Forcing immigrants to abide by law somehow a problem.
Omega 6 rancid bullshit being pushed as ‘sausages’
Get the Trades Descriptions Act people on this bollocks.
“Plant-based protein – from peas, fava beans and rice – has been used to create the “sausages”, enhanced with a trace of beetroot to lend a “meaty colour” and coconut oil to create juiciness, enclosed in a casing made from algae.”
Mycotoxins from algae, lead, arsenic and mercury from rice, a waste of peas…. it isn’t even organic, loaded with pesticides. If they hate carnists, why replicate it like a sinful sensualist?
“Manufacturers, supermarkets and restaurants are all scrambling to cash in on a changing food landscape in the UK as consumers embrace flexitarian diets –”
Not by choice, they’re poor.
It found early backing from legendary Silicon Valley financiers Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers – and later from Bill Gates and Leonardo DiCaprio – before it brought its first product, a chicken-free “chicken”, to market in 2013.
The “salmon” rolls are crafted from an Asian root vegetable called konjac, a colourless jelly-like substance which is being used increasingly to fashion vegan versions of faux fish and seafood. All the sushi is hand-rolled and packed in 100% biodegradable packaging.
Peasant food that tastes like shit. Hard pass.
Eat what your ancestors did.
Search “ancient [country] diet”
Kill people to save….. what?
The polar bears are being miscegenated out of existence with grizzlies.
A genuine warning, but keep importing people with TB in their system!
He wanted to make a big deal out of it even when they were dating.
Now he’s considered a whipped little cuck.
The BBC has apologised for failing to warn the Duke of Sussex before broadcasting and publishing online an image from a neo-Nazi social media group that called him a “race traitor” and depicted the royal with a gun pointed at his head.
You could give up the title, and then nobody would have a right to an opinion on it.
The image, published on BBC Online and broadcast on News at 10, was a stylised collage from an online post on a far-right platform, which also included blood splatter and a swastika, and was captioned: “See ya later race traitor. #racetraitor.”
fake and gay
like harry and smegs
It raised “serious security concerns” for Prince Harry and “caused his family great distress specifically while his wife was nearly five months pregnant”, a spokesperson for the duke told the Guardian.
like they say to the proles, if you don’t like it, don’t look? you wanted to attention whore bragging about her exoticness, ya prick
if you don’t like muslim rape gangs, stop looking at ’em! they’ll magically vanish
that little narc would love to control his image but his concubine has ruined it
nobody respects him, before we didn’t really notice him
he married her to take down the monarchy’s reputation and succeeded- why moan?
Both the BBC internally and the broadcasting watchdog Ofcom rejected a complaint by the duke, ruling that the use of the image in a report about the activities of the group was clearly in the public interest. However, the BBC has now apologised for not warning the Duke and Duchess of Sussex before broadcast and online publication in December last year.
It isn’t our fault you married a fug.
The corporation said it recognised that “before publishing seriously offensive material we need to be vigilant in balancing the impact on individuals against the wider good which may be served by publication”.
In a letter to Harry, the BBC also said it had committed to strengthen its guidance on the use of content that poses risk of offence to the individual portrayed.
Harry’s spokesperson said: “His Royal Highness welcomes the letter from the BBC relating to the shocking image published by BBC News last year as part of a report on the activities of a British neo-Nazi group with links in the US.
disliking a gold digger isn’t a crime
“His Royal Highness raised the issue with Ofcom about the rebroadcasting of this racist image due to his concerns that hateful and dangerous propaganda had been spread globally by the world’s most important public service broadcaster. Due to the credibility of the BBC, their choice to publicise this material created an open door for all other media to reproduce it.”
he married her because of her race, THAT’s racist
he kept bringing it up, he claimed to be spiritually African, he has a racist fetish
he attacked the media about it while dating
While welcoming the BBC’s apology, Harry did not agree with the decision to broadcast the image. “His Royal Highness maintains that instead of reproducing the image and giving a platform to something that would have only been seen by a few, it should have been described so that others would not potentially be influenced by such an inflammatory image,” the spokesperson said.
