Why most people who now die with Covid in England have had a vaccination
Comment is Free > Comments banned.
Oh dear, might you have fucked up your health for life? You got guinea pigged by choice. Who’s so smug now, Karen?
The depopulation narrative is gaining steam in lines like this “Don’t think of this as a bad sign, it’s exactly what’s expected from an effective but imperfect jab”
Literally the opposite of what was promised. Injecting them with saline would’ve produced better results, no inflammation.
Left wingers are in an abusive relationship with Government.
“MailOnline headline on 13June read: “Study shows 29% of the 42 people who have died after catching the new strain had BOTH vaccinations.” In Public Health England’s technical briefing on 25 June, that figure had risen to 43% (50 of 117), with the majority (60%) having received at least one dose.”
Here we see Narrative Yoga:
“Consider the hypothetical world where absolutely everyone had received a less than perfect vaccine. Although the death rate would be low, everyone who died would have been fully vaccinated.”
less than perfect? actively killing people
“But the risk of dying from Covid-19 is extraordinarily dependent on age: it halves for each six to seven year age gap. This means that someone aged 80 who is fully vaccinated essentially takes on the risk of an unvaccinated person of around 50 – much lower, but still not nothing, and so we can expect some deaths.”
Wrong. Risk of death is based on amount of modRNA you were injected with.
The more, the more fatal.
There’s plenty of cope in the DM comments to spare.
Nay, it works! It must work! I didn’t risk my health for nothing!
Wait until they find out Germany banned them and their ilk.
Totally unfair in my opinion. You didnt get the choice of what vaccination you were given, you got given whatever was available on the day of your appointment. why should you be penalised based on that?
I’ve had both vaccines and I still can’t travel. I never got the choice of what vaccination I received. When will this end?
You were naive to believe that getting poisoned would win your freedom back.
When you actually wake up ? I’m afraid you’ve been duped. We warned you. You called us “tin foil hatters”. We kept getting it right. You should be afraid. Because the vaccine we warned you not to have will kill people in staggering amounts starting this autumn.
You really think they gave the royal family something with a risk of blood clotting that’s still in clinical trails.
Anabella,so true and most of us did not want vaccine but threats,lies scaremongering,made us believe it was what all good citizens do to protect themselves,others and country,What a farce and completely untrue all turned out to be.
A British government report has potentially lifted the lid on why Germany is pulling its citizens out of Portugal.
It is a report that answers the question yesterday by Portugal’s minister of foreign affairs Augusto Santos Silva: “Why are German authorities ignoring the Covid Digital Certificate?”
“People over the age of 50 who have been fully vaccinated are three times more likely to die from the Delta variant than those who haven’t received any vaccines” (this is a headline taken from Swiss online ‘uncut news’ yesterday).
The jabs can precipitate a ‘rare’ but deadly condition known as ADE (antibody dependent enhancement) which basically means that someone who might have naturally developed only a mild illness as a result of contracting Covid-19 could experience severe disease, lasting morbidity and even death as a result of having been vaccinated.
The British government report “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation” dated June 25 may explain it (click here).
Pages 13 and 14 explain that of the over-50s attending A&E as a result of contracting the Delta variant between February and June this year, 3,546 were fully-vaccinated (having received both jabs); 976 were unvaccinated.
Almost every organ had high levels, almost. Almost total infestation. Almost like someone injected it!
Boosters push and more explained at bottom.
“The first-ever postmortem study of a patient vaccinated against COVID-19 has revealed that viral RNA was found in every organ of the patient’s body, meaning that the vaccine is either ineffective or the coronavirus actually spreads faster in vaccinated individuals.”
Both. But more Latter. And more fatal. I already covered the jabbed dead versus normal. Jabbed are literally more likely to die from it. MSM is hiding this and going on about symptoms. Dead people have reduced symptoms, can confirm.
“A previously symptomless 86-year-old man received the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. He died 4 weeks later from acute renal and respiratory failure. Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Spike protein (S1) antigen-binding showed significant levels for immunoglobulin (Ig) G, while nucleocapsid IgG/IgM was not elicited. Acute bronchopneumonia and tubular failure were assigned as the cause of death at autopsy;
however, we did not observe any characteristic morphological features of COVID-19.
Postmortem molecular mapping by real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed relevant SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold values in all organs examined (oropharynx, olfactory mucosa, trachea, lungs, heart, kidney and cerebrum) except for the liver and olfactory bulb. These results might suggest that the first vaccination induces immunogenicity but not sterile immunity.”
So to save 86 year-olds, for like, six months, we need to damage all young adults and children? Fucking locusts. Are the Bad Boomers in power pushing this a Biblical plague? Maybe the jab itself is more Boomer Doomer than the wild virus.
It makes sense the liver would be clear because the liver’s function is clearing that shit but finding it in the heart? Goner. Dead man walking. Kidney? Suggests liver moved it there. Cerebrum? Yep, zombie.
