And now they cry!

“And now, they find their Day is over! their power gone! and the throne of this nation possessed by a Royal, English, true, and ever constant member of, and friend to, the Church of England! Now, they find that they are in danger of the Church of England’s just resentments! Now, they cry out, “Peace!” “Union!” “Forbearance!” and “Charity!”: as if the Church had not too long harboured her enemies under her wing! and nourished the viperous blood, till they hiss and fly in the face of the Mother that cherished them!”

No Gentlemen, the Time of Mercy is past, your Day of Grace is over, you should have practised Peace, and Moderation, and Charity, if you expected any yourselves.

Source?

British Literature 1640-1789: An Anthology, pp. 370.

I meditate on this whenever an enemy of progress gets too big for their boots and feigns umbrage, especially the Muslims. Especially the Muslims.

The author in particular is Defoe.

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Shortest-Way_with_the_Dissenters

Video: The story of your enslavement

10/10 would share again. Shop around.

[read after]

Molyneux is the only redpill that hasn’t shamed himself with degeneracy.

Breath of fresh air.

The question you’re not allowed to ask:
Who are the farmers?
There is a social contract of slavery. As soon as you are born, there is a price on your head. What you’re told you owe society. It’s called national debt and ‘we’ can’t even pay the interest. It’s a con. You never agreed to it. This is why people are giving up. There is no fairness or incentive. The system is rigged via the devalued currency.
It’s the scientific model of management, Fordism. They’ll be nice to you, because it keeps you docile. They’ll tell you they care, because it means you’ll behave. They’ll promise you the world, if you work. Which is real? Only the work is real. Communists and capitalists come from largely the same stance, with inverted conclusions. The capitalist wants to be his own boss in this system. The Communist wants to be his own boss, self-employed, direct his own labour, in another system. Each believes they can maximize utility in their chosen system. Overall, there is hardly any difference in what they want – to keep what they earn. But from which State? Marxists think the State cares for them, but Marx wanted to destroy the middle-class, not the owners they are uniquely  empowered to oppose, and he never went into politics. Politicians are rich. They pay themselves above minimum wage and then flout that law to hire illegals. At least the capitalists are somewhat honest about those Homo Economicus motivations. The key difference is theft. Capitalists say enough has happened, wise to how shitty this system is but hopeful about improvement, at least for individuals who…work hard, Communists want more theft, to put the shoe on the other foot and get The Man tomorrow. Who will enforce this? The angry mob? No, they aren’t intelligent. The Man will never force measures against The Man. I alluded this in “Best Post“.

The only thing they care about is what they can take. They can’t take something you haven’t produced. This is a generational strike. Millennials (and younger) won’t get these goodies. There is no bribe, it’s fucking Monopoly money, fairground tickets for broken rides. But we’re still held responsible for governments and debts we weren’t alive to vote for. That’s illegal, it cannot be forced in either case. The system was damned long before we were born. We are not responsible. We cannot save it, nobody can ‘save’ it and they shouldn’t want to. Those people with the power to do anything are dead (they did manage to take it with them, in experiences and hedonism) or at the top of the chain, they don’t see it as a ‘problem’ to fix, a feature, not a bug. Intergenerational betrayal, and the young will live to see it.

Hey, I have been trying to warn people. I’m not alone in this. Why the maybe passive approach?
They control you with lies. It isn’t for public sector pensions, unfunded liabilities – it’s for the children! It isn’t for the whore down the road who you wouldn’t buy a drink, let alone the lifestyle of contraception, it’s for Family Planning! It isn’t for the ingrates in other countries who try to kill us, it’s for the foreign poor! Lions do not own lions because there would be a fight, eventually. We call this empire collapse. However, humans can own humans if they lie about why.

What are you working for? Which system is it, you support? Are you free to say ‘no’, openly, to your owners?

