Oct 1st deadline and shedding paper

I would’ve guessed September due to schools and universities.
Then there’s the magic bean branding of Poison AZ is worse than Poison PF. The illusion of choice.

So hypothetically we can sue the companies for damage from spike protein shedding, since we didn’t consent to take it into our body. Like trespassing, biochemically.

So good for you, the military in Australia is apparently using ‘task forces’ with the police to hold people down and inject them (chemical rape). I’ve asked for public videos I can link to about this, yet to see anything but it would make sense why Youtube suddenly suspended Sky News Australia. Why now?

https://www.fda.gov/media/89036/download

Design and Analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria-Based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products
Guidance for Industry

No pretending they didn’t know, this paper is six years old.

I’ve yet to see any proven limit to the shedding. Rumour has it they may stop after 2-4 weeks post each injection but this is unlikely. We know people have been producing spikes some 5 months later, so I’d wager eternal production that tapers off. This could be a straight AIDs.

See sections VI and also page 15.

“Shedding of such products may be intermittent and unpredictable”.

“higher potential for recombination or reversion in the patient, the shedding pattern and/or what is shed may change”

They’re supposed to already know, among other things:

“The duration of shedding, including the first and last day of shedding, and the peak period(s)”

Page 16 notes they need to study:

“• Whether the shed product was determined to be infectious.”

Watch the cop out:

“Because transmission to untreated individuals is an extremely low probability event,”

that is opinion, not fact

the point of science is checking

“monitoring such individuals for transmission is usually not required during the clinical

development of a product. However, if there is a potential for transmission, additional”

like a gain of function spike? That potential?

“data will be needed to assess that possibility; in which case, we recommend that sponsors

consult with OCTGT in connection with developing a monitoring plan.”

Monitoring. Not stopping. That’s it. And it’s probably why some of them were given placebo and saline. The shedding group?

One response to “Oct 1st deadline and shedding paper

1. Be civil. 2. Be logical or fair. 3. Do not bore me.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s