Maybe the liver pushed it out of the liver, and back into the bloodstream, infecting the brain? Old people and some heavily disease-burdened (like STDs) have thin blood brain barrier.
The cerebrum or telencephalon is the largest part of the brain containing the cerebral cortex, as well as several subcortical structures, including the hippocampus, basal ganglia, and olfactory bulb. In the human brain, the cerebrum is the uppermost region of the central nervous system.Wikipedia
All we need is psychosis and they’re literal zombies. Maybe the psychotic break happens later, once it’s really stewed in the brain juices for a while. It’s written off as dementia in old people so may already be happening. Maybe they get a form of terminal agitation in addition. I do actually know my stuff. When it’s in the basal ganglia you are absolutely screwed. That’s motor control. It’s in the hippocampus possibly explaining the terminally stupid decision to get a second one. It’s damaging memory then, which suggests senility symptoms oncoming. I wonder if it’s more likely to kill small or large amygdala people faster. Likely smaller.
What is the overall effect of this death stick? Advanced cellular senescence? Meaning the average age of death would be those with least lifespan left, presently seen, but that will just keep getting younger and younger and younger. Logan’s Run modRNA mod? So a basic model we assume their remainder lifespan is cut in half. Does this help pension plans and national debt? Well assuming 80 is lifespan (slightly shorter in men, who are dying faster from this…) then a 60yo would die at 70, a 50yo would die at 65, a 40yo at 60, a 30yo at 55, a 25yo at ~50. a 20yo at <50, a 10yo at 45 a 5yo at 40 … etc. Down to school age.
Nobody would die before 35 except anomalies. Do we see this? Why try to deny those unless pattern?
Anomalous deaths would be acute advanced senescence. Intention may be largely chronic. They can blame global warming.
So, yes. That’s very neat. A lot of younger fertile people getting it would die around menopause/manopause. Hence, perfect economic efficiency is achieved. The aging (genetic void) population dies off as soon as reproduction is achieved. We’d need at least ten years to see if average lifespan has gone down (80 to 70). Assuming this simple model. Younger Boomers and Gen Xers are the ones to watch. A reversal of lifespan is unprecedented. This is the slowest kill model and explains the push until 2023*. We’ll begin to notice by then en masse. This is why new techs need a decade PLUS of human trials. They look at lifespan.
*MPs love the book Nudge. Has the NHS guaranteed treatment for genomic ‘vaccine’ damage? No. Nobody is talking about this. Experimental subjects are considered consenting adults, so may not be eligible for NHS treatment.
Add in a sterilising effect especially in men, STD transmission, and the guidestones would be about right.
If that basic of the most basic models is correct, then the kids currently injected will die shortly after their feckless parentals. Remember, saving the NHS also means fewer old people burdening it like lampreys. They could come out later and thank you for your willing participation, since you did technically save the NHS – by dying younger. Experiments are permitted to legally deceive you, so long as they debrief you. In 2023.
By accelerating aging population, that’s very eugenic technically but deeply wrong re family. Surplus of orphans. Pedo paradise. Adult IQ would be higher (and GDP shoot up) since the morons would’ve happily skipped along for the euthanasia, children in tow.
The average age is 80-something now because they have no remainder, so it becomes weeks, not years. It fits.
And there’s no known time limit on shedding those synthetic SPs, secondhand smoke-like. At a certain uptake, society may be fumigating itself. Birth rates already have tanked. We may need a leper colony. They could be lifelong biohazards. They could easily test their exhalation at different points post-experimental injections. PE majors have a tube you breathe into, they could easily do it. The fact they don’t means they know the result would make them hated. Could be like the Island 2005 film.
The basal ganglia are a group of subcortical nuclei, meaning groups of neurons that lie below the cerebral cortex. The basal ganglia is comprised of the striatum, which consists of the caudate nucleus and the putamen, the globus pallidus, the subthalamic nucleus, and the substantia nigra The basal ganglia are primarily associated with motor control, since motor disorders, such as Parkinson’s or Huntington’s diseases stem from dysfunction of neurons within the basal ganglia. For voluntary motor behavior, the basal ganglia are involved in the initiation or suppression of behavior and can regulate movement through modulating activity in the thalamus and cortex. In addition to motor control, the basal ganglia also communicate with non-motor regions of the cerebral cortex and play a role in other behaviors such as emotional and cognitive processing.
If it retarded them, I doubt any of us would notice.