First lie: Who rules over you? Do you know? Do you know their names? Are you allowed to know?
Second lie: Who writes the textbooks? Are you taught the controversies, all moral sides or the Official Party Line? Who decides what is true for the poor, who attend state schooling?
Third lie: What is your currency? What is your value? Does money give you that? Does office paper? Gold? Food? Where is your value? External or internal? Who lies about this? Who says, in effect, ‘you need us, so you’d better behave’ or ‘toe the line, or you’ll be sorry’? Is that not a threat?
Fourth lie: Do the government do things on your behalf, in your name, without asking? Is that a democracy? Do they do the opposite from what they promised? Isn’t this… fraud? Do you even know what they’re doing? Why not tell you?
Fifth lie: Do they divide you from your kin? Isn’t this a distraction? Didn’t this start with preschool, when they told your family to abandon you (causing known psychiatric damage) to the state schooling system? Do you ‘defend’ groups you do not belong to? So… who defends you? Are you allowed to defend yourself?

It is Reverse Psychology and a fair amount of gaslighting (the true purpose of propaganda, doubt your own mind and they run it, in effect). The State tells you that you are worthless, from birth. Without you, they have nothing. They produce nothing. The state is innately parasitic.
Are you allowed or encouraged to succeed, or shamed and guilt-tripped? Isn’t this abuse? In a relationship, wouldn’t this be domestic abuse? Coming the state, isn’t that propaganda? Are you allowed ambition or achievement? Or, whatever you manage to scrape together from these seeds, do you get told ‘you didn’t build that’? Did someone else file those papers, grow those crops and study for those grades?
If they couldn’t profit from their ‘policies’, they wouldn’t push them. Who is held responsible for their failure? Those who created them and promised results (fraud) in academia? The politicians who wrote them into law? Or is the general public called the failure, since nobody is allowed to question anything else? Look to the second question.
Who has the power? The rich? Are they the same thing? What about the bribed? The workers keeping the system going? Who could improve the system? Who runs it? This relates to the first question.
Who claims to be one of you, but drags you down? Who are the crabs in the bucket making you hopeless? Calling you worthless, like the system itself?
What do they promise? What’s the alternative? ‘Bad things might happen‘ – how does that rationale differ from the Boogeyman? This is used on adults, mind.
The ‘arts’ is a good example of unofficial welfare. If you don’t want to see a play, why should you pay actors and co. for a play you’re never going to see? Why should middle-class hobbies be subsidized? Why not football matches? Why not bread and circuses? Who gets priority? Why? Which information do the arts convey to the public, how can they control the proles that the other hobbies and leisure pursuits do not?

How did this happen? Democracy is a good idea but has certain prior conditions that must be met e.g. population homogeneity, industry, longevity. When people step over the line and survive, there is no line. Find the crime without a punishment. People should have freedom, the State (a press-gang of a minority of bullies over the majority People) should never, they must be servants limited by necessity and mutual agreement. That is capitalism as an idea, some libertarianism without the globalism.

Instead, think of the ultimate minority group: the elite. Have some sympathy with the champagne socialists. Someone’s gotta crush the grapes, might as well be yours.

Denial is psychologically easier than dealing with it, they’re primed (the real subliminal effect, look it up) to be immature – less grit, lower impulse control, shorter attention spans than previous generations. We were bred to be weak by the State. Like Carlin said, just smart enough to run the machines but never to question why. We didn’t cause this mess, but this is how we live now. We must deal with it.
In a crisis, there is a normalcy bias. People will walk around as though nothing is wrong. On a societal scale, this is ongoing. There are problems, but not the problems the State feeds and funds. I repeat myself. The State is the enemy of the People, whether it be a Communist or capitalist one. If every man is equal, there can be no judges, no politicians, no lawyers, no preachers, no teachers, every man must stand alone. If every man is equal and not an animal, why need a State?

You could simplify that K-types are producers, the little red hen baking the bread and r-types the swarming locust of consumers.

I wonder what lesson that holds for Ks, when the Malthusian trap, the demographic crunch (or economic correction of all the bubbles popping at once to make ’08 look like a child’s Frozen birthday party) snaps on us. It may not happen overnight, but in politics a week is a year. A few years this would take for the shit to trickle down, a few months tops.

The r-selected need a State because it steals the wealth they cannot, as it steals the wealth they cannot produce themselves. The K-selected, dwindling in number with a small, short boost recently, do not need a State. They use the State to connect with each other. That already existed in ancient times, the tribal business.

What is control, in these contexts? Who is controlling you?

