Elegance or decadence?

5 min. Male designer speaks.

There’s a line, isn’t there? Think how much we spend on clothing today. Think how little is any good. If anything, it ought to be better. In menswear you see a lot of circulation, for instance, the gilet is a doublet.
A related discussion in vintage or re-enactment circles is the glamour/beauty debate.
Beauty is natural but human beauty never has been. Primitive tribes had shell necklaces and the torc or crown were made alongside spears. This is something we are so immersed in we cannot see it, there is a hierarchy of style and the modernist love of minimalism (it’s been almost a century now! come on!) came from an American urge to distance themselves from Europe and carve out what is ironically a more rugged, romantic* standard.

Boomers were defined by the hippy look, androgyny that mimicked the political shift.

People wore wigs in most centuries for decency reasons, like hats, they wore heels and girdles, eyeliner was medicinal. Male watches, wristwatches, were originally ladies’ bracelets. To this day, the face is too large for the male wrist, they go overboard to make it look manly with a chunky appearance. If humans put effort in, and since wearing clothing is legally required, they naturally want to express who they are and where they come from and that art form shouldn’t be dismissed. The utility belt began as female, with its height in the chatelaine. Men would only have things strapped to a military uniform from the shoulders, where their muscles could take the weight. Heavy belts help women, whose strongest muscles are our thighs.
The 1950s makeup aesthetic was heavily painted, more than some looks now. There was a full face of foundation and a lot of powder. These days, with HD cameras, it would look cheap as Hell.
Men forgoing makeup is modernist, inspired by the Romantic* philosophers because it was au naturelle.

To this day, many of you don’t know where this sudden squee over the working class came from.
https://www.artofmanliness.com/2010/09/19/3-archetypes-of-american-manliness-part-iii-the-self-made-man/

Yes, it was totally your idea… like the American eagle that isn’t Napoleonic that isn’t Roman…. calling it, Empire = eagles. Sciencey.

The Romantic poets had a fetish about the countryside and farmers, this continued on into Vincent’s art but began around the 17th century with still life and paintings of farmers and cooks. The simple life to contrast the urban “Enlightenment”. Industrialization got the Romantics down, they thought machines were replacing men and making them more effete, dependent. Actually, how many men can stitch a button?

There’s a physical component to gendered presentation, the scale of masculine to feminine.
Modern looks are androgynous, even for men. Denim is andro, cotton, andro, jeans, andro, boots, andro, ties, andro, scarves, andro, t-shirts, andro, it’s all andro-andro-andro-andro!

For real.

Look around and see for yourself.

Women aren’t dressed like men, men are dressing more like women. Do you need a loose fit of maternity wear? Think back to 1980s suits to now, picture the silhouette. Modern men cover up way too much skin, historically. Why? Well, they don’t fight, there’s no body heat being lost. Sports replaced wars. The wealthy areas tend to be cold or polluted, so we cover up. Powerful men are in vogue, fewer dandies and more fat old men, who tend to cover up.

Long coats are Byronic, like long sleeves. Cravat and tie are basically the same thing in French. Grooming became more important, they didn’t just drop a standard so telling women to forgo makeup would be like telling men exactly which hairstyle to wear regardless of face shape and job and climate and whether or not they were allowed a beard, absurd in any time period. Makeup, like hair style is also cultural. You can see comparisons on Youtube of say, French and American makeup. Men couldn’t have beards in the upper classes until soap and good hygiene became the norm. There were reasons for the aristocratic fashions and all grooming is good grooming, with the exception of anal bleaching.

That would be masochism.

Suits, for instance, change how a man walks. Other men don’t notice, we do.
If a man can’t buy a good pair of shoes, do we trust him?
The effect on manners and a sense of personal dignity cannot be under-estimated.
As one man I know put it, he recently got into vintage and said “I know now that I felt like shit because I looked like it.” People responded to that insecurity signal. Depression is linked with unemployment but also sloppy dressers.
Why is there an envy of the stylish? They look happy. We imagine them contented.
It’s different to pin what caused what and I’m not a man so your feels aren’t my beeswax.
When we picture a utopia, what do we spotlight? What they wear. Instinctively, you care. Cosplay is all about the style and the feel of an era, what it represents. Living history, I’ve heard it called, like recipes and music.

They build up on skills and those traditions are rooted in history, in a country and time.

20m. German lady.

A critical aspect of femininity is presentation and expression.
It isn’t limited to women, however, men gain a collective identity more.

It affects how you carry and identify yourself. Think military uniforms.
This concept was floated in NRx years ago but I figured I’d bring it up again.

6m. French designer.

There’s a distinct pride element, whether it’s class, sex, nation, occasion (we still dress up for weddings..) and think how many aspects of appearance are banned or frowned upon (up to the English flag, because it might offend).
SJWs themselves cannot resist the siren song of a uniform but the blending is childish, Monroe catseye glasses with a Betty fringe and Audrey shirts, they signal an ignorance of feminine style. It’s pure fashion and poorly crafted as a look. There is no style.
How many people dress like hoodrats and chavs that wouldn’t dream of it ten years ago? Thanks to Anonymous making it middle class rebellion.
How did wearing Mom Jeans become Tech Guru status? Apple smartphones.
Why don’t men wear hats and spats and carry canes?
Where did all the petticoats go?

These sound superficial but the fabrics follow the philosophies. Designers respond to demand.
We dress cheaply because clothing is made cheaply. That makes us cheap people. History will view us as such. Trends set in LA temperatures look ridiculous in Europe. I said it.
Please can men discuss this because obviously I don’t want to tell you what to wear but women notice. We note the expression and effort, why else do you think the gay best friend thing came about?

This isn’t superficial, aesthetics is critical. It’s the ultimate emotional appeal (looking good) and, no offense, but the signal of sophistication and elegance is one few people could ever make. Natural beauty is genetic but style is a level playing field. The dress-up montages in film and anime are a token marker of stepping into a social role (think Iron Man suiting up) and mature responsibilities.

I’ve noticed one particular thing I want to point out before I set this festive post on a timer: PC culture has risen as appearance has gotten more sloppy. With weak signals from look, the verbal mannerly side has gone into overdrive.

Could the Alt Right be too popular?

It’s attracted a lot of free riders off the coat-tails of various claimed ‘successes’.

