18th century American women voting

No, the 20th century didn’t ruin your country.

You were meritocratic.

Click to access Lewis.pdf

For a brief period after the American Revolution, some women
were allowed to vote, in one of the thirteen new states. The New
Jersey Constitution of 1776 enfranchised not only men who met the
property requirement but women as well. The specific language:

[A]ll inhabitants of this Colony, of full age, who are worth fifty
pounds proclamation money, clear estate in the same, and have
resided within the county in which they claim a vote for twelve
months immediately preceding the election, shall be entitled to vote
for Representatives in Council and Assembly; and also for all other
public officers, that shall be elected by the people of the county at
large

No taxation without… ah, that’s right!

Representation!

Wait – it gets weirder. Other states.

Click to access freeblacksconstitution.pdf

Before 1820, free black men could vote and white women couldn’t.

So much for your IQ and race realism, huh?

Plenty of states were just male supremacist and misogynist, regardless of qualification.

[Checked: Deadlink from bookmarks, damn. Well, 1820 was the date to look up.]

Now you know why the first feminists were generally “white supremacists*“, because if you let someone you consider subhuman vote before your sister, something isn’t right. Clearly, that person isn’t meritocratic, AKA the American Way. Let the person who can (usually) barely read and write have a say, against the highly educated, who can’t?

Women were preferentially home-schooled with a governess, which we now know is better!
Plus finishing school, which everyone forgets. Bring back those.

They ended black and female voting in New Jersey in 1807 because white MEN were dressing in drag or blackface to cast extra votes.

Sounds fair.

*They wanted to be treated the same as black men so I dunno how that logic works.

It’s funny when I must correct Americans on their own sodding history.

If it weren’t so sad.

And where’s the female incentive to contribute to a society that provides no incentive?

This isn’t Communism, everyone needs incentives. Women aren’t respected by men generally as feminine or wives any more…so fewer are feminine or wives. People can (and do) suppress their natural instincts if society actively punishes them for it (say, you lose the Vote when you marry), a dysgenic outcome. And men are suppressing their paternal instinct because losers on the internet disrespect fatherhood as stupid (but Homer Simpson is insulting!).

Nobody can honestly answer that question. Incentives must come to the individual, so the reward can’t be another person e.g. men, children. And men had the “reward” of a family too, plus the Vote (when property ownership was dropped). Ancient tribes survived because they were meritocratic. You contribute, you have a say. This includes the choice to elect representatives, those representatives don’t get to turn around and limit the Producers in the society that supports their existence. And who produces more vitally than women?

Homogeneity is based on shared values and fair incentives. So for example, everyone values Christian charity and all members could have a seat at the table for free food if they fell on hard times.

It’s like how lower class men have been too stupid to realize they celebrated their own replacement for the profiteering of the rich men. Robots work in factories instead of you. Drones are soldiers instead of you. Immigrants in lower-middle job roles like taxi driver and cook, instead of you. And you welcome sexbots? Seriously?

Men celebrate their replacement for laziness and cowardice and wonder why they’re in a weaker bargaining position.

Less contribution (more restriction), less incentive rewarded.

You cut off your own opportunity, welcome to the inevitable outcome.

Appropriating a white Christian virgin

Non-Christians can’t depict Christian saints. I can’t dress up as Buddha, it’s fair.

https://www.headout.com/tour/8898/united-states/new-york/saint-joan

The cultural welfarism never ends. Eventually a black man will play Hitler.

Write your own plays about your own history.

I’m sure there’s a joke about stealing white people’s shit in here somewhere.

Was the free labour worth all this bullshit America?

Was it worth the cultural conquest?

Cast a black person as an historical white is the new edgy gay subplot.

Oilspilling is just cringeworthy.

I can’t see “we wuz virgins” catching on. Threaten to burn them at the stake and they wouldn’t lift a finger for that belief. Eventually they’ll say white people never existed you know, they’ll claim we were all albinos.

Actually, some are basically claiming that now.

I wonder if anyone’s calculated how much black people cost America up until now versus what they actually brought in? That would be fascinating reading. Was slavery financially worth it?

Hey Elon

Maybe help these guys?

Nah, that would be philanthropic, we both know you’re not Tony Stark.

You hate right to repair.

“I’d like to, but I know how that ended for another set of people who tried to do that,” he said. “They shut them down within months. And Tesla doesn’t give them the tools they need.”

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/qvm3z5/rich-rebuilds-tesla-repair-and-salvage

But he’ll give them to China.

Very patriotic American thar, hoy.

Not to Americans repairing things that are scrap (upcycling!) but to other foreign hostile people who definitely won’t copy them and sell inferior dangerous versions or anything. They also won’t be itching to hack your autopilot’s auto-shoah feature.

