Was mass immigration a conspiracy?

aka

Why did Labour lose the last two elections? Not just the one after Rotherham?

https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/pressArticle/83

The strongest evidence for conspiracy comes from one of Labour’s own. Andrew Neather, a previously unheard-of speechwriter for Blair, Straw and Blunkett, popped up with an article in the Evening Standard in October 2009 which gave the game away.

Immigration, he wrote, ‘didn’t just happen; the  deliberate policy of Ministers from late 2000…was to open up the UK to mass immigration’.

That’s beyond gerrymandering into outright voter fraud.

He was at the heart of policy in September 2001, drafting the landmark speech by the then Immigration Minister Barbara Roche, and he reported ‘coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’.

Instead it’s proven Enoch correct.

Multiculturalism has failed.
Swedish feminists are moving out of No-go zones full of Muslims they voted to welcome.

That seemed, even to him, a manoeuvre too far.

Tony Blair removed the death penalty for treason……

look it up…….

The result is now plain for all to see. Even Blair’s favourite think tank, the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), commented recently: ‘It is no exaggeration to say that immigration under New Labour has changed the face of the country.’

Passports*

easily taken back

they leave as soon the economy properly tanks

or they’re drafted into a war

whichever comes first

the interesting part will be going after what they owe this country, once they’ve left

never piss off the white people, it’s world war or nothing

yet they treat us like simpering ninnies

like the colonies thing was a coincidence

It is not hard to see why Labour’s own apparatchiks supported the policy. Provided that the white working class didn’t cotton on, there were votes in it.

Now they’ve lost the WWC.
The response?

Not to earn the core voter base back.

But to continue betraying them by importing rapists for their daughters.

The WWC is proud, in a word. They do not forget grudges over generations.
WWC votes are often the Kingmaker in FPTP. That’s why Labour backed altering it.

Research into voting patterns conducted for the Electoral Commission after the 2005 general election found that 80 per cent of Caribbean and African voters had voted Labour, while only about 3 per cent had voted Conservative and roughly 8 per cent for the Liberal Democrats.

The Asian vote was split about 50 per cent for Labour, 10 per cent Conservatives  and 15 per cent Liberal Democrats.

That meets all the criteria for treason.

Giving people citizenship on the probable basis of how they’ll vote.

Advertisements

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s