Myself, I don’t think memes count as work, they’re just a bit of fun slinging at the precious Narrative.

I’ve been watching very closely and thinking carefully about The Next Step.

I can’t honestly say there is one. If this turns out to be a purely-memetic trend, it will shortly implode, possibly to change into a more extreme form. I know there are people who probably want that to happen, the SJWs in particular, this way when they scream ‘literally Hitler’ something might stick.

I think the core issue with AR is attracting too many socialists.

They think they can play both sides in effect, a new breed. I’ve complained in the past about the fence-sitting social liberal, economic conservative but this is the opposite. I’ve never seen it before. The social conservative, economic socialist. It makes no logical sense whatsoever. The economics and social policies must match. This is looking like edgy libertarianism, with additional servings of autism and grievance.

We have plenty of just grievance, we don’t need to make any up.
Don’t get me started on the weakness of civic nationalism.

Too much conflict, too few standards.

There’s no such thing as a right-wing socialist, FFS.
We need K-selection, not slightly weaker r.

There’s too many heavy symbolism issues dragging the good ideas back. History didn’t work or we’d still have it.

There’s too many crazies or obnoxious fools being let in, if they signal.
Ahem, since when did we give a damn about virtue signalling?

I covered this before in the ‘hypocrisy of the signalling right’.

They’re not held to any standard. Most are atheist and happily genetic suicide.
We need a minimum barrier of knowledge without blocking people who want to understand.

A few have clear disturbances that nobody begs them to correct.
Filtering out the embittered (especially at Mom/women) would do a world of good, they tend to congregate on that idea. Fine, go live on a homoerotic island with all your bro-boyfriends. It’s like claiming a modern   Matriarchy, it’s absurd. Some MRA and MGTOW types have been picked up and given a platform to turn us against one another. Division in a gender war is what the SJWs want. It’s anti-natal.

The men do not police the other men and naturally the women can’t do it. Few women stick around for the general shouting-down from the obnoxious oafs. It drives away that spirit of cooperation required.

What’s the plan? What’s the goal?

Memes are beyond the lolz, they contain ideas. They carry philosophies. They are not vapid insults. See Wrath of Gnon’s superb interview.

This is why the Left can’t meme. They lack the underpinning of reality.

They’re right, though. It is a war of ideas… but it never ends. Where is the vanguard?

We may be skirting into similar delusory territory. It’s like that silly ‘get back in the kitchen’ meme. Meanwhile, the West dies.

I find myself going back to the neoreactionary materials, as you must’ve noticed. Other traditionalist places too. There’s only so many times you can see the n-word thrown around for shock value before you realize you’re not going to get an intellectual debate about the future of the West and civilization with these children.

A change is coming and we need to clean house. The nihilists and the promiscuous are the worst – the prosocial rot, the antisocial cancer. Druggies after that. All degenerate really means is antisocial, as in, bad for society, anti-societal and dyscivic. These ‘hobbies’ are not individual, they cause social harm e.g. antibiotic resistance.
We cannot decry degeneracy when we allow degenerates. We’re not Jesus, we can’t absolve them. If they’re hell-bent, so be it. It’s God’s will, they deserve to be there. Missionaries do not fear God because they have a Messiah complex, trying to save everyone. Few deserve salvation. You need leave them only breadcrumbs – those are memes.
The Left is strong because it is a lifestyle and because they feel strong and united from the cheerleader effect. The media crumbling, the narrative imploding, damages their bubble illusion.

You can’t attract good people with negative degenerates.

We don’t want to implode like the shitheap that was the manosphere.

This is without going into the distinct probability of black ops. I mean, wouldn’t you?

This MSM attention is making me nervous for the first time ever.
Woman’s intuition, something is wrong. This has been too quiet, too easy for a while.

We don’t have any lifestyle guidance. None of the basics our forefathers took for granted. Places like artofmanliness come close to what I mean. Nothing about music or art or books to read. Where is the right’s culture?
Where are the lists? Where are our curricula?

We need a vision of utopia. Or what are we aiming for?

We’d be weakened as pure, modernist reaction to online sensationalism. Event-based. We need to become the event others respond to.

If this becomes a popularity contest at the expense of substance, it’s a pageant. There are too many farces of Patriarchs that can’t even do their own laundry let alone raise a family and keep a wife happy.
We can do better than the Patrick Bateman metrosexual model of masculinity, all fake muscles and ‘notches’.
These are the people who don’t get that Fight Club is satirical. They’re living the ridiculous.
The West doesn’t want more cushion dogs. Speaking of, treating dogs like kids is creepy. Stop it. You’re as bad as cat ladies. It’s Paris Hilton Syndrome.

The energy-giving, useful people like me and others are retreating. We don’t want to cope with the dross.
I think we’re unconsciously waiting for them to get bored or self-destruct, as hedons always do. Then we sweep back in to clean up. I fear we may have invited in the ideological equivalent of locusts, they kill any movement they join like losers picking up a fashion trend. The degenerate are the most worthless humans you shall ever encounter, it’s like babysitting children. They slag off snapchat but use ‘XD’ seriously. Male thots. All about attention. Nix the narcissists in your midst or perish. They aren’t allies but fairweather friends.

Look up the rest of the phrase ‘birds of a feather flock together…’.

The r-types will necessarily drive away the Ks. Problem is, this is a pure K-movement. They’re the barbarians, the fifth column. They don’t want change but they seek our power, to take it. What do you expect from socialists? All they do is eat, eat, eat away at the People.

Man card isn’t a thing. It doesn’t exempt you from explanation, falling in line with the group’s standard of conformity, from working yourself, making changes and it certainly doesn’t give you a license to whine, bitch, order around women or better men. In the Old Testament, men had rites of passage and standards of etiquette to have any power, or else they were children.

You fire the lazy employee. You shun the slothful activist. This isn’t a fucking hippy commune.

This is work, bitch.

We don’t have champers for socialists. The hen keeps her bread. Welcome to K-shift, have fun.

