America’s stop hitting yourself

The logic seems to be: Women can’t oppress me, if I oppress them first. How is that going away? The lampreys on MGTOW have utterly ruined it. Who actually supports rapists and murderers without mental issues themselves?

The characteristic of revenge fantasies is that they never actually work.

Logically, if they did keep all 100% of women under male control, all women would be able to renounce all forms of legal responsibility to the man in charge of them. It used to be that way in some places that if women ran up massive credit debt, her husband would be automatically expected to pay. If a woman broke the law, her husband would be expected to provide her alibi or, sometimes, be blamed for forcing her to do it – and be punished in her place. You really want total responsibilities over all those idiotic messes? REALLY. Even SJWs don’t want to be held accountable for what men do. They also want women controlled for life but believe women have expiry dates… need I mention how impractical that is? You can’t drop a responsibility. This is like the people who take a commitment (e.g. marriage) then complain it’s limiting…. The men against marriage would be forcing themselves into a de facto marriage of statistically older (longer lifespan) women. They also wouldn’t be getting sex either, consent still exists. Plus they’d have a recession economy, since half the workforce is gone and never has to work again (sounds nice).

Many of their economic woes are caused by globalization.

They blame the West instead of the East. That is irrational. The propaganda is about the West because it isn’t the West, we were doing well until the rise of Asia stealing our production and student places (most women in top Western universities are Asian, in on forged transcripts, they never mention this).

Mostly, it’s immigration.

If you showed the happy 50s husband the MGTOW posts online they’d probably tell you it was a mental problem. It does share similarities with borderline personality (assuming all people hate you, insecurity, flashy purchases, assuming all people will take things from you and abandon you eventually, feeling out of place).

Hating women (okay, distrusting is visible) so much they deny their own gender role (and thus, power).

from their own files

Do they cut off their nose to spite their face, or their dick to spite SJWs?

You don’t want to pay income tax but want women to pay it?

You don’t want to pay child support but expect mothers to live off air?

You don’t want to fund schools if you don’t have children (that one is fair).

You don’t want men to protect women but refuse the death penalty for the worst criminals? How else do we get rid of them?

You want socialism (the Pill, abortions, STD shots) without the pricetag, seriously? Why not crawl back into your mother’s womb at this point? You don’t want to be an adult. If disabled people can be responsible and productive, what’s your excuse?

Apparently being our gender role oppressed them first. Somehow. Women oppressed them by needing to be provided for, due to the choice to be the baby-carrying and physically weaker sex. Because we choose those, we choose our sex apparently and fuck Darwin, “man up” is apparently hate speech.

Asking an adult male to act like a responsible man is now “sexism”, according to these guys.

(Why do you think a man cannot be a responsible adult without being married ? HMMM?)

Are your parents pushing you to get married? Diddums, you think that doesn’t happen to women?

Are your parents pushing you to have kids? That one REALLY happens more to women. By an order of magnitude.

Is nobody allowed to criticize baby, for fearing he feel SHAME?

Why can’t we shame men who deserve it? They shame women all the time. Shame is good. It makes people question immorality.

If you’re so immoral that shame works, that’s called a conscience and you should listen to it.

Because funding the mother of your children is evil but foisting them on an expensive nanny is good parenting. Studies be damned.

Can I point out the obvious?

If men don’t want to be men – that might explain why women don’t want them.

If we wanted girly men, we’d be lesbians?

A man is not his car or cologne, that would be sexist and dehumanizing. Replacing dignity and masculinity with material possessions and arrogant bragging just puts women off. The good women. Brands are telling you you need to buy stuff to impress women. Is money all they have to offer as a person? How did that work before credit cards?

Oh yeah, men gave the one thing women couldn’t provide for themselves. Men were manly.

If you want to be a metrosexual man, fine. You can’t change biology to make women get the hots for it. This is like fat acceptance but for pajama boys.

“Why can’t the woman pay me paternity leave?”

Because you didn’t give birth. If you gave birth, one day, we’d support you 100%. However, in reality, men cannot give birth, whatever the BBC says. Maternity leave happens after the birth to medically recover from the worst of it (really it takes about a year biologically).

