Being forced down our throats

Gore warning. Even Tufano’s a traitor. Pity, I could’ve found investors but Europe is rejecting halal bullshit. For obvious reasons. Funny couple of clips at end.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/857515/church-schools-serving-halal-meat-to-pupils-claim

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/934454/bbc-countryfile-halal-meat-slaughter-islam-muslims

For context.

Canteens in 27 Lancashire schools attended by 12,000 pupils are dishing up meat from animals not stunned before slaughter.

The list includes Church of England and Catholic schools, and the leader of Lancashire County Council has claimed parents are not being told what their children are eating.

Council chief Geoff Driver told The Times: “My suspicion is that some schools are simply just buying all halal meat because it’s the easiest thing to do.

Abdul Qureshi, LCM chairman, hit back by accusing Mr Driver of embarking on a “crusade” and said Muslims would boycott school meals if the council voted to ban non-stunned meat.

He said: “It will create huge agitation in society and we are already fighting against Islamophobia.”

He said “many, many Muslims” attended Lancashire’s Catholic and Church of England schools.

“Some of them are 50 per cent Muslim, some may be even more.”

Yeah, Muslims are attending Christian schools and trying to impose Muslim “law”.

This was 2017.

What about Christophobia? Why are they allowed to attend?

Lancashire County Council said the decision of what to serve pupils and how much to tell parents about it was made by each school. 

No it’s a consent issue. I’m sure the boards voting have a Common Purpose though.

2018:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/934454/bbc-countryfile-halal-meat-slaughter-islam-muslims

THE BBC has come under fire for broadcasting a segment on Halal meat on Sunday night’s Countryfile with viewers accusing the Corporation of hitting a “new low” and “justifying vile Halal slaughter practices on our soil”.

Mr Heap said: “Like some other religions how the animal is killed is significant and for Muslims that means Halal slaughter in which a blessing is said before the animal dies.

Discussing the practice the Imam said: “There are certain practices where you want to fulfil a commandment of God and you’re basically invoking God’s name upon that. You are making the sacrifice in the name of God and now it’s made Halal. Halal means permissible and it’s been made permissible by God for you.”

It isn’t our God. That’s a violation of our human rights.

Brought up because, 2019

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1167969/EU-news-Belgium-halal-kosher-ban-slaughter-religion-animal-welfare-latest-ecj

BELGIUM is set to challenge European Union laws on halal and kosher slaughter in a court case that could have massive repercussions across the bloc.

The french-speaking region of Wallonia, on September 1, will become the second Belgian authority to ban halal and kosher slaughter in a move to ban killing animals without first stunning them.

It’s barbaric. They try to call it “traditional” in our news propaganda but it isn’t traditional here, it doesn’t belong here and never will. Also, the Muslim religion is so young it should barely merit anyone’s consideration.

Flanders first introduced a ban, which came into effect on New Year’s Day, on the Muslim and Jewish ways of ritually slaughtering animals. Critics of the ban have suggested the move comes as part of a shift to an anti-immigrant shift across Belgium as the right-wing Flemish nationalists continue to cement themselves in mainstream politics.

Or Europe wants to be European? If they don’t like it, fuck off home.

While the court could take up to two years, any decision could set a precedent for the whole of the European Union.

A number of EU countries, such as Denmark, Sweden and Denmark, have banned traditional slaughter without stunning.

But the court challenge will test European laws between animal welfare and religious freedoms across the bloc.

The freedom not to eat that shit?

Mohamed Bouezmarni, the head of the Muslin association in the town of Arlon, has warned bans could drive the ritual slaughter underground.

He told Politico: “Everyone will do it at home, or in some corner, hidden from view.

Grounds for deportation.

“I think that is not the animal activist’s aim.”

Pinchas Goldschmidt, the president of the Conference of European Rabbis, warned Jews were left as “collateral damage” while bans targeted the Muslim community.

Go home to Judea. Nobody cares.

Europeans want their continent to have our own people’s practices.

That’s our birthright.

comment

If you go to Y. Tube and look up hal al slaughter you will see the horrific abuse these animals are put through , they are kicked , thrown about , and the sheer terror is plain to see in the animals. This barbaric practice is abhorrent , worse till in moos lime countries , were people, including children stand and watch, laughing at the terrified animals, and blood running down the streets .