But the term is accurate.
It’s like saying gingers have no souls, it’s clearly true.
The BBC Online article, which investigated the activities of Sonnenkrieg Division, reported: “One image suggests that Prince Harry should be shot for marrying someone of mixed race and exclaims ‘see ya later race traitor’.”
sounds hokey, registers fake
who in the BBC made it?
I suggest “god hates a race traitor” next time, BBC, with the Thou shalt not commit adultery bit.
Nobody wants him dead, we want him poor, divorced, paying huge child support and watching his kids embarrass him.
The BBC reduced the size of the image online the following day, and removed it two days later. The corporation said the image had been removed because public interest in the article had reduced.
Harry was the only person to complain to Ofcom about the issue.
After the BBC report, Michal Szewczuk, 19, from Leeds, who created the image, was sentenced to four years and three months in a young offender institution,
but he’s foreign, they must be wrong
after pleading guilty to two counts of encouraging terrorism and five counts of possession of terrorist material, including the White Resister Manual and an al-Qaida training manual.
the things they plant, what bullshit
Oskar Dunn-Koczorowski, 18, from Chiswick, west London, who admitted two counts of encouraging terrorism, was sentenced to an 18-month detention and training order.
The duke had complained to the BBC that publication of the image fell “below the generally accepted standards as to harmful and offensive material” and there was insufficient justification to warrant the publishing of the image, given that it had been created by the group to incite criminal action.
nobody cares enough to touch him, we prefer to laugh at his misery for the next X years
marry in haste, Harry
The BBC did not uphold the complaint, maintaining publication was in the public interest. Ofcom also did not uphold the complaint, ruling there was “clear public interest” in conveying “clearly and impactfully the offensive nature of the group’s messages” and that it was editorially justified.
Harry later discussed his concerns with the BBC’s director general, Tony Hall.
so you claiming you married her blackness is okay
but other people noticing isn’t?
why not wear it like a badge of honour?
because you know it isn’t
you heard it here first but he’s planning to dump her to shame his family, to salvage his rep (won’t work) and thinking his kids will leave him immune to criticism as a white guy in politics
he’s going to put all the blame on HER (racist) despite his choosing to marry her, that was his plan in choosing such a cold woman
I’m actually on her side now, he’s a monster. DARVO piece of shit. She’s trash but he represents us.
I hope Charlie revokes his title, he might. They didn’t get HRH.
Prince Harry has spoken out on racism on several occasions. In an unprecedented statement when news of his relationship with Meghan Markle became public, he criticised “racial overtones” in reporting. Earlier this year he said “unconscious bias” passed from generation to generation could lead to racist behaviour in people who do not believe they are racist.
like wearing a Nazi uniform?
marrying a black woman to use her like a weapon? ‘fuck you Dad!’
An Ofcom spokesperson said: “This image was highly offensive, but in our opinion, its inclusion in the article was editorially justified as it was used to condemn and illustrate the racist group’s activities, which was in the public interest.”
A BBC source said: “This was an important piece of journalism which led to the arrest, conviction and imprisonment of two members of a neo-Nazi group.
why don’t they name these things? because you’d be able to check and see what they were actually talking about
The image of the Duke of Sussex was included to show the abhorrent nature of their behaviour and Ofcom has subsequently concluded that there was a clear editorial rationale for using the image which, in the context of the news report, was considered unlikely to incite crime.
“Naturally we regret the distress caused and we apologised for failing to warn Kensington Palace in advance that it was to be published.”
if police attended the burglaries beforehand, he’d still be alive
black woman complains about ghetto catcalling
druggies are shocked that drugs are connected to violence
Labour forgets it was founded by jews.
nobody wants to live in London
poles sense legal consequences
idiots don’t do research, or talk to historians
[even I knew that]
foreign students too big a profit margin to hold accountable