The problem with meditation rituals +IQ

Not meditation as in thought, contemplation but the Indian-seeming ritual.

Not yoga, which is a made-up substitute religion sold to Boomers, I already linked about that (it was in the New Yorker too).

Skip to the end at the IQ bit if you don’t care about genetic load and IQ as a related tangent.

New Age meditation is for rich people to pretend they have problems. If they were spiritual at all, they’d quit their vices. They would see how vice harms them and their soul. They connect with nothing real. It’s a hallucination projected on their bubble.
Meditation as it’s sold in the West is an opiate for idiots, they’re already mindless drones of conformity. As a form of prayer, it’s egocentric (muh Higher Self – do you mean Holy Spirit?). As a biological thing, Muh Scientism, it over-develops the parietal lobe (a bad thing, sloth ensues, fine if you’re a mountain man?) at the expense of the frontal lobe (a VERY bad thing, they’re crippling their critical thinking, humans need that rationality). An IQ study in fully developed adults who start meditation would be interesting, but they’d never be able to find a publisher* for the fact, with a good method, IQ would go down. Imagine all the products they couldn’t sell! The horror!

*Why you never hear the downsides of many antisocial practices, but meditation does reduce in-group loyalty, which “they” actually want (less genophilia, less love of your family where it should be, with your KIN). Phrased like that, the “love” rhetoric falls flat. If you cannot love your kin, you don’t love. Anyone.

Can Meditation Increase IQ?

Though no standardized test was developed as a result, the study interestingly demonstrated head size has almost nothing to do with intelligence.

True.

Also, women can have larger heads than men and the men who don’t get this… are morons.

IQ is simply a good method for representing intelligence in an individual, compared to the general population. IQ testing has its limits, but there is a reason for its sustained and wide acceptance in psychology.

You have to act on your IQ. Bitching on reddit how “misunderstood” you are is worse than being average.

Genuine intelligence does seek out truth though, not just info to show off.

The biggest contributors, such as…

  • Genetics
  • Conditions in utero
  • Experiences at a very young age

…were never much under our control.

Yes, an individual’s IQ score can vary mildly throughout life, and more can almost always be learned, but there is simply very little evidence that intelligence itself can be increased over time.

It can’t. Anyone who says otherwise is selling you something. Most of it’s genetic.

Attention gains are often just using the idiot-phone less and avoiding EMF.

Think about it – where do they meditate? Low EMF areas. What don’t they do? Check their phone every five minutes. It isn’t the ritual. Put down the Apple products.

So wherever you are in the distribution, whether or not you’ve even taken an IQ test, is where you’ve been from a young age and where you will stay.

It’s a big pill to swallow.

That’s the main red pill. Most men in particular refute this and become full-blown sociologists (sociologist fallacy) going on and on about nurture-theories. Noooope.

DNA is destiny, dude.

Plus, logically, if your score were already high… you wouldn’t feel a need to increase it?

Hey, I’m just being rational, pretty sure that’s illegal. As a woman.

A study published by Dan Simons and colleagues looked at these brain training games, and only found:

  • Strong evidence of subjects improving in the trained tasks themselves. Meaning, the more they played the game, the better they got at the game.
  • Less evidence that subjects had improved performance at closely-related tasks.
  • Little evidence that the subjects increased performance on distant-related tasks (anything outside the game, in the real world) or enhanced their everyday cognition in general (meaning, no raise in IQ).

Let them profit off idiots. By going for that IQ boost stuff, you’re admitting you’re low IQ already.

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1529100616661983

It’s like men who take dating advice from other men, especially bachelors. At least talk to really old, happily married men? But noooooo. Or since the sexes are mentally different, talk to women about how they assess men to become the best competitor (and other men ARE your competition). …And they wonder why they attract angry, manjaw women – because they’re vibing with what another man told them.

Men also tend to give one another terrible advice, consciously or subconsciously to scupper competition. Rarely even trust relatives, same fact sadly holds with women.

Money shot:

Meditation can’t increase intelligence because there is little evidence intelligence can be increased by anything at all.

That’s it, that’s the fact.

ANYTHING. AT ALL.

Stop looking.

However, meditation can help you increase your IQ score by sharpening your mind and maximizing your ability to focus.