I have seen it for real in a slaughter house about 50 years ago. The animal to be killed and those in close proximity can hear, smell and sense it and the cries and screams they make is awful to hear and see them struggling. The problem with the meat though is that any animal that suffers unnecessary or undue stress means that their bloodstream is packed with endorphins that are released and it is said that the meat does not taste as good as it would do if not stunned first in a calmer environment. Personally I would rather limit the practice so that the majority of the population who are non-participants of those faiths know that animals were killed humanely.

aka civilization? yeah, we have a bias to that

It’s also more bitter and tough from the adrenaline, a taste the East prefers, so you can’t even justify from a taste perspective.

They are pure scum these people that put animals through this type of abuse.,

Unfortunately, these backward peoples do not share our thoughts about cruelty to animals. They seem to gain some pleasure from maintaning the practice on the grounds that the man with a child bride said so. Obscene.

You forgot the part where he ordered his son to divorce so he could rape the wife. What Muslims call visions were literally just lucid dreams, it’s demonic to pass that off as religion.

Islam and Judaism, the kiddy rape religions.

High time the UK also banned these cruel practices. If a persons religion stops them from eating non-Halal meat they can become vegetarians

It’s laughable seeing Butchers trying to make Halal Slaughter look good

Ritual and Slaughter are two words that should never be combined in anything considered legal. It is illegal for very good reasons and there should be no exceptions.

They merely practice on non-human animals.

With Kosher, we all know Jack the Ripper. That’s why he killed them by the neck, a tricky thing unless you’re a halal/kosher butcher. There are multiple tough layers of tissue. He ate Mary Kelly’s face.

Take a good, long, hard look. Should this ritualistic killing practice be legal in the First World?

And that guy tried the same thing on the non-jew mother of his child.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/09/26/21st-century-blood-libel/

His name literally sounded like libel.

“ripping parts of her face off and draining her of all her blood in their Hollywood apartment”

same as Mary Kelly

An autopsy found she was tortured for eight agonising hours before she died from her injuries.

from https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4550817/was-hollywoods-worst-ever-murder-predicted-by-millionaire-killers-graphic-novel-featuring-a-female-character-being-brutally-murdered-and-drained-of-blood/

What does that look like?

Allow them to train in this and it’s probable they’ll use it on you once they have numbers.

From the recent murder:

Her skull was exposed after parts of her scalp and one ear were either cut or ripped away.

Or chewed off.

According to the Toronto Sun, Dr James Ribe of the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office said: “I have never seen this before.

“And I doubt hardly any forensic pathologists in this country or abroad have even seen this, outside of, perhaps, wartime … it’s extremely rare.

“[Her] entire scalp was traumatically absent and was not found, was not present with the body.”

The report shows there was also an injury to Kasian’s jaw that appeared to be human bite marks.

Those are similar to Kelly.

So this religious sacrifice stuff is not trivial.

comment from Express paper

One way to deal with it is to mark all food that is halal as such, and no meat prepared where ANY halal slaughter happens is marked as halal. Then we, the non barbaric people of the planet, can refuse to buy any halal meat and avoid all shops where halal is sold.

They want to deceive.

For example all NZ lamb is halal, ALL of it. But this is not marked. And if you ask any of the major supermarkets if they can guarantee that any particular cut of meat they produce is or is not halal they cannot guarantee this. Why? Because they are scared. Let us make them scared of going broke!

The law is already there. They need a legal case.

A fine point here

Imagine the debate if freedom of religion was extended to people following the Incas’ religion. Should the human victims be stunned before their hearts are ripped out?

Yeah, that’s the point. You’re training up executioners. Just in case a One World Religion were forced on us at any point.

Our supermarkets should be legally obliged to label meat which is halal/kosher so that as consumers we can make an informed view as to whether or not to buy it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_protection_in_the_United_Kingdom

https://www.simplybusiness.co.uk/knowledge/articles/2017/03/sale-of-goods-legislation-consumer-rights-act-guide-for-small-businesses/

“Under the Consumer Rights Act, traders have certain obligations when they supply goods (including digital products) to a consumer. This basically means that your business has to comply with certain rules when you sell things to customers.

Under the legislation, the products you sell must:

  • be of a satisfactory quality
  • be fit for purpose
  • match the description
  • be installed correctly, if installation was part of the contract”

Implying non-Halal when it isn’t, is a violation. Deception by omission.

