Please, stop denying this. It isn’t very red pill of you.
There’s sufficient text there to see it’s a concrete connection – not limited to symmetry, not vanishing upon single-side presentation, please stop denying this. It’s getting difficult to watch.
Full paper because there’s always that one guy where you can tell what he looks like through the screen, like a fat acceptance activist.
Just because they’re scared to use the word beauty in connection to men doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist, insecure men are worse than SJWs sometimes.
These studies ain’t hard to find.
You manosphere types are just lyin’.
Symmetry is actually a misnomer, since symmetry is a feature of feminine beauty.
It was recently proposed that symmetry is not a primary cue to facial attractiveness, as symmetrical faces remain attractive even when presented as half faces (with no cues to symmetry).
This is the issue with treating the sexes as the same, especially in evo studies?!?!???
Here, we use real and computer graphic male faces in order to demonstrate that (i) symmetric faces are more attractive, but not reliably more masculine than less symmetric faces and (ii) that symmetric faces possess characteristics that are attractive independent of symmetry, but that these characteristics remain at present undefined.
I don’t see men arguing we must study this for equality’s sake. [but we should]
They seem to prefer ignorance.
Harder to lie about your alpha genes when it’s literally written on your face.*
Deep down, they know. That’s why so many ‘players’ get plastic surgery.
But women are fake, right, guys?
*again, alpha is a pair and a breeding couple, not an individual, it refers to a social rank