“Why are women congratulated for conceiving?”

Because it’s a medical phenomena that happens inside their body. 

Are they really this dumb? [yes]

They continue to grow and support life itself, that’s impressive. They’ll also have to give birth, which you won’t.

Most of their complaints can be answered with: well, you don’t have to.

Women who choose not to have children still see pregnancy test adverts. They aren’t bitching about it.

Spinsters see marriage programmes on TV. Where is their forum bitching?

Society doesn’t stop because of Princess.

They sound transgender, with all this talk about the ‘evils’ of gender roles and being fluid in their societal duties.

You’re either a man or you’re not. This isn’t hard.

Don’t they get this? I think many of them just have such a low IQ they think the basics of adult living are a huge accomplishment. Women should scatter rose petals at their feet for… not having a criminal record and other things that are… normal.

They want to be spoiled but they aren’t even gay.

Men do the spoiling. Get a boyfriend, let him spoil you. Why do you think men get a sex change? They want a sugar daddy, they need to look female.

Women do provide for men but not the maternal succour they try to demand. Women are maternal to children, not adults and especially not sexual partners. It’s creepy. To be that needy as an adult, just go get it from your actual mother. You will never find a sexy mother replacement. It’s irreconcilable. Women respect (and are attracted to) adults.

(They also won’t find a new one every decade as they age. They think they don’t age.)

Yeah, demanding things from women they cannot biologically (are not evolved to) provide is a recipe for failure.

You can’t blame that on women, broflake.

I deserve this and this and this…” is bullshit in entitled women and men!

You deserve nothing and respect has to be earned. They don’t even respect themselves.

If I hated American men and wanted their legacy to die out, I’d convince them women are like the Jewish Lilith and never to marry or have kids (both of which extend male lifespan and joy).

Males commit more suicide because most of those suicides are bachelors.

Being single (bachelor) is the biggest suicide risk factor for men.
Almost like they evolved to have a spouse?

ding ding we have a winning study, they’ll never look into it

admitting their lifestyle is medically bad for them would require self-critique

(single women by contrast live longer, especially nuns or the celibate women)

asking happily married men how they did it would require change

Men are also at risk once they are hit by the reality of aging in the 50s. Men young enough to be their children outcompete them.
I’m sure that’s a coincidence. It can’t be regret, right players? There’s no such thing as player burnout, is there?


Don’t get me started on the narcissists who feel entitled to sex with women ….without the women part. Well, if you encounter any human socially, you’re bound to expect problems from that. The original MGTOW was quite brilliant in forsaking women and even dating them altogether. Fucking women causes 99% of women “problems”, you signed up for it. Nobody feels sorry for somebody that stupid.

Psychopaths in the wild

I was scrolling through perfume news the other day (don’t ask) and this is a bloody fine example of the typical pre-30 psychopathic personality, before too many failures have racked up to expose them (past 40 they tailspin with a weird wife, gambling, drugs and near 50 is the classic crisis). Whether he is or not I don’t particularly care but…the signs are useful for demonstrative purposes. It’s an uncanny resemblance if not.

There’s a ream of gossip online I won’t repeat, not knowing the truth but suspecting some truth to it. That’s me being fair.
That is one of the most glib and tone-deaf interviews I have ever seen.
There are robots who could give better replies.
Dat comment section.

I predict failure purely because refusing samples is a red flag to perfume quality.

Also too many adjectives is a sign, like the girl who uses awesome and epic (but never good or nice) probably has a personality disorder too. Shrinks can actually identify some conditions by transcript, that must be cool.

I was discussing this interview (and the creepiest female interview I ever read) with someone who had already heard of him (a man, similar age but legitimately successful) and he showed me this:

A breakdown that reads like it came from Dr Hare’s notes.

Is anyone stupid enough to think a fake Youtube name would work?
Like, with your face, mannerisms, travel habits, job and voice out there… and 4chan… really? AFTER music videos?!!!