The eternal r-type

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/unbelievable-mother-of-15-kids-somebody-needs-to-pay-somebody-needs-to-be-held-accountable_12012011

for the Title alone

“Somebody needs to pay! Somebody needs to be held accountable!”

comment

“At what number of children does a woman loose her ‘reproductive rights’ to bring even more children into this world that she is unable to care for? Why are you and I ‘forced’ to support children that we had no part in creating? I had no part in the pleasure of any of the orgasms required to create these children …… so why am I required to support them and their mother?
I am informed that here in Florida, the grandmother of the children will go to DCF and allege that her daughter is unfit to care for and raise her grandchildren. Once the mother is declared “unfit”, then the grandmother will gain legal custody of the children and then become their “foster parent”. This changes the whole nature of the situation from a welfare issue to a foster care issue. Grandma can then collect approximately 2.5X more as a foster care provider than her daughter can receive as a welfare recipient.
At this point, the daughter moves back in with her mother and her children and they all live happily after ….. at our expense. How about after the delivery of two welfare babies we also provide the mother with a tubal ligation; at our expense of course. To be completely fare about the whole thing, we also give the father a free vasectomy.
Food for thought homies. Too cold on my part?”

This sex-positive Sexual Revolution propaganda is all about dem dollars.

It’s a wealth transfer to the immature dependents (high time pref) from the actual adults (low time pref). The productive are being vampirised for the leeches, that’s why they can’t afford to breed themselves!

You have a ‘right’ to breed as many children as you like, under our construct of consensual=moral, but you do not have a right to force others to pay for it. At most, your own relations ought to pay for them, not strangers. I find it funny the men complaining about free birth control are the ones (sluts) who benefit from it, they never want to shut down free STD clinics or the abortion clinics, do they?

Replacement-level only is too generous, one child only. You need to breed those genes OUT.
The old rule was all those claiming any welfare go on birth control OR forsake all right to support for any child they produce while claiming.

“This angers me because I remember trying not to cry when I went in for my tubal ligation. We wanted more kids but knew in our hearts we couldn’t afford more. We stopped at three, wanted five originally. It was hard but I figured if I was ever in a position to truly support another lil guy then I could afford a reversal or in vitro. Made sense to me then, makes sense to me now. I don’t regret it because I know my kids would have less if I had been emotional and selfish.

And then to think of the poor couples who can’t have any at all! Really makes me sick. And more and more people have no responsibility for thier actions in any way anymore. I have to wonder, if there were no such thing as welfare, would she have had all those kids?”

It hurts other, better women most of all, the ones who keep their legs shut.

In a way, it’s deeply sexist against K-women. We have a shorter breeding period where we’re forced to pay for welfare trash babies instead of saving for our own.

“Let’s be fair…
Norplant as long as you are on welfare.
Once you start on welfare no more children are added to the payouts.
You lose the right to vote as long as you are on welfare.
to collect welfare you need to turn in the father with a DNA test to prove it.
So if you are down on your luck you get help, and if you turn your life around you get to have as many children as you want, vote, and collect child support from dad(s)”

Why should anyone’s sex life (lifestyle choice) be subsidized by the taxpayer?

The assumption nobody ever attacks.

There is no such thing as a human right to orgasms.

You have no right to a sex life, especially at the expense of others. This goes from free contraception to rape. Within marriage, you have a right to sex. That is literally the ‘conjugal right‘. You don’t have conjugal rights over anyone you’re not married to. That’s the real issue, they refuse to marry.

They want all the perks of marriage: sex, children, financial providence but no obligations or responsibilities.

In a patriarchy, it’s always the father’s responsibility as the provider, this is more a paternal failure but the women are almost as bad. Simply extract all the mother’s costs from the father, or he can work it off in prison. That’s the only way to do this, the traditional way.

Without promiscuity culture, this would never have happened.

Social shame would have prevented it but who wants to name the Beast of lust? All both parents want is ‘fun’.

They had sex knowing the biological consequence. You are taught this before puberty. You can have ‘fun’ in a thousand other ways or take up a masturbation habit if orgasms are so core to your self-esteem. Too much sex and the wrong sex (out of marriage, with strangers) is bad for your body and mind. It’s also common sense. There is NO such thing as ‘casual sex’. It has one, clear outcome.

comment
“If you can’t feed em, don’t breed em.”
“The bitch and her bastards belong in the gas chamber.”
“How’s about the Dads pay and you keep your legs together. I don’t owe you anything.”

If anything, they owe society.

In these cases, it’s always unfair to blame only the mother when it takes two to horizontal tango.
Always ask: where’s the father?

comment on a previously linked article, relevant
Long before you start saving money for your own kids, you pay for someone else’s. Get some single mother’s kid set up with toys, clothes and food and THEN you can start putting aside some money for your OWN kid, but not before. First some brown kid somewhere gets a Tonka truck, new jeans, KFC, ice cream sandwiches with your money. See what’s left, stick it in the piggy bank for your kid. Fuck it.”

The welfare system is unjust.

Our future is stolen.

World War Three?

You might think this is an eerie kind of fanfiction…

it is not.

Just bear with me here. Listen a little. 2,000 words.

What if the EEC, later known as the European Union, were in fact part of a long line of Empires? A chain stretching back into Ancient times? Now, every kind of society has a maximum size, and various points of failure, like a building.

The function of each of these Empires is simple – labour. Slavery in its brutal form but productivity nonetheless.

The only means by which this can operate is control. A series of levers and social ‘memes’ that keep the whole machine ticking over, because humans must be entertained. It’s not bread and circuses, it’s hot dogs and reality TV. Consider every Empire, by size or density of its population, an experiment. A living experiment with humans much like Calhoun’s rats.

With the same dismal end.

You could relate this to the circling of the degenerate drain known as r-selection.

I’m afraid it’s a little broader than that, you’d need HBD, biohistory and various other theories including psychiatry for a complete picture.

For example, I covered the probable role of syphilis and especially neurosyphilis in the formative modern history of the West. Then there comes the obvious selection pressures of war, Black Death and various toxins, released deliberately in many cases.

The Romans probably fell in IQ due to the cumulative brain damage of lead in their piping.

The Victorians later had problems with cholera.

Basic sanitation is a key vector of disease transmission, ironically. This would relate to water fluoridation in the modern water supply, I’ve linked to its neurotoxic state, acknowledged in science.

Population control can also be achieved by sterilizing STDs, the most recent being Ebola in that is sterilizes via death. Before that, the mysterious origins of HIV and the unusual number of strains, including those tested by militaries. Naturally, this would only work if you pushed some kind of Sexual Revolution to increase the transmission potential but kept it low for your own group.

