Dr on jab ethics

What ethics?

“We already know how politicians have coerced the public into conforming to their agenda through fearmongering and the implicit denial of their freedom if they do not consent to vaccination.  But in my article today I want to ask questions of British medical practice. …

{and omission, people forget the omissions}

Public Health England, the NHS and the medical profession have surely been negligent in not carrying out such a basic precautionary protocol given the novel nature of the vaccines themselves, the very short trial periods, emergency authorisation and an all but mandatory national rollout across all adult age groups – with child vaccination threatened. Is it really such an achievement to produce a pharmaceutical product very quickly (aided by advance government ordering) and start injecting it into people without a comprehensive scheme to analyse and monitor the long-term implications?”

Peer pressure – not just for kids.

Feature, not bug.

Doesn’t the Moderna website refer to their product as a ‘technology’? As in nanotech? This is not a dead version vaccine. It’s an experiment. They are legally permitted to lie to you for experimental purposes.

“The most difficult aspect of healthcare, in my opinion, is taking the time to listen to patients, obtain a good history, investigate their complaint, reach a differential diagnosis, a definitive diagnosis and treatment plan before spending even more time providing informed consent and finally carrying out the treatment. The vaccination programme has simply involved a huge amount of logistics, computers and getting people to turn up and be jabbed. Sometimes even the administration has been cropped and the message has been ‘just turn up and grab a jab’, almost as if you were going down to McDonald’s. The actual ‘jabbing’ has sometimes been delegated to people who are not qualified healthcare professionals. When I have asked vaccinated people how the proposed treatment was explained to them it was obvious that there had been a gross lack, a negligent lack of properly informed consent. When I have asked people how they felt after receiving the inoculation some have said they were fine but others who described feeling ill (enough for some to have had to take a few days off work) though they said they did not report it to their GP.

It is important they do. It is forcing the MHRA in the UK and the CDC in the US to add more detail to the listed observed side effects of the drug, for example as with myocarditis. “

Yes, just following orders. They’d have to sack doctors and nurses for administering it but volunteers?….

and guess who got the saline in his example, just guess

if those people who didn’t give a shit enough to go into work (and transmit and shed, potentially) nor tell their doctors of any side effects, if they start dropping in flu season, don’t fear the Reaper they chose it

with the bruise guy, the obvious question is – if that’s what it’s doing to his arm, what about his brain?

The brain has blood vessels, mate.

I hope to continue to support vaccination in rigorously safeguarded circumstances. But past disasters show why rushing out the coronavirus vaccine could still prove to be ‘colossally stupid’.

The Covid vaccination strategy and implementation may, in the field of medicine in years to come, be regarded as shameful. My confidence will be restored only once medical ethics return and these programmes are subjected to the highest forms of short and long term scrutiny. 

Aktion T4. They praised it initially. Initially.

By implementation, read: coercion.

Strangely, Florida and the Amish are fine.

The pharmaceutical companies of course have been awarded immunity from liability and NHS staff have also been granted indemnity protecting them from legal action as a result of any problems with the vaccine. 

What the law easily giveth, the law easily taketh away…

Following orders has never been a fucking excuse or every gang member ever would get off scot free.

Given the government’s financial incentives to doctors to jab as many people as possible, you might have thought the General Medical Council would have stepped in to protect the public from a conflict of interests. But no. In every respect the public has been left unprotected.

The Nuremberg Code was devised through painstaking years of expert legal wisdom with the sole aim to protect the public from the sort of unethical medical practice we are witnessing today.

Due to T4, where the doctors were mundane evil.


You know who else went door to door to find dissidents and people who didn’t want to comply with the state?
N a z i s. Wake up people, this is coming.

Yep, the Nazis were the official government presiding over T4. And you wonder why young people don’t answer the door.

Here the normies are waking up a smidge too late, as the literal army is in charge of ‘giving out’ the jabs, because this is totally normal and not at all creepy hold you down medical martial law or intimidation. So you can’t saunter on down and ask questions because these are literally the army. There is nobody medical.


The idiots of useful idiot fame are holier than thou:

“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.” – C. S. Lewis

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s