An earlier coronavirus vaccine paper: why boosters and well, all of this really
Vaccines against infectious bronchitis of chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) have arguably been the most successful, and certainly the most widely used, of vaccines for diseases caused by coronaviruses, the others being against bovine, canine, feline and porcine coronaviruses. Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), together with the genetically related coronaviruses of turkey (Meleagris gallopovo) and ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus), is a group 3 coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus being tentatively in group 4, the other known mammalian coronaviruses being in groups 1 and 2. IBV replicates not only in respiratory tissues (including the nose, trachea, lungs and airsacs, causing respiratory disease), but also in the kidney (associated with minor or major nephritis), oviduct, and in many parts of the alimentary tract–the oesophagus, proventriculus, duodenum, jejunum, bursa of Fabricius, caecal tonsils (near the distal end of the tract), rectum and cloaca (the common opening for release of eggs and faeces), usually without clinical effects. The virus can persist, being re-excreted at the onset of egg laying (4 to 5 months of age), believed to be a consequence of the stress of coming into lay. Genetic lines of chickens differ in the extent to which IBV causes mortality in chicks, and in respect of clearance of the virus after the acute phase. Live attenuated (by passage in chicken embryonated eggs) IBV strains were introduced as vaccines in the 1950s, followed a couple of decades later by inactivated vaccines for boosting protection in egg-laying birds. Live vaccines are usually applied to meat-type chickens at 1 day of age. In experimental situations this can result in sterile immunity when challenged by virulent homologous virus. Although 100% of chickens may be protected (against clinical signs and loss of ciliary activity in trachea), sometimes 10% of vaccinated chicks do not respond with a protective immune response. Protection is short lived, the start of the decline being apparent 9 weeks after vaccination with vaccines based on highly attenuated strains. IBV exists as scores of serotypes (defined by the neutralization test), cross-protection often being poor. Consequently, chickens may be re-vaccinated, with the same or another serotype, two or three weeks later. Single applications of inactivated virus has generally led to protection of <50% of chickens. Two applications have led to 90 to 100% protection in some reports, but remaining below 50% in others. In practice in the field, inactivated vaccines are used in laying birds that have previously been primed with two or three live attenuated virus vaccinations. This increases protection of the laying birds against egg production losses and induces a sustained level of serum antibody, which is passed to progeny. The large spike glycoprotein (S) comprises a carboxy-terminal S2 subunit (approximately 625 amino acid residues), which anchors S in the virus envelope, and an amino-terminal S1 subunit (approximately 520 residues), believed to largely form the distal bulbous part of S. The S1 subunit (purified from IBV virus, expressed using baculovirus or expressed in birds from a fowlpoxvirus vector) induced virus neutralizing antibody. Although protective immune responses were induced, multiple inoculations were required and the percentage of protected chickens was too low (<50%) for commercial application. Remarkably, expression of S1 in birds using a non-pathogenic fowl adenovirus vector induced protection in 90% and 100% of chickens in two experiments. Differences of as little as 5% between the S1 sequences can result in poor cross-protection. Differences in S1 of 2 to 3% (10 to 15 amino acids) can change serotype, suggesting that a small number of epitopes are immunodominant with respect to neutralizing antibody. Initial studies of the role of the IBV nucleocapsid protein (N) in immunity suggested that immunization with bacterially expressed N, while not inducing protection directly, improved the induction of protection by a subsequent inoculation with inactivated IBV. In another study, two intramuscular immunizations of a plasmid expressing N induced protective immunity. The basis of immunity to IBV is not well understood.
Serum antibody levels do not correlate with protection, although local antibody is believed to play a role.
Adoptive transfer of IBV-infection-induced alphabeta T cells bearing CD8 antigen protected chicks from challenge infection. In conclusion, live attenuated IBV vaccines induce good, although short–lived, protection against homologous challenge, although a minority of individuals may respond poorly. Inactivated IBV vaccines are insufficiently efficacious when applied only once and in the absence of priming by live vaccine. Two applications of inactivated IBV are much more efficacious, although this is not a commercially viable proposition in the poultry industry.
However, the cost and logistics of multiple application of a SARS inactivated vaccine would be more acceptable for the protection of human populations, especially if limited to targeted groups (e.g. health care workers and high-risk contacts). Application of a SARS vaccine is perhaps best limited to a minimal number of targeted individuals who can be monitored, as some vaccinated persons might, if infected by SARS coronavirus, become asymptomatic excretors of virus, thereby posing a risk to non-vaccinated people.
Looking further into the future, the high efficacy of the fowl adenovirus vector expressing the IBV S1 subunit provides optimism for a live SARS vaccine, if that were deemed to be necessary, with the possibility of including the N protein gene.
“We have documented the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of lipidots, synthetic 55-nm-diameter lipid nanoemulsions with potential applications for diagnostics and drug delivery. After intravenous injection in healthy mice, lipidots are stable in blood and taken up preferentially in liver, adrenals, and ovaries, where they release their lipidic cargo. Lipidots depict an original biodistribution, not previously reported for other inorganic or organic nanoparticles, toward organs involved in steroid hormone synthesis and storage (adrenals and ovaries) and localize to precise sites in these organs, suggesting potential applications for imaging and drug delivery.”
A friend suggested the Pfizer one may be ‘safe’ because rich areas are buying it. That was Boomers avoiding the heart effects reported from AZ, possibly to push them to the others, none of them are safe. Potassium is also used in lethal injections, to stop the heart. It’s in Pfizer. Talk about red herring. Watch deaths from heart disease in, say, the next three years.
