MRAs for custody of rape babies

http://bust.com/feminism/193580-man-kidnaps-rapes-and-impregnates-12-year-old-girl-and-now-is-taking-her-to-court-for-custody.html

They never talk about these cases.

In September 2008, Christopher Mirasolo, 18 years old at the time, kidnapped three 12-13 year old girls for two days in a vacant house near his families property. He now has joint legal custody of a child conceived out of that rape. 

The Detroit News has been following this story, stating that one of Mirasolo’s initial victims discovered she was pregnant the same month he was convicted of rape. Mirasolo served only six months of his one year sentence for that incident, and in 2010 was later convicted of another child rape and served only four years of the 15 year sentence. Her family was told he only served 6 months because “first-time sex offenders weren’t sent to prison because people come out worse after they go there” and he needed to care for his sick mother.

Oh no, the rapist might get raped. Think of the criminal, won’t somebody please think of the criminal?

Now, he has been awarded joint custody of the baby boy the first victim has been raising since she was 13 years old — but how? Apparently, through some shady legal nonsense, he illegally got her address and claimed she consented to adding his name to the birth certificate.

12.
Consented. 12.
This is the company you keep.

Like forging documents approved by a minor makes you look any better?

Now, because his name is on the birth certificate, he has been granted joint custody, and given the ability to be active in his child’s and his victim’s life. The victim and her attorney insist this all started after aid she recieved from the state was being investigated – ya know, a single mom can’t get health insurance AND food for her baby without some bureaucrat sticking his nose where it doesn’t belong.

Yeah, the man is always the Real Victim here, right?

Classic DARVO.

You know if a Muslim did this the internet would go batshit.
Why are Muslims held to a higher standard? Why?

Child bride advocates: We adult men have to rape children because women might choose not to fuck us! They can’t be allowed to say no, they’re not really people* with the right to reject. But we tell them and ourselves it’s good for society. Since when have rape babies ever gone on to be, like, serial killers or something? Don’t oppress me with genetics.

*bestiality is the argument in favour? The best argument in favour. If you’re in favour of infantilising all children, good, but then you shouldn’t want to fuck them.

Why is a white man allowed to get away with any of this?
Do you still believe bleeding is the stable, reliable indicator of breeding ability, rather than a bizarre outcome of xenoestrogens in the modern world?

MRAs are responsible for this child abusing shit.
No, random men do not have any rights over random women. Sexual or otherwise.
They never did at any point in history, that’s an internet myth. You are stupid for believing in it.
There is fuck-all proof because it’s made up as the tooth fairy.

Keep your white Sharia and move to Saudi Arabia where you belong.
If you want someone to abuse, get a dog. Wait, they love their dog more than any wife. I think I see the problem. It’s them. They should be sterilized.

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s