really mansplaining refers to debate practices done incorrectly or in bad faith
it’s all about the pretentious people appealing to their own authority
in lieu of proof/s
they lack honour but go on to disrespect their opponent while refusing to let them leave
trans. intellectually dishonest bullies
aka It can’t be antisocial if I use big words! Stop crying! Stop hitting yourself!
they assume an authority above the other speaker without anything to back it up
it’s just extremely more typical for the male to bitch with rationalizations to feel intellectual
it’s a logical fallacy to wield the terms and ideas of logic incorrectly
their own emotional high rests on their opponents’ ignorance of correct form
like kicking sand in their eyes in a fight
they need to cheat because they’re scum
no parties involved can commonly articulate this because neither of them fully know the rules
in short, in response to one stupid person/group, you get the REAL triggered group
they pretend to be offended by lies, but it’s really personal -like, REALLY personal
the opposite of gentlemanly (correct form) making them instant losers
going “achtually” when nobody invited them, they don’t know what they’re talking about (man card is not a valid qualification on STEM topics) and sperging out
in a woman it’s called being a gossip, being a bitch, whining, being nosy or nagging
they try to pass all those off as proof of masculinity and veracity (fooling no one, causing temper tantrum)
it’s entirely fully 100% bitchy men pretending to be smart
starting on the idiots they perceive as slightly lower in the chain
throwing a tantrum when you point it out
not men, but boys, too easily triggered to be masculine
when arrogant men and women bump noggins, but project their faults as an innately sexual thing
buy hey, I just believe in Burden of Proof
Most things are not obvious. Otherwise, a debate would be redundant.
My personal favourites are;
you’re too dumb to explain it to (or, Occam’s razor, you can’t do it cos you’re poorly informed and therefore wrong) but also I don’t even understand you and that’s your fault (incredulity)
If I repeat myself maybe it’ll make it sound like I have a valid point.
If you call me out on any of my bullshit, somehow ad hominem.
Autistic shrieking as they gesture at both wikipedia and the common dictionary of non-technical terms.
If you make my beliefs look stupid, I will get so defensive I can only call it a strawman but cannot explain why.