I’m getting off topic. Let’s keep to certain facts.

Each Empire was doomed to fall, based on its sheer volume of inhabitants.

This is a rule of history.

The EU has already failed based on metrics alone. Its currency has failed.

With the Euro gone, there is nothing to prop it up.

Even the human labour doesn’t exist in both the numbers and the quality (IQ) required. The fall of the EU isn’t an achievement so much as inevitability. The dysgenics put in place for the world wars guaranteed any such plan was doomed.

Much like taxation of the wealthiest (most productive within a year), you can only push so far because people break. They’ve long been suffering the slow death of inflation. This changes a person, it alters the amygdala at least. People seem less polite, more crass and less content with whatever comforts or luxuries their money buys them.

Social power never existed, it’s a polite post-war lie to cover armament for military might.

Considering all of these facts, how can I explain recent events?

Russia is not the danger. The USA is a defanged hound.

It’s China.

A war with MENA is good for the money-lenders, based entirely on the resources found there and nowhere else. How dare those pesky locals demand to be paid for what’s in their country?

Hence, open borders aka NO borders.

It’s Communism with other nation’s resources.

A war with China, however… they don’t believe China has the balls.

Oh, it does. It’s been preparing since WW2 for the next match.

It produces most goods in the world. How quickly would it win, owning all the equipment? They understood Marx well, you cannot produce tanks without a Means of Production.

This isn’t by any stretch all. To keep this short.

There are many economic unions in the world. Only the EU gets attention.

They are temporary alliances, that shall evaporate upon trial.

Nobody wants to upset China, because they’ve been selling their people’s labour at the price of slaves. To foreigners, no less! Some of the most racist people in the world! But why?

As part of a long-term plan to overthrow the West using capitalism, its own invention. Capitalism’s weakness is the honesty of white men, also why ‘free trade’ is BS. Other races prize lying to outsiders, whether you call it taqiyya or etiquette, where they suddenly stop inviting you round if you get fired. The people who seem most polite are lying, they’re hiding something.

It’s been gagging for this shot since the Industrial Revolution, and two world wars weakened us all nicely.

To sacrifice a few generations in the name of their collectivism, indulge in the West goodies but be not of it. To send some r-types overseas to settle and become key figures in politics (this is happening in America as we speak, a Red tide rises) and I already linked to the Economist ages ago predicting WHEN, not IF, but when China will overtake the US economy.

Most people would read that and go back to crying in their cornflakes about feminism.

It’s all connected. Would there be any Yellow Fever, without anime porn?

Would Western men who think they’re too smart for Hollywood porn, be so useless and lotus-eating, like the parasite single (bachelor) men of Japan, without it?

Back to the economy. When any country becomes a dominant power, it gets to play world police aka start as many wars as it likes.

Ask yourself: Is China more bloodthirsty than the US?

Has it dogmatically enforced its own culture, unlike the USA?
Has it tortured its own people to achieve?
Which tries to be the fairer?

What are the signs, you ask?

They learn Western culture e.g. the violin, religiously, to blend in.

But they do not expand the canon.

They punish their children to achieve at any cost, and top the league tables.

This allows them access to the prestige western schools, to befriend future politicians and observe any blackmail material firsthand.

What does a war need? Money and bodies.

Well, there’s a story that they could march all their fighting age men and encircle the world. They have the largest self-sustained population in the world. An excess of men. Anyone read on history knows there is only one means to get rid of a surplus of men. Who can sustain greater losses, all of the West or China?

OK, but what about one baby as a rule?

Why did they make that rule? They knew in their culture it would lead to a surplus of men. Why would a government obsessed with military investment need a huge stock of men to outnumber their main capitalist competition? They’re being trained, and not in factories.

Asia is obsessed with STEM and the military.

Why? Well, engineers and doctors are the two occupations critical to any war effort.

Ideally, you want to train your people overseas, use up their resources while building connections to exploit as informants later, and then extract them back home, depriving the enemy of key workers to subsistence peace-time level.

Gee, which race has a near-monopoly on those two occupations?

But people who read foreign papers will know they changed the baby rule recently.

Again, I ask you.

Why?

Two babies. This is interesting. It means the fighting age culled population will have sufficient females (baby 2) to breed with. It all fits.

The Marxism of China still encourages child-bearing, but the grandparents retain a prominent role to care unlike the West aka Baby Boomers.

People have been spoiling for a war since the 80s, Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, all just paper targets.

There are many economic unions and these libertarian experiments (inc. the EU) are, whether they know it or not, pawns in a wider game, the leagues before WW3. You need the upper hand before the game starts, and that’s why nobody wants to start it. The US is not the strongest player, it’s the UK because we can push the US based on our unique geography and naval supremacy. However, the US doesn’t know which enemy will rise up next, or believes in arrogance nobody will dare challenge it (naive) based on two wars it lucked out of. They can’t attack everyone.

That’s why Hitler lost.

Russia and China are in an economic alliance together, I forget which one. The US is not.

That is why both Russia and China have been buying up gold.

You only need that for one thing as a nation.

A gold standard.

China has been faking its gold exports, look up the ones pictured with a Panda hallmark.

Why do that? Aren’t they our friends?

They’ve been taking over cyberspace too. Most hacks now come from Asia, not Russia.

Why need gold practically? It can be used in electronics, especially high-tech war equipment.

They have a lot of men to equip.

If they run out, they can always use some older women. Thanks, feminism!

If China announces it’s moving to a gold standard, the USA will be forced to default.

I believe this may be the black swan you’ve all been looking for?

The EU is backed by the IMF, whose traders include Deutsche Bank, close to open failure.

Like Lehman Brothers in 2007.

UK gilts are bought off the backs of nothing, you’re supposed to trade heavily in gilts during times of war. As in, we’re fuck out of options.

The bubbles accruing on top one another for decades, sped up since ’08, will go at once like dominos. Where do we owe this money, ultimately? Not so much the Jews, although yes historically. All roads lead to China, they keep buying up Western debt, ostensibly for ‘social power’ and out of the goodness of their commie little hearts.

I wonder if we can learn anything about massive indebtedness from the Weimar Republic.

