Of all the spiteful mutants, there are more crazies walking around in society, instead of OD’d or in asylums where they would’ve been. We live in a low trust society, so trust of strangers is CORRECT to be at an all-time low.
By pushing the non sequitur that stranger danger is muh anti-male sexism, as opposed to mature common sense, the MGTOW types really sound like they sympathise with such nutters. When a man crosses the street at night to avoid a gang of other men, is that sexism?
That’s how women feel ALL THE TIME.
Of course, if all women could be legally armed for self-defense purposes, we’d be more confident around strangers.
Disarming men is fine because they can still hand-to-hand the average criminal, it’s a sexist law that makes women helpless.
Distrust isn’t the same as hatred, like respect, nobody OWES you their trust for existing, broflake.
We should all avoid the low IQ* in general for health and since most of those statistically happen to be men, then if that makes women who prefer not to be attacked “sexist” then yes, happily we’ll be sexist and SAFE, snowflakes.
You can’t deprogram evolution. We have survival instincts and without these wits, patriarchy is supposed to protect us from evil men. Patriarchy isn’t power to all men, regardless of character, only good ones who earn respect. The misfits who view it greedily as oppressive and sadistic would ironically be most suppressed under it.
Think of the canny judges of the Victorian era who purged us of many low IQ in that time (allowing greatness of culture) by sentencing a teen boy who stole a loaf of bread to hang. Sexist? Or sensible?
Everyday we see crime reports…
aaaaaand it’s always men.
That’s the red pill, shove it.
*Low IQ/crime connection is undeniable.
That’s also why rich people hate poor men in particular – the vices.