There are others but I can’t be bothered to go hunting when it’s obvious. Transparency is vital.

comment

if they want this kind of slaughtered babaricly meat, go to your country of ancestry. too much of muslim and jewish ways are being forced on us.

The Jews made up Islam to weaponise against Christian Europe, study up.

The child rape exemption is a critical similarity. Oddly similar ages and everything.

Non-Muslims can’t have Halal, it’s idolatry and an animal sacrifice when Jesus was the last sacrifice. But Muslims can eat Kosher…. it’s the same religion. Atheists also have a right to abstain from these products, it’s basic consent.

from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27324224 :

“During the process, a Muslim will recite a dedication, know as tasmiya or shahada.”

“Tesco says the only difference between the halal meat it sells and other meat is that it was blessed as it was killed.”

“Blessed?” Are you serious? No wonder their company is tanking.

Ever since this came out, 2014, people are boycotting.

They’ve lost clean half their pricing.

“Stunning of livestock has been mandatory in the the EU since 1979, although member states can grant exemptions for religious slaughter.

Note: Member…. states… not nations. Sections of EU Empire.

Some countries, including Denmark, have opted to ban non-stunning slaughter altogether. The UK government says it has no intention of banning religious slaughter.”

How many Gov petitions can you ban? Can we reach Brexit Party for comment?

“Jewish law strictly forbids the use of stunning and meats are not blessed in the same way.

Unlike for halal, kashrut does not require God’s name to be said before every slaughter after an initial blessing.”

Not our God. Who is we?

“Currently, there is no requirement for halal or kosher meat to be specifically labelled.”

False, trades description act and various consumer protection laws as well as religious rights to decline consent (it’s idolatry to any other religion so Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist etc).

The laws are right there. You are neglecting the population and animal rights in refusing to enforce them. There’s a negligence here bordering on criminal “oversight”.

Slight detour but relevant. #######

Presumed consent with organs is also a violation. Will you care when they book your euthanasia appointment? The boat people need transplants, evil Anglo. You had an unlicensed opinion and the diversity board has voted to terminate you with extreme prejudice. Yet nobody is asking in the run-up to this election. A country of sheep led to slaughter.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-45056780

“If passed, it is expected to come into effect in England in spring 2020 – because the timetable for its introduction will allow for a year of “transition” to the new law.”

“Under the new law, those who do not wish to donate their organs will still be able to opt out via the register and by using an NHS app that launches at the end of the year.”

Opt-outs make “errors” and bodies are raped anyway (yes, it’s organ rape, the forcible seizure or taking), found hollowed-out when checked. We won’t gut you, trust the app! What if they don’t have access to the app? Old phone, no phone? Even the Nazis didn’t do this shit.

“Currently, fewer than half of families give consent for their loved one’s organs to be donated if they are unaware of their wishes, and ministers hope that the new system will encourage people to make their wishes known before their death”

They’re going to over-ride the families with it.

“Under the new plans, specialist nurses will be on hand to discuss donation with families after a loved one dies.” Guilt-tripping the grief stricken, shame on them. And define “dies” because viable organs are still alive at the point they’re ripped out, it’s murder. So after it’s proclaimed dead but not biologically?

“We need to address myths and misconceptions around donation, and we will only do this by having informed debate and dialogue, which I hope will be fostered by these proposals.”

Are all NHS doctors obligated by oath to donate? No? Huh. Funny that. All politicians signing this in at least? Why won’t this register be public? It would reduce errors.

Consent to donate, comrade. We won’t kill you. Here, take a shiny cutesy death card and await treatment for twelve hours before we suspiciously put you/r loved one on a Death Care Pathway (still done).

What’s to stop ‘mistakes’ when they plant cards on people who didn’t want it? You can’t ask questions, the state owns your body. China is a human rights monster, remember?

“We must have a full, consistent public education system with faith groups, schools, colleges, universities, and with the public as well,” she said.

Revelations doesn’t apply to you if you’ve been butchered. I do wonder if the cannibals are planning on nicking a lot of this organ meat. I find it odd Jimmy Saville wanted to be left alone in NHS morgues with fresh human corpses.

We live in Hell, I’m 99% sure. Gaslighting kids to donate their organs when 3D printing exists but they’re too cheap to do it (despite a rejection rate of zero). Lord, please destroy socialism soon.