These people poison their own baby formula and don’t withdraw it from the market. They don’t care about one another (beyond direct blood relations) and they hate us.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/china-shipping-human-flesh-cans-8217761

Russia wants to be able to trade with them. This requires gold. People like Putin watch commodities over the Forex.

I don’t often talk shop or economics but this next piece is illustrative.

What’s the immigration rate of China?

So, if a series of riots were to take place based on new, entitled ‘citoyenne’ … we’d be too busy dealing with civil war (4th generation) to consider the mere possibility of another.

Does Crimea make more sense now?

How about in light of the fact that China’s greatest enemy, the Japanese, are being antagonized by North Korea as China’s bitch?

Why do that on their behalf, draw fire like that?

It doesn’t many any sense. If you’re too close to the people who hold a grudge like the Middle Eastern population only with slightly more common sense.

Which countries have retained their culture, yet appeared right-on to embrace multiculturalism?

Even Israel can’t claim that, they’re losing key demographic territory to Palestine. They’re over. Finished.

China, meanwhile, has about a billion. It can afford espionage, brain drain to export and cuddle up to the natives.

It spreads all sorts of rumours about how superior their women are, truly feminine (fake).

India will side with whoever pays them, it has a surplus of men, China has been purchasing Africa in such a ballsy colonialist move I’m astounded nobody has mentioned it.

Africa is key territory for manufacturing weapons. That’s why British Empire.

Natural resources, vital elements.

I do know more, much more, but alas, I can’t really say atm. This is all quite easy to check. The Red Scare is aimed at the wrong target, the Russians are broadly white, Christian and share our culture, including our art.

Who retains their own ‘art’ but appropriates Western culture down to our clothes and eyelids?

..Who sells the dinghies to the ‘refugee’ invasion?

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2093030/rickety-boats-used-smuggle-migrants-europe-made-china

http://www.reuters.com/article/europe-migrants-china-idUSL4N1I62PD

CHINA.

I’ll drop this for now. I’ve been working on these premises for a long time, they’re accurate. I am still here and still thinking, just longer term than the stark majority of shitposters.

Look around. All I ask of you.

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/08/21/chinese-ships-planes-hold-war-games-sea-japan.html

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2017/05/08/Chinese-coast-guard-sails-near-Japans-Okinawa-Senkaku-Islands/5641494268445/

I’ll just leave these here. No reason. It’s all a coincidence.
http://www.thetower.org/article/chinas-deepening-interest-in-israel/
http://www.timesofisrael.com/topic/israel-china-relations/
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/israel-china-relations
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2080572/china-and-israel-vow-deepen-relations
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-investment-israel-idUSKBN187080?il=0
“”China’s international surge of state-driven investments in emerging technologies should put the United States and our allies on notice,””
“”Once we became a portfolio company of these Chinese investors, they helped with opening doors in China … where the business community really relies on connections you build there.””
“”We are not worried to take Chinese money over U.S. money,” said Bar-Zeev of IronSource. “If you can deliver, there are endless opportunities.””
The EU is a distraction. The future flag is…

The G8 is nothing.

Alliances are everything.

Video: The story of your enslavement

10/10 would share again. Shop around.

[read after]

Molyneux is the only redpill that hasn’t shamed himself with degeneracy.

Breath of fresh air.

The question you’re not allowed to ask:
Who are the farmers?
There is a social contract of slavery. As soon as you are born, there is a price on your head. What you’re told you owe society. It’s called national debt and ‘we’ can’t even pay the interest. It’s a con. You never agreed to it. This is why people are giving up. There is no fairness or incentive. The system is rigged via the devalued currency.
It’s the scientific model of management, Fordism. They’ll be nice to you, because it keeps you docile. They’ll tell you they care, because it means you’ll behave. They’ll promise you the world, if you work. Which is real? Only the work is real. Communists and capitalists come from largely the same stance, with inverted conclusions. The capitalist wants to be his own boss in this system. The Communist wants to be his own boss, self-employed, direct his own labour, in another system. Each believes they can maximize utility in their chosen system. Overall, there is hardly any difference in what they want – to keep what they earn. But from which State? Marxists think the State cares for them, but Marx wanted to destroy the middle-class, not the owners they are uniquely  empowered to oppose, and he never went into politics. Politicians are rich. They pay themselves above minimum wage and then flout that law to hire illegals. At least the capitalists are somewhat honest about those Homo Economicus motivations. The key difference is theft. Capitalists say enough has happened, wise to how shitty this system is but hopeful about improvement, at least for individuals who…work hard, Communists want more theft, to put the shoe on the other foot and get The Man tomorrow. Who will enforce this? The angry mob? No, they aren’t intelligent. The Man will never force measures against The Man. I alluded this in “Best Post“.

The only thing they care about is what they can take. They can’t take something you haven’t produced. This is a generational strike. Millennials (and younger) won’t get these goodies. There is no bribe, it’s fucking Monopoly money, fairground tickets for broken rides. But we’re still held responsible for governments and debts we weren’t alive to vote for. That’s illegal, it cannot be forced in either case. The system was damned long before we were born. We are not responsible. We cannot save it, nobody can ‘save’ it and they shouldn’t want to. Those people with the power to do anything are dead (they did manage to take it with them, in experiences and hedonism) or at the top of the chain, they don’t see it as a ‘problem’ to fix, a feature, not a bug. Intergenerational betrayal, and the young will live to see it.

Hey, I have been trying to warn people. I’m not alone in this. Why the maybe passive approach?
They control you with lies. It isn’t for public sector pensions, unfunded liabilities – it’s for the children! It isn’t for the whore down the road who you wouldn’t buy a drink, let alone the lifestyle of contraception, it’s for Family Planning! It isn’t for the ingrates in other countries who try to kill us, it’s for the foreign poor! Lions do not own lions because there would be a fight, eventually. We call this empire collapse. However, humans can own humans if they lie about why.

What are you working for? Which system is it, you support? Are you free to say ‘no’, openly, to your owners?

