It’s domestic. They should be up in the Hague. Nuremberg 2.0. Armbands when? Subhuman rights.
No food shopping, /wallstreetbets should demolish their stock (Tesco etc.). No getting a job, going to hospital (ER too!), going to Gov buildings (e.g. to pay your bills) and no skipping the country when they round you up as a ‘refuser’ or ‘denier’. Online shopping will rocket, until that is twisted to somehow need it too, how can preventing people from buying food be made legal? Holodomor 2.0? The pubs and shops are ‘only following orders’…. like that works.
PAPERS PLEASE will be SCAN YOUR ID HERE. Never scan yourself, this isn’t a farm.
Phone problems > ID implant. Slippery slope is really coercion, a vitiation of any consent obtained under false pretenses like misinfo or disinfo.
Normies: Do you think this will end with a one-off ‘experimental’ (no sue) ‘jab’? No, 3-4 per year, ‘unforeseen complications in young people’ (infertility, NS paralysis/neurodegeneration, mortality) and multiple other ‘jabs’ you’ll be legally forced to get with this precedent. The MPs do NOT own my nor your bodies.
I TOLD YOU ALL SO. FOR YEARS NOW.
When have I ever lied? …..
Time delay is programmed in.
There are lots of stories about what this vaccine will do to people a log time down the road, from sterilisation to cancer, its all too scary knowing what we know
Immunologist: Pfizer, Moderna Vaccines Could Cause Long-Term Chronic Illness
February 15, 2021
In new research published in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, immunologist J. Bart Classen warns the mRNA technology used in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines could create “new potential mechanisms” of adverse events that may take years to come to light.
Back in 1999, leading U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official Dr. Peter Patriarca contended that modern advances in vaccine technology were rapidly “outpacing researchers’ ability to predict potential vaccine-related adverse events.” Patriarca mused that this could lead to “a situation of unforeseen and unpredictable vaccine outcomes.”
In a new research article published in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, veteran immunologist J. Bart Classen expresses similar concerns and writes that “RNA-based COVID vaccines have the potential to cause more disease than the epidemic of COVID-19.”
For decades, Classen has published papers exploring how vaccination can give rise to chronic conditions such as Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes — not right away, but three or four years down the road.
In this latest paper, Classen warns that the RNA-based vaccine technology could create “new potential mechanisms” of vaccine adverse events that may take years to come to light.
Classen’s study establishes the potential for the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna to activate human proteins to take on “pathologic configurations” — configurations associated with chronic degenerative neurological diseases. Although his specific interest is in prion diseases (conditions associated with misfolded versions of normal proteins), Classen also outlines a handful of other mechanisms whereby RNA-based vaccines could give rise to “multiple other potential fatal adverse events.”
Ensuring that patients clearly understand risks — including known risks as well as potential unknown risks — is an important component of the informed consent process. This is all the more true when the intervention is experimental and lacks long-term safety data, as is the case with the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines against COVID-19. The FDA authorized the two vaccines for widespread emergency use based on just two months of clinical trial data.
Unfortunately, it is not unusual for researchers’ communication of risks to be perfunctory. In October, researchers at New York University and Tulane reported that the information communicated to participants in the coronavirus clinical trials about a worrisome problem known as pathogenic priming was “sufficiently obscured” as to make “adequate patient comprehension” of risks “unlikely.”
It would be interesting to know what those researchers would say about Classen’s blunt conclusion that “Approving a vaccine, utilizing novel RNA technology without extensive testing is extremely dangerous.”
Those contemplating COVID injections may be ignoring potential risks at their own peril.
Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease, J. Bart Classen, MD.
here, planned neurodegeneration = slow, slow murder
Edit: yes, that also means lowering IQ
although IQ may be boosted by amino doping – sauce
personally, I think I’m maxxed out