As we know from Mr Robot it is possible to fireball a battery remotely.

They could ship it with extra faults since they’re custom build.

And extra bugs. In politician’s cars.

Wi-fi in a car is the worst idea ever. Is he being this stupid on purpose?

He’s going to go down in history as a bigger douchebag than Edison. These stories come out despite him repressing most of them! Yes, repressing was a deliberate joke.

As a billionaire (I doubt that) he refuses to pay up to the farting unicorn artist.
Scrooge would be impressed by how tight his ass is. He’s acting like he’s billions in debt.

He changes his opinions to suit whatever selfish thing he has going on now.

Classic psychopath trait. He thinks we’re too stupid to notice. I did!

Claims to love capitalism when discussing Edison to businessmen.

Claims to be libertarian and love Ayn Rand when he wants to date a fan.

Claims to be a socialist now he’s fucking one who looks twelve.

And he dared make a pedo joke? Your hoe looks like a Thai prostitute!

Skunk hair and a permanent SJW sneer, keep it classy.

And that’s the type he sleeps with openly.

Imagine the skank’s row in his walk-in closet.

She can’t even sing so no prizes guessing how she got her job.

I bet she loves it when you oppress her though.

I’m 99% sure he’s roleplayed as Karl Marx.

Sounding like a dying cat running out of breath isn’t Enya, Town Bike.
Either that or a seance where the medium fakes the ghost noises.

If she recorded herself mid-orgasm I doubt you could hear the difference.
Subject yourself to the audible waterboarding of one of her songs and try to tell.

First one listed and I’m right. Auto-tuned to cringe levels, bland lyrics and the dubstep is the best part. Again, THE CLICHE DUBSTEP IMPROVES IT.

And she’s awful on social justice if you actually look.

Cultural appropriation of a French, Christian virgin folk hero, for starters. From a cheap, unholy slapper with absolutely nothing remarkable about her “art”. Joan would spit on her as a whore. There isn’t a cross to be seen – on a SAINT.

See, that’s my bitchy side but it’s funny because it’s grounded in reality.
Elon is funny because he isn’t.

He’s everything we want him to be. Well, everything and nothing.

See, he claims to have been a lot of things he isn’t now. In college, supposedly he didn’t drink/do drugs/sleep around. Guess what he spends a lot of time doing now. If you saw value in those things at their highest temptation, some would stick. A teetotaler doesn’t suddenly develop a taste for wine. It just doesn’t happen.

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/vbqnpd/elon-musk-twitter-socialist-anti-media-tesla

Nothing worse than a socialist. Commies aren’t dirty as socialists, who pretend to be nice and noble while robbing you dry for their own personal, private property. Every dictator in history used the “greater good” bollocks. Taking from the most productive is literally how all socialism “works”. You cannot physically take from the “less productive” you retarded fuck!

HE COMPOSED THAT. IMAGINE THE DRAFT HISTORY. FUCK.

He is actually one of the dumbest people ever to get these basic things wrong. He’s more shallow than his taste in women. People lie about his IQ, watch his interviews and he’s a bumbling tool. He’s never worked an honest day in his life to think this shit. And no, sitting at a computer doesn’t count, I do that all the time and it’s a piece of piss.

He’s vapid as the Valley whores, possibly worse. Get better meds.

It’s like if one of his exes said “I’m vegon, I’m a vegan who eats bacon.”

But they were 100% serious.

Like the vegetarians who don’t object to killing fish.

The “first principle” of socialism is I can take your company, Elon cos “you didn’t build that”.

Why do atheists jump from one bullshit fad to another in the search for meaning?

For when he deletes that tweet the next time he pretends to have a convenient change of heart.

Elon Musk is literally a Nazi. National socialist.

“I’m nauseatingly pro-American”. Nationalist.

Here he is bitching about socialist China’s tariffs.
https://jalopnik.com/trump-is-now-just-reading-elon-musks-tweets-1823626946

“True socialism”

No True Socialist!

That is not a socialist. Liar it is.

https://jalopnik.com/cucked-1795736068

“Climate change is real.” Actually you already know climate change is the political initiative and global warming is the climate theory. Climate change cannot possibly be real because it isn’t scientific. It’s unfalsifiable as a term and if you did test it, hey, the climate is supposed to change it’s called a season! That’s why scientists use it for nothing! It’s worth nothing!

The more I look into this guy, the more he seems like the worst person on the planet.

Socialists don’t tell their workers to walk off an injury, you loser.

(Yes, loser, all his relationships fail).

