During cross-examination, vile Patton even asked his defence barrister: ‘How can it have been rape if there was no violence?’
Where the hell would someone get such a totally wrong idea?
This is why coercion and threats don’t count as consent. Legally.
It is much the same as a written contract.
Leeds Crown Court heard that Patton was ‘obsessed’ with his victim and he threatened to hurt her family and damage their property if she did not agree to meet him.
He should be swinging from a rope like the Rotherham lot. How can white supremacists claim to be superior while they’re soft on people like this? You want to let this one run around near your sisters, mothers, grandmothers, daughters – because an owner of a penis can do no wrong? You think you’d get low crime that way? Like majority white Europe never hanged people?
No Patriarchy in history went nicely on abusive little men, let alone easy.
They knew they only get worse, a rotten apple mustn’t be allowed to spoil the barrel.
His victim is ruined for life. As an r-type, you’d expect him to be proud of this.
Sexual entitlement, this is where it leads.
Today, at the same court, Patton was sentenced to 13 years in prison.
For seven charges? I hate this country. Why bother? Why not 13 days? 13 minutes?
Patton, who in the past had told the woman she was ‘nothing but a dog’,
Clean the gene pool, please. Men, this is your gender role.
slapped her repeatedly and even brandished a knife before telling her he was going use her as a sex slave.
Where did he get that idea?
Did anyone ask? ….
“No violence” guys, and if you think he’s nicer to other men, you’d be naive.
Psychopaths are worse with men than they are with women.
But women need to “give men a chance”, right? Fuck our right to safety, let’s coddle some snowflakes.
When men give creepy guys on the bus a chance, we might listen.
Patton has previous convictions for criminal damage, theft and battery.
And just 13 years?
And doing anything to an unconsenting person is violence. Because of the consent part. So I’m guessing low IQ with omnipotent fantasies of Genghis Khan?
(He probably thinks Khan wasn’t a rapist either).
The battery occurred in 2014 when he pinned his own mother to the floor by the neck and then punched her once in the face.
A generation with no father to slap them for getting out of line? Guessing.
What’s the bet he blames his mother for his deadbeat father? Would this be delta or omega, in the silly hierarchy?
But we can’t bring back drafting why? If they’re violent thugs anyway?
After being locked in the house the first night, his victim banged on the windows and screamed to attract attention, but Patton ran over and grabbed her by the mouth and nose, put his arm around her neck and told her to shut up.
“No violence” guys.
He choked her but no violence, obviously.
Having put his arm around her neck, Patton threw her on the floor then picked her up and threw her on the sofa, smothering her and causing her to struggle to breathe. When she told him that she did not want him, Patton replied: ‘Wrong answer.’
Sometimes the feminists have a point. The right to refuse anything is a basic human right of liberty. I bet he didn’t want to marry her, either, so a traditional excuse of “but it’s creepy love!” wouldn’t wash.
I doubt her father would give permission to let a man abuse his daughter, in marriage or out.
This isn’t a thing where it’s okay when white people do it. I see too many soft men talking tough about tan-toned women but when it’s a white person and especially a male there’s an almost privileged number of excuses made.
But there’s no such thing as male privilege (read end, I now believe). Any woman who doesn’t want to be raped is a feminist (well, shit, I guess we all are, how terrible of us not to be whores from porn).
No, there are no excuses for any aspect of this. It is evil.
Evil when any sex, race, sexuality does it.
Pure, Satanic evil.
Patton grabbed her hands and made her hit herself in the face. She was petrified, crying her eyes out, and he picked up a knife from the mantelpiece.
She was screaming for him to calm down. He was telling her she should slit her throat, but she managed to calm him down and he forced her to kiss him and tell him she loved him.
The next morning, he told her that if she performed oral sex on him that it would calm him down before ejaculating inside her wearing no protection.
Rape, would count even in a relationship. Clear elements of force (ordering, changes).
It’s like the callous men assume this can never happen to them either.
Plenty of male rape victims in the world. Rapists use the same tactics on them.
Let me guess, after the (attempted) coercion, she put up last minute resistance?
That force has a legal name, rape.
Check the legal codes. I did.
When the victim went for a shower, Patton came in and raped her again.
I wonder if Roosh V’s forum will welcome him with open arms for having a “concubine”. Check the web history, I’m certain you’ll find it, but the police haven’t reached the level of common sense where they look for incitement to rape and “rape isn’t real” (because women aren’t human) propaganda. I said this would happen years ago, you plant the entitlement and lie about the laws then eventually some psycho will act on it.
But the propagandists are also legally culpable. This isn’t a “game”…
‘Given his young age, I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt and not say that he is dangerous.’
He should be swinging. I’m sure he’ll convert to Islam while he’s in there. He’ll fit right in.
Update: I can only find the false dichotomy of rape and violence (rape is inherently violent as the ultimate sexual, violent crime) in PUA materials.
This was literally the top of the search results. Don’t get mad at me.
“What I’ve gathered from the words of these future Pulitzer Prize winners is that women are not getting raped by violent offenders while taking a jog in the park or walking through a dark street—they are getting raped by men they already know,”
I can’t find this false distinction anywhere else? Can anyone else show an earlier origin?
Seriously. Genuine request. Where did this toxic narrative come from?
“I also read that men must be taught not to rape,”
but what of the places that teach them to rape?
“which means that they are all born with the capability to rape and have zero instinct to know that taking a woman with violence is improper.”
Define violence. You don’t have to pin someone down if you coerced them but both are violent acts in consent law, whether it’s sexual or cheating granny out of her title deeds. Any force of consent is not consent.
In that very wording there is already violence “taking”, rape means to “take”.
The basic premise of that mess was: It isn’t my male duty to control my body, it is the world’s responsibility to tread on eggshells around it for me.
That’s why everybody thought wow, what a pajama boy. Handle your own feelings, including lust. That’s in the sodding Bible. The men who claim to know how sexual relations should play out better than Jesus
and that strangely put all the social power on one side (a dying society, because the sexes can’t cooperate) is a sign of how our times are done for.
And if rape were legal, it would mostly be men raping other men. It would involve murder. You can’t have a rape culture without a high risk of homicide. The world would be a gay bar toilet at 2am. Somehow I don’t think this is what they envisioned, being very echo chamber. The highest sex drive men… are gay. The streets would be like prison for the average man, kidnappings and false imprisonments would be the norm.
There was no logic to call it a “thought experiment”, it was a stupid metaphor (private space*, sexual safe space, yes!) about how a woman’s No is never real because neither is rape. If you don’t believe in certain things, what’s the point calling yourself a society?
This guy (top) lived out Roosh’s rape “experiment”, on “private” (read: false imprisonment) property. Nobody else seems to have made this connection.
*Which is ironically calling on ideas of a marital bed and conjugal rights to endorse fornication and rape.