The Race Relations act looks like a tightening noose, year on year.
Freedom of association? Freedom of hiring/firing?
Freedom of productivity?
The gender wage gap (while it exists all over the place in varying directions) is a generally false question because it assumes you have more in common with your group demographically (sex) than your occupation – at WORK.
Work is a role, and this would logically lead to demanding the tall poppies be cut short.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. – Boetcker
Do you want a welfare state or not?
We need all the GDP we can get, ya blithering idiots.
The Bell Curve has already explained different performance in the same roles by IQ (or GPA) and the military has known for about a century.
If you want to crack open the can of worms, have at it.
It’s well known if that book came out today, the evidence would be undeniable (we have MRIs and genetics now).
Should we hand over all positions of power to a group of people purely based on how they were born?
How is that ANYTHING but a privilege?
A protected class is the new aristocracy.
If you want a democracy, a meritocracy, you don’t demand employers release CONFIDENTIAL PRIVACY DATA on other employees. Equality of outcomes is insanity, especially from those plugging diversity!
Ironically, it will become all about performance, and since certain groups
have lower-ranked performance, if you push this, they simply won’t be hired.
This will undo AA hiring. A company cannot afford to pay everyone top performer wages.
Category error – using the top wages as an anchor point, a norm, is statistically false.
If you want a cause, married people earn more than single people for the same work.
It’s known but you won’t see them bring it up because wifey poo likes to spend spend spend.
Singlism is a problem, where equal work is done, because of outdated notions of supporting a family like companies are a miniature welfare state. Bachelor men (including cohab) are screwed by occupational singlism more than women, because their jobs tend to compete with married men. I think that’s why manosphere types haven’t brought it up, because they can’t blame women when it’s intrasexual competition.
All fair competition is fair game under meritocracy though.