The constant moving, can’t stick with anything is a sign.
The classic “if you question or disapprove, you’re jealous” line in the fragrantica comments.
“he starts a patreon to get enough money to launch his own ‘mass appealing fragrance’ a little down the line he buys a 300k ferrari and doesn’t have enough cash to get the bottles he wants. he removes all criticism from his comment section”
White-collar fraud, saying you’ll take money for one purpose and using it on another…

(to be fair, apparently it was a lease)

He seems dumb enough to seriously believe in Roosh’s forum religion, the long rambling imagery reminds me of the style, trying a round of windbag negs (negging doesn’t work) and the supposed clock thing is typical narc. They think everyone is paranoid like they are. Normal people don’t fear aging. Assuming a well-presented woman is a slut is really…. unfortunate. There’s nothing immoral about looking like a woman, would he prefer an androgynous blimp? Looking nice is again, normal….

It has nothing to do with you, dude. Women don’t dress with men in mind.
Fashion is about other women. At most.

Unless you’re royalty, you can’t be a manwhore and expect it to never come out. Only because royalty can afford large bribes to keep quiet.

Isn’t that the point of being promiscuous, they want the reputation?

It doesn’t make sense to think that could be kept quiet…. like sluts don’t brag? Either party?

A lesson from the Jeremy Fragrance school of flirting (he should open):

“It will happen.” Either he doesn’t listen (and obviously sucks in bed) or he thinks he’s suave.

“You will wear…” are you gay? Controlling is creepy [50 shades of shit] but it’s actually hilarious when guys claim they aren’t gay but have ‘opinions’ on womenswear. Real men don’t give a shit what you’re wearing.

“You hot woman” “what I do with you” “It will happen intensely babe”

A man over 20 using the word babe.

It’s like the personal fanfic of a horny 13 year-old.

“I go with you on restroom, kiss you and press you down open my business suit pants.”

Porn addiction makes men embarrassing. She repeatedly tries to gently correct him until he gets nasty. Threatening the Reaper to a woman clearly attractive enough to flirt with just seems like desperate tactics. Take rejection like a man.

Pick-up lines clearly do not work.

He’s not bothered, really! (texts multiple passive-aggressive paragraphs intended to make her, what, suicidal?)

“You are sick” objective observation there from well-dressed woman. He has a thing for teenagers.
“I see how that pisses you off….” they cannot take criticism, like a baby. The cheap Svengali abuse routine is nauseating. I know you are but what am I – but serious and proud. They actually think they influence people with this bullshit, who just think WTF? Is he high?

He deliberately tried to damage her self-esteem, to make her possibly easy to sexually exploit, that’s textbook psychopathic.

Men don’t take validation from women either, he looks like an utter loser in this exchange, this definitely smells of Roosh’s forum cult. 99% failure and they’ll still claim it’s a science. Sunk cost is a bitch. Get over yourself and buy hookers. Think of all the hours these people waste…. trying to do something humans did for millennia naturally.

She’s right, he started it. He tried trolling her. She was just showing other people, which women do constantly. If he was right and she was some slut, it would’ve stuck to her instead. He accused her of being a whore too. (He clearly didn’t believe it, because pros don’t work for free). She should sue. Her reputation is real and hence, valuable, financially. I’d sue. That’s a serious set of allegations. Solicitation alone (if he claims he thought she was) is very illegal?

Compulsively lying men (psychopath marker) cannot be allowed to get away with it, they’re the reason defamation law exists. You can’t just claim things about a woman’s medical affairs. Defamation is reckless, like psychopaths.

I love e-celebs, their fuck-ups are real, unlike the reality TV stars.
I can’t wait to watch this shitshow.

New subscriber to the circus.
Why does anyone want to be famous? Who is dumb enough to want all that attention, especially if they’re doing shady shit?
That’s the narcissism, I guess. The greater thrill.

I don’t think he looks under 30 myself but maybe it’s sun damage. Germans get a lot of that in their DNA. I’d say 30-32 so probably sun damage. Then again, showbiz practically expects you to lie about your age.

This isn’t a bad song (Europop mashup with K-pop, am I right?) but the nudity is awful.

For balance, female example of the glibness.