No such thing. Marketing gimmick you cannot measure (see study above, no real results, self-report is crap). ADD is also bullshit, it’s the new dyslexia (as Spectator leaked) for describing low IQ offspring to narcissistic parents who also refused to discipline their brain as babies and toddlers (easy to spot, the baby holding an iPad). You cannot have an attention deficit, that would make you a vegetable, in a COMA. It’s an alternative state of consciousness like anesthesia, which literally winds down your attention to a deficit aka below consciousness (it can be measured by EEG). They literally give the kids amphetamines, club drugs, because a key sign of low IQ in kids is low energy, listlessness, ennui (side effect arrogant atheism), later called “failure to thrive” (as spiteful mutants) since the mutation load doesn’t process for energy in the body effectively. Think about it – they’re only slow, compared to the genetically healthy norm of age peers. Again, their genetic inferiority -compared to the norm population of the parents requires them to take SPEED.

What is the Amphetamine Speed?

“The amphetamine speed is actually a “slang” name for the entire class of drugs known as amphetamines. All amphetamines, whether legal or illegal, activate chemical processes throughout the brain and body and so “speed up” most every bodily function.”

They have degenerated that far down. The drug category of speed. Why would energy level drugs “help” unless the root issue is genetic?

esp when the effects inc.

  • Loss of interest in sex
  • Impotence
  • Restlessness
  • Irritability
  • Agitation

Adderall

Impotence and no libido is great for depopulation efforts. But they want the low IQ to be productive workers for the companies.

But isn’t a supposed symptom of ADHD already the last three?

Yeah, don’t expect logic. Low IQ people often self-medicate with drugs anyway. It’s the dirty little secret of drug addicts. They often lack the full frontal lobe function for impulse control. Making it legal makes them worse, it enables them.

How can we tell it’s genetic? Look for a paternal age effect. All fathers biologically contribute is DNA.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/aging-dads-more-likely-to-have-kids-with-autism-adhd-schizophrenia-and-more/

ding ding ding

Researchers examined all births that happened in Sweden between 1973 and 2001, and found a child born to a 45-year-old dad was 25 times more likely to have bipolar disorder, 13 times more likely to have ADHD, 3.5 times more likely to have autism, 2.5 times more likely to exhibit suicidal behavior or a substance abuse problem, and twice as likely to have a psychotic disorder like schizophrenia when compared to kids born to a 24-year-old father.

13x more likely past middle age

13, men have a right to be told this stuff in Sex Ed, family planning is important

and yes paternal is a bigger risk:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/older-dads-may-increase-childs-health-risks-more-than-older-moms/

the real QED? missing link:

https://www.webmd.com/baby/news/20090309/older-fathers-lower-iq-in-kids#1

Children born to older fathers don’t perform as well on tests of thinking skills during infancy and early childhood, while those born to older mothers have higher scores on the same tests, a study shows.

Ouch.

It’s like how single parent fathers also have kids with crap outcomes and test scores. The manosphere is in serious, life-ruining denial. Any single parent is a crap-shoot. Men have a right to know this young, to prepare.

The reason for this discrepancy is simple and evolutionary.

In fathers, early breeding (20s) is a sign he can mature faster than peers and lock down a quality woman earlier. He’s just a better man. Sorry.

Society shouldn’t enable dysgenic men to breed at all, especially in the teens. Also, sorry. But social policy matters here.

Women settle earlier, the lazier they are (dysgenic, r-select) from less discernment, the feminine trait. High IQ women complete education first, before assortative mating with a man in their class and general IQ band (eugenic, K). Child IQ maps most onto maternal IQ, as previously linked about if you search. The mother is the one raising it, don’t choose a bimbo. Also, her DNA having a high mutation load in utero will hamper the kid’s IQ regardless of the father. You’ll note in men with more than one wife, the kids with the wife who settled later are smarter, she’s more feminine and discerning. Women prepare for marriage and kids too. You need a woman who isn’t just a breeding sow. A woman who takes kids seriously and wants them, not a meal ticket. Avoid the Meghans.

McGrath’s team analyzed data from a large study called the U.S. Collaborative Perinatal Project, which recruited pregnant women from 12 sites in the U.S. from 1959 to 1965. The data from this ongoing project has been a “treasure trove” for researchers, McGrath says.

His team looked at more than 33,000 children born between 1959 and 1965 and then looked at their results on cognitive tests administered at ages 8 months, 4 years, and 7 years. The tests evaluated the children’s ability to think and reason, measuring such skills as concentration, learning, speaking, reading, arithmetic, memory, and motor skills such as coordination.

