Tradlarpers lie about the Bible.
As in, blatant lying.
Specifically (and atheists shouldn’t marry, that’s repeated* throughout the Bible) on Marriage:
” I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7 I wish that all of you were as I am. ”
“8 Now to the unmarried[a] and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do.”
“17 Nevertheless, each person should live as a believer in whatever situation the Lord has assigned to them, just as God has called them. This is the rule I lay down in all the churches. 18 Was a man already circumcised when he was called? He should not become uncircumcised. Was a man uncircumcised when he was called? He should not be circumcised. 19 Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing. Keeping God’s commands is what counts. 20 Each person should remain in the situation they were in when God called them.”
“But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this.”
“38 So then, he who marries the virgin does right, but he who does not marry her does better.”
I don’t criticize MGTOW for being unmarried…. as long as they’re moral.
I do criticize larpers who insist everyone must marry (like vain them) as if that were 1. possible or 2. desirable.
They think they have a right to “give away” these people’s bodies!
*There’s an interesting point in a commentary, since it’s against marrying diversity:
“The Greek word for “unequally yoked together” is not found elsewhere, and was probably coined by St. Paul to give expression to his thoughts. Its meaning is, however, determined by the use of the cognate noun in Leviticus 19:19 (“Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind“).”
However, a man can only love as a husband sacrificially
Your mother no longer comes first, nor your friends.
Divorce is acceptable for abuse, adultery, abandonment of either party.
The poorer, innocent party should receive alimony for supporting the richer’s efforts to earn it.
Re-marriages of the sinning party are not Biblical.