If you want another, female example of how not to give an interview (unless you want to seem like a cunt):
She literally wrote a (inspired by a true story) ‘fiction’ book about basically hooking (you don’t live with a man for two years with no sex).

The best tell with the females is emulating another, competition. She literally morphed herself into the ex-wife to try and transfer his affections and loyalty to her.

And a female mask drop, 1:22 panic from exposing the lack of empathy.

Woman who has said:
“I have an obsession with mortality. I saw a friend die when I was 18 and I can’t get over it. I know it’s unhealthy but I don’t know how to rid myself of it. I’m terrified I’m about to die or that all the people I love are about to die, every second of every day.”
So no, that isn’t awkwardness. She pulls a different set of facial expressions when he is watching to when he isn’t. Psychopaths mull over death like a meal but try to make out like it’s anxiety when it sounds clearly like enthusiasm and, as she put it, obsession. The only thing a psychopath is capable of fearing is death (their own*) and she seems to expect she can be rid of (or never feel?) any other fear.

*or the death of anyone useful to them.

Despite this detour into being interesting, now she’s a yoga vegan who believes in global warming and cares about animals way, way more than people, because that makes sense.

comment “What an upper class arsehole she is.”
correction below “*lower class
Public schoolgirls. Hated here. They’re all like this. All of them.
“Those sunglasses say it all…”
“I think its both ways. If you notice, he seems just as vacant and distant as she is.”
The signs. Are there.
“Marriage is a social construct, but I still believe in it,” – things a traditional woman would never say, Alex.
For God’s sake, stop milking the American taxpayer. No vagina is worth that. Clearly neither of you can be trusted near an altar ever again, lest you make another ‘mistake’. Why are people granted so many marriage licenses? A driver’s license has a sensible limit!

Weird interviews are everywhere nowadays.

Were none of you taught interview skills from a young age? Really?

Actress Talulah Riley shares her obsession with mortality and life with a billionaire
“Am I going to be with Mr Average? That’s the way I see it!”
Trash. Absolute trash.
Don’t be trash.

Skank spotting has nothing to do with showing skin or designer labels.
A woman who likes fashion isn’t a slut or she couldn’t get away with dressing like one socially, a snake doesn’t say venomous on its head but a non-venomous one might.
This supposed snowflake exceptionalism to average is how they think. Daddy’s Little Girl. Violet Beauregard.

Maybe Jeremy should give her his number and tell her what to wear.

Is Kate Upton oppressed?

They aren’t a Marxist if they wouldn’t strip all middle-class savings (including their own).
If there shouldn’t be a (low) cap on earnings and savings, they aren’t Marxist.
Naturally, they refuse to quantify, being dishonest. 30k a year is rich here.
Class is actually defined by income and lifestyle. Both quantifiable and tangible.
Don’t trust the CM definitions. They’re wrong. It isn’t about whether you’re hired. Most people don’t work in factories anymore.
Real Marxists should be calling for income caps and a total ban on luxuries including drinks, clothes and cars.

Personally, I find the mudshark fat, dumpy and over-rated.

Who owns all the MOPs?

The banks.

Who should be nationalised, fully?

The banks.


However, loss of social mobility in a meritocracy is due to IQ.

GDP is tied to IQ too. It isn’t personal.

However, myths of high IQ in certain groups are…. fake news.

Verbal IQ shouldn’t be included but Jewish IQ would be trash without it.

Who said we needed a verbal section? Jewish psychiatrists.


The best part of these discussions about Marx is asking why all the books on him cost money.


Technically, Communism is more oppressive than a tithe.

Most workers would love a tax cap of 10%, they refuse to do that.

Why no tax cap?

Rent controls won’t save as much money to the poor as a universal tax cap.

A flat tax. The only “fair share”. Maybe the “Government” (BOE is private) shouldn’t take more than its “fair share” from all, in equality.

Churches are more Communist than SJWs, they give out books for free!

I’ve literally never paid for a Bible.

I have one of those faces where people assume I’m a sinner so they just give me Bibles.

Marxism is the classism that brainwashes the poor into letting the rich (middle-class) tell them what to do, because slightly richer people exist and must be stopped! (As the middle-class obviously get these marching orders from the even more wealthy). Talk about false consciousness.

