When you think about it we live in the most unfree, tyrannical society ever.
Holding a public opinion gets you arrested and thrown into a dangerous, deprived place full of armed disease-ridden savages who want to psychologically torture and kill you for breathing because something something Crusades.
Show me any time period in history that tops that for the average citizen.
Only the genocidal witch trials maybe. MAYBE.
We will be the future’s dystopian historical setting.
If the State enforcers don’t like the parents, they can steal (and sell) children.
That is slavery, literally. Thanks, Blair! (not accidental)
The Lefty McCann parents still have their kids. So who’s getting robbed in the most evil (genocidal) way and their children literally abused in a system that doesn’t care, they have worse life outcomes across the board (there are many many cases if you look)?
Above: we make it worse in every way, let us magically make it better with even more money.
The “care system” is systemic child abuse. I’m not being dramatic, I’m being scientific. It is a lifelong punishment without crime. Libertarians say nothing, for shame!
Abuse cases involve physical, sexual and psychological abuse, plus the fundamental isolation (human right to family life) of being kidnapped on top of prison structures (Orwellian “care homes”) inflicted on innocent people (the places have guards, it’s a prison) – so taking them out of those alleged* situations isn’t the real motive, is it? There are druggings (poisonings) and tasers involved if the child resists their effective imprisonment.
But making “bad people” aka bad parents not have kids in the first place is “evil”?
No, only if you wanted to sell them.
Sorry, “financial incentives”.
We live in a world of fat teachers reporting children for obesity. I didn’t realise they were doctors.
Why not arrest the teachers? If the children weigh in (humiliation is illegal but they do) then why not the teachers in front of the kids?
*Implying public servants never lie to justify their job, you kidding? Why are family courts not public as common law dictates yet socially valid? That makes them technically illegal and they will be outed eventually.
Why doesn’t a child have a say in who they’re sold to? (Forced adoption is the PC term for legal human chattel, fridge horror is knowing taxpayers fund their own children being sold from them).
Why conduct social engineering experiments on helpless children they know to cause bad outcomes e.g. two “dads”, single foster parent, mixed religions that mutilate the genitals of children?
Adoption studies show it doesn’t work, they still end up like their birth parents, so “improvement” isn’t a valid excuse anymore (Jayman covered parenthood and adoption facts that go against “common sense”).
Care homes are just children’s prisons worse than 99% of the situations (they appeal to exception) they seek to “rescue” the child from and get this, many are actually privately owned. What’s the first thing a pedophile would buy into?
Their testimony, btw, is not believed, especially if they put drugs in the kid’s food.
A prisoner in for child rape has more rights and public respect for their feelings than a child in a “care home”.
So they’re taken out of a home that’s probably fine but poor (money into the home would help instead of giving it to busybodies who want to control freak a child’s life because they’re childless**) and instead abused in a system of all types then cycle of abuse means they’re likelier to “need” that system in future like a hole in the head.
Where is the logic here?
Dependence, never trust a socialist. You’re better to them weak or dead.
The state grows as the people wither.
** Measure a social worker’s saliva serotonin when they get their (sexual) high off being a control freak and order the kidnapping of children. It would be comparable to SS camp guards in Nazi Poland. Do that study, Peterson, become a legend in psychiatry. I won’t take credit, I swear. It would come under pathological altruism despite being sadistic, deliberately abusive but masquerading as altruistic for a dual boost (covert narcissism).
The McCanns neglected their children obviously, but who’s to say what is neglect and abuse? The SS as they’re aptly known tried to take children off people for political party membership (never a left wing one, it was libertarian UKIP), for being Christian and for teaching them “bad” habits like making gun noises at school during lunch or being unPC, telling the black kid at school they aren’t English and never will be, they’re African (biological fact). That last child was put on a list. Literally.
The SS are the enemy. Any excuse to intrude in your life and threaten to genocide (c, e and usually b) a bloodline they hate, think SJWs with power over innocents. For b, there are plenty of studies that keeping a child from their relatives exerts profound psychological damage, it’s essentially a form of torture.
It’s political war on your very bloodline, that’s worse than murder!
At least the child would survive you! And be raised by family, where the only good scientific outcomes happen!
They called the Rotherham rape victims prostitutes. They still do.
That is not even feminist. That’s gaslighting for terrorists (sexual terrorism), a form of treason.
Abuse of public office? Neglect (irony) of duty of care? Privileging adults over children they are sworn to defend? (They swear oaths in kangaroo court but an oath to do their damn job hasn’t been brought in because….?)
These people brought in Sharia courts in the West. A parallel legal system, also illegal and invalid.
They are the biggest child abusers in the world, by number and horror.
Look up the woman from Italy (white foreigners aren’t safe!) forced to have a C-section (which could’ve killed her!) so they could steal her pre-term (now at-risk) baby before she left the country legally to go home!
This happens every day, ruled in secret courts.
You don’t hear about it because years after the case, the poor parents can’t legally talk about it!
Is that justice? Ah, no reporters that way. Clear motive why it’s “contempt of (illicit) court”.
MRAs need to make family courts public before any other legal changes can happen, idiots.
Oh, and they target poor couples who can’t afford to legally defend themselves from the slander of monstering. Vox Day won’t dare mention this mess. A study of children taken by class membership would definitively prove the social injustice and its precise genocide.
No court should be secret in a free society.
It doesn’t protect the children, it protects the slave owners.
Why can’t the child sue the person who bought them?
Stefan won’t touch this because he’s a coward.
[And America does it too. Land of the free (unless you’re a minor).