#######

Consent to your destruction, all this says. If you think it isn’t related, including the Cannibalism for Global Warming initiative, you haven’t been paying attention.

From above:

“The HFA says many slaughterhouses will have chosen to move to halal processes so they do not lose Muslim customers.
The latest census suggests there are 2.7 million Muslims in the UK, with a spending power estimated in the region of £20bn.”

Latest was done almost ten years ago.

“Jewish and Muslim leaders agree, and have called for “comprehensive labelling” of meat.”

THEN WHY ISN’T THIS ACTED UPON. WE NEED COMMENT PRE-ELECTION.

Especially since this is EU related and we had Parliament petitions.

Halal video.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=545_1345800806

Five minutes but grisly.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=EsCJ_1566751879

Abigail Ward, 16, who attends Gildredge House school in Eastbourne, East Sussex, was told by exam board OCR that she had made ‘obscene racial comments’ while answering her Religious Studies exam in June.

On the subject of halal butchers, the student had written, ‘…which I find absolutely disgusting.’

Speaking to The Sunday Telegraph, the 36-year-old said the family were shocked by the decision to disqualify her daughter, and the exam board has since been overturned the decision.

Have an opinion until you can’t.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=44b_1487932189

Rat being tapped out of a halal animal like it’s normal. The conditions are disgusting and we’ve seen people filming in the places here, videos on the paper websites, with loud music terrifying the animals and what looks like shit everywhere because they were so terrified.

As far from clean as possible.

http://www.dialrel.eu/images/veterinary-concerns.pdf

The prevalence of animals with bilateral false aneurysms was 7 and 8 percent for
Shechita and Halal slaughter, respectively, whereas no false aneurysms occurred during
bleeding in cattle that were electrically stunned and simultaneously developed a cardiac arrest.
The authors concluded that combination of false aneurysms and collateral routes to the brain
present a risk of sustained consciousness during religious slaughter in cattle.

….Velarde et al. (2003) showed that lambs that were hoisted and bled without being stunned, lost
less blood from the sticking wound than lambs that were electrically stunned (250 V, 50 Hz,
3 s), hoisted and then stuck.

aka the more European way

The authors mentioned as a likely explanation that the muscle
contractions associated with electrical stunning forced blood away from skeletal muscles
towards the vessels in the thorax and abdomen.

And other proof of its inhumanity. 80 pages of it.

Aspiration of blood and refluxing gut content after the incision was considered a welfare
concern after slaughter without stunning. Though this problem was mainly associated with the
inverted position, it occurred with the upright position for both Halal and Shechita slaughter
(Gregory et al., 2009). The authors examined bovine respiratory tracts following Shechita and
Halal slaughter without stunning, and also in captive bolt stunned animals. During all the
treatments animals received the cut in the upright position. The study found blood lining the
inner aspect of the trachea in 19% of the Shechita, 58% of the Halal and 21% of the
stunned/cut cattle. Blood was found in the upper bronchi of 36% of Shechita, 69% of Halal
and 31% of stunned/cut cattle. Ten percent of the Shechita, 19% of the Halal and 0% of the
stunned/cut cattle had fine bright red blood-tinged foam in the trachea. Blood covering the
larynx was recorded for all cattle. It was concluded that concerns about suffering from airway
irritation by blood could apply in animals that are either not stunned before slaughter or do
not lose consciousness rapidly whilst blood is present in the respiratory tract (Gregory et al.,
2009). These concerns are based on the fact that fluid in the respiratory tract in conscious
animals leads to irritation of sensory receptors lining the airway, and in particular the
receptors on the glottis and the carina of the trachea. In animals with intact vagus nerves there
could have been a cough or expulsion reflex, but coughing would be absent when the vagi had
been severed (Canning, 2007) though lower airway irritation may still occur through
sympathetic-spinal afferent pathways (Quin et al., 2007).

Again animals are put into these restrainers by hand and the head is supported
by hand during and after the cut. Sheep have been observed shackled by one leg (Catanese et
al., 2009; Cenci Goga et al., 2009) before sticking for Kosher slaughter (up to 17 kg
liveweight, line speed exceeded 200 sheep/ h) and for Halal slaughter (sheep up to 55 kg
liveweight, line speed could exceed 150 sheep/ h). Shackling time averages ranged between 1
and 4 minutes before performance of the cut, but can reach 5 minutes if the time was needed
to sharpen the knife or if the operator had to approach first to perform the cut. During
shackling before sticking some sheep hung calmly whereas others struggled. Struggling was
increased if a sheep touched another struggling sheep. Sheep reactions also included turning
the head to the side and apparently looking around, kicking with the hind leg and vigorous
struggling including movements of the whole body. In the last case, the movements were
thought to be escape behaviour. Struggling and vocalisation sometimes occurred in response
to the cut.

