Close to 90 percent of anal cancer cases can be traced back to HPV. But the cancer itself is relatively rare.
Not the point. You shouldn’t have STDs in your arse.
That’s the point.
If only we had a book of some kind, teaching people these basic facts of life.
What to do, sure, but more importantly and practically, what not to do…
Yeah, that’ll do.
Honestly, the worst lie atheists peddle is that the rules of reality are arbitrary.
Things are called bad for a reason – because they ARE bad for you. Personally.
Morality is based on the individual and their dumb-arse choices.
It’s gay sex. Doesn’t matter if you’re doing it with a woman, if you’re not doing it with the woman parts of the woman. Gay sex habits, gay sexual statistics. Because we know that bell curve ends well.
“And though cases have been slowly increasing in recent decades, only one of every 500 people will develop anal cancer in their lifetime, generally between the ages of 55 to 64 — a stark contrast to the one in every 22 people who will develop colorectal cancer.”
- Not correcting for sexual ‘lifestyle’. Not an argument.
- As if microbes cannot migrate. Through the same system. With zero boundaries. The area of the tract is vastly larger than the opening. Accounting for physical size.
“Similarly, the greater number of sexual partners, the greater the risk of cancer.”
I keep seeing the manosphere complain about prostate cancer but deny… this bit.
How did it get there? Magic?
You can only shut out reality for so long. Before it comes knocking on your backdoor.
You notice how so few of these sex-positive people are willing to talk about medical facts, from HBD to STD immunity?
Prostate cancer is under-funded, therefore women are wrong.
Prostate cancer is bad, therefore breast cancer is funny.
Prostate because man. Manly man macho man. Listen to Mr Man. Anal fun.
Note: This pathogenic cancer aetiology is a great score for Gay Germ theory. I wonder if the ‘men’ indulging in the medically, morally wrong type of sex to imitate porn stars (great sexual role models) will show greater effeminacy (and other atypical gender psychological outcomes). So the pussies complaining about cancer in men as sexist are happily spreading germs they know probably cause cancer in women. No sympathy necessary.
“two-thirds of new cases are diagnosed in women.”
Did I mention the best part?
Men can catch and keep STDs in their urethra from not wearing a condom, it makes you less of a man regardless of where you stick it. It doesn’t just protect the woman/receptive party. Even the testes are not immune, as Ebola shows.
I mean, anal sex with a woman can still result in pregnancy so I don’t know what argument they’ve got at this point.
Almost like it’s evil (as eating bad pork used to be fatal, prior to antibiotics and electric ovens). All the stuff about the sin of men lying as with other men refers to this practice, it isn’t exclusive to gays but it’s the only internal type they can do, they don’t have as much choice. When God got mad at sodomites, they might’ve been doing it to women, also raising questions about spilling seed with the expected pre-marital stuff to boot. I mention that because the guys who get high and mighty about doing it with women, are actually worse according to the Bible than the homosexuals they look down on.
Wherever anal sex is discussed, it should be dismissed, based on literally ALL the evidence.
Never taught to kids as the ‘same’ and OK to emulate based on porn.