Human genetic load dragging us down

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788123/
The long-term consequence of such effects is an expected genetic deterioration in the baseline human condition, potentially measurable on the timescale of a few generations in westernized societies, and because the brain is a particularly large mutational target, this is of particular concern.” The word is dysgenic for $200.
“Ultimately, the price will have to be covered by further investment in various forms of medical intervention.”


Good luck with dropping global IQ, if anyone dared measure such a thing. Sum IQ/global population is the equation.

Who will pay for this global NHS? Our NHS is already running down with a slight immigrant pressure.

It is slight compared to The World.

As JF has mentioned, “clusters” as seen in racial categorization, pertain to findings of genetic distance.

http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0010070&type=printable

Examination of the relationship between genetic and geographic distance supports a view in which the clusters arise not as an artifact of the sampling scheme, but from small discontinuous jumps in genetic distance for most population pairs on opposite sides of geographic barriers, in comparison with genetic distance for pairs on the same side.

Called it.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/01/23/chromosomes-make-culture-including-language/

Speaking of germline mutations ruining society.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5597845/

Older fathers’ children have lower evolutionary fitness across four centuries and in four populations

Is that a large enough sample for the manosphere? They don’t like the answer so obviously not.

As if I don’t post topics strategically… tut tut.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/01/17/old-men-dead-babies/

“Higher paternal age at offspring conception increases de novo genetic mutations. Based on evolutionary genetic theory we predicted older fathers’ children, all else equal, would be less likely to survive and reproduce, i.e. have lower fitness.”
The sins of the father…
Old dads, no grandkids?
“showed negative paternal age effects on infant survival and offspring reproductive success.”
Sexual selection goes for young men, with better hormone profiles and less obesity.*
Darwin says aged paternal societies are bad for it. Nobody needs your dusty DNA. That’s a sign of corruption – keeping the young men down, not breeding. *another direct link to children again
“Effects survived tests for key competing explanations, including maternal age and parental loss,”
Again, you cannot blame the women.

“We can use our findings to aid in predicting the effect increasingly older parents in today’s society will have on their children’s survival and reproductive success. To the extent that we succeeded in isolating a mutation-driven effect of paternal age, our results can be understood to show that de novo mutations reduce offspring fitness across populations and time periods.”

As close as science gets to settled.

Old fathers are a sign of a dying society. Right up there with strippers and crossdressers. You passed the time period where you were viable with decadence but managed to breed anyway, that society’s social norms are seriously damaged. Applies to women too but paternal age is a bigger factor so I have to spotlight. In a Patriarchy, you would expect fathers are held to the highest standards possible. Their total authority relies on the moral authority consequent of that fact.

Link: How likely is a hard landing?

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/hard-landing-scenario-should-not-be.html
Rather.
“Those who watch closely will notice that even small changes in the laws and rules can have a big impact on how things unfold. A lot of strange almost bizarre theories are floating around concerning our economic future. This means that on occasion it is wise to step back, take a deep breath, then try to sort out what is really happening in the economy.”
Hm.
“Central banks can stack the deck but when it gets too high and begins to fall they may not be able to control the direction or who it will crush. Many of the investments people make are predicated on the idea that if the economy fails we will have a soft-landing, or if it does crash the result will not be fatal.”

If you’re stupid, yeah. We have socialist schools so we hate the markets and know they’re always doomed to crash. It’s the one useful thing we’re taught. We had to discuss hyperinflation and the crash of ’29 at length.

“The idea the economy will simply be able to adjust and grow its way out of many problems we have tried so hard to ignore and not just muddle along but to thrive defies what history has taught us. It is based on a view of history that often overlooks the many who have “lost it all” in prior periods of economic chaos.”