Vocalising in sheep sound like a child screaming MAAAAA for its mother, it’s eerie and almost human.

Keep eating halal and telling yourself it’s okay.

The whole paper is kinda like that. The animals beg to be let go, that’s probably why they like it.

Other methods are to place the bird in a cone before performing the cut or placing the birds in lateral
recumbency for Halal slaughter. According to Dialrel experience, restraining poultry for
Shechita was performed manually or by shackling chickens and turkeys before cutting,
although the latter was not according to kosher rules. During shackling chickens could hang
calmly or show wing flapping which in some cases was vigorous and long lasting.

Less suffering huh?

Liars.

Including Halal Tufano. Don’t buy from him, he doesn’t even put it on his FAQs.

https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2016/04/11/GUEST-ARTICLE-US-halal-food-regulations-Are-you-up-to-speed

“Multiple states have enacted statutes in recent years to regulate the halal food industry and to prevent mislabeling and deceptive practices”.

Deceptive practices, huh?

Yeah, those are awful.

https://frankiesfreerangemeat.com/pages/about-us

“Integrity and Accountability”

“The lack of honesty and accountability in the current market for naturally raised animal products has driven me to provide people a product they can find their true health with.”

“We will be sourcing meat from farmers raising animals for us to these quality standards.”

Highest quality Halal cuckery. You have to write to him before he’ll admit it, which is illegal.

Halal signage be displayed where an establishment sells both halal and non-halal products”

As is that. He doesn’t label and it’s meant to be per product like with allergies.

Trust no cuck, [bonus gifs at end] you actually have to seek this out even from people who pretend not to be snowflakes. It’s sad I know this legal side and Americans don’t… or pretend not to. No document disclosure either.

NEW YORK “All food items must also have a halal label affixed to them when they are packaged and being sold as such”

You know they have to hire Muslims to do it too right?

“Slaughter by a Muslim”

So they’re isolating the food industry from Westerners.

When sheep are group stunned in a pen, they may hide their heads under animals which makes it difficult to correctly place the electrodes.

The average number of cuts as reported by Gregory et al. (2008) was 3.2 cuts during Shechita
and 5.2 cuts during Halal slaughter of cattle.

The one cut propaganda is a LIE.

In sheep, according to the experience of the Dialrel WP2 members, the minimum number of cuts required to sever the major blood vessels of the neck for Halal (without stunning) and kosher slaughter ranged from 1 to 6. For cattle

either one or up to 60 sweeps of knife have been found.

Up to 60.

Religion of cruelty.

For poultry usually one cut was
performed. Additionally to multiple cuts, after withdrawing the knife from the wound,
additional cuts were sometimes performed during Kosher and Halal slaughter. Each time the
knife touches the surface of the wound the potential exists for further nociceptor activation.
Even if the knife blade is twice as long as the width of the throat, there are limitations to cut
the neck of large cattle with a small number of cuts. This is due to the fact that according to
the area to be cut the length of the blade increases disproportionately depending on the
pressure that can be applied by the operator (Adams and Sheridan, 2008).
Especially in sheep but also in cattle an additional aspect may be thick wool or coat, which
may have to be parted before the cut. Otherwise this would constrain the blade during cutting
and could cause blunting of the blade. Blunt blades are especially welfare relevant if the neck
is not sufficiently stretched to fixate the flexible skin around the neck of sheep or cattle
(Wenzlawowicz and Holleben, 2007).

As for the painless lie, will you settle for EEG?

