. However, that caveat exists for operating equipment like cars or computers, not anything you do with your body, to which you cannot fully consent because you are not fully conscious. However, this applies to passive interactions, actions transgressing against the body of another are deliberate so counted. Otherwise every rapist would claim to be drunk – which they already do.

The Daily Stormer, “the world’s most visited alt-right web site”, proposed a different course of redress for the “hero and TOTAL BRO” Alchin. There is no suggestion that Alchin supports the broader views of the Daily Stormer or its campaign on his behalf.

A post in late June singled out Alchin’s “100 times tighter” rejoinder as “the perfectly natural response to being brutally oppressed by unhinged women your entire life”.

I really hope they’re joking.
If they think any type of harassment is a justified/natural response to a random woman, they need to remove themselves from the internet and check into therapy.

In October 2015, the 25-year-old was charged after he posted 55 derogatory comments in two hours, many directed at Sydney woman Paloma Brierley-Newtown. source

Natural response?

Entitled narcissist response.

Remember this has nothing to do with porn.

Speaking of, considering men commit most violent crimes by far and convicts can’t vote, if we’re taking Suffrage away from ANY sex, it’d be men. Men got universal rights around the same time as women and that can be revoked too.

I love how this type calls women a ‘fucking disgrace’ when he’s clearly a waste of air. If he’s a slut, he’s part of the same social problem he decries. At least those feminists were generally leaving him alone. Don’t pick a fight you can’t finish bitch. Women own the verbal smackdown.

“So glad the judge thinks I ‘over reacted’ so glad that when women stand up for themselves they’re either hysterical or causing far more damage to the poor ‘mens’,” she wrote on Facebook.

True, every time the monster mob goes after a man, these keyboard alpha bitches complain.
He picked a fight, he escalated, he dared her to take it to court. He caused the damage to himself by being a walking, shitposting piece of white trash.

You can’t build a Patriarchy with ‘men’ like that. Nobody will respect them, let alone follow them. When they talk about Patriarchy they mean a Sexual Revolution power fantasy.

As a comment points out;

Funny how alcohol makes men less responsible for their actions but it makes women MORE responsible for whatever happens to them. The judge is pretty much saying if you are female online you should expect shitty treatment, because you are female online.

this

another

That’s 55 messages in two hours. I’ve never known a player on the pitch to throw a sustained two-hour rant like that before.

Yes, that’s a psychiatric condition, probably psychopathy.

He’ll end up in prison, probably for assault. I guarantee it. A suit can’t cover trailer-park. Then he’ll be passed around like a pretty ashtray and know that rape is actually 100x tighter when it’s anal on a man by another man called Big Dave.

Hey, it’s a rape ‘joke’, right?

One response to “Rape threatening online abuser gets sent down

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s