Now counted as ‘hate speech’:
Attacks on a person’s emotional, romantic and/or sexual attraction to another person.
Nothing about protecting minors or age of consent.
And they criticize Trump for being with Melania all the time.
If we can’t call furries, weebs and pedos sick, WTF free speech is there?
A paraphilia is a pathology, not an orientation. Youtube is acting like a World Government.
Vox was right, this “I don’t see race/sex/gender” shit ends in “I don’t see age.”
I warned you too but he was spot-on in the slide.
You have to click on the Other Types tab here:
This bit also applies to child abusers:
- Claim that individuals or groups are physically or mentally inferior, deficient, or diseased based on any of the attributes noted above. This includes statements that one group is less than another, calling them less intelligent, less capable, or damaged.
- Conspiracy theories saying individuals or groups are evil, corrupt, or malicious based on any of the attributes noted above.
The MAPs rebrand of child predators would count.
Banning modern science:
- A documentary about the scientific study of humans: A documentary about how theories have changed over time, even if it includes theories about the inferiority or superiority of specific groups, would be allowed because it’s educational. We won’t allow a documentary claiming there’s scientific evidence today that an individual or group is inferior or subhuman.
This cannot be legal. Taxpayers funded that research and have a right to access it. How can you trust science if you’re not permitted to discuss it? Differences aren’t judgmental, it doesn’t mean inferior. It’s saying like a fish is better at swimming than a monkey. They’ve banned modern biology. Liberal Creationism at its finest.
This would include child abuse, rape, grooming and violence data.
There’s also a bit about ‘misinformation’ according to their corporate owners.
TikTok is winning because they never delete comments, all this also applies to comments.
More examples section:
- “[Person with attributes noted above] is scum of the earth.”
Child predators? yeah
- “[People with attributes noted above] are a disease.”
paraphilia is literally a disease, this is intentional
- “[Group with any of the attributes noted above] threaten our existence, so we should drive them out at every chance we get.”
And what if they do threaten one’s existence? Just permit the attack? Who has a right to safe spaces?
- “[Group with any of the attributes noted above] has an agenda to run the world and get rid of us.”
The second point obviously has proof behind it.
- “[Attribute noted above] is just a form of mental illness that needs to be cured.”
Definitely about pedos.
- Shouting “[people with attributes noted above] are pests!” at someone regardless of whether the person does or does not have the alleged attributes
For other Marxists, there is free speech because they’ll claim ‘context’
some pigs are more equal than others
complete with re-education in that Academy.
They’re telepathic about your motives now:
Consider the intention of your video — is it to inform and educate or to shock and incite?
Try to shock or disgust your viewers.
….like TV? Do they have a monopoly?
- If your footage is sensitive and requires visual anonymity, check out YouTube’s blurring tool.
Oh that won’t be used by the violent and predatory, will it?
Like parents filming pedos outside a school or identifying anti-fa claiming to be Trumpkins?