Democrat infections PROVE transmission

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243001

h/t Vox Day

from last post I did:

…No, it’s not true, and “the World Health Organization’s (WHO) chief scientist, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan” even admitted it’s not true. Here’s what she said: “I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.” (COVID 19 News Watch Archive, Children’s Health Defense)

but the NHS has admitted this on their website for ages. The ‘we do not knows’…

This also proves…. SHEDDING. Of the vax or the wild coof, you be the judge. Wild coof already has herd immunity, in April in this country, last year America reported it.
A shedding study MUST be conducted, to rule it out and silence the conspiracy theorists, naturally. Don’t you want to own the tinfoil hatters and debunk their kooky theories?

BBC

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210203-why-vaccinated-people-may-still-be-able-to-spread-covid-19

“When scientists analysed what had happened, they suggested that the chavrusa style of learning might have allowed for “particularly efficient transmission of mumps virus”. What might seem most surprising in this case is that the accidental superspreader had received a full course of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine. It’s likely that he did have some immunity – like the other vaccinated children, he developed relatively mild symptoms with no complications – but he was still able to carry the virus and transmit it to others.

In fact, most vaccines don’t fully protect against infection, even if they can block symptoms from appearing. As a result, vaccinated people can unknowingly carry and spread pathogens. Occasionally, they can even start epidemics. “

So you may pose a GREATER danger to others. Why do you deserve freedumb, comrade?

Wouldn’t it be hilarious if the health pass only applied to those smart enough to avoid this shit? Plot twist.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/feb/27/the-great-unknown-do-covid-vaccines-stop-you-spreading-the-virus

“Influenza vaccines don’t provide sterilising immunity, and depending on the vaccine type have an efficacy of between 4060% in terms of preventing disease. But they have proven invaluable at preventing hospitalisation and the burden of other diseases in vulnerable populations. It has also been shown with flu that other aspects of the immune system, unrelated to the immune response triggered by the vaccine, can kick in to fill the gaps. This may prove to be the case with Covid, but more time is needed to see if that effect kicks in.”

IF.

Hospitalisations are up, though?

This reassuring headline:

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cytokine-idUSKBN29Q2UT

Fact check: There is no evidence that mRNA vaccines would cause recipients to suffer from a ‘cytokine storm’

ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE.

WE’RE ABOUT TO LEARN WHY ONE TESTS THINGS BEFORE UNLEASHING THEM.

You may have risked life, limb, heart failure and your very fertility, but that is a risk… I am willing to take.
It was worth a shot, ey chaps?

Don’t listen to me, here’s a gov paper.

“In the current situation the JCVI has advised that
it is preferable for people in this age group to have
a vaccine other than AZ. You are more at risk of
the serious consequences of COVID-19 and will
have the most beneft from being vaccinated if
you are older, male, from certain minority ethnic
backgrounds, in some occupations, or are obese.
It is important that you have the vaccination as
soon as possible to protect you and to reduce
the chance of passing on the virus. If the situation
changes and you are offered the AZ vaccination
you may go ahead after you have considered all
the risks and benefts. Please carefully consider
the risk to both you and your family and friends of
COVID-19 before making your decision. Please
see the table overleaf.”

A reduction of 0.1% is worth ruining your heart, right?

“Currently JCVI has advised that it is preferable for
people under 30 to have a vaccine other than AZ
because the risk from COVID-19 infection is so low.
If you are offered the AZ vaccination you may wish
to go ahead after you have considered all the risks
and benefts for you.”

Everyone has a low death rate, more or less.

Mandating this shit for clubs is insane.

They describe common stroke signs at the end as normal.

then “Vaccination, helping to protect those most vulnerable” if getting it themselves didn’t work, this doesn’t work!

Helping by 0.1% is still helping, folks!

Talking about d-dimer results like that doctor from the video mentioned about heart failure:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/use-of-the-astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine-jcvi-statement-7-may-2021/use-of-the-astrazeneca-covid-19-azd1222-vaccine-updated-jcvi-statement-7-may-2021

Supposedly, 34 million doses prevented 10,000 deaths. Is that it? 2.94%?

