The types of “health” are related, really? Shook over here.
If only there were a physical connection we could see like some kind of fleshy vehicle of testable units, a body of some description. No, we’re floating blobs of consciousness in a cloud of feels, aren’t we?
Mutation (genetic) load is true, at least somewhat but who dares to directly study it? Instead we are left with related variables.
“The lifespan of people with severe mental illness (SMI) is shorter compared to the general population. This excess mortality is mainly due to physical illness. We report prevalence rates of different physical illnesses as well as important individual lifestyle choices, side effects of psychotropic treatment and disparities in health care access, utilization and provision that contribute to these poor physical health outcomes.”
“Nutritional and metabolic diseases, cardiovascular diseases, viral diseases, respiratory tract diseases, musculoskeletal diseases, sexual dysfunction, pregnancy complications, stomatognathic diseases, and possibly obesity-related cancers are, compared to the general population, more prevalent among people with SMI.”
People with mental problems can’t take care of themselves, really?
Not to be harsh but, is this news?
I searched, not one mention of fitness.
Ability to reproduce (here it would be impotence for age in the male) and carry (childbearing without issue for age, the female) is a significant component of it (organism fitness, for the nerds at home).
“struggle for existence”, he repeated in description
the vindicated theme for this post
“Besides modifiable lifestyle factors and side effects of psychotropic medications, access to and quality of health care remains to be improved for individuals with SMI.”
Enough of that for now.
And they’re exponentially more expensive.
I dislike this fact but…. the information is out there. We can’t help by lying.
There isn’t just one thing causing the “mental” disease and another separate thing causing the “bodily” disease.
It’s all genetic! At least, moderately genetic.
And remember I said exponential risk of suck?
“Charlson Comorbidity Measure: The Charlson model predicts the risk of one-year mortality for patients with a range of comorbid illnesses. Based on administrative data, the model uses the presence/absence of 17 comorbidity definitions and assigns patients a score from one to 20, with 20 being the more complex patients with multiple comorbid conditions. It is effective for predicting future poor outcomes. This method is explained in further detail below”
You cannot fight math. You will lose.
poor outcomes = death, more or less
This is tough to read like the IQ link. I wouldn’t blame you skipping all this. You cannot unsee it.
“One thing all of these models have in common is that they are based, in some degree, on comorbidity. Understanding comorbid conditions is a critical aspect of population health management because comorbidities are known to significantly increase risk and cost. In fact, a study from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports that care for patients with comorbid chronic conditions costs up to seven times as much as care for those with only one chronic condition.”
Twice the condition can be seven times the cost. I’ll leave you to think about that.
Is this systemic injustice?
The body is complex, various conditions interact with one another. Not killing the patient by accident due to Condition B to treat Condition A needs time and more research and more money!
“Expenditures and gaps in health care delivery are not evenly distributed across the population, however. To improve health care quality and reduce costs, policy-makers must focus on particular subgroups who are at greatest risk. Persons with mental health and medical comorbidities represent just such a population.”
“The pathways causing comorbidity of mental and medical disorders are complex and bidirectional.
What I said.
Medical disorders may lead to mental disorders, mental conditions may place a person at risk for certain medical disorders, and mental and medical disorders may share risk factors“
It’s all healthcare, people!
ALL OF IT.
For instance, low IQ can also ’cause’ someone to more likely get heart disease.
Here’s a clunker of a line.
“When mental and medical conditions co-occur, the combination is associated with elevated symptom burden, functional impairment, decreased length and quality of life, and increased health care costs.”
This upsets me. Just world is a fallacy.
Bear in mind the IQ/depression link in the last post:
“At the same time, major depression is a risk factor for developing chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular disease.”
If the economy is making people of a certain IQ band effectively useless, they’re going to be depressed.
Especially if “their” jobs owed by their home country are outsourced to visa people.
“Exposure to adverse childhood experiences such as trauma, abuse, and chronic stress are all associated with both mental and medical disorders, and responsible for much of the high rates of comorbidity, burden of illness, and premature death associated with chronic illness.”
It’s sad. It’s sad to read about. That is a harrowing existence.
