Sexual Revolution + Entitlement = r-types
There’s no excuse.
That’s literally, legally and morally the point. There is no mercy, no pardon, no excusing it. It’s an animal thing to do and reduce humans to, disgusts all upright citizens. If one person’s right to their body ceases to exist, it affects all of us. It is always 100% of the time, a crime. ‘Muh dick’ appeals to sexual emergency belong in the desert with the camels. Men, who are the majority of rapists by prevalance data, always have an outlet – two hands. Therefore, no such thing as blue balls as excuse for assault. Like Winona Ryder stealing, it’s spoiled for choice already.
If you try to come up with exceptions, you’re one of them.
Don’t defend criminals. If someone is richer than you, you can’t rob them. If someone is smarter than you, you can’t kill them. If someone turns you on, their body still belongs to them. Prison rape is sometimes deeply ironic.
The language of these discussions is dodgy too. The meaning of sex in society is ‘having sex’, it implies consent between parties (therefore, masturbation isn’t sex). Unless there is consent, it is automatically rape, so calling it sex rather than something literal like penetration, congress or coitus, is plain false. Consent is never assumed. Rape until proven consensual. Like any dead person turning up is presumed murdered. At first. The courts do not operate like that but common law and society do.
If the person you’re sleeping with would lie, you shouldn’t have consented to sleep with them. That’s your filtering problem, society shouldn’t have to change itself and suffer for your singular stupidity. Nobody forces you to be a slut #irony
It’s like promiscuous people complaining about STDs. You chose that life, you chose to take on the risks involved. Drunk people expect hangovers. If a bad consequence happens, question who is responsible for the bad cause. Don’t give crazy people power over you, it’s common sense. Society shouldn’t have sympathy for the dumb, but scorn. And no, wearing a mini-skirt doesn’t count as dumb in the First World, anymore than tight shirts on men. People get raped in petticoats and niqabs. Rapists want to rape, thieves want to steal, murderers want to murder- because they’re evil people. A tape measure to your hemline, a lock on your door and a baseball bat won’t stop such people from existing or targeting anyone (anyone). Nobody is exempt from crime, including punishment.
In the good old days of a Patriarchy, we’d hang rapists.
Not be autistically pedantic about ‘what counts’.
Whataboutism? Sounds like they’re arguing there’s no objective thing as rape, implying we should strike off all those laws and it won’t exist, and that’s the side they ‘debate’ from. Think of the people you’re defending, all of them. That’s you. Like gay stuff that inadvertently defends paedophiles. Still doing it. Yet we continue to see it, it isn’t clever. Nobody will think that.
Moving the goalposts, really? This from so-called ‘smart people’?
You can’t slide a moral absolute. There is no slope, they don’t notice because they crawl on their snake-yellow belly.
If a savage would think you’re a piece of shit…
You can’t defend the indefensible.
This is right up there, top 2. Totally taboo.