Economics works by quintiles, and taxes from this (aka Who is rich?). If you wanna go the typical way, sure, ask WHO is the 1% and what do they have in common? But realistically, they maintain power as the 20%.

The people screeching about the 1% are doing damage control as false opposition. To have a platform in the first place, to have the MSM’s ear, they are the privileged 20%.

I posted this at the beginning of the year.

Good luck. We’re all going to need it. If you’ve read this far, I sincerely wish you well.

Appeal to Authority is not an argument

Let’s go through a handful. I’ve had a spike in traffic this past week from people too spergy to know sarcasm when they see it. I don’t mind accommodating humourless prigs but then they try to order me around like I should seek their approval and that’s… that’s a thing, apparently? Mrs Grundy supported Hillary, they’re just projecting onto us as the Cause of their Problems (but what of the Final Solution)? I’ve seen them in the past week blame black people, white people, men, women, gay people, straight people, illegal people, dead people, Obama, old people, young people and Third Party voters, for their failure. It isn’t about any of us, and the divisive tactic is hardly surprising, it’s totally about them and it isn’t cricket. Trying to order your fellow voter around is what deservedly keeps losing you elections and referenda. The people saying we’re equal shouldn’t be patronizing or hiding certain material we supposedly aren’t smart enough to read and question. The real world isn’t a safe space. The opposite of democracy is tyranny, where you must vote for Saintly Candidate or Satan wins and Armageddon happens (concern trolling).

  • You aren’t 100% totally serious all the time, therefore, I can ignore you!

….wut

  • It’s art if I say it is, and if you don’t like that comedian you have no right to judge.

Let’s break out the rape jokes. Or maybe some of Eddie Murphy’s 80s materials on homosexuals.

  • You aren’t legitimate.

That’s the point. That is quite literally the entire point. Either I’m right or wrong. Nothing to do with approval or consensus. I’m not being paid. I don’t run adverts biasing me. That is quite literally the point and I’m impressed to see people who try and turn those into a bad thing. Calm down, everyone knows most blogs are crap. If I’m totally wrong, why does it trigger you? Only the truth smarts. Ah, but you see the hit count, don’t you?
It bothers you I don’t need to show my tits like that tramp Laci Green to get people to listen to me.
Listening to a woman? Based on her…. her, opinions?? No sexual appeal whatsoever?!

Aaaaah feel that, savour that? It's being right

Shocking, I know.

  • I can discredit you personally based on Opinion A. No person worth listening to would hold Opinion A.

No True Scotsman would reject free beer.
What genetics?

  • Obviously socialization factors are important.

Not as important as genetic ones. The harder science wins.
Also see the reproducibility crisis for how the sociologist’s fallacy works out.

  • Your opinions are mean.

Have you looked at the reasons? Nobody likes being mean.
I’ve even tried sympathizing with parts of Marx, but nobody Leftist complains about that….

In a democracy, most people will think you’re wrong. Deal with it.

  • You used a word I didn’t like (ex: usually cuck).

That’s the purpose of an insult, well done, dear.
We wouldn’t use it, if it didn’t work.
If you feel it applies to you, perhaps examine why?

  • Why don’t you show your face?

Monstering mobs, the scummy people who come after entire families and other large groups. From the people who want me to show my face. Also I’m not vain and text is easier to search.

  • I can’t tell if you’re joking.

It’s an intelligence test. You fail.
You aren’t tall enough for this ride.

  • Why did you do this? All this.

Don’t you support a woman’s right to independent thought if she isn’t left-wing?

  • You’re a terrible person.

You come to my house…

  • How dare you question Government/company/charity/campaign!

Who’s the conservative now? Look at you far-left liberals defending The Man. Warms the iron of Horseshoe Theory, dunnit?
Never question your betters, is it? Know your place? Is it, perchance, the kitchen?

  • You shouldn’t be allowed to have an opinion (if it’s different from mine).

This is the internet. You people adopted it, mine made it worth inhabiting. I thought everybody was entitled to an opinion?

  • You’re (dehumanizing insults).

I thought we were equal, comrade?
Dehumanizing makes you like Hitler. [that was sarcasm]

  • This is wasting my time.

