But that would save civilization

Trust r-types to come up with the best anti-dysgenics plan yet, out of an attempt at humour.

You take the bullets out of the gun before you wave it around, rather than covering everyone in Kevlar, logically.

Finally, a rite of passage I could get behind.

The financial and social burdens (approval) to enter matrimony used to put a damper on bad unions so a more technical approach must be considered. If you’re so alpha, why be concerned you won’t pass the fitness tests? The MRAs could be happy no fiendish, evil woman would sperm rape them, no more ghetto, no more alimony, everybody’s happy!

Literally 100% of women would endorse this plan, unless they’re spermjackers.

Seriously, all women would endorse this, unless parasitic. Only the reproducing rapists of men would disagree too. It literally cannot go tits up, my dudes. Think of the savings in the welfare system, for starters. That’s less tax necessary right there. Fewer screaming future criminals born into the world. Imagine the triggering of the Left at having no victim class to lord it over, no dysfunction sociologically. Instead, we nip their future voters in the bud, an existential genocide. They wanted to be replaced, right? CALL THEIR BLUFF. Pay all men a bonus of 10k to get it done upon 18 (and possibly to avoid the draft). Seriously. And get check-ups to ensure it holds. We’d end poverty overnight! The biggest predictor of poverty is premature parenthood! They can fund a future and have better odds of marrying well then too. Everyone wins!

Most Boomers wouldn’t exist if abortion laws weren’t brought in by them, but some years earlier. The hippies would’ve killed themselves. As the hippy mutates in every generation, imagine they just… stop. No oops babies for the manosphere to fake cry about. Everybody wins! It’s like our version of the Spartan selection. All you have to do is prove you’re not a fuck-up. Anyone with an IQ above a hundred can do that, if they choose. Imagine that culture of duty and honour. (fans self) It’s anti-Idiocracy. Galton would approve. All child related welfare would end overnight, including the immigrant breeding competition. The rationale of war widows is long gone. You chose to wed, you chose to bred, you can fund them all by yourselves instead. Therefore, the ‘anti-racists’ should logically support a move that quells anti-immigrant sentiment, by treating them like responsible adults. Spread your seed, pay to breed. Children are the ultimate luxury expense.

However, this would only work if ALL unmarried men had to do it (and already-married men also had to pass the tests of basic stability, mentally and financially). We don’t live in a tribal society anymore, solutions must be sweeping. Since men don’t carry the babies in this species, there’s no issue with medical side effects (and extraction under local is possible). Test all children at birth for paternity, publish the results in a public database and the system is rock-solid, all married men have assurance (or shame). If a married man sires a child adulterously, it’s easy to prove (paternity fail) and he is legally forced to get the snip-snip (a stigma and deterrent) and his wife can sue for the adultery (illegitimate children presenting a legal threat to their pre-established contract, maintaining the Biblical sanctity of the marital union in culture and encouraging women to marry out of this sense of safety). It’s a perfect system where everyone is kept honest. I think even MGTOW could agree to this. The problem genes in the species would die out. Degeneracy would disappear, gradually receding into small pockets over time until it went extinct entirely. It used to be underground and controlled for a reason. Rapists would fail in their strategy of stealing reproduction as a choice from women (so most rape would not happen, contra Freud’s blatantly dishonest assertions) or be easily caught. The moral culture would be gentrified and entitled parents would no longer exist because conception is not an accident. Most mental illness would also vanish. What is the downside? The Pill has already partially accomplished this, e.g. gay guys complain the gay ‘community’ is shrinking because many r-women who’d produce them are functionally infertile – but women aren’t responsible for the main r-strategy, literally called sneaky fucker in evobio literature. It’s the young dumb, and full of cum demo of low IQ men. We all know it.

Do you want to play Russian Roulette with the species?

The Pill damages women’s fertility in the long-term (look at gen X and IVF) and they’re giving it out to minors like smarties, for a long term use its inventor advised against, so this flip is really the only responsible solution. Surgical solutions on women would impair childbearing ability. This way would kill postmodernism forever, while allowing superficial bread and circuses to soothe the unfit (to be parents). It’s heavily patriarchal and gives men all the social power while allowing the cream to, er, rise. And replicate. Men improve as a group, genetically. Stupid women go barren as the viable men don’t want them. Women cannot deceive men as to their intentions. Women are respected as babymakers, but in a way we’d all agree with – protectively, no toxic pill chemical expectations poisoning our womb all because men can’t ice themselves for one afternoon. It isn’t like it’s every month for a week, is it? As Nature/God’s design intended, before the Industrial Revolution screwed us all over as a species with urban IQ shredders. There are also fewer great beauties among women because modelling and marrying with the Pill took them out of the breeding population, this would encourage those women back, with enhanced status to viable men and grant prestige amongst women. Women would get more feminine and beautiful as a sex, because all women have a natural desire to reproduce (conscious or not) and modern men pretend we don’t (to their own demise, sometimes). Easy sex has meant the ugliest women could breed, this reverses that trend. Forever. Natural selection of unfit female genes would thereby be restored, without reversing advances in gynecology. Femcels would actually exist and the baby rabies motive in the most rabid of SJWs would be laid bare for all of society to see. It would be undeniable and the power balance, interesting to see. If you only got it reversed to get married, divorce rates would plummet because the husbands would all be mentally stable, capable of leading strong families.

Again, marriage used to connote this filtration purpose – for MEN. By withholding their paternity for a woman who is worthy, wife material. Think about it.

In reality, looks and IQ correlate. And what man doesn’t want wide hips?

