Why the death penalty is a good idea, clinical side:
Trait empathy and criminal versatility in sexual offenders.
Associations between trait empathy and criminal versatility were examined in a sample of 88 incarcerated adult sexual offenders (29 extrafamilial child molesters, 26 intrafamilial child molesters, and 33 rapists). Considerable criminal versatility was observed, with 60% of the whole sample and 88% of recidivist offenders having previous convictions for nonsexual offenses. Regression analyses showed significant associations between trait empathy and nonsexual offense convictions, but not between trait empathy and sexual offense convictions. More specifically, greater involvement in violent offending (e.g., assault, robbery) was associated with lower levels of empathic concern and higher levels of fantasy. Greater involvement in miscellaneous (e.g., traffic, drug, public order) offending was associated with lower levels of empathic concern. We argue that insufficient theoretical and empirical attention has historically been given to criminal versatility among sexual offenders, especially among child molesters. In particular, we suggest that developments in empathy training for sexual offenders may benefit from distinguishing needs of criminally versatile and non-versatile sexual offenders. More knowledge about trait empathy in sexual offenders, and about situational factors that may override otherwise normal empathic responsiveness, is needed.
Nice to know misogynists are related to pedophiles.
If you don’t ‘think’ a rapist is sexist, I dunno what to tell ya.
You’re probably a misogynist?
It’s odd because most pedophiles are male on male, typically, so two sides of the same coin?
So pedophiles are just misandrists who find it easier to target physically weaker boys? Is that their tactic? While misogynists go more for adult women, being weaker but easier to plausibly deny as ‘consenting’.
Previously, rapists would claim not to know the victim… until DNA.
If empathy must be trained, which it cannot be (brain development, neural pruning) maybe those “incapable” of not attacking people should be put down like dogs, that keep attacking people. You don’t “lose” your temper, you choose to attack someone. Rape isn’t an accident, you hypoagency-pushing liars. If they’re a danger to society and for some obscure, rare, brain damaged reason cannot actually control themselves, they should be locked up in asylums.
Impulse control is a choice.
Over-ride seems to imply all men as rapists just waiting for an opportunity. BULLSHIT.
My hunger can overwhelm my urge not to steal a croissant… wait, I don’t do that, because that’s crazy. You don’t get to blame the world for your personal weakness.
Muh Dick is invalid.
r-types expose themselves
“It’s you, not me!”
spot the r-type is a fun game
slippery slope is not a fallacy, it’s pushing tolerance for evil
first it’s about letting your son be a manwhore, spreading STDs like a gay guy, causing various aborted pregnancies and without consequence, shun marriage
next thing you know he’s dressed in drag and eyeing the family dog
lefties wanna hook ’em young because if everyone’s doing it, they imagine they can avoid consequences forever
muh sexual expression has no limits, zero limits, there isn’t a level of depravity they won’t hit eventually for novelty thrills
When the Midwest receives demands from Dem voters for food, remember this.
“we explained” excuses don’t make a thing less evil
Never look at their behaviour and hold them accountable. Nope.
Don’t look at the Biblical list of crimes and wonder whether they’re there for a reason.