“Consequent on lockdown measures and the ongoing successful deployment of the COVID-19 mass vaccination programme, COVID-19 incidence is currently low, as are COVID-19 associated hospitalisations and deaths. A number of mathematical models have been reviewed on the potential impact of any resurgence of COVID-19 in the UK. These models indicate that as COVID-19 restrictions are lifted across the country, the number of cases is likely to rapidly increase sometime in the second half of 2021. As such, the current high levels of vaccine uptake and high pace of vaccine deployment are critical to maintaining control over COVID-19 in the UK, especially as physical distancing measures are progressively relaxed. Strong and rapid vaccine coverage will help to minimise the health, social and economic impact of any future wave of COVID-19.”

Models failed last time too.

Obviously it would increase during flu season, bravo. Or ADE….

“JCVI advises that all individuals offered a COVID-19 vaccine should be fully informed about the benefits and risks of vaccination and consent accordingly.

And if they refuse consent?

“immune system which reacts by producing antibodies and memory T cells to the SARS-CoV2 virus without causing disease.”

In that case it would be sterilising and it is NOT.

page 8

“authorisation for TEMPORARY supply…” “to prevent COVID-19 disease”

as we now PLAINLY see, it doesn’t WORK to do that

“high protection seen… until two weeks after the second dose” page 9

TWO WHOLE WEEKS WOW BOY SIGN ME UP

“the level of immune response that provides protection is unknown

trans. They don’t know if it works.

“We currently do not know how long it will provide protection for”

NHS, guys. Slow clap, slow bus.

“there is currently no available data which described how long
protection from the vaccine will last. Surveillance of those vaccinated will show whether
vaccine protection is long-lasting and whether the vaccine prevents a vaccinated person
from carrying and spreading the virus. Booster doses beyond the recommended initial
dosing schedule are not currently recommended.”

LOL NOPE

+ I am suddenly allergic to ethanol (alcohol).

“This vaccine contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs). It does not contain
preservative.”

RNA is part of the genome so it contains modified genome fragment.

“There are no known risks associated with giving inactivated vaccines during pregnancy, as
inactivated vaccines cannot replicate so they cannot cause infection in either the mother or
unborn child. As with most pharmaceutical products, specific clinical trials of COVID-19
vaccine in pregnant women have not been carried out”

something is replicating

were the genetics of alpha version the one found in Dems?

“Termination of pregnancy following inadvertent immunisation is not
recommended”

suspicious

“There is no known risk associated with giving non-live vaccines whilst breastfeeding. It is
unknown whether the vaccine is excreted in human milk and there is no current safety data
on the use of the vaccine in breastfeeding mothers. The Joint committee for vaccination
and immunisation (JCVI) has advised that there is no known risk in giving the vaccine to
breastfeeding women. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists therefore
state that the vaccine can now be offered to breastfeeding mothers if they are otherwise
eligible (e.g. frontline healthcare worker, care home worker etc).”

That is not scientific.

absence of …. you know, you know.

“There is no evidence from clinical trials of any safety concerns from vaccinating those with a
past history of COVID-19 infection or with detectable COVID-19 antibodies, therefore those
who have had COVID-19 diseases (whether confirmed/suspected) can still receive the
vaccine. This is because it is not known how long antibodies made in response to natural
infection persist and whether immunisation could offer more protection. If antibodies have
already been made following natural infection, receiving the vaccine would be expected to
boost any pre-existing antibodies.”

Sensing a pattern?

re animal derivatives:

“The Astra Zeneca vaccine is produced in a human cell line.
These cells are then lysed to release the vaccine and the cell debris is filtered during vaccine
production (ref. SPS).”

Humans are animals. You mean aborted cells. Murdered babies. No COE comment?

“The recipient is fit and well / exercises regularly / has good immunity /
eats a healthy diet. Do they still need the COVID-19 vaccine?
Yes. COVID-19 is infectious and anyone can catch it. Having a strong immune system does
not guarantee that your COVID-19 symptoms will not be severe if you do catch it.
By having the COVID-19 vaccine, you are protecting those who are most vulnerable to
serious COVID-19 disease. Current available data suggest that increasing age and male
gender are significant risk factors for severe infection. However, there are also groups of
patients with underlying comorbidities, where infection may result in increased risk of
serious disease, including diabetes, cancer and severe asthma.”

FALSE

“Vaccination is the best protection against getting COVID-19.”

Clearly lies.

“No, you would not be exempt. The vaccine is not 100% effective, we do not know whether
it will stop you from catching or passing on the virus. Therefore you would need to isolate if
you were identified as a COVID-19 contact. Failure to self-isolate may result in a fine.”

It’s 0-40% effective.

One response to “Democrat infections PROVE transmission

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s