In this country, they don’t give you even the illusion of choice, it’s largely based on age and supposed availability. There is no safe one.
The lipids preferentially allow the modRNA to ‘slip into the cell’ of those organs, as the enclosed PDF plainly states.
nb The effects described in Malice or Mistake? in the brain are prion–like, they needn’t be actual prions.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is a highly pathogenic emergent virus which replicates in cells that can express ABH histo-blood group antigens. The heavily glycosylated SARS-CoV spike (S) protein binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 which serves as a cellular receptor. Epidemiological analysis of a hospital outbreak in Hong Kong revealed that blood group O was associated with a low risk of infection. In this study, we used a cellular model of adhesion to investigate whether natural antibodies of the ABO system could block the S protein and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 interaction. To this aim, a C-terminally EGFP-tagged S protein was expressed in chinese hamster ovary cells cotransfected with an alpha1,2-fucosyltransferase and an A-transferase in order to coexpress the S glycoprotein ectodomain and the A antigen at the cell surface. We observed that the S protein/angiotensin-converting enzyme 2-dependent adhesion of these cells to an angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 expressing cell line was specifically inhibited by either a monoclonal or human natural anti-A antibodies, indicating that these antibodies may block the interaction between the virus and its receptor, thereby providing protection. In order to more fully appreciate the potential effect of the ABO polymorphism on the epidemiology of SARS, we built a mathematical model of the virus transmission dynamics that takes into account the protective effect of ABO natural antibodies. The model indicated that the ABO polymorphism could contribute to substantially reduce the virus transmission, affecting both the number of infected individuals and the kinetics of the epidemic.
Nearly 85% of all human beings have RH positive blood. Which merely indicates that their red blood cells contain a substance called the RHesus (rhesus) blood factor. Simply put, their positive blood contains a protein that can be linked to the Rhesus monkey.
It is acknowledged that blood factors are transmitted with more exactitude than any other human or animal characteristic. It is not generally known from where the negative RH factor derived, although tantalizing evidence exists that it arrises from genetic experimentation a little over 5,000 years ago.
The highest concentration of RH negative blood occurs in the Basque people of Northern Spain and Southern France, and in the Eastern/Oriental Jews. Only 15% of the entire world´s population is known to have the RH negative blood factor.
While it is known that RH negative blood – (type ‘O’) is the purest blood known to mankind, it is not known from where the negative factor originates, as it is generally theorized by evolutionists that there is an unbroken bloodline from early human prototypes (pre-humans) to present day human beings.
As previously mentioned, ‘Rh negative’ blood indicates no protein connections exist to the Rhesus monkey, whereas ‘RH positive’ blood does carry protein linked to the Rhesus monkey – hence the ‘RH’ designation, ie. rhesus. All other earthly primates have this RH factor. Thus if all humans evolved from that line, all would have the RH factor. Obviously, that is not the case. Therefore, there must have been some manner of intervention giving rise to Rh-negative blood groups.
Blood type ‘O’ is the most common of the blood groups. When we separate the ‘O’ types into ‘negative’ and ‘positive’ we find that ‘O’ negative (the universal donor blood) constitutes less than 7% of the world´s population. Science at this very time is attempting to create a synthetic RH negative ‘O’ blood, but without success. For while the protein in positive blood can be cloned, that of negative blood cannot – which is quite interesting, and may be indicative of an alien origin, or more probable, from early genetic experimentation during previous advanced human civilization(s).
alien? no, God
If the RH negative factor does not derive from any known earthly link (seemingly outside of the theorized evolutionary process) – from where did it originate? Geneticists generally claim the RH-negative factor is a mutation of unknown origin which apparently happened only a few thousand years ago. These ´negative´ blooded people spread heavily into the area of what is now Spain, England, Ireland, France and later into America, Canada and Australia. Basque peoples contain the largest concentration of known ‘O’ negative blooded people today because, they for the most part, have confined themselves to one area, whereas the Celtic people have branched out among all of the new world.
Explains targeting England. Disagree about Celts.
No solid scientific explanation exists as to how or why Rh- blood came about. It is presumed to be the result of a random mutation. Have you ever felt you were weird or different? It may be due to your DNA … 85% of humans have the monkey gene (RH+) and 15% do not (RH-) and maybe have an alien gene instead. RH- people are characterized by higher IQs, sensitive vision, lower body temperatures, sensitivity to heat and sunlight, psychic power, ability to stop watches and electrical appliances and having extra vertebrae. This film explores the possibility that we were bred as a slave race for labor, since 97% of our genetic code is disabled, with only 3% left for us to survive.
So maybe they’re culling o- or…. sparing them? Due to IQ.
no such thing as junk DNA it’s epigenetic
Interestingly, popular sciences endeavor to attribute Rh-neg blood groups to “mutations.” A solid alternative case may be extended to the conclusion that Rh-neg is NOT a mutation, but possibly the original human blood group. This, however, does not reflect tenured thought, and thus has never been adequately researched.