First lie: Who rules over you? Do you know? Do you know their names? Are you allowed to know?
Second lie: Who writes the textbooks? Are you taught the controversies, all moral sides or the Official Party Line? Who decides what is true for the poor, who attend state schooling?
Third lie: What is your currency? What is your value? Does money give you that? Does office paper? Gold? Food? Where is your value? External or internal? Who lies about this? Who says, in effect, ‘you need us, so you’d better behave’ or ‘toe the line, or you’ll be sorry’? Is that not a threat?
Fourth lie: Do the government do things on your behalf, in your name, without asking? Is that a democracy? Do they do the opposite from what they promised? Isn’t this… fraud? Do you even know what they’re doing? Why not tell you?
Fifth lie: Do they divide you from your kin? Isn’t this a distraction? Didn’t this start with preschool, when they told your family to abandon you (causing known psychiatric damage) to the state schooling system? Do you ‘defend’ groups you do not belong to? So… who defends you? Are you allowed to defend yourself?

It is Reverse Psychology and a fair amount of gaslighting (the true purpose of propaganda, doubt your own mind and they run it, in effect). The State tells you that you are worthless, from birth. Without you, they have nothing. They produce nothing. The state is innately parasitic.
Are you allowed or encouraged to succeed, or shamed and guilt-tripped? Isn’t this abuse? In a relationship, wouldn’t this be domestic abuse? Coming the state, isn’t that propaganda? Are you allowed ambition or achievement? Or, whatever you manage to scrape together from these seeds, do you get told ‘you didn’t build that’? Did someone else file those papers, grow those crops and study for those grades?
If they couldn’t profit from their ‘policies’, they wouldn’t push them. Who is held responsible for their failure? Those who created them and promised results (fraud) in academia? The politicians who wrote them into law? Or is the general public called the failure, since nobody is allowed to question anything else? Look to the second question.
Who has the power? The rich? Are they the same thing? What about the bribed? The workers keeping the system going? Who could improve the system? Who runs it? This relates to the first question.
Who claims to be one of you, but drags you down? Who are the crabs in the bucket making you hopeless? Calling you worthless, like the system itself?
What do they promise? What’s the alternative? ‘Bad things might happen‘ – how does that rationale differ from the Boogeyman? This is used on adults, mind.
The ‘arts’ is a good example of unofficial welfare. If you don’t want to see a play, why should you pay actors and co. for a play you’re never going to see? Why should middle-class hobbies be subsidized? Why not football matches? Why not bread and circuses? Who gets priority? Why? Which information do the arts convey to the public, how can they control the proles that the other hobbies and leisure pursuits do not?

How did this happen? Democracy is a good idea but has certain prior conditions that must be met e.g. population homogeneity, industry, longevity. When people step over the line and survive, there is no line. Find the crime without a punishment. People should have freedom, the State (a press-gang of a minority of bullies over the majority People) should never, they must be servants limited by necessity and mutual agreement. That is capitalism as an idea, some libertarianism without the globalism.

Instead, think of the ultimate minority group: the elite. Have some sympathy with the champagne socialists. Someone’s gotta crush the grapes, might as well be yours.

Denial is psychologically easier than dealing with it, they’re primed (the real subliminal effect, look it up) to be immature – less grit, lower impulse control, shorter attention spans than previous generations. We were bred to be weak by the State. Like Carlin said, just smart enough to run the machines but never to question why. We didn’t cause this mess, but this is how we live now. We must deal with it.
In a crisis, there is a normalcy bias. People will walk around as though nothing is wrong. On a societal scale, this is ongoing. There are problems, but not the problems the State feeds and funds. I repeat myself. The State is the enemy of the People, whether it be a Communist or capitalist one. If every man is equal, there can be no judges, no politicians, no lawyers, no preachers, no teachers, every man must stand alone. If every man is equal and not an animal, why need a State?

You could simplify that K-types are producers, the little red hen baking the bread and r-types the swarming locust of consumers.

I wonder what lesson that holds for Ks, when the Malthusian trap, the demographic crunch (or economic correction of all the bubbles popping at once to make ’08 look like a child’s Frozen birthday party) snaps on us. It may not happen overnight, but in politics a week is a year. A few years this would take for the shit to trickle down, a few months tops.

The r-selected need a State because it steals the wealth they cannot, as it steals the wealth they cannot produce themselves. The K-selected, dwindling in number with a small, short boost recently, do not need a State. They use the State to connect with each other. That already existed in ancient times, the tribal business.

What is control, in these contexts? Who is controlling you?

Economics works by quintiles, and taxes from this (aka Who is rich?). If you wanna go the typical way, sure, ask WHO is the 1% and what do they have in common? But realistically, they maintain power as the 20%.

The people screeching about the 1% are doing damage control as false opposition. To have a platform in the first place, to have the MSM’s ear, they are the privileged 20%.

I posted this at the beginning of the year.

Good luck. We’re all going to need it. If you’ve read this far, I sincerely wish you well.

New Yorker: Trump as literally Hitler

hahaha fuck you

http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/philip-k-dicks-intellectual-vision-for-living-in-a-fascist-america

drive-by bitching today

“plausible” – they keep using that word a lot…..

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

“reverse the New Deal,” correct me if i’m wrong, …but that sucked?

I was taught at school it basically saved the West and these same textbooks were wrong on plenty of other stuff once you read around them, as almost nobody did.