Measurement of the electrical activity of the brain to assess noxious stimuli has been
described in chapter 2.6.2. Recent advancements in electrophysiology have allowed
quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) in response to painful/noxious
sensory input, allowing the experience of pain to be more precisely assessed in humans and
animals. This methodology has been applied to the question of pain during slaughter of calves
by ventral-neck incision. In a series of experiments the results showed clear evidence for the
first time that the act of slaughter by ventral-neck incision is associated with noxious
stimulation that would be expected to be perceived as painful in the period between the
incision and loss of consciousness (Mellor et al., 2009). First the use of changes in the EEG
power spectral and a minimal anaesthesia model was validated for the assessment of noxious
sensory input using amputation dehorning as a noxous stimulus (Gibson et al., 2007). Then
the model was used to investigate the impact of ventral-neck incision without prior stunning
(Gibson et al., 2009b). The results demonstrated that ventral neck incision produced changes
in the EEG indicating that it was a noxious stimulus and therefore could be perceived as
painful in conscious animals. This was then confirmed in the second study addressing the
question whether the EEG responses after ventral neck incision were due primarily to the
cutting of neck tissues or to interruption of blood flow to and from the brain. The results
demonstrated that the predominant noxious stimulus was cause by the transection of neck
tissue not the loss of blood flow to and from the brain (Gibson et al., 2009a). In sheep there is
no direct EEG data that demonstrates pain in response to the cut, however based on the
physiological similarities between sheep and cattle, it stands to reason that the neck cut in non
stunned sheep will cause pain (Hemsworth et al., 2009).

The animal cruelty people are right on this one. This is why we fully stun.

Nerves severed during the neck cut have been described by Gregory (2004, page 96) to be
able to proceed signals for up to 4 seconds.

A lifetime in neuroscience. The time dilation of the stress alone would make it seem like five minutes.

Direct activation of neurones during transection of
the nerve results in an intense but brief injury discharge in the afferent nerves. The overall
effect is likely to be a sense of shock, comparable to an electric shock.

Uhuh…. convenient metaphor.

Subsequently, undamaged nerve endings and also nociceptors in the neck wound respond if stimulated or disturbed especially from cold drafts and mechanical effects depending on the way the wound is managed before consciousness will be lost (Gregory, 2005b; Gregory, 2004). Nerve
conduction velocities ensure that activation of brain centres following major cutting injury
occurs within milliseconds. Therefore, the potential experience of pain is directly relevant to
the events following the neck cut (Hemsworth et al., 2009).

It’s evil.

During the Dialrel spot visits even under apparently optimum conditions, reactions to the cut
as vocalising or exhaling (as long as the trachea was intact), retracting movements, struggling
or shivering have been found especially in cattle during Halal and Shechita slaughter without
stunning in both turning pens and upright systems. Reactions in sheep have been observed as

struggling directly after the cut but also shivering. Reactions of poultry have been retraction
movements and wing flapping.

You can’t pretend it’s better.

In conclusion it can be stated with the utmost probability that animals feel pain during the
throat cut without prior stunning. Whereas the actual cut itself can only be evaluated using
behavioural signs, questions remain about standardisation of cutting techniques. Because in
all probability animals are able to experience pain during and after the cut, the question of
duration of consciousness is very important. This applies as well for a smooth cut performed
by a skilled operator.

Cut, singular? Up to sixty!

Risk factors for increased pain include increased number of changes of
direction of the cut, increased number of cuts, wound manipulation (e.g. second cut),
insufficient length of the blade, increased cutting time, a blunt blade, nicks on the blade,
increased diameter of the neck, increased flexibility of the skin due to insufficient tension of
the neck tissue during the cut, thick wool or coat and excitable animals.

Is there such a thing as a non-excitable animal?

Section 4.1.2 goes into loss of consciousness.

It is also possible that animals regain consciousness during bleeding (see chapter 2.8 and also below). The duration of overall consciousness is of particular importance

I’ll stop here, you get the gist.

I’m too disgusted.

some bonus Halal Tufano GIFs/vids, I have the video footage but can’t upload it here on this site.

“happy”? lying or deceiving?

Halal is also cheaper to produce because it’s so inhumane and has fewer equipment requirements.

I know film people and they send me videos, GIFs and stuff. The irony of those two clips together with the same Old Hollywood aspect ratio was amazing.

Edit: They told me about this …thing and uploaded it for me, pasting links, hope this works. We pass around videos like this all the time and have a right good laugh about it so ignore the count. That was us before this post went live. He is Halal Tufano now.

You could probably edit some hideously gory Halal thing between these clips but I’ll spare you,

Shills, shills everywhere.

They also recently sent me this. If it looks like something Hollywood would produce, that’s because it is.

2 responses to “Being forced down our throats

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s