Finally, they looked for links with the father’s age, the mother’s age, and in one analysis also adjusted for socioeconomic factors such as family income and parental education.

The average age of the fathers in the study was 28.4 and ranged from 14 to 66. The mother’s average age was 24.8 and ranged from 12 to 48.

same average as the middle ages

In recent years, according to the paper, it has become very common for couples to delay having children until their late 30s.

They’re falsely told it makes the kids smarter, only in the case of good genetics (and so higher natural IQ), solid education before (no Marxism) and only the woman (who can then raise the kid better). Men constantly regenerate gametes so mutate in a compounding way. Their DNA becomes more mutated with age. Eventually it’ll be seen as child abuse to delay on purpose too long (when you already found the right person and have your health). Women are born with most of our eggs for this reason, to maintain the species. What’s eugenic in a woman is dysgenic in a man, the sexes are opposites! This gives men incentives to improve his tribe. Nature doesn’t hate you, it’s a challenge and men are failing by assuming they’re like women.

The older the father, the more likely the child was to score lower on the tests, except for one measure of motor skills.

When they looked at the mother’s age, however, they found that the older the mother, the higher the children scored on the thinking skills tests. (That finding, reported in earlier studies as well, may be due to a more nurturing home environment if the mother is older, but this study suggests children of older fathers don’t reap the same benefit.)

I love how they try to nurture it away. Nope. It’s biological mainly.

However, when the researchers adjusted for such factors as the parents’ socioeconomic status, including income and education, it modified the effect of both parents’ ages on the intelligence tests. For instance, the average score on the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale was nearly 6 points lower for children born to fathers age 50 compared to those born to fathers age 20. But when the socioeconomic factors were taken into account, the difference dropped to 2.2 points.

Incentives for high IQ men. Only low IQ men complain about fitness tests.

While the study findings may suggest the best combination of parents is an older woman with a younger man, McGrath says it’s too early to make any specific recommendations.

Suuuuure, PC liar. Protect those feels at all costs! Baby-killers.

They don’t mean by much, a few years, but modern men commonly lack any maturity to have a commitment in their twenties. I have noticed a trend of older women (5,10 years) settling with younger men, though. They also seem oddly fertile? The birth rate cult must take serious note of this. Older men regret not freezing their sperm but the egg freezing jokes are misplaced. Gametes degrade vastly faster in men. Sorry, you’re not like women?

If you really care about fixing sub-replacement fertility, look at what the data says is ideal and not your ego.

What’s behind the link between older fathers and lower IQ? “There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that the sperm of older dads develop more mutations, that is, spelling mistakes in the DNA code,” McGrath says. His team is researching this idea further in animal studies comparing young mice with older ones.

ding ding ding genetic load

Their train of thought is the same as mine.

They’re avoiding getting this out in case more men take paternity leave they don’t deserve (since men can’t give birth and have nothing to recover from medically). They’ll tiptoe around old guy’s feels about impotence even if it gives their eventual, panic spawn a low IQ and bipolar disorder. Don’t pin your hopes on having grandkids in that case, what a waste.

They don’t wanna get sued, so they won’t tell men how serious this is. Better have no kids than invest in a sickly one and have no grandkids. But Big Pharma doesn’t like that.

We have known about the paternal age effect for many years,” says Harry Fisch, MD, director of the Male Reproductive Center and director of urologic microsurgery at Columbia University Medical Center of New York Presbyterian Hospital. Yet, he says, “We are just starting to scratch the surface.”

Testosterone levels begin to decline slowly at age 30, Fisch says. Ideally, men should father children “sooner rather than later,” he says.

No, supplements aren’t bio-available the way real T is. Your DNA is still being damaged.

“The 20s and early 30s are ideal, but real life intervenes,” he says, making that time frame not feasible due to lack of a partner, difficulty getting pregnant, financial restraints, or a host of other factors.

Fix the economy so high IQ men can settle in their 20s. Stop forcing them to fund the kids of the feckless men.

That’ll sort sub-replacement fertility AND the spiteful mutants won’t bother anyway. People are not genetically equal. Spiteful mutants actually think they can have kids and avoid being a parent. You can’t just hand the kid to the mother 100% and act like a bachelor. Then the kids won’t give you grandkids out of actual spite, as happens to narcissistic parents. Abandonment is abuse, and that includes Don Draper careerism.