What they appeal to:

Marxism is the opiate of the masses. Original virtue signal shekels.

Why do you think it was called Das Kapital?

They repeat the same thing as the Papacy without the kneeling and funny hat.

Luther was right, all you need is a Bible. You don’t need a Church.

Perhaps race would be more apt.

Concern about white rape is funny

He was saying rape gangs, you classist bigots.

I was going to put white slavery but most people probably don’t know that slavery is primarily sexual.

To this day.

Notice they never try it on with middle-class girls.

They know they wouldn’t get away with it.

“these girls say they were” the judges forced to prosecute don’t believe them, consent should be age of majority and never presumed but then the pedo politicians wouldn’t have a cover either.

And why are they given special treatment on religious grounds in prison?

What if their religion were the anti-prison platoon? It’s absurd.

The point of prison is you have no control. And don’t put them all in one block. That’s a freedom of association.

This is slavery. Call them what they are: white slavery rings.

The only way to deter these predators is bringing back hanging.

The majority wants this. It was taken off the books illegally, without a vote.

Twice they crashed the Parliamentary petition website on that issue shortly after it went up.

It’s the most pertinent solution to people who should not be allowed out.

Sympathy for the victim, not the predator.

Unless of course, the girls and women are finally allowed their right to self-defense? Battered wife syndrome for slaves? Don’t attack someone without expecting them to attack back. First World logic.

It’s like the men who stupidly slap a woman on the arse and object when she slaps them on the face. Well, you started it. If a man did it to them, they’d escalate to a punch, minimum.

We probably need a return of etiquette laws. Hell, just enforcing harassment and stalking law.

These monsters were allowed around these girls. Like leaving that goat in Jurassic Park.

Prosecute the aiders and abetters just as severely. Name, shame, face in the paper.

Of course, the surest way to trigger a Muslim slut is to call them a slut.

They think nobody would dare. Just describe them. Narcissists are easy to trigger.

Also, let the wife leave them for “adultery”.

The rape culture is imported.

It’s low IQ so fixing it is not an option. Deport or hang.

We did this with our native rapists for centuries and it’s the reason they’re so low prevalence nowadays, the DNA was largely wiped out. White nation safety didn’t just happen, it took a lot of rope.

People forget, and then we need to begin again.

We can’t enjoy it any longer because people who want to destroy us invited the snakes in.

Start with the schools.

Why are taxpayers funding any religious schools or religion taught IN schools?

No religious teachings should go through the state. This is preaching.

Ban RE. It’s an abuse of human rights.

It has no place in a school’s compulsory curriculum, it’s too complicated and there are too many religions to teach below a university level.

Freedom from religion is a freedom too.

(Even atheistkult can get behind this).

Jawline moving make-up

Since the fake eyelids revelation freaked enough of you out.

Yes. It is real. You cover it with foundation.

Notice how the mandible itself (the true jaw) cannot be compressed at the corner edges, except with surgery.

Why I don’t trust “contour”. It’s old theatre make-up, literally it is, to look like another person.

This is, according to her, “a small face”. As you can see, still square.

In a natural square jaw (see Jolie or Grace Kelly for white ones) the corner of the “square” is lower than in other women.

A higher-set corner, smooth (less bone) and curved jaw sweeping down to the chin is feminine.


I’m scientifically, indisputably correct on that point.


THAT is a gracile jaw.

Finally, the angle of the face is important. She naturally tucks her chin to recess her face’s sides in shadow behind hair but she actually has a recessed chin already. That’s unhealthy, causes double chins but culturally encouraged.

It’s strange how this is suggested once you’ve watched that.

Square-jawed Hollywood women get Botox to reduce the muscular prominence of their jaw.

So it isn’t like Asians are the only ones.

And plenty of “White” Jewish girls are still pushing the definition of natural into absurdity.

Very natural, quack quack on, bitch.

A hallmark of that eye surgery is that to appear more doe-eyed, the best the surgeon can do is make the eyes look more distant from one another. This requires more surgery to open them out again, giving them that sexy ET look.