She basically made a video about my meme and rant/s from a year or two ago. I am gently fuming. People are getting paid for MY opinions. Except she skimmed the surface of the given reasons, making her position superficial and thusly, untenable. Dat dislike ratio. She’s also working with that shit SJW shoe company like big pockets ‘Bernadette’. Ew. Some ‘Catholic’.
but it’s true white men no longer make the effort, they all look like hippies who let themselves go and make no effort…. laziest men in history, really
We moved to Regency suits because the French men were massive sluts… with women. It was their sexual promiscuity as manwhores that was effeminate* and offensive to our Protestant sensibilities. Hence, the Victorians. So it was the cultural association with slutty men. Not the clothes. Get it through your thick skull, it wasn’t the clothes but WHO was wearing them. HERE is the part I always missed out.
hypersexual libido was always (Biblically) considered a feminine trait until the 20th century Hollywood propaganda against settling down in a nuclear family aimed at proposing men, since women have no refractory period basically and multiple orgasms
that’s why gay men are considered effeminate – massive sluts
with multiple rounds, like a woman
And then if it’s really about a human virtue, the men would also be held to the same requirement. There’s no logical justification for acting like men are the only sex to lust. You can’t have the women being holier than the men, can you? Thus, monks and nuns wore similar attire.
Nobody cared, it was just and the system worked.
… How immoral must you be to immediately start thinking of random people in sexual terms? What is wrong with you? They even do this with children. Is it safe to bend over around you? What about naked farm animals? The kind of people who would literally skirt a table-leg. They didn’t have the word projection back in the day.
The change in the ‘modesty’ of European clothing was actually a textile revolution in the Middle Ages. They weren’t choosing to wear those frumpy clothes, they had no others.
In fact, if they looked at modern man and woman, man would be considered more immodest because Speedos and toplessness, chest waxing and tan make-up are expected. By quantitative measures, men show more skin yet women do not commit most of the sexual crimes. The red pill burns.
If you wanted to spot a modern “whore”, tan is the modern rouge.
How about bringing back mandatory wearing of ties, while we’re mandating necklines? You gotta pay out for spats, tie, tie pin, collar stays, all these things, whether or not you need them. For public decency. You’re free, remember. Free to buy cheap! Like the other riffraff (note: there are no common expressions for a poorly-dressed man anymore and men always dressed more formally than the women). Since clothing implies personality, anyone wearing less than haute couture can be spat on in the street, a budget is no excuse to patronize fast fashion. Why don’t you save money and make your own clothes, don’t you care? And don’t even think about being fat. Man or woman, it’s a reflection of personal vice and never anything else, like food quality or poverty. Everything must be viewed in a dogmatic, falsely religious context, because doesn’t that sound healthy? Black and white thinking for all, there is no other reason.
When we take down the buxom or bulging billboards of lingerie and boxers models, I might believe you care about the public’s innocent eyes…
THE PROBLEM IS LECHERY
Karolina ignores this.
It isn’t about modesty, it’s the moral weakness of being unable or unwilling to rein in your personal impulse control and then trying to force the rest of the world to accommodate you like a safe space. In other news, all fatties should be allowed to forcibly close every donut shop within a short drive, because tempting someone by existing is a slight on their “honour”. And the shrew wonders why they’re still unhappy, after censoring and banning anything that makes them uncomfortable. The problem isn’t that nice things exist, the problem is you. Beauty shouldn’t be covered up to hide your inner ugliness.
It isn’t only women’s breasts that are sexualised in the media, is it, Mr Pecs?Women may struggle to breastfeed BECAUSE of bras.
If anything, women have more cause to expose than men, since our breasts actually retain a second biological function and constricting them is bad for the nerves, increases the breast cancer risk and weakens the ligaments that prevent sagging. Logically, none of the anti-feminist stuff checks out this time.
wow my 3yo opinions, das vintage
if you’re reading this K stop toeing the PC line it does not work
Stop walking around in your underwear and expecting us to respect you!
You must really hate yourselves to go round looking like that.
If we treat you like dirt, you can’t really blame us. You’re indecent.
Regency fashion is less comfortable for men than those tunics top-left, which cover more manhood than trousers. Easier to replace stockings than buy new trousers.
other opinions they may use:
Only in the 20th century did it suddenly become acceptable (imho, no) for an adult man to wear shorts. It was considered ridiculous and you’d be mocked for it like turning up to a funeral in assless chaps, as was going topless until coal-miners striked because of job demands. This is the God’s honest truth. Look it all up. Shorts are literally the most immodest thing a man can wear, the male mini-skirt. It’s worse than a mini-skirt because things can play peek-a-boo. Short sleeves come in a close second and were taken up by the Italians with the sleeveless ‘wife-beater’ where they both should have been left, men couldn’t show their waistcoat at the beginning of the 20th Century.
Casual or modest, pick ONE.
…The funniest thing my society friends ever heard about women’s fashion was one drab man telling, loudly, anyone who would listen, that spaghetti straps were the sign of a slut.
These are the guys who refuse to buy a drink to assert interest (formal politeness) or buy a dinner they invited their intended to (the formal rule) but they want a woman with expensive taste?
Are you quite sure?from https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/04/10/women-used-to-be-ladies/
I note she didn’t deny the Marxism. The video isn’t longer because I’ve taken to hiding my advanced opinions on niche subjects, knowing Youtubers rip off little blogs. They keep bloody doing it so I gave up.