In a perspective on the study, published in the same issue of PLoS Medicine, Mary Cannon, MD, of the Royal College of Surgeons in Dublin, Ireland, says it is important to take socioeconomic factors into account when looking at the effect of a father’s age (as well as a mother’s).

IQ predicts SES so no. Shut up, Mary.

Men reap as they sow. They wanted to shirk patriarchy first. The ‘Sexual Revolution’ killed patriarchy in part by making it kill itself. Yes, waste your best sperm jacking it to porn, you’re free. Your sperm will be super potent for autism by the time you figure it out. Wait until they find out all those clubbing STDs make mutations more damaging.

Is it a coincidence the Boomers are the first generational product of ‘free love’? I think not. I have a pet theory the bad type of Boomer’s father picked up STDs during the war from brothels (men were enticed to attend by YKW) and warped their brain development by passing to the mother. The military won’t do that study.

Back to meditation.

The frontal lobe issues “muh concentration, et al.” are low IQ, from their heavy genetic load; the dumbness, the dense quality of them is a symptom of the IQ range. AKA being thick. Attention is filtered by your brain structure and informed by genetics.

from top:

It’s there at that maximum level of focus where you are the smartest you can possibly be. But unfortunately, neither meditation, or anything else, can increase where that limit is.

Denial of humanity is narcissism, denial of human limits. Pure egocentrism, spiritual bypassing for the ritualists.

It’s funny how both groups (New Agers and ADD/ADHD excuse-makers) are often also IQ denialists, while simultaneously wanting to ‘boost’ the thing they claim doesn’t exist? Deny mutation load, bitches. When we can test for it at birth, welcome to Gattaca. IQ tends to predict certain personality traits e.g. laziness, so people would actually be happier. Telling everyone we’re genetically equal makes the stupid miserable. They assume the system is against them, actually their parents.

Many relaxation symptoms of meditation rituals are just coping with a coffee addiction, mostly Starbucks, which they never drop. They love Starbucks more than any God. The breathing exercise kind isn’t meditation. It’s most commonly fighting a histamine, pesticide, GMO and/or mycotoxin response from a bad diet and sleep pattern. It’s suppressing your immune system from healing the damage. Like mega-dosing antioxidants means those free radicals can’t kill the cancer in you – so the cancer kills you. Stop trying to fix your biology, the train is fine.

They never mention that parietal/frontal issue but cranial space is at a premium, when one part grows, another is damaged and atrophies. When a person is stressed, they must address the causes in their life, rather than hoping for some genie to wing it for them. Opening your mind up invites all sorts of trauma and bad karma in, like opening your front door and leaving it unguarded overnight. Guard your heart, your mind and your soul. Cynically, the New Age people probably know what they’re doing, and they’re injuring the competition. Do not assume their sincerity. Most New Agers are deeply intellectually dishonest and they rip one another off all the time. A person who believes in moral absolutes and karma would never! Avoid the communal narcissists who are basically cult leaders. In another time they’d be leading witch trials for a girl who rejected them. If their object is material, that’s an abuse of the spiritual. Look at the vice in their personal life, where it cannot hide. Drink, drug, debauchery problems? They help no one, they are Will O Wisps guiding you to your own destruction. Siren songs are not a myth. They constantly travel, to hide from themselves? They seem weirdly lonely and depressed when not distracted by travel? Don’t take their life advice, they cannot be happy. The particular reasons for them don’t matter. Don’t let it be your problem. Spiteful mutants are nomads. They cannot settle – in a job, in a country, by marriage. They’ll search until they die.

Meditation amplifies your emotion, the way it’s packaged now to rich people will be interesting as they lose their fortunes. Especially Boomers, with no time to recoup or ability to compete in the Brave New Multicultural World they generally voted to import in. Sorry Boomer, you’re too white and male to be manager this time! Here’s your AA boss.

They haven’t tried it from a state of loss and deprivation, but a bubble of delusion and “I deserve this”. Meditating from any bad place, as a ritual, is like the surest way to become suicidal. New Agers know but never talk about this. If you ask around, people know this commonly but the topic gets banned or taken down. It’s ritualised rumination. Rumination is actively bad for your health (unless your health is already bad and you mistake normal for good).

That’s a cult indicator, forbidden bad experience discussion, it puts off new recruits.

They prefer to shame people for bad results, like that’s the first person it ever happened to.

(There’s drug abuse purging from the body years after the fact, a common cause of sudden health problems and ‘depression’ or ‘anxiety’ in celebrities. It takes years for drugs to fully leave all the organs. Who cares?)

