The Masons aren’t pagans

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/284331798357

Y U ASK?

They are ATHEISTS.
There is NO religion to them.
They are but a HUMBLE DRINKING CLUB.
That’s why all the secrecy, the levels and the sign on the door about abandoning God to pass onward.

They are not a religious organisation at all, no.

Even in Victorian times, as this locket clearly demonstrates, there was no Devil worship!

Reminder: this was before the invention of Wicca in the 1920s.

So, what does that star really mean?

So, this locket should not exist. Hint hint. I’m not buying it but one of you might get a kick.

If the Masons were so important, we’d have evidence!

Comic: CHINOs, Churchians and other cucks

You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?
You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?
You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?
You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?
You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?
You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?
You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?
You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?
You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?
You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?
You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?
You aren't gonna put me in the garbage dump, are you?

Wait, is this mansplaining? Did CHINOs invent it to talk over the Word? It is, isn’t it? Wow, it’s real. A dismissal and cover story lie.

“What you really mean is-” a subtle type of gaslight.

They are asserting you already believe the proposition they haven’t made yet so they don’t need to prove it as a positive claim. Assertion without argument. Time-travelling propositions, what a time to be alive. SJWs do it too, like that Channel 4 interviewer with Peterson. If you think the arguments are indeed the same thing ultimately, it is still on you making that claim to explain precisely why, with reasons.

So violation of burden of proof hiding behind a gaslight (you already believe this) appears to be mansplaining. Interesting.

SJW example parodied here.

Sometimes people do listen to me

Sometimes people do listen to me, pigs fly.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/hormone-pills-offered-pregnant-women-25533453

I’ve told you 1. a cure for covid found in the ground (liquorice root, glabra) 2. what was going to happen with national debts and the markets (over years including hyperinflation, called years ago) 3. the cure for early liver failure in supplement form and recently also 4. the cure for early heart disease in supplement form, both cheap. I know my stuff. I’m the most intelligent person on the planet nobody has ever heard of, because I don’t wish to be famous. I may be forced into the spotlight at some point but you could easily tell it was me because I’d know all …this. It’s very niche.

‘Member when I was writing about pregnancy a lot? Including but not limited to the Vitamin C abortion post. I know/of a lot of pregnant women currently (not my situation, presently, but others) and they sought my advice. This is what happens when you listen. I have no reason to lie, financially or otherwise.
I was researching how oestrogen dominance is affecting women of the West and the cure, from an obscure American doctor’s blog I linked previously on here, seems to be pure progesterone, no wacky dacky variations. However, I pointed out it’s more reliably absorbed in a topical vehicle (as did the American) and the NHS loves them some pills. (Redpill: Many women are too lazy for topicals or too dumb to apply them properly, saturating one area of skin to the point of inaction).
However, I curiously neglected to mention how this may prevent a return of breast cancers, another reason I researched it.
Softly softly catchy monkey. The NHS doesn’t like things that actually reduce its budget, it’s a socialist exercise in embezzlement and most of the money goes to the black-hole of mysterious ‘admin’. Progesterone tamps down oestrogen in women to normal healthy levels, and breast cancer is heavily an oestrogenic disease (even in men). So it can help for male BC cases too. They’d need to balance T and other related androgen types to the male levels, though, requires a little more tinkering but I’d happily oversee the study (I’m not a Dr). Obviously it isn’t as important as pregnancy and men don’t technically need their breasts, they’re easily removed. However, in women and pregnancy and preventing …death, this works and is important to the future of our civilization. Now I haz proof. But there’s a lot more to it.
Mark my words.
Considering one common cause of death (COD) in women is that, and on the rise with the junk food pushed at women, I like to think I’ve found a cure for cancer, at least a resurgence of it. It’s hardly THE cure but it’s a good starting point. Credit where it’s due. This might become salient if the clot shots cause it by the adenoviral oncogenesis mechanism.

A lot of women will need a progesterone prescription during pregnancy, purely due to the postmodern high E environment.

[I know I probably shouldn’t be sharing this in case the enemy gets it, including Mrs Midwest with her recent sickeningly enthused support of certain race-mixing, (that white model camwhore doing all the IVF married to the gross Chink, I’d rather die) but they’ll probably find out anyway so I may as well claim it.]

However, this unhealthy hormonal skew exists more in non-whites, whose testosterone is often too high, especially the Asians with the manjaws bigger and broader than their husbands*, even while trying IVF and explains their super-high fail rate. Did I tell them this? Fuck no. Demographics is destiny, I’m not a traitor. Still. They do. Objectively. They can’t just admit it so they’ll never test it.* The Satanists imitated race-mixing in non-mixers, using chemical warfare to do it.* Meanwhile, mixed race couples (like Taylor R) have more infertility issues due to hormonal issues such as this*. Again, did I tell? …What do you think?