It’s a very Edison way of working, to try and ban the competition. Fascist, actually.

Move to China.

Fixing the inbred face

I was going to do this on Prince Harry but managed to resist.

JUST.

Like I said here, it’s all about the chin.

Using the most primitive corrections, you’ve probably seen this guy.

Well I felt bad about pointing this out and also wanted to demonstrate why jaw surgery is by far the most extreme of all. Like, it shouldn’t count as the same person for legal (and genetic) reasons.

In most cases, if the genes were otherwise good, there’s little wrong with the central face.

All you need do is add back the bone’s structures (corrected for race and sex), reduce and slim the ears and actually, he could model!

His jaw would be broader than this but the bare minimum structure has the same effect. This is what I wanted to show. Jaw surgery can turn what we’d normally consider “hideous” people into model material.

So Prince Harry’s children could easily be better-looking than he is because his wife’s strong masculine features would dominate his inbred ones!

The worst living case is Zuckerberg. He looks permanently ill in every photo. The chin causes the lower lip to protrude in a classic gormless expression. There is historical precedent for his look.

“Neotony” isn’t an Asian thing

If I don’t correct the pedophiles trying to feel normal, who will?

Humans are considered by some biologists to be a youthful looking species. We have weak (gracile) jaws compared to say, gorillas and large heads compared to say, chimps.
Stop trying to snowflake a biological possibility of prevalence.
It isn’t Asian or even characteristic of Asians (anime isn’t real!), it’s more prevalent in women than men (but common to humans) and can occur in Asians. However, most Asians have narrow, upturned (i.e. not round) and small eyes – thus cannot count under that heading. They are the least youthful on that feature!

You know, on average and before Daddy’s plastic pays for new plastic.
There are plenty of Asians who don’t have it (most by definition, attractive people are always a minority in their own population) and get the most surgery in the world to reset their masculine bone structure where possible in easy areas like the jawline and brow bone.

The technical un-PC term is “pedomorphic” so….

yeah…

Don’t go round telling people you find that hot.

Another error made on purpose by perverts?

Young isn’t the same as sexually immature. Men are sexually disgusted by signs of sexual immaturity so quit pushing that or show me some amazing, ironclad studies to back up your claim.

p.s. A fetish isn’t covered by sexual selection. Please stop getting evolution wrong, America! If you’d pass over the many white, black, whatever else women with larger eyes and smaller gracile (not under-developed/inbred/immature) chins then what you really have is Yellow Fever, a paraphilia (fetish). The Kibbe gamine type exists in all races and Asian culture expects women to fake it. So they do.

Youthful (but NOT immature!!!) features indicate health. That’s it. That’s all.
As in, an Asian looking really cute by plastic surgery with no waist, boyish hips and poor fertility doesn’t count under the biological model as fit. Because it isn’t real. Biology covers what is natural only. It also covers evolved historical conditions, new transportation and the race mixing that is possible isn’t covered because it’s novel. I’ve covered as much as possible that’s available to discuss online with the medical issues boyish women have with childbirth. If C-sections didn’t exist, a lot of Asian women would die, especially if the baby is half-white. Most women who go in for IVF are Asian (and have a higher failure rate than White women) and nobody knows why because nobody is allowed to study racial differences openly.

If they cared about these women, they’d study things to actually help them.

Fetishists miss the part about the eye shape and size because the common black eyes (again, contacts don’t count as genetic!) cue to their stupid brain that the woman is in love with them (pupil dilation) and not a threat.
Their cartoons look like white women, they get surgery/hair dye/makeup/skin glue/fake eyelashes to look like white women and their husbands cheat with Russian prostitutes. Actions speak louder than words.

What’s been called “psychological neotony” by some obvious pedophiles is emotional retardation and intellectual immaturity. That’s all retardation is, being stuck in an earlier stage of development. Humans have life stages, to not grow up is disturbed. They are just as bad as the vapid Valley girl.
If it’s vapid and stupid when white women do it, it’s the same when Asians do it. Stop white (yellow?) knighting. Fake femininity is obnoxious.
Neotony or in accurate anthropological terms, pedomorphology is allowed in society because we’re decadent, it is a sign of civilizational regression to encourage showy incompetence. It’s literally the female equivalent of the soyboy. They’re useless and act like children to get out of their citizen’s duties in life. And you’re falling for that?

It’s your life to ruin, I guess?

Black women have a tendency to act strong to get male resources, Asian women have a tendency to act weak to get male resources. White women can go either way with Eastern European acting weak and Western Europe acting strong(er).

But your hierarchy is fake science.

As a race, the “neotonous” features as characteristic belong to Europeans.
Show me a mathematical computer study that tops this.