“decades later, the world is ruled by fascist powers.”
unlike the EU
“A year later, the show’s second season has arrived amid a resurgence of real-life white nationalism”
[citation needed]
“As a man with a vocal admiration for authoritarian leaders is about to be sworn into the White House”
if the words hurt them, imagine the guy who comes after Trump
the force of the full pendulum swing might kill them
Pence is the real Republican and Trump knew he’d be competition in a future election, the man is not dumb, he pretends to be, like a less cuddly Boris Johnson, better thought of as the snake of Westminster. 
>The past is not the present, this reality is not sci-fi. Stop.
you must be new here
These people are academics??????
ffs this is why they lost
everything is Hitler, shares in Hitler memes, buy buy buy
they tried really hard to make the nazis look bad in that show, like – they have cameras
but the modern internet is worse so…. nah
no crime, no disease, but they have cameras, goys
“non-Aryan people, and their culture, have been eradicated”
I am a lady and I won’t rise to that bait.
omg why no facepalm god ugh wut
The urbanites really hate the idea they’ve been replaced, huh?
Your politics are not relevant, guy in a studio apartment.
You can tell they’ve been getting their politics from comedians for too long.
“shows Americans adapting to fascism with an alarming smoothness” idiots
implying all americans are white and xian
true, but idiots
shooting themselves in the foot
like in every white man, a Hitler crouches, waiting to spring out
….like, I wish they had at least one ball…
anything but a weeb, basically
Hitler is really just this century’s Napoleon anyway.
“Tuesdays, they burn cripples, the terminally ill,” he says. “Drags on the state.”
…..this person either knows nothing about communist state murder or chooses to ignore it
and if they’re terminally ill, that’s euthanasia, which they support
#factsarehard
“For those not targeted for elimination, the show suggests—for nice young white men like Joe Blake in particular—the American Reich would not be terrifying at all. It might, in fact, look a lot like the America we already know.”
youliar
I demand 50 privilege points for this gif.
Harry is the epitome of white privilege, he is literally magic and saves the world with Saviour Complex.
the 2nd season was just banal, tepid, so-so
the death potion scene in fantastic beasts was fucking disturbing and that’s a kid’s film
“Yet it becomes worryingly easy to overlook his atrocious misdeeds,”
>heroes must be spotless jesus figures, implies the jew
they dropped the brackets trend pretty quickly when it revealed their power levels, didn’t they?
“an expert emotional manipulator who terrorized subordinates and innocents alike” 
that's enough stop please karen will and grace
-all the judgemental stares for that vacuous comment-
a competent, intelligent white man with no vices is now satan
how far has popular culture sunk
even superman is killing illegal aliens
if Trump turns out to be milquetoast, all bluster, will they hate him more, or less?
” In another year, the show’s insistence on humanizing fascists might have seemed like a provocative choice”
…….lolwut
dehumanizing people IS fascism
fascists are people, human and capable of love cos this isn’t a fucking disney story, it’s reality
“when it is more urgent than ever to distinguish right from wrong, real news from fake, and differences of political opinion from the dangerous undermining of democracy”
things the vatican would say for $200
“the dangerous undermining of democracy”
people voting for someone we don’t like, this undermines my right to win, somehow
still think trump is controlled opposition
the jewish line is too hard and pushed too hard
the resistance to socialism is often full of shitty people, they can’t be both pro-state and rebels, these bloody signallers
“moral desperation, a loss of faith in anything but self-destructive violence”
r/atheism
“unavoidable complicity of living “normally” under empire”
bull-shit, son
nobody has a choice there, it’s live or die, until you can vote in someone new
the hero never has a family, cos he wouldn’t risk them for his ego
“a novelist—an eccentric inventor of alt-histories who served as a stand-in for Dick himself”
is that an allusion to alt-right
is this like the new voldemort
you don’t pronounce the T, it’s silent, so it’s really alt-rye. we are big on gluten.
all-aryan heritage grains, really, which is germinatedly superior
artists step out of the politically correct because it’s morally wrong
*mic drop*

You can see why it’s called the Jew Yorker, can’t you?
well if white identity politics is morally wrong, in a time of relativism, and jews are white, and not a race*, and up is down, every jewish person is literally hitler? #sjwlogic

blackadder I know sarcastic

*implies Israel/Judea is not anybody’s homeland, because those exist for races, not religions

practically, why is the Left dead?

supranational/globalist cultural Marxism, to be precise

120 reasons. Tiiiiime …. is on our siiiiide……

you're fucked lol tilda constantine gabriel

I did this in bitchy listicle form. If you go aspie on me and try to debate point by point, I will ignore you because I don’t care, these things cannot be stopped and I am not solely responsible for this coming shitstorm. I don’t need to answer, I don’t have answers because a) I’m not a liar, and b) the outcome was set in stone long before we got here. There is no nice way to go down with the ship. Write your own damn blog if you’ve got so much to say.

I’m telling it how it is.

cool mocking shades yes peace

You got a bum deal lad, but who's fault is that?