But stress shouldn’t be lumped in with trauma and abuse.
“Many of the most common treatments for diseases may actually worsen the comorbid condition.”
You tell me where the solution is because I don’t see it.
A society of hospital patients (don’t forget aging demographics).
Over to Oz.
“Mental disorders were more common among people with chronic physical conditions (28.0%) when compared to people who did not have a chronic physical condition (17.6%).”
The data is usually out there. Tough to find but present.
“This article briefly reviews the associations
among alcohol dependence, major depressive disorder, and
posttraumatic stress disorder. Dysregulation of the brain’s and
body’s stress system (i.e., the limbic–hypothalamic–
pituitary–adrenal axis) might serve as a common mechanistic
link to explain some of the relationships among these
frequently comorbid conditions. Finally, the article examines
the role of sex differences in stress circuitry. These differences
may explain why men and women differ in their risk for
developing comorbid alcoholism and stress related disorders.”
Addictions play into it too, because of course they do.
And you can’t really blame sexism for an individual’s brain circuitry.
Let’s look at one more substance and how it alters development (i.e. when children/teens/young adults use it).
An interaction of marijuana and low IQ they won’t study so here’s something odd.
“Psychotic patients who used cannabis frequently before illness onset have higher genetic predisposition to schizophrenia than those who did not”
“Our study supports an association between high SZ-PGRS and frequent cannabis use before illness onset
in psychosis continuum disorders.”
Before someone points to this classic arse-covering exercise,
I linked because you wanted info on school shooters and pot use is a major factor.
Naturally the drug use wouldn’t change IQ because the IQ is the causative factor in having a childhood addiction problem.
However the study compares ongoing users to abstaining, not ongoing addicts to a twin who never did the stuff, there is no control group, making this link pointless so don’t try to send me it. I’ve seen it.
When the brain is developing, there is a permanent loss of functioning.
And abnormal function. Like with any drug to any developing organ.
For the ‘self-medication’ lie:
“The use of marijuana did not correct the brain function deficits of depression, and in some regions made them worse.”
“Of additional interest, those participants who used marijuana from a young age had highly abnormal brain function in areas related to visuo-spatial processing, memory, self-referential activity and reward processing.”
No, they cannot perceive themselves accurately.
This whole drug study in children (<25) thing is like breaking someone’s kneecaps with a baseball bat and wondering why they can’t sprint. You wouldn’t give them alcohol and tobacco, why give them anything else that’s an addictive drug and think it’s fine? Why not nice and “natural” opioids next?
[ I googled this as a joke and fuck you, America.
druggy parent trash pushing it on the kids? That’s low. ]
Why not the ankles too? Why not?
I firmly believe some of these kids have the misfortune that their parents are their worst enemy in life.
“The study found that early marijuana use was also associated with lower IQ scores.”
Associated. Which first? The lower IQ or child drug abuse?
“With past research suggesting a genetic role between marijuana use and depression, Dr. Osuch and her collaborators at Western University’s Robarts Research Institute also conducted genetic testing on participants. They discovered that a certain genetic variation of the gene that produces Brain Derived Neurotropic Factor (BDNF) was found in greater proportion in youth who used marijuana from an early age. BDNF is involved in brain development and memory, among other processes.“
Could be a race-based finding, unclear.
“This is a novel finding that suggests this genetic variation may predispose youth to early marijuana use,” said Dr. Osuch.”
So how many of you heard about it in the MSM?
Funny how they trust none of the political news but all the scientism rationalizing living like a CA Democrat member.
It doesn’t have to be good universally for you to do it, like smoking tobacco, just admit it can be bad for society and move on. Denial of biology makes it more annoying and a full ban more likely. Shaming normal people for being “squares” is what all druggies do including alcoholics.
Why link that here?
What would drug use increase, in the organism? Mutation rate. The genetic load (whatever it was) becomes heavier. So to do that before reproducing, knowing the adverse effects, the child/ren will be worse off as well. So much for “doing no harm” and “victimless crime”. Eventually parents will be sued by their children for bad lifestyle habits that damaged their personal genome (and their children’s genome etc). It’s coming.
I warned you, cannot unsee it.