Hello Laurence

Other actors are watching this, you know.

Waiting. Biding their time. Previously, actors went along with the PC as exempt…. but now…

Now it’s coming for THEIR jobs. This shall be interesting. You can’t find a bigger narc than a stage actor. I’m waiting for Hiddleston to flip. I know the things he did in Venice Beach.

Also what is that morph, just look at it.

Young people are getting it

A good sign.

BUT

Not to diminish his achievement or anything but…

  1. I also have built a Wendy House, with electric and such. You can call it Tiny House but … ‘cmon. It’s a Wendy House. Plus he might’ve just bought a kit as his base, they sell kits (guess how I know) and it’s cheating. I saw kids (pre-teens) do this two decades ago, he isn’t the first. It’s like this century’s treehouse. Previously, it was a cleaned shipping container, which is structurally better for electric (fires) and plumbing (floods) than “reclaimed” wood anything, that will rot. He hasn’t treated it properly (can tell by the surface and so could a GCSE wood tech student) and there are also toxic industrial chemicals in it to be discarded like that, he’s ingesting them by breathing unless he processed the wood to scrap personally. Doubt it. That suggests he didn’t research or do enough of the grunt work himself. Doesn’t mention how he lifted all that, including load bearing structural beams, …so mumsy probably hired a team of immigrants. Also, doubt it’s up to building code, so any injuries later suffered by him or guests, or if he sells it (current market value zero, it’s treated as a temporary structure for legal and tax purposes like a …Wendy house) would be on him from neglect. He didn’t say it was up to code as a human dwelling. Red flag. Roof could collapse in a storm and kill him splat.
  2. His grandparents own the land so… it isn’t really him, is it? Why do we praise all these posh kids for doing the bare minimum? I’d be the first to praise the self made and hope others imitate it but you can’t imitate the critical fact of having rich and indulgent grandparents. Did he fund the construction with a paper round or ‘pocket money’?
  3. It’s obviously a shag pad, come on. He isn’t planning on knitting the long nights away. Waste of space.

This is the shit MGTOW should actually be doing, not trailing random SJWs on twitter to bitch at them.

Build shit.

Teach one another. On that note.

Few extra notes:

He can’t be very good as a carpenter at that skill level. It isn’t even weather-proof, all the pores of the wood are exposed. Have you been to England, mate?

It doesn’t look traditional, really, but a good paint job can fix that. Choose organic paint so you don’t die of cancer from it.

He is not an architect, hire an architect for one hour to sit down and brainstorm issues like there’s no structure above those doors, for example. You need an archway of some kind to take the load in Newtons off of all that glass? Also, that looks like conservatory doors, the glass is different and the space more narrow, more brittle -cheaper. Why cheap out?

You rarely see windows that close because it weakens the wall. And that’s less than a foot between fixtures. NO. Kits account for this. The upper window weakens the ROOF.

….Why?

Fences are made of soft wood that absorbs rainwater, they cannot carry heavy (cheap) glass and especially layers of metal like tin. There’s a reason we use bricks, darling.

Posho: “It’s all cheap materials, yah”.

Host: “Brilliant.”

Posho: “Yah.”

Me, in the background: “But he might literally DIE?!”

Is this a deleted scene from Idiocracy?

Why not use the scaffolding for the load bearing? He knows there are different types of wood, right?

RIGHT?

His ear has the heart defect pinch shape. He’s probably a very ardent moron. I never met a high IQ person with that.

5×2.5m is a mental health risk, among other things. Basically smaller than some prison cells. Weird he doesn’t have a massive porch then, lazy?

It’s free real estate, literally.

Road regulations…. so it isn’t actually a house. He could still have the wraparound porch too.

It is a temporary structure… those are not safe for permanent dwelling, they let anyone make those.

That fire extinguisher is way too small.

The TV 1. exists and 2. is on the load-bearing wall.

Why do all that to …watch TV? Stay in your bedroom and get over yourself.

Pallet wood is chemically sprayed. Unsuitable for interiors.

https://diyprojects.com/know-safe-use-pallet/

He wasted the quality wood panels on the interior roof instead of the important WALL holding it all UP.

The footage of him cuts out before major lifting, totally used immigrants for the shag shack.

Did he steal from work? Like, lying to a client to steal their old, expensive shelves is theft.