Hoes would need to work in Costco. Imagine it. You say muh female accountability and responsibility sure, but the only way to en-FORCE is to impose it, since women are the passive sex in the species and mirror changes in men with a brief time delay e.g. hyper sexual culture. You cannot affect change in women without first changing all men. It’s biologically impossible. This is genius. Smarter people on average by default. As national IQ rises, so does national GDP and life outcomes of the citizenry. There is no downside unless you’re a spiteful mutant.

As a society, we need to stop acting like women get themselves pregnant. It’s a curious, irrational mental block in the chain of biological causation. It’s such an elegant solution I had to post.

There is literally no downside to that plan. We clearly need a synthetic fitness test to match our synthetic era. Begin with a countersignal, it’s brilliant! It’s hilarious this is horror dystopia to a guy who will clearly never convince a woman to reproduce with him by conscious selection. It culls only r, who hate kids anyway. We’re sparing children abusive, ‘permissive’ parents and it’s 100% Biblical (the connection to God shown by the men, who might do an Onan with their own wife – this avoids that, it gets reversed to get wed – beautiful!). We’d stop seeing atheist couples treat matrimony like a narcissistic party with no fruitfulness (DINKs). Pretty much only conservatives would breed, and seeing as how partisanship is mostly genetic in studies, the Left would be dead. If neocons were smart, they’d come up with this stuff. Appeal to the high time preference by encouraging their genetic suicide tendencies. The political centrists have already Pilled themselves out of existence (a chemical abortifacient, see above – the Pill replicates the miscarriage effect of endometriosis, it’s secretly evil) but men shagging women on it never considered themselves responsible for potential abortion (unlike God). Two absolute facts (common sense) of any high IQ civilization: 1. Men are responsible for their seed, not women. 2. The Pill gave women too much power, I said it. Short of banning it, because you’re all the real pussies here, this evens the odds and feminists couldn’t complain because mens’ body, their choice to breed, since if all men got it by law there’d be no more sneaky fucker strategy, no alphas ripping the rest of you off (see seduction law for how that turned out, America) nor paternity issues with random cads concerning married men – also women couldn’t bitch about side effects, there’d be no need to take it without genuine medical requirement. It spares women suffering, including rape babies! The feminists should be cheering this on! The only valid reason for abortion -barring a fluke fatality risk- would disappear overnight. SHOW ME THE DOWNSIDE HERE, SJWs.

nb Men would have all the power in courtship again but no manwhores could complain because they’re freer than before!

If society wishes to treat fertility like a medical pathology, let’s be reasonable.

The fallacy of poor analogy where a fuck-up of a man (future deadbeat) is synonymous with a rape victim is my only problem with that tweet’s metaphor.
Technically, just enforce the patriarchal law that men have zero rights to a child if they failed to marry the mother. That’s literally why men got married, to have a legal right. If you’re not married to her, that is not your child legally and you have no say.
Conservatives already figured this all out millennia ago. It’s in the Bible.
It tells men to avoid seductive women, fornication and adultery i.e. only sleep with your wife. A man had no legal rights to illegitimate children, because they were so. Most of the West’s ills are due to this socialist oversight. Yes, the woman would have to go it alone, but compared to….? It’s either that or shotgun weddings by definition. Imagine if all deadbeats were forced to marry the mother/s of their babies and support them, to relieve the rest of us for caring for sprogs we didn’t consent to make (a policy of: not my orgasm, not my problem). America’s Idiocracy failing is the moral failing of recognising deadbeats as legitimate fathers. They are not patriarchs, that is a privilege (the woman consents to marry, easy to prove) and not a right or entitlement in any civilised society. It protects a family’s rights to approve of their child’s reproduction choice (as the fruit of their investment and marital contract). You can’t protect anything without deterrents, even an empty house will attract druggies wanting to do smack. Also, prevent second spouses (in a cinderella effect) from taking what is due to the rightful heirs of the first union. This is easily done and actually what a patriarchal culture would practise, over the laddish cult of hedonic cads dodging responsibility for their own fuck-ups, expecting everyone else to pick up the welfare bill while simultaneously feeling entitled to all the privileges of fatherhood. Men honour their commitments.

to avoid obvious questions based on post rarity:

re Robin Hood, I did say Zoomers would be losers. It’s only just begun.
Their data is more valuable than their trade, RH users are morons. All the data feeds into AI algos that pre-empt them and due to fibre optics, win. You’re paying the casino to look at all your cards while playing against you, basically.

re Trumpkin
Calm before.

re me
still not dead, and that’s amazing, considering. There’s a very long, comprehensive list of people I have pissed off. Mostly hiding in my BOL in the country. It’s great. Wifi sucks. Various celebrities are following suit. Isn’t it weird how half of Hollywood has gone quiet and people who used to get photographed constantly dropped off the map?
Hoping there’s no EMP because Chicoms may get pissy if their invasion plan is thwarted. Half of Hong Kong arriving in England would make Boris look just as based as I always claimed he was. As you know, I’m his biggest fan. The perma-vaccine push every four months looks less like ‘crazy conspiracy’ every damn day. Nobody listen to Cassandra! I am very used to it!
We’ll probably be fine. 85%. If somebody kills Trump I’ll be worried.

The usurper won’t last long.

Currently: watching a video of Mads Mikkelsen doing the drop splits. It’s been a rough year.

2 responses to “But that would save civilization

  1. How long do you think the usurper will last? Friend of mine says six months, what with all that immigration and job cutting he’s doing.

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s