That there was a group of “pure” humans, not directly related to the evolutionary processes on Earth, is a distinct possibility. This reasoning would suggest that the original humans on our planet were not directly related to the apes, but at some point were “MADE” or “genetically engineered” to give such impression.
Perhaps it was never intended that the Rh-positives become the dominant species. That through some as yet undetermined epoch, the genetically impure group gradually became the controlling species, except for several remote enclaves, initiated a wide-ranging genocidal pogrom, effectively wiping out those who gave birth to them.
Maybe the depopulation lot think they’re evening the odds. RH+ babies harm Neg mothers right?
What if effects are type mediated?
I can see why China wanted to kill us.
As you can see the vast majority of RH- people come from the Basque people of France and Spain, and then Europe has the second highest percentage. We can surmise that the RH- blood type originates out of Europe and has spread over to other countries that contain European ancestry heritage. The RH- recessive alleles (+/-) make up approximately 60% of the Basque people and 40% of the Europeans, so that means that a higher percentage of RH+ people in Europe are carrying the genetics of the RH- factor in their DNA.
The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood. About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene. The average among most people is only 15%-Rh negative, while some groups have very little. The Oriental Jews of Israel, also have a high percent Rh negative, although most other Oriental people have only about 1% Rh negative. The Samaritans and the Black Cochin Jew also have a high percentage of Rh negative blood, although again the Rh negative blood is rare among most black people.
Somehow I am offended by this.
“The Celtic people of Ireland and Great Britain also have high incidences of the RH- factor and it has recently been proven that there is a genetic link between the Basque and the Celts. This research proves that the Celtic people came from the Basque regions of France and Spain and a group must have migrated over to the islands of Great Britain.
As a direct result, Hemophilia became known as the “Royal Disease”. To keep this in perspective, only about 5% of all “royalty” have Rh-Factor negative blood…which means “less than the general population. That would indicate that the vast majority of “rulers” and “monarchs” are NOT Rhesus-factor negative. Is this by chance? or by genetic engineering called “arranged marriages”?
Is “hyper-creativity” a “symptom” of Rh-Negative Blood? Artists? Entertainers? Who knows…but if European Royalty refuse to marry into the Rh Negative blood line it means one thing…Rh-Neg people are a “competing royal line”.
It may be a method of DEPOPULATION beginning with infecting those GRADUALLY who are RH NEGATIVE.“
This was on a random zerohedge comment but I’ve heard a lot like it.
I practice Tai Chi and Qigong daily and my wife does Reiki energy work. People that I practice with that have taken the fake vaccines have been finding themselves cut off from the healing energy source that they could previously tap into. These horrible poisons are designed to cut you off from accessing higher power potential and essentially steal your soul and your potential. Anyone that knowingly poisons a child with these devilish concoctions has earned eternal torment.
Bodily healing energy is soul energy, you heal from your soul. Jesus was a healer with a totally pure soul, so could heal others. The soul retreats and eventually we die. Simple metaphysical or occult knowledge. Religions agree.
Intuition or Guardian Angels also refers to this, New Agers call it Higher Self or Higher Power. They’re not always wrong.
There is a bond to God, creator of Life. Severing this produces death, acutely or progressively. The body decays like a tree struck by lightning. It seems fine at first. I’ve heard the reprobate mind is caused by a willful severance of this spiritual tie. Spiritual ties aren’t just human to human, the original one is our branch to God’s root. Eventually we’re supposed to be called back home. The Bible and other religions have metaphors involving roots, including the Hindu word mula. Family tree structures are by design.
I supposed it’s possible they come out (or secretly gave) something like the cancer ‘cure’ in the ted talk. It keeps you in your body, perhaps, whatever the cost. Like a soul level locked in syndrome. Similar to drowning people pulling others down with them, crabs in a bucket style, this would explain the rabid insistence you do it too. An impending sense of doom is medical, common to heart problems and stroke, a sense something precious was lost. Misery loves company. You’re stuck here, forever.
Perhaps bodily, perhaps only spiritually. It’s the leading explanation behind ghosts and Asia has wandering ghosts.
Mental health effects of the Walking Jabbed will be interesting, and oddly not included as official reactions. The brain is immune mediated.
I’ve known some minor healing work myself and it’s real. It made me re-read the parts of the Bible that refer to it. We have this essential skill because we need it.
If they became psychotic or demented without it, would they kill the rest of us? Psychotic episodes are within the realm of possibility. Theory dubs them inflammatory.
Acedia is unholy. They want you hopeless > faithless. Faithless men are desperate and easy to control or trick.
“One important result of this procedure is the great confusion it creates in the mind of every observer, friend or foe. In the end no one knows how to distinguish truth from falsehood. The totalitarian potentate, in order to break down the minds of men, first needs widespread mental chaos and verbal confusion, because both paralyze his opposition and cause the morale of the enemy to deteriorate unless his adversaries are aware of the dictator’s real aim. From then on he can start to build up his system of conformity.”