Sorry but it is. Lying like you’ll throw it out is also fraud. I’ve seen carpenters try to do that, pirating old (antique, valuable) bookcases for their shitty personal projects. If anyone gaslights you about the value of lumber, ask why the hell they want it then? Happened to some old relatives. If you eventually choose to dispose of something, you’ll do it yourself (and after a valuation). They should be relieved to hear that… unless they’re thieves.

nb Pirating to sell on as lumber is also theft.

A house made of cheap, old wood…. and a FIREPLACE.

That takes… wait for it… cheap, old wood.

The noob doesn’t even have a grate or an ash pit. Fireplace also next to huge electronic TV on the wall. Ambient heat damages electronics. Electrical fire probable. An electrician would never approve that and the fireplace isn’t even on the floor. Heat travels up, you monkey.

Did he not grow up with a fireplace? Did he never ask? And where’s the poker, brush, equipment? Inspection certificate so you don’t choke on fumes? Where does he season the wood? (He doesn’t).

Basic homesteaders impoverished in America know more than this guy. Watch them first. Tart it up later.

Putting fireplaces in a corner is also the worst place, asking for a fire, it’s attached to half the house, two wood walls. Mid-wall, mate. Mid-wall with no glass (that melts, also water is wet).

Wood counters attract germs.

Iron… in a shower. In a hot, humid environment. With cleaning chemicals. Iron.

A shower topped with…. bare wood. Steam + wood = rot.

Any time someone says they do their own plumbing, and they’re not a plumber, run.

It’s like he’s trying to kill himself. No rail to stop him from falling out of bed, breaking his neck.

Sorry to nerd out but… basics. I’m dragging out of love.

You go boy?

One pulley for a ladder that size. A rope pulley, not even metal.

Also ladder is made of wood. A soft wood… no rubber on the tips at the bottom.

Six grand for that. I could do better with three. My current record for a DIY like that is just over one and a half for a bug-out space but I don’t count that for personal reasons (calling in favours for the person, connections) and because of inflation.

-From experience on projects helping friends plan this stuff, learn from it. Plan, plan, plan before you assume what you need. Note: never a TV.

Europhiles love a predator

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-51133850

“By no stretch of the imagination could a contemporary author write so blithely of his seduction of underage girls – and, in Matzneff’s case, of boys too.”

Oh, like that’s worse? Because he also raped boys?

Seduction isn’t Hollywood, that’s a lie. By definition, seduction is against that person’s individual (legal) will and consent, and seduction is still illegal under common law for many reasons, especially of children.
Paedophiles have tried to normalise everything but a fetish to children and only to children is sadistic, they wish to harm and corrupt. That’s the process of evil.

“And even if he did, there would certainly be no-one leaping to his defence, accusing his detractors – like they accused Bombardier 30 years ago – of reactionary neo-Puritanism and failing to understand the wellsprings of teenage sexuality.”

I’m sure there’d be some Muslims in pick-up, somewhere, that’s the re-brand attempt.
It’s disgusting some Westerners try to justify these attacks, knowing the child outcomes of child abuse (mental problems, addictions, suicide, pair bonding issues as an adult, trauma and PTSD). Worse, they say it’s ‘culture’ if the predator is white but apparently a Muslim is so foreign. You can’t pick and choose pedos.

The real rape culture is the ‘free love’ left-wing ‘culture’ that assumes everyone is “up for it”, even children. But what was the kid WEARING when they were raped type of victim blaming. In the First World, we can show skin without some subhuman trying to absolve themselves from their actions with a convenient ‘loss’ of control, ‘loss’ of agency.

Bring back hanging for rapists, it’s very simple. They’ll magically find their impulse control if not enabled by victim culture that sees the scum of the earth as a ‘slave’ to their libido (who isn’t? deal like everyone else) who ‘can’t help’ (can’t resist) attacking. Let children and women defend themselves, they lack the physical strength to do it without weapons. Re-open the asylums if the poor, pitiful, woe-is-me predators can’t function in society, this is why we have so many now. They closed the asylums to normalise this.

Most predators are serial offenders, it’s a tiny group of pedos doing this.

There’s the telling projection of ‘fun’, pedos do find getting away with it ‘fun’ and try to groom victims to agree, to normalise.

“And yet just a generation ago, evidently, the idea of sex between adult men and adolescent girls was not only not shocking – in “enlightened” circles, that is. More than that, it was seen as liberating for the youngsters themselves – a final casting off of the sexual bonds imposed by the old pre-1968 order.”

