If you’re not free, you’re a slave.
It’s that simple. This challenges the notion of the freeman. Does the Gov own your body to take consent from the individual via coercion and intimidation? If so, can we hold them financially and medically accountable, fully, as legal dependents? (nb And how much !vax damage is covered for free on the NHS?! Also will private providers be forced to cover it, if the NHS does not? – FOI request the Parliament for this, publish answer)
Solution proffered at end.
“Firstly, to make vaccination the basis of whether someone is allowed entry to a venue, or participation in an activity, makes no logical sense in terms of protecting others. If the vaccines are highly effective in preventing significant disease, as seems to be the evidence from trial results to date, then those who have been vaccinated have already received protection; there is no benefit to them of other people being vaccinated. Further, since vaccines do not prevent infection per se even a vaccinated person could in theory carry and potentially pass on the virus, so to decide someone’s “safe non-spreader” status on the basis of proof of their immunity to disease is spurious.
Secondly, the introduction of vaccine passports would constitute an unethical form of coercion and violation of the principle of informed consent. People may have various reasons for being unable or unwilling to receive vaccines currently available including, for some Christians, serious issues of conscience related to the ethics of vaccine manufacture or testing. We risk creating a two-tier society, a medical apartheid in which an underclass of people who decline vaccination are excluded from significant areas of public life. There is also a legitimate fear that this scheme would be the thin end of the wedge leading to a permanent state of affairs in which COVID vaccine status could be expanded to encompass other forms of medical treatment and perhaps even other criteria beyond that. This scheme has the potential to bring about the end of liberal democracy as we know it and to create a surveillance state in which the government uses technology to control certain aspects of citizens’ lives. As such, this constitutes one of the most dangerous policy proposals ever to be made in the history of British politics.
Finally, as Christian leaders we wish to state that we envisage no circumstances in which we could close our doors to those who do not have a vaccine passport, negative test certificate, or any other “proof of health”. For the Church of Jesus Christ to shut out those deemed by the state to be social undesirables would be anathema to us and a denial of the truth of the Gospel. The message we preach is given by God for all people and consists in nothing other than the free gift of grace offered in Christ Jesus, with the universal call to repentance and faith in him. To deny people entry to hear this life-giving message and to receive this life-giving ministry would be a fundamental betrayal of Christ and the Gospel. Sincere Christian churches and organisations could not do this, and as Christian leaders we would be compelled to resist any such Act of Parliament vigorously.
We draw your attention to the recent Judicial Review overturning the Scottish Government’s ban on public worship, which demonstrates that such disproportionate prevention of the right to worship is a clear infringement under Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights. We cannot see how any attempt to prevent people gathering for worship on the basis of either testing or non-vaccination would not similarly be ruled to be a breach. We agree with those members of Parliament who have already voiced opposition to this proposal: that it would be divisive, discriminatory and destructive to introduce any such mandatory health certification into British society. We call on the government to assert strongly and clearly that it will not contemplate this illiberal and dangerous plan, not now and not ever.”
Also, ask how many religious organisations will be held to the exact same rules? Call out the mosques and synagogues. Two-faced enforcement is also grounds for a lawsuit that would abolish it. Many mosques have been open this entire time but the police daren’t oppose them.
This is sorting the wheat from the chaff.
My body is my Temple and I intend to keep it clean, they’d have to hold me down. Nothing more need be said. Bullies only respond to strength. You have given them no actual grounds to listen to you. Civil liberties can mutate into Collectivist Commie Responsibility quickly. You cannot reason with the reprobate. You haven’t told them anything you’re going to actually do. Say you’ll open, that this is their forewarning and intend to refuse to enforce any such mandate as evil. Call it evil. This is a matter of humanity, dignity and freedoms of conscience and association. Jesus let them arrest him, are you men or mice? Trust in the Lord to rescue you. Let people see what they do. YE OF LITTLE FAITH. What profit it you if you gain the worldly things and lose your soul? Cowards ask their entire life to be blessed by God then fail the test, whimpering they were tested and complaining about their ill-luck. A test is a blessing in disguise. Trials are not comfortable. If you side with worldly things, be prepared to be destroyed along with them.
Nobody is going to make Roman candles and you’re still terrified of a trifling inconvenience.
You must frontload against oppression. Meekness in the face of evil is weakness. Have faith in your Lord and the courage of your convictions. What’s a little prison and how will that make them look? You have more power than you realise. The Queen is protector of the faith AND Crown prosecutor (Regina versus) in ALL criminal cases. She can veto all statute. Act before a statute is written.
Would she convict you before the realm (and the COMMONWEALTH) and de–legitimise her own rule? Especially with America closely watching the Family? THINK. You would have all eyes and sympathy and legal validity.
It’s a BLUFF. Fucking CALL IT.
This would challenge the Monarchy’s very authority via divine right of kings i.e. its right to preside over us. They COULD NOT allow it to oppress Christians. This goes above the heads of the MP lackeys you appeal to, this goes all the way up to the top. The Queen wants good PR. The circumstances are ripe. Monarchy > Democracy MPs.
Write an Open letter to the coronated Protector of the Faith, to be viewed by all faithful Christians under her gracious Reign, including the Commonwealth. Beg for protection.
IT’S LITERALLY THE FOUNDATION FOR THEIR ENTIRE POWER STRUCTURE. You have nothing to lose.
Make history. France cannot do this. Italy cannot do this. You must inspire all of Christendom.
THE RIGHTEOUS HAVE THE HEART OF A LION. WHAT IS OUR NATIONAL, ROYAL ANIMAL?
If not, the words Constitutional Crisis have a certain ring to them.
p.s. ask FOI about Midazolam usage re fatalities given and medical justification for ever using it with opioids.
Freedom of THEIR religion:
Get the ingredients.
Once it’s in, it’s never coming out. Damage is cumulative. There is no proven limit to shedding.
“there’s no reversing this” RNA is part of the genome, it’s a genomic alteration and thusly permanent