– The Rape of the Mind – A. M. Meerloo, M.D. (1956)
ZioHedge is really pushing the “reset”. Wants you all to believe it’s inevitable.
31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
28 And when he was come into the house, the blind men came to him: and Jesus saith unto them, Believe ye that I am able to do this? They said unto him, Yea, Lord.
Putting faith in men is silly. This is spiritual war.
1056 (d) The State Health Officer, upon declaration of a public 1057 health emergency, may take actions that are necessary to protect 1058 the public health. Such actions include, but are not limited to:
page 38 on doc
1097 4. Ordering an individual to be examined, tested, 1098 vaccinated, treated, isolated, or quarantined for communicable 1099 diseases that have significant morbidity or mortality and 1100 present a severe danger to public health. Individuals who are 1101 unable or unwilling to be examined, tested, vaccinated, or 1102 treated for reasons of health, religion, or conscience may be
But it doesn’t prevent transmission, the NHS ADMITS it’s non-neutralizing, non-sterilizing. You can still pass it on, that changes nothing. This is an admission the Stab does NOTHING.
It’s insanity, the poorest of logic:
My mask doesn’t work unless you wear a mask.
My vaccine doesn’t work unless you get a vaccine.
Occam: THEY DON’T WORK, THEY NEVER DID.
I told you herd immunity is a myth. If you insist on 100% uptake, there is nobody to ‘protect’ and vitally, no control group to show them up for legal reasons.
1103 subjected to isolation or quarantine. 1104 a. Examination, testing, vaccination, or treatment may be 1105 performed by any qualified person authorized by the State Health 1106 Officer. 1107 b. If the individual poses a danger to the public health, 1108 the State Health Officer may subject the individual to isolation 1109 or quarantine. If there is no practical method to isolate or 1110 quarantine the individual, the State Health Officer may use any 1111 means necessary to vaccinate or treat the individual.
LAND OF THE FREE HUH?
At least they admit ‘vaccination’ is distinct from treatment. It treats nothing.
Authorised by the person Just Following Orders!
How are they gonna pass that here, apart from the already linked blame game conspiracy of Jabbed Dead caused by Normies? Rather than the thunderingly obvious explanation a la Occam it was the common denominator the Stabbing.
They claim to have nabbed 81% of adults here last I heard, why not stop? Didn’t America want 70% for so called herd immunity by artificiality (impossible)? At what point do they dial back? 100%. It’s about the domestic ID to take a piss in a public toilet.
Meanwhile, UK reached herd immunity the natural real way in APRIL. The papers also admitted this but proceeded to gloss over it.
1112 c. Any order of the State Health Officer given to 1113 effectuate this paragraph is shall be immediately enforceable by 1114 a law enforcement officer under s. 381.0012.
MUH MILITARY. People forget they can legally enforce the law on duty.
Except as otherwise expressly provided in this 1191 act, this act shall take effect July 1, 2021.
Amid fears a sizeable proportion of the population are still sceptical of getting the Covid vaccine, those who have so far turned down the chance to get inoculated may soon get a knock on the door to find out why.
SHOVE YOUR DEATH LOTTO UP YOUR BACKSIDE.
And Boomers wonder why we never answer the door.
Door-to-door services have had some success during the pandemic with contact tracers and testers deployed to reach those who authorities have been unable to contact via other means.
No, they’re intimidating people. Legally, it’s intimidation. They chose to ignore you.
Mr Zahawi has declined to say whether the Government is recording data on everyone who has so far refused the vaccine.
so far? try always
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme yesterday, he confirmed that everybody who had had the vaccine went into the national immunisation vaccination system.
Remember this. DIY Pandemic since the natural route failed. So the only asymptomatic cases possible are the jabbed.
“There are two main types of immunity you can achieve with vaccines. One is so-called “effective” immunity, which can prevent a pathogen from causing serious disease, but can’t stop it from entering the body or making more copies of itself. The other is “sterilising immunity”, which can thwart infections entirely, and even prevent asymptomatic cases. The latter is the aspiration of all vaccine research, but surprisingly rarely achieved.”
Asymptomatic isn’t how the natural immune response works. Yeadon covered this.
They’ll have no excuse come autumn. 6/7 covered definitely qualifies as nationally covered. Either it protects the stabbed or, as evidence suggests, it’s more fatal to them due to ADE. That counts as a jab reaction.
I was in a class once and a bleeding heart asked why we used so many animal models. The professor rounded on her and asked Would you rather we kill your relatives instead? Shut her right up. I think about this a lot.
It was a biology class. He also went into a short burst of a lecture on longitudinal effects.
If they actually got even 60% (which they admit is basically mostly white people) then bye bye native population. I hope to God I’m wrong. Alas, the trajectory of the data by reaction gets worse by the day. Maybe this was a punishment for Brexit, would explain Boris.