I only want to help people that Satanic anti-natal pollution is trying to kill, God works in mysterious ways, higher than my scientific pride, and I fear his wrath.
Don’t fuck with your bloodline. There were so many passages about this and a full Commandment.

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Race-Mixing/

Deuteronomy 23:2 – A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

Job 14:4 – Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one.

Nehemiah 13:3 – Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.

Hebrews 13:4 – Marriage is honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge.

Note: mis-translations of the Adultery commandment are especially Satanic.

Leviticus 20:24 – But I have said unto you, Ye shall inherit their land, and I will give it unto you to possess it, a land that floweth with milk and honey: I am the LORD your God, which have separated you from other people.

The Bible is so abundantly clear that you cannot endorse any form of mixing and be a Christian:

https://biblehub.com/leviticus/21-14.htm

He must not marry a widow, a divorced woman, or a woman defiled by prostitution, but only a virgin from his own people,

See more at end.

*orally test European and Asian young women who’ve never taken contraception, you’ll see who’s higher T. The broad, thick square jaw cannot hide. Check WHR too.
*Yeah “you have more T than your cuck soy white boy hubby”, that’ll go down well! Great PR!
*all the companies they own under an umbrella corp polluting us with xenoestrogens is a fucking coincidence? Why do you think they did that? Look at the birth rate then back to me.
They cannot decrease European women’s genetic higher levels of E so they made them super high and temporarily lifestyle infertile (but also fat, to encourage race-mixing in both sexes). This has caused a surge of partially genetic conditions like endometriosis, which the very curvy Marilyn Monroe had, that the spike shot also imitates to abort babies, as previously covered.
*why do you think the chink IVF people put her, a race-mixer, on hormonal meds? You think they dunno? Curiously Taylor’s URL and so old channel name (linked above, hover) is TaylorR1488. Click it, the link works. User names do not change on YT, channel names can. She knows it’s wrong and still did it. How degenerate. What a waste of good white genes, making a fug fat mongoloid hybrid. Know a tree by its fruit. They have some fugly fucking fruit. The kid’s mental illness rate is the cherry on top, follow my tags.

There’s a whole shit sundae beneath and there but for the grace of holy GOD go I!

Note: this also explains why so many women with Dominance symptoms get pregnant on the pill. One form of the Pill is actually pure progesterone, by itself. If her levels were postmodern and unhealthy before, taking the pill like that actually made her MORE fertile because oral contraceptives assume the woman’s levels are healthy and normal to begin with, a grandiose assumption that doesn’t factor in pollutants in the food, air, water, shampoo etc. Asians on the combined Pill are more likely to get pregnant because their race is high in T so lacking in P and E, which is literally the Pill. The manosphere wanted answers, I got ’em! The slow conception is actually caused by the mixing, not the Pill. Read: A lot of those Thai hookers are indeed fertile on the Pill, if they’re actually women. This is also why women are horrified at the cuck soy white guy who would settle for them once they go off the Pill, her oestrogen levels are dropping to her genetic levels of femininity (look at the jaw, it’s low). See? Who else can explain so many levels of other people’s valid observations, neatly wrapped into a glorious little Christian and scientifically compliant bow? Yeah bet we’re all jealous of the rice-cookers and mudsharks, right faggots?

And I guess I jealously wrote the Bible too, huh? 😛

End

The Bible clearly calls it a betrayal, it’s genetic treachery:

https://biblia.com/bible/esv/numbers/36/3-6

But if they are married to any of the sons of the other tribes of the people of Israel, then their inheritance will be taken from the inheritance of our fathers and added to the inheritance of the tribe into which they marry. So it will be taken away from the lot of our inheritance. And when tthe jubilee of the people of Israel comes, then their inheritance will be added to the inheritance of the tribe into which they marry, and their inheritance will be taken from the inheritance of the tribe of our fathers.”

And Moses commanded the people of Israel according to the word of the Lord, saying, “The tribe of the people of Joseph uis right. This is what the Lord commands concerning the daughters of Zelophehad: ‘Let them marry whom they think best, vonly they shall marry within the clan of the tribe of their father.

So we see the women still had the choice, within certain limits, i.e. the LAW of GOD. I can always spot real Christians by the presence or absence of fearing His wrath. If you think rich Asians haven’t asked me out, think again. Like drugs, just say no.