Marquardt female ideal, sexually mature and youthful.

Proportionately large eyes, high, well-formed cheekbones, full but not huge lips and narrow mouth (youthful mouth indicator for femininity, not fullness which men have moreso) and a fine nasal bridge, soft brow bones and cherry chin, gracile thin jawline and thinner overall face shape closer to oval ideal, 2:1 ratio.

I drew this in case some bitch can’t do ratios.

Shapely philtrum (predicts uterine health), proportionate ears and nostrils (evolved to climate), healthy eye distance (neither too big or too small, beauty is healthy average because it shows a low mutation load)!

Fits closest to Europeans, matching up to corroborating dating site selection data and male preference attitude surveys who would preferentially date a European woman.

European fits it best based on youthful features, then Africans because they have large eyes and full lips and THEN Asians. The eye area is crucial for this. If you don’t have youthful eyes, you don’t have it.

One warning:

Looking like a baby also means looking like a boy, femininity is different. It is not childish, it’s womanly.

The classic beauty within her race does not look like a girl.

Femininity has certain features which coincide with youthful and healthy.

Women have longer, thinner faces including noses and paler skin than their racial male counterparts. This is constant throughout all races. Don’t look at models for an average, they’ve had work done.

Basic rundown for you to begin your own research.

I hate explaining the obvious. The white woman picture has filled lips, ignore that detail.

You might argue, where’s the Marquardt data for that?

Here’s the face-on beauty ideal for women from their global dataset.

Name that race.

Fully feminine and neotonous face with the contours shaded correctly.

Note the longer nose but more delicate bone structure (as opposed to yang angular).
Note the thinner face and reduced mouth width.

Basically everything above it.

Oval, check. Thin but not under-developed nose, check. Round curved brows, check. Narrow mouth with full lips (so incredibly proportionately feminine). Soft features including round normal eye shape, check. Heavily dimorphic, check. Long face compared to male average, check. Small but developed chin, check. High delicate cheekbones, check.

Example of those IRL.

This is so blitheringly obvious to me I struggle to put it into words.
I guess I’ve been trained to see this but did you never notice?

Really?

Pretty/cute/sexy are absolute shit compared to beauty.

Black women are higher on this trait of neotony than Asians and everyone talks about them like dirt when they don’t deserve it.

Africans have great eyelashes too, unlike the majority of Asian women.

The eye area is the hallmark of this trait. So African women can look great in 20s makeup.

I’m redpill which means I tell the truth, even when it isn’t about my own group.

Compare with the Asian standard model based on the dataset of averages.

Looks very masculine to me. Very angular, very strong, very yang.

No, neotony is the least Asian thing. I’m sure their surgeons will be pleased to hear you ever considered otherwise. One sign an Asian woman had surgery is that her chin now looks inbred and under-developed, like European royalty sometimes did.

Her larger Asian skull formed in the uterus and by chopping and sliding and trashing the bones to look more European, by proportion it now looks weird and doesn’t fit with the rest of the head’s bones.

There’s a definite look. Example in white people.

The chin looks weird. Not a good look.

Cute?

You can’t hide your real bone structure, even with surgery.

The skeleton is inside you.

Don’t make me like him

The more people pile on, I start to feel sorry for the little weasel.

http://www.cracked.com/blog/why-it-was-always-dumb-to-worship-elon-musk-as-savior/

I don’t want to regard anyone who attends Burning Man willingly as human.

If you knew the sort of things that happened there, you’d agree.

It’s like the gay fuckparty to end all fuckparties. With drugs and children present.

Demographically, such people are on the way out.

https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/dystopian-conservative-future/

Viking welfare system including child support

http://www.academia.edu/161539/A_Medieval_Welfare_State_Welfare_Provision_in_a_Twelfth-Century_Icelandic_Law_Code

If Vikings think providing is the manly thing to do, what’s a modern soyboy’s excuse?
They also had divorce and actually, a very very lawful society. Turns out you can’t conquer other peoples if you fight unfairly with your own kin.

Call it chivalry if you want but fathers who invest in their kin group have better fitness.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/03/04/rk-and-trivers-parental-investment-theory/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/07/04/r-types-polyandric-and-k-types-monoandric/

And women don’t cheat because they’re ovulating, idiots.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/02/09/female-fertility-doesnt-encourage-cheating/

We don’t have a naturalistic fallacy excuse either!

You can’t have a patriarchy without fathers who take responsibility.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/02/14/interpersonal-deprivation-from-single-fathers/

Extra credit:

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/03/04/link-feminism-as-the-death-of-self-respect/

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/10/19/women-notice-how-you-treat-the-rest-of-us/