I’m not sure I want to see what the world looks like, after this horror.
In this study, this study, and this study, it was found that people who were extroverts, outgoing and social had more D2 receptors in their brain (this is an oversimplification of the results. Link is provided for more detailed read.
It has been shown through the science of addiction and fMRI scans that the brain chemistry of the porn addict mimics the brain chemistry of addicts with other forms of addiction. These brain chemistry are characterized by hypofrontality (memory and cognitive impairment) and largely reduced number of D2 Receptors.
Actually, hypofrontality is a nice way of saying retardation since it refers to incomplete development or function. That’s literally what a retard is, the word meaning slow in French.
So they are literally retarding themselves, the wankers.
COMMENTS: First study to show that drug use causes a decline in dopamine (D2) receptors. Important because addicts have a low number of such receptors, which may contribute to addiction. Also shows that receptors can bounce back, but rate is highly variable and not related to baseline D2 receptors.
“..not.. accepting new.. clients who have taken.. experimental vaccine.. decision.. made in consultation with our insurance.. health professionals.. unknown effects of.. mRNA.. VIRAL SHEDDING..” – CP Fitness – personal health training facility in Waco, Texas pic.twitter.com/Q45O1Iizm3
A team of researchers from the US and the Netherlands recently reported that antibodies to the spike protein and the RBD are detected in saliva samples from healthcare workers vaccinated with mRNA vaccines. Within 1-2 weeks after receiving the 2nd dose of vaccine, 37 of 37 and 8 of 8 recipients of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, respectively, had IgG antibodies against the spike protein in their saliva, while IgA was also found in a significant proportion. These observations may be very crucial to understand vaccine-mediated protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease.
RNA is required for protein synthesis, does not integrate into the genome, is transiently expressed, is metabolized and eliminated by the natural mechanisms of the body and is therefore considered safe4,5,6,7. RNA-based prophylactic infectious-disease vaccines and RNA therapeutic agents have been shown to be safe and well-tolerated in clinical trials.
genome part is wrong
transience likely wrong too
On the basis of the tolerability profile of the first dose at 100 μg and the second dose at 30 μg, participants randomized to the 100-μg group did not receive a second vaccination. Reactogenicity was generally greater after the second dose in the other two dosing levels; however, symptoms were transient and resolved within a few days. Transient decreases in lymphocyte counts (grades 1–3) were observed within a few days after vaccination, and returned to baseline within 6–8 days in all participants. These laboratory abnormalities were not associated with clinical findings.
RNA vaccines are known to induce type-I interferon, which has been associated with transient migration of lymphocytes into tissues19,20,21,22.
Assuming that the neutralization titres that are induced by natural infection provide protection from COVID-19, comparing vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 neutralization titres to those from sera of convalescent humans provides a benchmark for the magnitude of the vaccine-elicited response and the potential of the vaccine to provide protection.
Because the titre at which human neutralizing antibodies are protective remains unknown, these findings are not proof of vaccine efficacy.
Efficacy will be determined in a pivotal phase III trial. Because the cohort that received the 100 μg dose level did not receive the booster dose, no data for immunogenicity after a second vaccination at this dose level are available; however, there were no substantial differences in immunogenicity between the 30-μg and 100-μg dose levels after the first dose. This observation suggests that a well-tolerated and immunogenic dose level may be between 10 μg and 30 μg for this vaccine candidate…..
Our study had several limitations. Although we used convalescent sera as a comparator, the kind of immunity (T cells versus B cells or both) and level of immunity needed to protect from COVID-19 are unknown. Furthermore, this analysis of available data did not assess immune responses or safety beyond 2 weeks after the second dose of vaccine. Both are important to inform the public health use of this vaccine.
Follow-up will continue for all participants and will include collection of serious adverse events for 6 months and COVID-19 infection and multiple additional immunogenicity measurements for up to 2 years. Although our population of healthy adults up to 55 years of age is appropriate for a phase I/II study, it does not accurately reflect the population at highest risk for COVID-19. Adults who are 65 years of age and over have already been enrolled in this study and results will be reported as they become available. Later phases of this study will prioritize enrolment of more diverse populations, including those with chronic underlying health conditions and from racial and ethnic groups that are adversely affected by COVID-1923.
Regular readers will recognize the usual antivaccine claims, just with the hyperbole and ridiculousness dialed up to 11 and beyond. I’ve mentioned many times how antivaxxers like to make the false claim that vaccines are made from the “tissue of aborted babies,” ignoring the fact that cells isolated from a fetus in the 1960s and maintained in culture in dishes over 50 years are not the same thing as “tissue from aborted human babies”.