It speaks of destroying them totally because God drives them out, literally the opposite of taking in rapefugees and visa people.

When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations—the Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites, seven nations larger and stronger than you— and when the Lord your God has delivered them over to you and you have defeated them, then you must destroy them totally.[a] 

Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy. Do not intermarry with them. Do not give your daughters to their sons or take their daughters for your sons, for they will turn your children away from following me to serve other gods, and the Lord’s anger will burn against you and will quickly destroy you. This is what you are to do to them: Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones, cut down their Asherah poles[b] and burn their idols in the fire.

Noble pagan my arse. (Also, Muslims have a sacred stone).

Puts the mongrel child mental illness rates into sharp focus, dunnit? His ways are truly Higher. I have this conviction not out of envy (do you know how easy white women can get browns, including yellows? I could get a hundred numbers in a week if I wanted, easily) but because I have actually read the Bible and taken pains to understand my Creator’s Will for my life.
It is an abomination and all the studies of bad outcomes prove it conclusively. Do you think the Marxists happen to be right about this one thing? How naive.

For those cucks saying “the Old Testament doesn’t count anymore, only Jesus!”

Try actually READING:

https://biblehub.com/hebrews/13-8.htm

Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.

And Jesus said “The Scripture (OT) cannot be broken” John 10:35, called it the “commandment of God” (Matthew 15:3) and the “Word of GOD” (Mark 7:13). The current year is in our LORD and he spake.

https://danielmiessler.com/blog/no-jesus-did-not-soften-the-old-testament-in-fact-he-did-the-opposite-and-heres-what-that-means/

I’m compelled to speak this truth, repeatedly, however they mock me, by Matthew 28:20.

20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

Not the parts you like from reprobate pride and sick twisted lusts, conveniently ignoring the parts ‘pornographers’ spend a lot of money to brainwash you to practise, in direct violation of your Father!

You can tell the ‘hate speech’ laws are Satanic because only Christians cannot speak the most blatant truths about our own scripture. The Father of Lies (Satan) doesn’t mind many of the misconceptions in other religions, including incest. So what is this, logically, but outcest? Outbreeding is the technical Darwinian name, miscegenation the postmodern one. The SJWs fear me for good reason, I’m empirical. The worst part is the outcome studies are there, existing, as proof for the violation and these so-called redpills do not care. You’ll answer to your Father, don’t worry about me. I love watching fuck-ups.

Daniel 12:24

But you, Daniel, roll up and seal the words of the scroll until the time of the end. Many will go here and there to increase knowledge.”

All of Matthew 5 also fits.

3:10

The ax is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.

Miscegenation is genetic death, right there.

Edit: relevant https://adam4d.com/old-testament-god/


Starve the Beast

I know of specific, major shows cancelling early (like day/s early) because they demanded a ‘covid passport’ for entry. Did I attend them? No. Attendees told me. “There was no one there”.

I can’t say but…. a lot. And economically very very important, not like knitting circles.

VIPs are meeting privately, which is preferred. No diversity bullshit.

This is an experiment in malicious compliance.

Films are also bombing like the chink directed Eternals race-mixing propaganda, especially in countries requiring ‘passes’.

No transmission difference when studied

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211124/Markers-of-SARS-CoV-2-shedding-in-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-individuals.aspx

In this study, the authors discovered no statistically significant difference in transmission potential between completely vaccinated people and those who were not fully vaccinated. As a result, the findings suggest that prevention and mitigation measures should be implemented regardless of vaccination status for those living in high-risk environments or who have large exposure to the virus.

No info on actual shedding.

Stigmatizing the normal is not warranted, says guy doing his damn job:

There is increasing evidence that vaccinated individuals continue to have a relevant role in transmission. In Massachusetts, USA, a total of 469 new COVID-19 cases were detected during various events in July, 2021, and 346 (74%) of these cases were in people who were fully or partly vaccinated, 274 (79%) of whom were symptomatic.

vaxdemic

In Münster, Germany, new cases of COVID-19 occurred in at least 85 (22%) of 380 people who were fully vaccinated or who had recovered from COVID-19 and who attended a nightclub.5 People who are vaccinated have a lower risk of severe disease but are still a relevant part of the pandemic. It is therefore wrong and dangerous to speak of a pandemic of the unvaccinated…

Telegraph: Politicians got saline +ONCOvirus

“During the conference she showed codes on the bottles where each contains 1, 2 or 3 digits, and then explained the meaning of those numbers.

