Hit me with your cancer brick

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/14/mobile-phones-cancer-inconvenient-truths

Hit me

(beat)

Hit me.

From my research, iPhones are worst.

This is fine.

A cull of telly-tubby mobile users would be grand.

Meanwhile, Musk baits the internet and thinks he can win.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/shortcuts/2018/jul/13/who-wants-to-be-a-billionaire-not-elon-musk

Silly old man.

It isn’t because you’re rich, it’s because you’re a conceited, attention-seeking dickhead.

Who won’t let other people just do their job because you’re used to blowhards of the Silicon Valley blowing up your ego like a misshapen balloon.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-14/elon-musk-told-shove-proposed-cave-solution-his

Gay face is real because hormones are real

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/07/artificial-intelligence-can-tell-your-sexuality-politics-surveillance-paul-lewis

Somebody study cuck face.

I suggest Elon as #0.

Show me the percentages.

For lolz, an app that tells you who got Botox would be funny.
A quick way is to view from the slight side, if their brows are way too arched. Normal people see a dip as the brow curves down the bone and causes an illusory drooping effect.

Another app that tells you percentages of origin from mystery meat or predicts what a race-mixed kid would actually look like based on the parents.

“As well as sexuality, he believes this technology could be used to detect emotions, IQ and even a predisposition to commit certain crimes. Kosinski has also used algorithms to distinguish between the faces of Republicans and Democrats, in an unpublished experiment he says was successful – although he admits the results can change “depending on whether I include beards or not”.”
True.

But who wants to tell them personality research is generally a con?

“It suddenly struck me,” he says, “introverts and extroverts have completely different faces. I was like, ‘Wow, maybe there’s something there.’”
True.

“Thieves were notable for their “small wandering eyes”, rapists their “swollen lips and eyelids”, while murderers had a nose that was “often hawklike and always large”.”
I think women have the right to a rapist predicting app.

“Kosinski’s research dismisses physiognomy as “a mix of superstition and racism disguised as science” – but then argues it created a taboo around “studying or even discussing the links between facial features and character”.”
If you have nothing to fear…
It’s like how to spot an ugly person online, they argue beauty isn’t objective and men never are.

“There is growing evidence, he insists, that links between faces and psychology exist, even if they are invisible to the human eye; now, with advances in machine learning, such links can be perceived.”
No, you can train it.
Women with good creepdar seem to be born with it.

“There was also anger that Kosinski had conducted research on a technology that could be used to persecute gay people in countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, where homosexuality is punishable by death.”
It’s already legal to abort for no reason, maybe screech about that?
One day, a gay pregnancy test will exist, along with an ugly and a stupid one.

Market forces, mate.

“In a mocking critique posted online, Todorov and two AI researchers at Google argued that Kosinski’s algorithm could have been responding to patterns in people’s makeup, beards or glasses, even the angle they held the camera at. Self-posted photos on dating websites, Todorov points out, project a number of non-facial clues.”
Why the hate?
1. money loss
2. They’re scared there might be an algorithym for pedo face and their own friends could pop up.

“Thus,” he writes in his paper, “gay men are predicted to have smaller jaws and chins,”

Everyone has a chin, that’s an indicator of genetic health. Stick to jaw.

“slimmer eyebrows, longer noses and larger foreheads… The opposite should be true for lesbians.”
“This is where Kosinski’s work strays into biological determinism.”
That’s just called biology. An apple seed grows into an apple tree, not a Seville. Grow the fuck up.

“At times, what he says seems eerily reminiscent of Lombroso, who was critical of the idea that criminals had “free will”: they should be pitied rather than punished, the Italian argued, because – like monkeys, cats and cuckoos – they were “programmed to do harm”.”
Guardian doesn’t believe in evolution (or inevitable cases of organic atavism).

But when I press Kosinski for examples of how psychology-detecting AI is being used by governments, he repeatedly falls back on an obscure Israeli startup, Faception.”
“On its website, Faception lists eight such classifiers, including “White-Collar Offender”, “High IQ”, “Paedophile” and “Terrorist”.”
Gotcha.
Personally, I want to see the high IQ trait details.

Illuminating, what they choose to flag as a threat.

“The last time I see Kosinski, we meet in London. He becomes prickly when I press him on Russia”
News journalists have no right to interrogate scientists like the truth police.

You report on fluffy animals, stay in your lane, Lois.

comment from our superiors
“If you put Rees Mogg into the system does it confirm that he’s an utter bellend?”
I’d like to see the average attractiveness of conservatives against how right-wing they are.

Personal reasons.

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s