You act like I care. Your time, your business. However, if you were half as open-minded as you like to signal, you would read around from time to time, as I clearly do. You all have exactly the same brainless objections, thinking you’re so clever. It’s like the redditfags who parrot clever-sounding words and phrases “correlation is not causation”. You have plenty of websites of your own. This isn’t your safe space. You don’t own everything.

  • Why can’t we talk?

You mean, why can’t you manipulate me with feeling?
You can open up a Youtube channel for all I care. Talk to them. As it is, I’ve progressed through those simplistic arguments years ago and it takes up too much time to explain to ingrates who come here in droves every so often. I don’t owe you a reply or recognition. This is not a milquetoast cocktail party.

For the serious audience that tries to think independent thoughts:-

Why do so many young people now think Appeal to Authority is an argument?

Are they still brainwashed into obedience from school? It’s like crimestop. There’s no such thing as a dangerous and unacceptable idea. If others want to self-limit, sure, that makes it easy for the rest of us. Less clog in the drain.

The internet is a swirl of ideas. You don’t get to pick who gets to post. It’s democratic.
I mention things because they seem interesting, not necessarily true, I don’t presume. They are intended to challenge you. If you cannot reject it, there must be some truth to it, however unpleasant.

For people bitching about the ‘truth’, because I use that word in the header tongue-in-cheek, as if parts of it aren’t subjective in places (the personal is political places), they sure don’t sound like the moral relativists… Your truth is not my truth. Our experiences differ and the evidence says at least one of us must be wrong. Common sense, surely?

You don’t expect me to do time-travel telepathy do you?
Let’s write all the opinions I don’t have for some reason, held by a person who’ll read this in the future and doesn’t really care about objective truth. OK.

They want to feel secure that their opinion is politically correct, the latest evidence be damned, and to feel safe, ignorant (nothing ‘mean’ in their pure little heads, they don’t feel the full spectrum of human emotion like the proles) and comfortable in those opinions, unthreatened by people who don’t even take selfies and post hashtags to Twitter. Oh, the horror!

It’s the adult equivalent of ‘I saw one thing I didn’t like (inevitable with honesty) so lalala I’m not listening to all the rest.’

Edging closer to the truth is better surely? Right??

There are no excuses to ignore valid evidence. I’ve ceded plenty of times my opponents had a point. Derailing and straw-manning to totally different points isn’t fooling anyone. The truth is not simple or easy and never nice and PC. PC is a facade of lies to deliberately hide the truth e.g. beauty is on the inside, reject computer models. We oppose the intellectual dishonesty, as did your fellow pinko George Carlin. Classic liberals are thinking this has all been taken too far in the name of coddling adults who expect respect without comporting themselves above the level of a temper tantrum. The people in this part of the internet know all about logical fallacies and SJW tactics. Name the beast and it can’t bite you, we’re immune. In fact, we should thank you, because if you didn’t set so many people against you with your repellent personalities and rude discussion disruptions, over many years, we would never be replacing traditional media. Infiltration doesn’t work either, since our debates tend toward cerebral theories you either get or you don’t. None of this is our fault, we leave you to various fruitless campaigns and it’s impressing nobody to start on people who for the most part mind their own business in their own parts of the internet.

One rung up is the fascist temptation to censor. Liberal until tyrannical. Hey, I want all those people I disagree with to have free speech. It’s free comedy. I link to them. I say, there, look, go and see for yourself I’m not making this up. They really are that dumb.

You can’t discredit someone who doesn’t value your opinion. We just laugh at you. It’s like a schoolgirl starting a rumour, it changes nothing and you’ve proven you don’t have a substantive reply. Is that the best you can do? Is that your level?
You can’t de-legitimize someone who seeks a totally different metric of legitimacy (nothing to do with traditional authority or MSM/Baby Boomer approval, more like a Wild West anarchy approach to the truth). Sometimes it’s rude, to shock people into waking up and smelling the shit around them. The new rebels are right-wing, get over it. It’s been fifty years of Red, you’ve had your time. The pendulum is swinging back, various elections are proving it. Either stick around and learn something or go back to your bubble and keep wondering why your polls are out of touch. I won’t start on the economic models and QE out of clemency.

  • Why can’t we open a dialogue?