Number 1 is the placebo, saline. Number 2 is a the mRNA. The number 3 is an mRNA stick that contains the onco gene, linked to the adenovirus that contributes to the development of cancer. She said those receiving the number 3 bottle will develop soft tissue cancer within two years of receiving the jab.”

So she secretly gave the politicians number 3? By ‘accident’, of course.

comment

“If you check hard enough, you will find references to that fact that certain batches of vaccine deployed in the USA have far more deadly consequences than others. Deaths and bad reactions are not occurring randomly as one might expect, they are in clusters where the vaccine batch is the common denominator. Other batches have essentially no consequences. What is in them? Enquiring minds want to know.”

People are referencing a Robert O Young.

And in the UK, Amazon and other companies are tracking you like a prisoner:

The Daily Record reports, “We have learned the NHS mobile phone app which presents the personal medical information in the form of a QR Code shares data with companies including Amazon, Microsoft, ServiceNow, Royal Mail and an AI facial recognition firm.”

Cardiac issues paper:

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

RE ONCO GENES, TEXTBOOK:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8503/

Infection may be productive, abortive, or latent. In productive infections, the viral genome is transcribed in the nucleus, mRNA is translated in the cytoplasm, and virions self-assemble in the nucleus. In latent infections and in transformed and tumor cells, viral DNA is integrated into the host genome. Virus-host DNA recombinants are also found in productive infections.”

“Most adolescents and adults have circulating neutralizing antibodies; immunity is widespread. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes destroy adenovirus-infected cells.

There is no treatment. Whole-virus vaccines are not used because of the potential risk of oncogenesis. Other vaccines, including recombinant vaccines, are under development, but adenoviruses do not represent a serious health hazard.”

So far.

Host cells differ in permissivity for adenovirus types (Table 67-2). In permissive cells, the virus multiplies productively and kills the host cell. Other cells are semipermissive, allowing replication at low efficiency, whereas in still others replication is blocked and the infection is abortive. As discussed below, in some abortive infections all or part of the genome may be integrated into the host DNA, resulting in a latent infection, which may lead to oncogenic transformation.”

Slow kill.

“Most of the adenovirus genes (Fig. 67-3) are transcribed by the host DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II in a complex transcriptional program. This program is regulated by the nucleotide sequences and the structure of the viral promoters and by a host of cell-encoded transcription factors that recognize specific upstream and downstream nucleotide sequence motifs in the promoters. Genes in the E1A region of the adenovirus genome are the first to be transcribed. One protein product of this gene region is a transactivator that is essential for the activation of all other viral genes. This immediate-early viral function can also activate or inactivate certain cellular genes.”

“Virus interaction with a host cell can be blocked at many different steps, thus leading to an incomplete or abortive cycle. Depending on the permissivity of the host cell, different types of adenovirus-host cell interactions can be distinguished (Table 67-2). Many cultured human epithelioid cell lines are productively infected by human adenoviruses. Rat cells are semipermissive (e.g., for Ad5), and permit viral replication only at low efficiency. The outcome of an adenovirus infection depends on the animal species, cell type, and virus type involved. For example, hamster cells are abortively infected with human Ad12. The viral DNA is transported to the nucleus, where part of it is integrated into the host cell genome. Both in productively and in abortively-infected cells, the viral DNA gravitates towards and becomes transiently associated with the host cell chromosomes as demonstrated by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Most of the early viral genes are transcribed, but the late genes remain silent in the host cells. Ad12 DNA replication in hamster cells cannot be detected with the most sensitive techniques. The major late promoter of Ad12 DNA is inactive in both uninfected and Ad12-infected hamster cells, whereas it functions in infected human cells. Ad2 cannot replicate in monkey cells; in this case, the translation of some of the late viral mRNAs is amiss. The adenovirus genome persists, perhaps for a very long time, in cells of the human tonsils. It is not known how adenovirus replication in this human organ is restricted.”

“Latency and persistence of, as well as oncogenicity by, DNA viruses are frequently associated with integration of all or part of the viral genome into the host cell DNA. Integration of adenovirus DNA has been demonstrated in abortively infected cells, in adenovirus-transformed cells, and in Ad12-induced tumor cells. In productively infected human cells, recombination between adenovirus DNA and host cell DNA has also been observed. However, it is not known whether this recombination can lead to stable integration, because in the productive infection cycle the host cells are eventually killed. There is evidence that early in productively infected human cells Ad12 DNA becomes preferentially integrated into human chromosome 1.

GM humans, no longer human beings legally.

They’re signing you.

