Excellent bait. I’ll take that.
The “supremacist” entry is actually two things, it “doesn’t follow” logically that they have any connection.
Every culture thinks itself the best, this is called patriotism and the basic instinct is called genophilia, it’s in the dictionary and you can check for it.
On the other hand, the second part is a foreign policy based on colonies, which put the domestic citizen at a long-term disadvantage, a form of pathological altruism, to make the first colonists filthy rich. As you can see, there is an error here.
A more interesting chart would be foundational premises or possible ones to each. No belief is theoretically irrational however impossible or unwise practically, there is a premise.
I humbly submit a proof list subject to change or criticism.
- I have a right to my body, my genetic continuation and the homeland my ancestors bled for. Freedom of association.
- There are irreconcilable differences between groups of humans and for global peace, each must be respectful to stay away from the others’ homeland/s. Nothing exclusive and protective. Golden Rule doesn’t exist. The Buddhists lost to Islam. To compromise with evil is to enable and absorb it.
- I am a human and my kin have rights as such. This…. shouldn’t need to be said. Regions = reservations. I think a more subtle point might be underlying that Native group ought never slave (pay taxes from labour* and forced confiscation) for the out-group. No racial plantations, even if they’re desk jobs. Hostilities are guaranteed based on Darwinian genetic competition and what is earned by group A is the sovereign right (coffer) of Group A. That if the tax revenue were kept within-group, group B must earn their own keep (and A’s respect) or go home if they intend to live on largess as a dependent, the only remaining issue of intra-racial class would be simple to handle as a society (for largely IQ-communication reasons) without the scientific gunpowder of race relations that destroyed America.
- You know the struggles and achievements of your group for your (future then, present now) benefit and refuse to deny them like a Thomas. Anyone in your land or expecting the fruits of this ancestral labour (legally a delayed gift to one’s kin ONLY) connotes a responsibility to lead and direct these exclusive resources (if there is a surplus chosen to share by the within-group, outward) so they are not squandered on those who would not appreciate them like good seeds on rocks. For example, if you want the beer, be nice to the brewer and don’t try to take over from him in his own brewery. Draws on White notions of guest right and opposes odious debt for emotional appeal.
- Ah, you thought I wouldn’t touch this one, huh? Well, I’m not a wimp. Considering the inception of nuclear armament and the inevitability that some low-IQ dolt will get angry with access at some point, we either disarm the groups who stole technology they have abused to oppress their people, who cannot morally understand how to manage it OR try to restructure their societies according to a more responsible model (imperialism). This won’t work. There is an impasse where the biological differences are too great and many groups are annihilative, religious ones. You cannot reason with a deluded person. Eventually, they claim, they intend to swarm us by over-population (soldiers). A first strike as a defensive manoeuvre is the only strategy to prevent imminent invasion at some point in this century as global resources contract to their NORMAL levels before the false Pied Piper markets of globalization. War is always triggered by this contraction historically. They have been murdering and raping and invading our people for (centuries). They hate us and show cruelty even to their own people, children and animals. We are long overdue an active strategy to re-assert our soft power considering we have a narrow demographic window with which to secure our homeland. Our populations cannot raise recklessly (nor would we wish this) because of farming limits and cost of living being dragged by demand. Quality of citizen over births in abusive situations. We use our IQ advantages and cut off parasitic groups that are already hostile and awaiting opportunity. Technology can fight for us?
- n.b. Considering they refuse to control their population in a “demographic transition” aka How the First World happened, yet feel entitled to our living standards and money, they will collapse our economy before we help them and if you look at Africa, two centuries plus of “Christian“ interventions made them worse (more people, worse diseases, more corrupt). Our altruism to the outgroup is a pathological arrogant act to feel superior, a countersignal we could never actually afford, an error from Ice Age cooperation we did not evolve past yet; causing a genocide to our own people directly (no reciprocity – I don’t see Africans donating food to UK food banks) and in what should’ve been invested back to the in-group who are owed assistance and the help to thrive, (no guilt) including infrastructure and technological advantage. The foreign populations will be knocked down by famine as the UN themselves suspect this century. It would be kinder to control their populations by force now. If they cannot even survive with a reduced, more intelligent population, the best possible chance and gift we could give, they are ill-adapted to the modern world and nature should be allowed to take its course. It’s God’s will. They don’t care about their own survival? Why should we?
Is that somewhere around the rationales given? They could be tested.
Nowhere to put this but a policy idea of missionaries. Anyone who signals (other) culture is so superior must move there to improve it, than import it and burden everyone else (the r-strategy, Cloward-Piven). On the legally binding condition they can never return or beg to be rescued. I’d make it into a TV show.
*Corvee slavery, a little about.
An example of how fundamentally illegal this system is, the taxes of white women in Europe who cannot save the money to have children, are being used to pay for a non-white woman’s children she didn’t consent to make and has no parental responsibilities toward. She is forced to spend X hours per week working so another woman can confiscate her earnings and live off them like a master.
Taxpayers! Calculate how many hours per week you slave for someone else.
You plug the hole in the boat before bailing out water. You prevent the larger, external pressure mounting before addressing local problems. Whites are the minority of the world and should be treated the best, according to social justice.
With rising debt per head in the West, look at a debt clock, the whole world must be enslaved a la the Corvée system at some point, it’s mathematically inevitable. The money we give/gave to say, Africa, will need to be paid back …with interest. The non-whites who drastically outnumber us must be sent the full bill at some point, including punishing interest. Considering most of these people can barely earn a dollar a day, such is the economic demand for their IQ in the time of machines and robots, mass suicide is likely. Or… war. Ah, margin calls.
It was an investment, not a gift.
Having mis-spent it, they still owe it.
China is sweeping in to try and claim this White investment (including literal purchase of white homeland, as if we’ll respect any illegal property right to what is ours!) and they will have no moral problem with killing hungry mouths across Africa when they complain. Their soldiers aren’t playing.
It isn’t charity. It has never been charity. It has been bribery and odious debt.
It isn’t charity with someone else’s money, it is theft. Tony Blair is rich, the soldiers he lied to are dead. The nation he deceived is poorer for his terms.
Naturally none of this matters if you don’t unpick who causes all these problems and put them on trial. Otherwise, these things will happen again.
If wakanda can exist in their minds then so should whitekanda
They have Wakanda, we have Albion