THEY LITERALLY ARE THE SAME THING YOU FUCKING GAMMA
Non-neutralizing antibodies also recognize and attach to dangerous invaders, but they cannot prevent it from spreading. In a way, non-neutralizing antibodies are like GPS trackers. These proteins signal T cells and other parts of your immune system that there’s a problem, but not deal with it directly. Non-neutralizing antibodies are helpful, but they’re not as powerful for fighting infections as neutralizing antibodies. source
Non-neutralizing antibodies are also produced after viral infection. Such antibodies bind specifically to virus particles, but do not neutralize infectivity. They may enhance infectivity because antibodies can interact with receptors on macrophages. The entire virus-antibody complex is brought into the cell by endocytosis. Viral replication can then proceed because the antibody does not block infectivity. This pathway may allow entry into cells which normally do not bear specific virus receptors.
Non-neutralizing antibodies with Fc-mediated functions, such as antibody–dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), are of increasing interest in HIV-1 vaccine design. There is evidence that HIV-specific ADCC antibody responses are associated with slower HIV-1 progression.11 Further, ADCC responses can force immune escape, implying they impart significant pressure on virus replication.12 Macaque studies suggest that ADCC functions of antibodies can assist in protection from SHIV acquisition.13 The partially successful RV144 Thai HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial utilized a prime-boost regimen of a canarypox vector followed by a protein boost and induced robust ADCC responses.14,15 Interestingly, non-neutralizing antibody responses to specific Env regions were associated with protection from HIV-1 acquisition.14View chapterPurchase book
If a patient’s immune system produces only lower-affinity antibodies (or even non-neutralizing antibodies that do not block the receptor binding site of the spike protein at all), cellular protection becomes compromised, even though the immune system might try to compensate by producing increasing amounts of these weak or non-neutralizing antibodies.
Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory distress syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), was initially reported in December 2019 as pneumonia with unknown etiology in Wuhan city of China. The World Health Organization recognized SARS-CoV-2 as a public health concern and declared it as a pandemic on March 11, 2020. Over 12 million people have been affected across several countries since it was first recognized . The disease, unless combined with other comorbidities or other preexisting diseases, is usually mild. Approximately 11% of cases require acute medical aid . Broadly, two modes of transmission of COVID-19 exist—direct and indirect . The direct mode includes (1) transmission via aerosols formed via surgical and dental procedures and/or in the form of respiratory droplet nuclei; (2) other body fluids and secretions, for example, feces, saliva, urine, semen, and tears; and (3) mother-to-child. SARS-CoV-2 is thought to commonly spread via respiratory droplets formed while talking, coughing, and sneezing of an infected person. The exposure and, hence, risk of transmission are increased if the infected person is present within 1-m length of susceptible host. Less number of infected patients has shown to shed virus from sources other than the respiratory tract. Though not high, the risk of transmission through modes other than respiratory tract can still be possible. Indirect transmission may occur via (1) fomites or surfaces (e.g., furniture and fixtures) present within the immediate environment of an infected patient and (2) objects used on the infected person (e.g., stethoscope or thermometer) [3, 4].
that means skin
Several of these modes may be underestimated and cause increased spread of virus. The goal of this paper is to briefly review how SARS-CoV-2 is shown to transmit via various modes and propose measures to reduce the risk of spread within the population and operating personnel.
As the document states, one can be “exposed to [the] study intervention due to environmental exposure,” including “by inhalation or skin contact” with someone involved in the study, or with another who has been exposed in the same way.
Dosage: 3 cups per day or more of any desired strength (based on the quantity of needles added to a french press or teapot) with an approximate 1-3 tablespoons of needles per cup of near boiling water. This is a maintenance health-building dose.
maybe pine needle essential oil applied topically before seeing the doomed? wrists?
or liquorice root? Honestly I doubt breathing can cause infertility in women because it isn’t direct enough but I could be wrong. Maybe it’d cause miscarriage in the already pregnant but fucking a man with it is the grander risk. I wonder how long they’re taking the drug, I guess until the shedding stops? When is that exactly? Then again secondhand smoke gets into our bloodstream so why not secondhand spike proteins? Do the lepers have to die to stop shedding or is there a limit, suggesting why boosters? I’d say a month minimum shedding based on probability.
“Jacques Attali was an advisor to François Mitterrand (former President of France) and wrote this in 1981:
“In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old man, because once he is over 60-65 years old, man lives longer than he produces and it costs society dearly.
Then the weak and then the useless who do not contribute anything to society because there will be more and more, and especially finally the stupid.
Euthanasia directed at these groups; euthanasia must be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases.
Of course, we will not be able to execute people or organize camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe that it is for their own good.
… We won’t be able to pass intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine! …
We will find something or cause it; a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the elderly, it does not matter, the weak and the fearful will succumb.
The stupid will believe it and ask to be treated. We will have taken care of having planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.
The selection of idiots will therefore be done by itself: they will go to the slaughterhouse alone. “ This fragment is excerpted from his book “Brief History of the Future”, published in France in 2006.”
Understand that we are smart enough to find our own solutions, and apply them. Those willing to take proactive protective measures, maintain their health, and become more self-reliant will rise from this period of change and transformation successfully.