“Recently, an interesting alternate mechanism of insertional mutagenesis in adenovirus-transformed or Ad12-induced tumor cells was discovered. Insertion of Ad12, plasmid or bacteriophage lambda DNA into established mammalian genomes can lead to extensive changes in patterns of cellular DNA methylation far away from and on chromosomes different from those of the site of viral DNA integration. Since patterns of DNA methylation are related to expression patterns and genome organization, alterations in patterns of DNA methylation might affect many cellular functions whose altered expression may play a role in insertional mutagenesis and viral oncogenesis.”

“Analyses of several different integration sites in transformed cell lines suggest that transcriptionally active regions of the host cellular genome, which have a characteristic chromatin structure, are most apt to recombine with foreign (viral) DNA. Adenovirus DNA frequently recombines with cellular DNA via its termini, and terminal viral nucleotides are often deleted from the integrated viral DNA molecule. In general, considerable variability is observed in the structure of the site of integration. No specific cellular DNA sequence has been found at the site of viral DNA insertion in established cell lines. Cellular DNA can be deleted at the insertion site, or the cellular site can be preserved to the last nucleotide. Ad12 DNA is frequently integrated nearly intact in the DNA of nonpermissive hamster cells. However, Ad2 DNA is usually integrated in fragments in hamster cells permissive for Ad2.”

Making mutants:

“The adenovirus system has also served as a model for studying the function of sequence-specific promoter methylations in mammalian cells. Upon integration of the adenovirus genome into the host cell genome, a highly specific pattern of methylation is de novo imposed on the integrated viral genome during many cell generations. This de novo methylation is not primarily dependent on nucleotide sequence. Site of integration, structure of integrate and genetics of the host cell are contributing factors. There is evidence from analyses in many different biologic systems that sequence-specific promoter methylations can cause long-term gene inactivation.”

Why so many boosters?

Somewhat self-erasing:

“Ad12-transformed hamster cells or Ad12-induced hamster tumor cells maintained in culture can eventually lose the integrated copies of viral DNA. This loss suggests that adenoviruses might cause transformation by a “hit and run” mechanism.”

“The so-called oncogenes represent a set of cellular genes that are involved in many different ways in growth control. Oncogenes in adenovirus-induced tumor or transformed cells have received surprisingly little attention. The few studies on this topic have reported occasional changes of oncogene activity, particularly for the myc gene. Moreover, E1 proteins can bind tightly to the product of the retinoblastoma (RB) or the p53 gene, which are considered to be anti-oncogenes. It has been suggested that the fixation of the anti-oncogene products by E1 proteins might contribute to the transformation of cells. The interplay of several viral and cellular factors may eventually alter the cellular growth control and weaken or overcome the host defenses in such a way that an adenovirus-transformed rodent cell can grow into a solid tumor.”

Little attention? Wanna bet?

“Since many human tumors do not contain even traces of adenovirus genes or gene products, the possibility that adenoviruses cause human tumors is low. New, more sensitive techniques are now available. Moreover, the “hit and run” hypothesis has not been ruled out. Since even experimentally induced tumors can lose the viral genome and retain oncogenicity, this possible mechanism of transformation of human cells is still being studied.”

NOT known to what extent they “continue to replicate” through life.

Nice.

“Adenoviruses have been isolated from severely immunocompromised patients, such as those with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Many of these isolates, including the adenovirus types 42 to 47, are found in the urine of AIDS patients.”

Control:

“Since adenoviruses are excellent antigens, vaccination could be very effective. However, viral vaccines usually have not been used because adenoviruses are involved in tumorigenesis in animals and in cell culture. Moreover, adenovirus infections only rarely cause serious complications. Nevertheless, efforts are under way to produce vaccines by recombinant DNA technology. Purified hexon or fiber preparations induce high levels of neutralizing antibodies, and vaccines based on these proteins have been tested successfully.”

“Adenoviruses have been used as vector systems in approaches towards human somatic gene therapy. The early region E3 of the viral genome is not essential for viral replication in cell culture and can be removed to yield space in the genome for the insertion of foreign genes constructed for therapeutic purposes. Moreover, the E1 region of the adenoviral genome can be excised to incapacitate viral replication in human tissues thus offering further space for foreign gene insertions. Manipulated, E1-deficient adenovirions can be propagated in the human cell line 293 which contains in an integrated form and constitutively expresses the E1 region of Ad5. Results adduced to date indicate that manipulated adenoviral genomes, e.g. with the test gene for β-galactosidase under eukaryotic promoter control inserted, persist and continue to express this test gene in different organs of rodents for periods up to months. It is not known whether these viral genomes can integrate into the host genome under these conditions.”