He speaks like they don’t deserve to burn.
You play with fire.
Worst, you play with someone else’s fire.
Someone’s retirement fire.
A nation’s fire.
I’m sure there’s a myth about this somewhere. The punishment was eternal.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/apple-and-amazon-share-ugly-truth-they.html

“Is the typical Apple user so self-centered that they just don’t care, or do they lust for the product so much that they bury and ignore their social conscience? These consumers are even willing to pay higher prices to lock themselves into a closed system tightly controlled by Apple.”
I know a man who uses an iPhone and has done public work against child slavery. You might have seen him on TV at some point. I mention this because trust me, that doesn’t narrow it down. Whatsoever.
It is impossible to hold a conversation on this topic. Otherwise an intelligent fellow, he mumbles and points the finger.
What dystopian relief films like Fight Club miss is how most of the people in the system and in the Matrix are complicit, knowingly and willingly so. They are objectively terrible.
When they complain about losing their ill-gotten savings, remember it’s the honest people who really paid for it in the first place. You can’t consume things you don’t produce, it’s a law of nature. If you are consuming beyond your real production (easy jobs don’t count) then someone else has been slaving away for your luxuries and if you lose them, that is justice, not an injustice. These people remind me of the entitlement of a baby who throws away its rattle (iPhone models) expecting it will always be replaced by a caretaker.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/china-state-driven-business-model.html
Those who surrender to the idea America is too small to lead based on population numbers do not understand that quality beats quantity hands down. Sadly the spirit of, “I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today” is alive and well in many of those advocating free trade and the expansion of globalism. Whether driven by greed or suffering from being short-sighted, buyers of the many products we import each year should resist giving up their futures so that we can buy the latest fancy flat screen television or set of patio furniture made in China for far less than one made in America. Countries that export goods at slightly below cost in exchange for manufacturing jobs are not stupid – they are predatory and we in America are their prey.”
Globalization isn’t free, it’s treasonous. If you want to develop another country, move there.

They don’t think it’s their future. They, the middles, aren’t the working class. They don’t care. Nobody has to care about them, then? Excellent.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2017/12/is-growing-national-debt-no-longer.html
All y’all need to read After the Empire: The Breakdown of the American Order.
Empires collapse, they do not slide.
Trump is an overt paper tiger to match the nation’s own power.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/planning-sustainable-future-for-mankind.html
Good blog.
Very good blog.
“civilizations share a sharp curve of decline. Remember this is totally entwined with the economy and everyday life. Indeed, a society’s demise may begin only a decade or two after it reaches its peak population, wealth, and power.”

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/the-three-reasons-america-faces.html
You had to import the Chinese, didn’t you? The Muslims are nothing to the Red Dragon. Muslims aren’t taking the University places on your prestigious national STEM courses and taking all that knowledge back home with them, to compete against you.

America used to be smarter.

“Uncle Sam introduces Eastern Barbarism to Western civilization.” You don’t see many white women making kitten-crushing videos.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act
“It was repealed by the Magnuson Act on December 17, 1943.”
“While the Magnuson Act overturned the discriminatory Chinese Exclusion Act, it only allowed a national quota of 105 Chinese immigrants per year, and did not repeal the restrictions on immigration from the other Asian countries. Large scale Chinese immigration did not occur until the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
I hate it when I know American history better than Americans.
Sure, blame Africa. Like all the abortions of AAs have given them powerful numbers to swarm you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pace_v._Alabama
“They were charged with living together “in a state of adultery or fornication” and both sentenced to two years imprisonment in the state penitentiary in 1882.”
Those were the days.
Would SJWs really be a problem if being a massive slag (male/female) were illegal again?
You want to go back America? Want to be conservative? Are you sure you want these laws back?

Gee, why were marriages so secure, back in the days you could literally throw cheating spouses in prison?
Asians counted under miscegenation law until 1948. Pick your poison.
Even today, although all its constituent sections have long been repealed, Chapter 7 of Title 8 of the United States Code is headed “Exclusion of Chinese.”[36] It is the only chapter of the 15 chapters in Title 8 (Aliens and Nationality) that is completely focused on a specific nationality or ethnic group.”
There’s a reason for that. The first isolated communities that refused to integrate were called Chinatown.
All the much ado about Muslim bigotry has precedent in the American law for the Chinese so yes, they are right in that you can’t allow the Chinese to do something then complain when other Asians pull the same con job.
The Chinese had gangs long before the Muslims too.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/how-great-empires-collapse.html
“One common thread and sign the end is near is a massive growth in crony capitalism and corruption. Even when the signs of decline may be everywhere that does not guarantee the end is near. As the foundation crumbles away it is not uncommon for those in power to extend their rule by many tricks and changing the rules in order to gain a new lease on life.”