You don’t want open debate. If you were ever capable of following the rules. You platform ban people in public for trying to dissent. You try to get them arrested for peaceful protest.
That isn’t liberal.
You want to preach, except there’s no basis for this. There is no legitimacy. If we’re all equal, you have no more value than I do. Including moral authority.
It’s like an atheist in the pulpit. You’re what’s been dubbed many things: the New Church Ladies, cultural regressives, rabbits, degenerates (happy to sin, like Satanists), all sanctimonious and Shame-on-You-ing. This is why you get nowhere and nobody listens to you. We’re all adults here. You have no right and to put it in your lingo, you speak from a position of privilege. Or at least liberal privilege. You demanded identity politics and now you have it. You can’t complain you got what you wanted, now it’s all people see because you told us to.
Think of the rich celebrities in gated communities telling all the poor people they’re bad and need to reject the segregation of gated communities. People are not stupid. They’re angry and totally validated.

The Left is dead. Its globalist spin, the rampant supranationalism post-war, is a cultural artefact of the 20th century Empire-building, the ‘Unions’. Accurately, wing politics is dead too.
It’s now about issues and identity. National and genetic competition (what you dub inequality).
Get over yourself.

This blog and those like it are not for you. They are not for pinko approval, Princess.

Finally, the best slight because it exposes you for who you truly are.

  • You’re crazy.

You’re gaslighting me. Typical mansplaining. It’s never the women who try that means of dismissal and self-doubt.

Someone who doesn’t hate themselves irrationally for being born, or being white, or whatever else, it must be triggering to you.

In your language of child memes.

“Why aren’t they listening to us? We called them crazy Nazis, didn’t we?”

If you don’t see the problem in insulting people you need to persuade, you’re retarded.

Socially.

Real retards are actually very nice people with far more common sense.

My readership is diverse

june2015readership

I don’t understand it.

why are you even here damon ian wtf
e.g. Some non-white countries really love reading about the race, race realist perspectives and ‘white people’ material (with the last, especially black people). I accommodate the needs of my readers when choosing subjects to cover. They take a genuine interest in those taboo subjects, since most whites won’t touch them with a bargepole from fear and I sincerely appreciate that and try to balance it when I report stuff. Non-whites aren’t the enemy by default unless they’re doing something they shouldn’t be doing (mostly those are plain crimes), kinda like hate the sin not the sinner, except that notion is wrong when applied to religion. Some terrible people are white, every race has its fuck-ups and I wouldn’t like to be pre-judged because of them (cough Jack the Ripper cough). We need balance and perspective to have these discussions. I believe they have the right to self-determination of their race within their native homelands, the same with every race, including white people. We shouldn’t be pushing groups to mingle against their will (freedom of association) or when it’s bad for them (outbreeding depression, multiculturalism social problems). I’m quite rare in this regard, not wishing harm or punishment for some grand revenge fantasy’s sake. ideally live and let live. I think that’s why some of you are here.

My sentiment on the tide against PC.

We agree on certain basics, like the existence of difference. We have the best odds of figuring out these bigger problems, like SJW entryism, (one of my most popular topics) with a cross-cultural perspective, up to the global population. Power-trip ranting won’t get us anywhere.

When I started out, I figured I’d get mostly UK people and a smattering of US thanks to the cultural venn diagram. I guess the truth does transcend boundaries, or some other Polyanna platitude. The full list (these are weekly) often features a remarkably high showing from Arabic countries, especially properly Muslim ones like Saudi Arabia. They like the sex subject advice best…. and coverage of Western decline.

glare glaring stare no stop please wtf drinking tea disapproval forever

Whatever floats your boat, chaps.
Frankly, if we over here keep fucking up much longer, I’m right there with you. Let it burn. It’s easier to rebuild from ash than cut rot from living tissue. I’m too nerdy to come up with cooler metaphor.

Still, one could never accuse this site of being “white supremacist” although the topic(s) is discussed. I feel this is important to note. It is possible to discuss and share. If we’re only sharing what we believe to be true based on the available evidence, anthropologically or psychologically, what is there to hide from one another? The truth converges over time.

I shan’t attempt to understand Malaysia or certain islands, but rest assured, I see and appreciate you!