From? 1996

2019

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31821536/

Extensive studies on viral-mediated oncogenic transformation by human adenoviruses have revealed much of our current understanding on the molecular mechanisms that are involved in the process. To date, these studies have shown that cell transformation is a multistep process regulated by the cooperation of several adenoviral gene products encoded in the early regions 1 (E1) and 4 (E4). Early region 1A immortalizes primary rodent cells, whereas co-expression of early region protein 1B induces full manifestation of the transformed phenotype. Beside E1 proteins, also some E4 proteins have partial transforming activities through regulating many cellular pathways. Here, we summarize recent data of how adenoviral oncoproteins may contribute to viral transformation and discuss the challenge of pinpointing the underlying mechanisms.

oncogene 1998

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC147177/

2001 breast cancer

https://www.nature.com/articles/1204914

Considering this,

https://www.news-medical.net/health/What-are-Adenovirus-Based-Vaccines.aspx

A coronavirus vaccine known as ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or AZD1222 was developed by the University of Oxford and AstraZeneca to treat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (the cause of COVID-19). In this vaccine, a modified version of a chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAdOx1) is used which can enter human cells but not replicate inside. A gene for the coronavirus vaccine was added into the adenovirus DNA, allowing the vaccine to target the spike proteins that SARS-CoV-2 uses to enter human cells.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32156-5/fulltext

Use of adenovirus type-5 vectored vaccines: a cautionary tale

We are writing to express concern about the use of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 (Ad5) vector for a COVID-19 phase 1 vaccine study,1 and subsequent advanced trials.

Over a decade ago, we completed the Step and Phambili phase 2b studies that evaluated an Ad5 vectored HIV-1 vaccine administered in three immunisations for efficacy against HIV-1 acquisition.23 Both international studies found an increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition among vaccinated men.24 The Step trial found that men who were Ad5 seropositive and uncircumcised on entry into the trial were at elevated risk of HIV-1 acquisition during the first 18 months of follow-up.5 The hazard ratios were particularly high among men who were uncircumcised and Ad5 seropositive, and who reported unprotected insertive anal sex with a partner who was HIV-1 seropositive or had unknown serostatus at baseline, suggesting the potential for increased risk of penile acquisition of HIV-1. Importantly for considering the potential use of Ad5 vectors for COVID-19 infection, a similar increased risk of HIV infection was also observed in heterosexual men who enrolled in the Phambili study.4 This effect appeared to persist over time. Both studies involved an Ad5 construct that did not have the HIV-1 envelope. In another HIV study, done only in men who were Ad5 seronegative and circumcised, a DNA prime followed by an Ad5 vector were used, in which both constructs contained the HIV-1 envelope.6 No increased risk of HIV infection was noted. A consensus conference about Ad5 vectors held in 2013 and sponsored by the National Institutes of Health indicated the most probable explanation for these differences related to the potential counterbalancing effects of envelope immune responses in mitigating the effects of the Ad5 vector on HIV-1 acquisition.7 The conclusion of this consensus conference warned that non-HIV vaccine trials that used similar vectors in areas of high HIV prevalence could lead to an increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition in the vaccinated population. The increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition appeared to be limited to men; a similar increase in risk was not seen in women in the Phambili trial.4

https://www.nature.com/articles/1204861

Regulation of the cell cycle and apoptosis by the oncogenes of adenovirus

  • 2001

The oncogenes of adenovirus, E1A and E1B, play an essential role in establishing a productive virus infection in human cells, and are both necessary and sufficient for transformation of primary rodent epithelial cells (White, 19951998). The products of the E1A and E1B genes also modulate the interaction between the infected cell and the immune system of the human or rodent host (Wold et al., 1999). E1A stimulates entry into S phase to create the appropriate environment for the replication of viral DNA in productively infected human cells. This same growth deregulatory function of E1A is also essential to the transformation of primary rodent cells. E1A accomplishes cell cycle deregulation by binding to and perturbing the normal function of key negative regulators of cell growth, including the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), and the transcriptional coactivator p300. Ironically, these very activities of E1A that are required for productive virus infection and oncogenic transformation also stimulate programmed cell death (apoptosis) (White, 19951998). Apoptosis is the cellular defensive response to gross perturbation in cell growth regulation induced by E1A during virus infection and transformation. E1A expression in productively infected cells also decreases the threshold of killing by death signaling cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), which facilitates death of infected cells. Neither of these events is favorable for virus production. In transformation, the induction of apoptosis by E1A nearly abrogates the oncogenic activity of E1A, and necessitates that E1A be coexpressed with an inhibitor of apoptosis for transformation to occur. All of these pro-apoptotic activities are counteracted by expression of E1B, which sustains productive infection and transformation.

