Mind cancer typical of Cultural Marxism. Remember, once an idea is in your mind, you can never pluck it out.
Her ancestors had the great societal culture of rice farming and famine, they continue to rip off Western technologies, unable to come up with much themselves. Meritocracy a myth, unless it’s your SAT score. It’s interesting that she describes her own toxic conformity to academic culture. I’m familiar with this.
Liberals hate property rights (r-types are consumers, not producers) and originality (jealousy). Picasso could actually paint, he conned the art market with crap and got a laugh out of it. It started off as one big joke involving a urinal. They were literally taking the piss.
Liberals distort epistemology, mis-perceive or falsely convey the labels of symbology as the symbols they distinguish and deny empiricism or objective fact-testing in definitions. e.g. Geometry is a settled science, not up for debate or opinion. Feelings like Asch’s lines do not change factual definitions. This is peer pressure and brainwashing under the guise of open-mindedness and ego-boosting (her sickly sweet tone of voice, like speaking to a child). Their brains have fallen out. If they hate labels so much, they should quit coming up with trendy new terms for sexuality, because orientation theory is a gigantic Victorian labelling system. If they hate labels so much, they should quit with the ad hominem: like Hitler, literally Hitler, bigoted, sexist, racist, phobic etc. Or maybe the purpose of language is communication and that requires labels, rather than crazed gesticulation? She likes consensus and conformity, but not the consensus of what a shape is, or the conformity of shapes to objective rules? ~cuckoo noise sounds~
Liars. Not even liberal. I love the part where she says she doesn’t want to dominate the conversation, even though it’s her opinion or you’re wrong, but all opinion counts and also, there is no such thing as truth, in full postmodern trash, so nobody can technically have an opinion regardless.
Cognitive dissonance doesn’t apply to idiots. They don’t flag these as errors.
PC lies by filling the air with nonsense words and hoping you’ll be distracted long enough they can get power over you.
“top-down?” you mean teaching? and that isn’t what top-down means, it’s a processing term based on neuroscience and computer metaphors
Teachers not important in colleges? Really? Authority figures bad? Why are you paid so much?
“Who gets to judge?”
…Experts. People with the facts. Bloody Hell.
Top kek comment: “Wouldn’t this reduce art to propaganda, like Socialist Realism was?”
In one, son.
Also “Bombastic nonsense. Epistemology has nothing to do with politics; sjws are trying to look cleverer than their content normally allows by appropriating philosophical terminology.”
Stealing. The term is stealing.
Philosophy and science are apolitical because they align with the brutal, unvarnished, inconvenient truth, not the specific groups of people with vested interests.
Critical theory is a nag. A whiner. All it does is complain, it cannot create anything new. It attacks everything but in failing to have positive assertions, it is impossible to falsify itself. It is purely destructive and intends to divide people and sweep up power in the chaos. These people can’t come up with new words at least, they must pinch those from other topics and abuse them.