The Kinsey data was forged, he was a sadist pedo into teen boys and eventually fired for it.

“Gradually his star faded. There was growing distaste for his sexual predilections, and before this latest controversy he was an all-but-forgotten figure outside the Left Bank.

But in 2020 the moral compass had shifted 180 degrees. What had been seduction was now abuse.”

It always was, it’s even in the law, from breach of promise to criminal conversation. Hollywood lies should not be treated as real. Hollywood has imposed a fake norm on us, glamourising predation, what we see now is Power to the People, from the internet.

Hell, they’re still making films that glamourise child rape e.g. A Bigger Splash. 2015?

Memoryholed:

https://worldhistoryproject.org/1938/frank-sinatra-is-arrested

“Frank Sinatra was arrested in 1938 on charges of adultery and seduction. Yes, they used to be able to arrest people and charge them with seduction, something that faced a 23-year-old Frank Sinatra.”

You want traditionalism? A high trust society? Re-instate the charges or the West shall perish.
It’s now called “grooming”, who could ever possibly agree with legally permitting grooming? 

Protect women and children or the future is done for.

It’s a return to history the cuckservatives are too blue-pilled to ever suggest. What if it’s their daughter, their son? Their wife being accosted when they’re away at war? You can’t be around all the time, there must be legal recourse.

“What Matzneff saw as a celebration of sexual adventure with partners who, though young, were always consenting, had become an evil power game.”

No, they groom them, BBC. Children CANNOT consent, but psychologically abusing anyone would vitiate the ‘consent’, legally.

You can tell the BBC covers for pedos by pretending the victims are ‘up for it’.

Again, the laws pre-dated this for good reason, it was pro-social to protect children, boys and girls.

“And when publishing executive Vanessa Springora brought out a book this month describing the traumatic effects of her own relationship – aged 14 – with Matzneff, it was clear that he was now a literary non-person.”

Pedos lie, shocker. Predators lie about their victims.

They also lie to their victims – lovebombing, gaslighting, future faking (specifically covered under breach of promise) – things previously covered under seduction, now euphemistically called “grooming” (PC term, grooming for rape aka seduction). Coercion isn’t legal, whatever you do it for.

“In France the age of “sexual majority” is 15. If an adult has sex with a person under 15 he or she will face prosecution, though not necessarily for rape.”

Then why can’t they vote at 15? They don’t really consider them mentally able, which says it all.

France was over long before they invited the Muslim pedos. Actually, that’s why they invited the Muslim pedos.

Pedos like other pedos.

“At the age of 14 you are not supposed to have a 50-year-old man waiting for you when you come out of school; nor to share a hotel room with him and find yourself in his bed… when you should be having your tea,” writes Springora in Consent.”

Huge age gaps should be outlawed anyway, it always predicts some form of abuse beyond a solid generation (25-30 years or so). When one party’s brain hasn’t finished developing, we have no scientific reason to allow people under 25 to “date” whoever they want, the parents also dropped the moral ball and should be ashamed socially as enabling the rape of their child.

“The other people in his “seductions” also existed and their story is now being told.”
Pedos lie, they’re predators. If they’ll rape a child, boy or girl, why not lie about it?

This is like thinking murderers will obey gun laws.

Age of consent must be majority, sex is medical. Minimum age to marry must match as well, especially in a Catholic country, otherwise this is such a convenient oversight for the Weinsteins.

Europhilia is pedophilia with more wine.
Pushing the culture of places with dehumanising ages of consent, despite their claimed Catholic relgious background, is very telling.

France isn’t losing money on tourism because of Muslims, but the white, French men acting like brutes. It’s been losing money for decades thanks to the Boomer generation of degenerate losers. They’re stalking teenage girls (and pre-teens) and young women, shouting obscenities at them, trying to rub up against them on trains, publicly exposing themselves for public urination like a dog and flashing when a girl clearly just wants to go shopping.
The West needs to get its adult men in order, police to a first world standard already.
The Boomers who enabled this in media and TV should be up on charges of aiding and abetting trafficking, because a steady supply of groomed teenagers doesn’t just happen.

The stories of solicitation of women/girls also require punishment, there’s no such thing as ‘pick-up’, it’s solicitation.
Free love is free license to rapists and harassment, stalking, lying to get in a woman’s house are not uncommon. Psychiatrists know about these tactics. To catch a predator. The West needs to stop making excuses the predatory scum use to harm children, in particular.