1991 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2357510

You get the picture.

‘Vaccine’ mortality data, 4-5x risk

America is screwed to the tune of at least one in four.

“According to the report – which was released by the US Food and Drug Administration to provide background information on its questionable decision to grant full approval for the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 mRNA injection, after initially offering limited emergency use authorisation just six months after the vaccine’s clinical trial began – the total number of deaths reported in the vaccinated group was nearly one-quarter higher than the number of deaths in the placebo group.”

“While Pfizer released partial data on the outcomes from the six-month assessment ending March 13th, the new FDA report includes more comprehensive data, and shows a significantly higher number of all-cause fatalities among the vaccinated cohort.”

“The FDA report, however, revealed a larger number of deaths by all causes in both groups, with 17 deaths among the control group and 21 in the vaccinated cohort….

The relative difference in all-cause deaths between the two cohorts equates to 23.5%, with the vaccinated population having a higher all-cause mortality rate.”

Give them the traffic for the rest. Now onto the UK in detail:

Because the data shows that the fully vaccinated are up to five times more likely to die if infected with Covid-19.

Public Health Scotland publish a weekly report containing statistics on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status, and their latest report was published on Wednesday 22nd November.

The report contains data on the number of Covid-19 cases and hospitalisations from October 23rd 2021 to November 19th 2021, and the number of Covid-19 deaths from 16th October 2021 to 12th November 2021.

Here’s what the latest report revealed in terms of whether this is a ‘Pandemic of the Unvaccinated or Fully Vaccinated’…

Table 18 of the latest ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ shows the number of Covid-19 cases per week by vaccination status between October 23rd and November 19th. We’ve created the following chart on the published data.

source page 41

This data proves that the majority of Covid-19 cases in the past four weeks have been among the fully vaccinated population.

The above chart shows the cumulative number of cases per week by vaccination status as well as the projected number of cases per week up to December 17th 2021 based on the current trend.

….

But there are far more cases among the vaccinated population, with 50,222 cases being recorded between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th, and projections show cases could rise to a cumulative total of approximately 105,000 by Dec 17th.

Table 19 of the latest ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ shows the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations per week by vaccination status between October 23rd and November 19th. We’ve created the following chart on the published data.

page 47:

……But things are looking much worse for the fully vaccinated. There were 1,564 Covid-19 hospitalisations among the vaccinated population between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th. But projections show this could rise to a cumulative total of approximately 3,300 by Dec 17th.

Table 20 of the latest ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ shows the number of Covid-19 deathsper week by vaccination status between October 16th and November 12th. We’ve created the following chart on the published data.

Source 

This data proves that the majority of Covid-19 deaths in the past four weeks have been among the fully vaccinated population……

As things stand there were just 54 Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population between Oct 16th and Nov 12th, with projections showing deaths could increase to a cumulative total of approximately 95 by Dec 10th among the unvaccinated.

But if you are fully vaccinated then your chances of dying if infected with Covid-19 look far worse. Because there were 447 deaths among the vaccinated population between Oct 16th and Nov 12th, and projections show deaths could rise to a cumulative total of approximately 930 by Dec 10th.”

~5x more likely? Maybe more?

You give them the traffic for the chart mentioned:

“The chart shows that the vaccinated population accounted for 64% of cases and 74% of hospitalisations between Oct 23rd and Nov 19th, whilst the unvaccinated population accounted for 36% of cases and 26% of hospitalisations.”

Meanwhile between Oct 16th and Nov 12th, the vaccinated population accounted for a frightening 89% of Covid-19 deaths, whilst the unvaccinated population accounted for just 11%.

I hate being right.

“These are the figures we should be looking at to determine the effectiveness of the vaccines because it is impossible to be hospitalised with Covid-19 or die with Covid-19 if you have not first been infected with Covid-19.”

“The above chart shows the case-hospitalisation rate (No. Cases / No. Hosp.), case-fatality rate (No. Cases / No. Deaths), and hospitalisation fatality rate (No. Hosp / No. Deaths) by vaccination status.”

“Therefore, the rates per 100,000 of the general population used by the likes of BBC News are used to deceive you.”

I skipped the long-winded data explanation bit.

“Now that we’ve cleared that up – It’s quite concerning to find that all three rates are much higher among the vaccinated population, we should surely be seeing the opposite if the Covid-19 vaccines reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death?”

You assume their purpose was to prevent it.

