Read – and understand

All that is gold does not glitter,

Not all those who wander are lost;

The old that is strong does not wither,

Deep roots are not reached by the frost.

invincible summer

From the ashes a fire shall be woken,

A light from the shadows shall spring;

Renewed shall be blade that was broken,

The crownless again shall be king.

…How much do you skim, and fail to read, expecting you already know what it says?

Apply maths: Feminists cause inequality

Inequality is encouraged by divided decision making outcomes.

If Group A of women have no children, Group B have one and Group C have two, will their finances magically align at some point despite the pressure of expenditures caused by childrearing?

This is why societies need to actively encourage the family unit, you leftoid idiots. Children are an investment with a future taxable benefit to society. Your benefits and pensions are paid for by the investment of parents if you have no (productive) children of your own.

A palpable lack of correct information about the outcomes of different lifestyle choices e.g. partner count and divorce rates, age/fertility levels, drives natural discrete divisions into extremes.


To take a non-sexed unbiased egalitarian (even Communist) example.

Give everyone in the world £2,000.

Check in a year later.

How can anyone deny that some people will be doing well, and others will be doing poorly?
Inequality is driven by fundamental differences between people. In other words, human biodiversity. Where’s the celebration of ideological and intellectual diversity? Why should idiots be supported by the intelligent for freely made choices?

In an ideal feminist utopia, everyone is a feminist.
Where are all the productive people? When you take away the motivation, the carrot e.g. quality men from offering the commitment of marriage, the system falls apart. Productive people will not work when the fruits of that labour, their natural right, is stolen from them by broken societal decree. They strike from action because they are not stupid, that is why they are productive.

Feminism isn’t a war on women per se. It’s a war on productivity, a la Cultural Marxism. On good men and good women, who might’ve found each other. It might’ve worked before globalization, pushed by the same stupid groups who expected widespread financial ruin would turn people to their anti-capitalist alternative. Now, a single SWPL princess’ faux journalism can be outsourced to a very grateful girl in India supporting her children. Hallelujah, karma is sweet.

Apply Autocorrect, Replace: “privilege” with easy life or happiness

  • You should be ashamed of your easy life.
  • Check your happiness.
  • I am sorry for my easy life.
  • Happiness should be equally distributed throughout the population.
  • No one should have an easy life, it is wrong.
  • My government program would combat those with an easy life.

Do you believe in magic, in a young SJW's heart? Cos that's primo magical thinking padre NB. The Autocorrect/Replace game is useful when considering political propaganda. Your results may vary.

Quick Wisdom, Apply Philosophy: On — Privilege

Apply Kant: If everyone has a privilege, no one does.
Apply Ancient Greece: It comes down to an old philosophical question, is it better to be born (value life in principle) or is life a chaotic valueless entity (nbd).
Apply Popper: In the end, we’re all privileged to be alive, viewed from our own perspective. Beyond is unfalsifiable and alters the question to Knowledge Theory.
Apply Aurelius: It shan’t last. You shall die.
Apply Camus: Nothing else beats it. Life is a gift blah blah inspirational rallying cry over a much-needed morning coffee.

Gary Oldman speaks to me on a spiritual level