Avoiding the word ‘race’

http://anthropology.msu.edu/anp489-fs16/files/2012/08/Race-in-anthropology.pdf

Things a scientist wouldn’t do.

Imagine being so scared of the truth posed by harder sciences that you try to flip the cause and effect.

As in, that biology is shaped by culture.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.20983/abstract

That isn’t how evolution works. That’s really what it is, evolutionary denial.

White weeaboo people don’t spontaneously give birth to an Asian kid, do they?

The harder science wins, in this case, the mathematics of genetics.
When they compare intragroup, they rarely factor in the genetic admixture of many groups e.g. Africans living in America. This contaminates their group result.

Note a trend with these papers

https://www.anthropology.northwestern.edu/documents/people/di_leonardo.pdf

No such thing as whiteness, or an ever-changing and expanding definition of White.

They’d never dare pull that with any other racial category. The term is erasure. It’s white erasure.

This isn’t some sociology hokum you can talk your way around. Yet we see attempts.

Official statements try to minimize the evidence.

Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups. Conventional geographic “racial” groupings differ from one another only in about 6% of their genes. source

Only?

ONLY?

In genetics, anything over 0.0001% is huge. That’s the medical standard of significance. They can’t call it insig. but they’re downplaying it (lying) for stupids who can’t do stats. Six percent is huge. Physical variation is the forensic meaning of race, yes, but note the labeling problem, the so-called. Okay, improve the naming convention but what you measure is still real. 94% is intended to throw you off by the anchoring effect. That’s a deliberate bias (fraud) where you fiddle with the context. For the same species, 94% is incredibly low. 

Bear in mind, we share 50-60% of our genetics with a BANANA.

The bleeding heart of the rest of that page shows you aren’t going to get an intellectually honest conversation out of the people funded by the taxpayer. Fine, don’t develop race-specific meds, it’s black people that’ll die since they’re less insured in the US. Denial of reality has fatal consequences. Deny race-specific illnesses too, since it’d be racist to diagnose and treat them, huh? Like, the original definition of scientific racism.

http://www.jewishgeneticdiseases.org/diseases/tay-sachs-disease/

But wait, there’s more!

bowing

http://whoami.sciencemuseum.org.uk/whoami/findoutmore/yourgenes/wheredidwecomefrom/whatareourclosestanimalrelatives

Our closest animal relatives are the great apes: chimpanzees, orangutans and gorillas. About 98% of the DNA in your genes is exactly the same as in chimpanzees, making you as closely related to a chimp as horses are to zebras. Chimps and humans share a common ancestor, who was probably swinging through the trees about 5 million years ago. Many other species of ape around at the same time eventually became extinct.

Yes, you read that right, you have more in common with a chimpanzee than some other races.

darwincontrol

One response to “Avoiding the word ‘race’

  1. Of course culture can change biology, behavior and epigenetics/genetic damage.
    Of course the culture is created and bounded by the biology.

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s