“But unfortunately the above figures do not just suggest that the vaccines are ineffective, they actually suggest that they make the recipient worse.

A vaccine effectiveness of 0% would mean that the vaccines are ineffective and the vaccinated and unvaccinated have the same chance of dying if infected with Covid-19.

But a vaccine effectiveness of -95% would mean that the vaccines actually make the recipient worse, by for example decimating the recipients immune system, or invoking a response such as antibody-dependent-enhancement. Which makes the following figures extremely concerning.

“The above chart shows the increased risk of hospitalisation if infected with Covid-19, the increased risk of death if infected with Covid-19, and the increased risk of death if hospitalised with Covid-19, among the vaccinated population. The percentages have been calculated based on the ‘Rates by Vaccination Status’ calculated in the previous chart.

The chart shows that the vaccinated are 63% more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19 if infected, therefore this shows that the Covid-19 vaccines have an average vaccine effectiveness of -63% against hospitalisation.

But the most concerning figure demonstrated on the above chart shows that the vaccinated are 394% more likely to die with Covid-19 if infected. This shows that the Covid-19 vaccines have an average vaccine effectiveness of –394% against death suggesting the injections are completely decimating the recipients immune systems.”

Nearly 400%

“But not only that, the data also proves that the Covid-19 injections not only do not work, they also make the recipient worse, with a case-fatality rate five times higher among the vaccinated population than the unvaccinated population.”

h/t VD
In happier news!

Frankensteins are being killed by their own monster. Frankenstein was the doctor.

I think I speak for everyone when I say:

BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD

Youtube subtly enables “MAPs”

Now counted as ‘hate speech’:

Attacks on a person’s emotional, romantic and/or sexual attraction to another person. 

Nothing about protecting minors or age of consent.
NOTHING.

And they criticize Trump for being with Melania all the time.

If we can’t call furries, weebs and pedos sick, WTF free speech is there?

A paraphilia is a pathology, not an orientation. Youtube is acting like a World Government.

Vox was right, this “I don’t see race/sex/gender” shit ends in “I don’t see age.”

I warned you too but he was spot-on in the slide.

You have to click on the Other Types tab here:

This bit also applies to child abusers:

  • Claim that individuals or groups are physically or mentally inferior, deficient, or diseased based on any of the attributes noted above. This includes statements that one group is less than another, calling them less intelligent, less capable, or damaged.
  • Conspiracy theories saying individuals or groups are evil, corrupt, or malicious based on any of the attributes noted above.

The MAPs rebrand of child predators would count.

Banning modern science:

  • A documentary about the scientific study of humans: A documentary about how theories have changed over time, even if it includes theories about the inferiority or superiority of specific groups, would be allowed because it’s educational. We won’t allow a documentary claiming there’s scientific evidence today that an individual or group is inferior or subhuman.

This cannot be legal. Taxpayers funded that research and have a right to access it. How can you trust science if you’re not permitted to discuss it? Differences aren’t judgmental, it doesn’t mean inferior. It’s saying like a fish is better at swimming than a monkey. They’ve banned modern biology. Liberal Creationism at its finest.

This would include child abuse, rape, grooming and violence data.

There’s also a bit about ‘misinformation’ according to their corporate owners.

TikTok is winning because they never delete comments, all this also applies to comments.

More examples section:

  • “[Person with attributes noted above] is scum of the earth.”

Child predators? yeah

  • “[People with attributes noted above] are a disease.”

paraphilia is literally a disease, this is intentional

  • “[Group with any of the attributes noted above] threaten our existence, so we should drive them out at every chance we get.”

Like schools?

And what if they do threaten one’s existence? Just permit the attack? Who has a right to safe spaces?

  • “[Group with any of the attributes noted above] has an agenda to run the world and get rid of us.”

The second point obviously has proof behind it.

  • “[Attribute noted above] is just a form of mental illness that needs to be cured.”

Definitely about pedos.

  • Shouting “[people with attributes noted above] are pests!” at someone regardless of whether the person does or does not have the alleged attributes

Pedos fits.

For other Marxists, there is free speech because they’ll claim ‘context’

some pigs are more equal than others

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6345162

complete with re-education in that Academy.

They’re telepathic about your motives now:

Consider the intention of your video — is it to inform and educate or to shock and incite?

Don’t:

Try to shock or disgust your viewers.

….like TV? Do they have a monopoly?

  • If your footage is sensitive and requires visual anonymity, check out YouTube’s blurring tool.

Oh that won’t be used by the violent and predatory, will it?

Like parents filming pedos outside a school or identifying anti-fa claiming to be Trumpkins?