It’s like any man who must say “I am king” is no true king.
Mostly they’re cluster Bs, usually male borderlines, so insecure in their identity they conflate bullying and domineering behaviour for confidence, having no true self or inner world beyond the superficial obnoxiousness.
And they think it’s okay because as Bs, they project everyone else ‘must’ be the same way (only lying about it).
All the alphas I’ve met were really nice. Family men types. The kind of happy that cluster Bs DESPISE. Alpha is a breeding pair. Female alphas don’t mention it either. If you’re at the top (a 10 overall) then why be mean? Where is the gain?
How can alpha/other exist if men don’t have genetic/appearance based leagues?
Why obsess over height or your jaw then?
All those refs to ‘dating studies’ that’s really just ONE study (I think OKC?) about women filtering the top men as a matter of course – well, that’s the imperative for women – filtering. That’s the whole point of dating, to find the One. It’s feminine. It’s normal. It’s loyal. It’s SEXUAL SELECTION. Most complaints re this line are pure cope from the unfit males. If you’re alpha, wouldn’t you be in that group? How is that a PROBLEM then? If women had no standards, they’d be prostitutes. ‘Game’ is linguistically the psyops done on trafficking victims to stay as slaves, so telling normal or sub-par men to ‘improve their game’ is knowingly encouraging them to waste their time by sociopathic men who know it doesn’t work.
The self-proclaimed alpha thing for individuals (rather than sociologically, which is valid) is really just astrology for men. Leos are jerks though. It’s literally a basic bitch list of negative Leo traits repackaged as “the chicks dig this, trust random posts on the internet, would we lie to you?”
Look at their wives, that’s all I’m saying. If they had a pussy VIP pass, they’d have a 10 trophy wife.
In studies, women want a man for a husband who is high in conscientiousness. Cluster Bs are the opposite.
Why don’t the manosphere tell you dat, huh?