  1. The victims of elder success are the young blood
  2. the social engineering from the state machine was oppressive, incompetent and bred resentment and distrust for authority
  3. classic worker’s rights, classic liberalism is being ignored for overseas politesse and bribery
  4. sjws are pervasive among all generations meddling but they roll out the young ones to recruit from our group, bragging about what massive losers they are
  5. dunning-kruger in hiring and firing for vital positions in society, diversity makes this worse and we’re expected to appeal to failures? winning strategy, guys
  6. multiculturalism bred low trust and lowering iq/dysgenic societies, basic infrastructure is failing thanks to a booming influx of constantly reproducing overseas populations because welfare systems have natural limits and these people aren’t coming from sub-replacement fertility population stock
  7. automation means we don’t need these low iq ingrate immigrants anyway
  8. cultures are not equal – if you need the first world, change completely to our standard or gtfo, we don’t need you, you need us, and we know it
  9. the first world owes the third world nothing, they don’t even pay their people properly and give them basic human rights, why should we give a single solid damn?
  10. hbd is ignored for a myth created in a homogenous stable society
  11. being nice on crime causes more crime because when you abolish the death penalty, a life of crime becomes a feasible career option
  12. terrorism is supposed to be acceptable as the price of good takeaway meals but truly a way for the rich to fuck the poor while pretending to help even more of the poor
  13. nobody knows what they’re doing and our leaders are pussies
  14. soft policies take hard cash and somebody has to pay it back – clue: not those who voted for it
  15. if you think third world debt is bad now, you wait and see until we want all our stolen foreign aid bribery money back
  16. malthusian trap will shut and this will be good, mass starvation and disease will be a relief
  17. debt is cheap and savings are punished, jews or other moneylenders will get it in the neck when this corrects
  18. capitalism has been pushing cheap tat as opposed to anything real like during the industrial revolution, causing a false prosperity and faulty senses of security
  19. the digital banking system is easier to wipe than burning billions of IOUs
  20. food security is an issue bigger than a blip in the climate
  21. feelings take precedence over facts so the wise are called cruel until you need to steal their 401k
  22. previous generations have voted themselves into a corner and the debt bubbles from multiple recessions will burst on their children and grandchildren, who will not be turning to the left for solutions
  23. political wings are outdated in light of issues and identities
  24. charity has become theft and the church is full of heathens pushing identity politics and the soft sell approach to hell
  25. class problems are passed off as age/generational problems (not all………)
  26. censorship from the ‘liberals’ = ????, clearly hiding nothing as they surveil us
  27. the farce of globalism is screwing over individuals in the nation, remember that?
  28. the unprepared young of luxury in the west are competing against the gritty, family-supported developing world (they are developing the gains that the west would have taken, had it sane leadership for a couple of generations)
  29. goods are lower quality and taxes are obscene for programmes few would personally support, we are still told we suck/are mean/heartless
  30. the phrase useless eaters applies to the people the west is directly funding, including paying them to breed when they can’t even feed themselves
  31. this stems from a guilt complex that is insane, related to original sin of whiteness/similar group, if you replaced all luvvie article references to White people with Jews, the racism would become painfully clear.
  32. drink beer and you’re a man – no, drinking beer gives you bitch tits, it’s estrogenic, adverts lie now more than ever, elite lifestyles and roles in society are advertised to lumpenprole and then wonder why they’re entitled
  33. bigotry and violence in media are bad and cause more of those things, but orgy scenes are good for you!
  34. the big spenders are the low earners and credit cards are the devil
  35. they don’t care about the future because they won’t live to see it, no shame in some people
  36. the people complaining about paying for their kid’s rent rates are the generation charging record-breaking rent rates, they also want to charge their child for living at home (you chose to make them, they didn’t choose to be born) and doing the right thing by saving to pay off the debts guess who told them to get? so parents could brag that timmy went to college
  37. marriage and kids are put off because nobody has the money and the parents refuse to help, but try to demand grandkids
  38. most people who own property don’t really want to own property, they see it as safer than stocks when stocks have returns and don’t depreciate over time
  39. most of those people can’t even maintain a property or assess business value with simple accounts
  40. literacy isn’t the problem, there are too many words and not enough numeracy with crayons to explain to grown adults why cause leads to effect and after eating one’s cake, you cannot have it again
  41. literal dependents on the taxpayer are called brave adults instead of immature drains
  42. old people had plenty of time and warning to save and didn’t, record low (no) savings – but they expect everyone else to save, pay into the system and save their special snowflake ass – no.
  43. they wanted to live longer but to work less and retire earlier. fuq math
  44. pensions are considered entitlements regardless of tax contributions, as if aging is an accomplishment, gold star here’s the bag of gold from people working three jobs to keep afloat and a participation trophy for life in the form of free shit for reaching ‘Old’ (ageism can be positive or negative, old or young) – these programmes will be phased out long before the people who paid for them need them, so it’s free!
  45. let’s celebrate youth culture by constantly insulting it and wondering why nobody improves the situation when all the outlets are owned or controlled in content direction by old people
  46. hollow status signalling is more important than cultural survival
  47. both recession and depression are poorly defined concepts, almost interchangeable, guess which one of these rhetoric-loaded terms is used for the young sufferings of each generation?
  48. and when the young refuse to buy the newspapers blaming them for everything they literally couldn’t vote for, who screeches about fake news, when the old media refuse to report the issues of citizens, their function?
  49. the confessional article should be banned as a professional format, it isn’t journalism, it’s a personal diary
  50. nobody cares, you aren’t special – stop crying, we want your vote
  51. vote for bearded white man weirdo in a stupid cap! he understands the plight of black dwarf lesbians! get a badge showing your historical illiteracy to your friends! this isn’t a con, the real con is people who want you to keep your own money!
  52. human beings treated like dogs at work – patronized, infantilized by childless co-workers, treated like free food is meant to make us happy instead of a pay rise, illegal unpaid overtime because muh corporate culture
  53. the idea self-pity makes you wrong automatically, hang statistical facts
  54. bleeding hearts have bone-dry wallets
  55. MSM covers up rape, has the balls to go on about rape culture – that’s media* culture, pedo-protectors
  56. the internet is scary, let’s shadowban people or topics and wonder why traffic suffers
  57. respect is earned – from the better-paid people who refuse to learn the technology and drag on their inferiors socially, what bullying? they’re joking, ignore the mental illness rates
  58. you must fix/change the world we ruined for you! why the anxiety?
  59. your living standards will be worse than your older relations, why the depression? you have snapchat! look at the kardashians! they seem happy!
  60. serve the people? people should serve academia, with taxpaid tenure for all
  61. educate yourselves- said unironically to the most educated generation in history, taught by the generation complaining
  62. anyone who makes me angry is a troll and can be ignored safely – why are polls wrong?
  63. who needs a safe space, when you have ‘hate speech’ LAWS. seriously. gulag/re-education centre LAWS.
  64. the more you compare common sense suggestions with hitler, the less people will think he was the bad guy here, same goes for his ideas- adolf, the socialist, decried by social justice, paid for by socialism… Firstly, Hitler only had one ball, that’s ableist, he was an Austrian immigrant in Germany, product of a broken family, a veteran with mental health issues and to this day, he is kinkshamed. Check your privilege.
  65. resources are finite but let’s chuck money into various bottomless pits and deprive the prosocial law-abiding natives because people who couldn’t even choose a decent major for a real career want to feel better about themselves
  66. expecting people won’t notice the inequality of outcomes has a definite racial flavour, someone is getting screwed… if we’re all equal….
  67. About this ‘equality’ – prove it to me, biologically. …No, really? What else did they lie about?
  68. parents pushing their kids to do better in a system designed to make them do worse, this will never cause backlash
  69. trends replaced traditions, brands replaced families for identity
  70. trends aren’t even understood, e.g. dabbing is a super-old form of hitler salute/bow
  71. sympathy for disgrace, indulgence of hedonism cause an unexplainable emptiness
  72. brilliant geniuses have been replaced by buzzwords from snake oil salesmen who think they can make a living out of telling you how to live… is the church not hiring?
  73. standards are seen as insurmountable for certain groups, like they’re incapable of impulse control e.g. sexual standards, ignore epidemiology
  74. california is not the world, the world is not california, also fuck off, crazy LA people
  75. california can’t even afford its own bullshit neither, hollywood discusses the ‘wage gap’, what about the ‘tax gap’?
  76. celebrate your replacement and the slow sustained death of your race…. totes not genocide bro, here’s an infographic
  77. your history of achievement is a list of sin
  78. those allowed on tv aren’t living with the problems discussed on tv e.g. let’s listen to a middle-aged scholar in a white area discuss the benefits of school diversity, as he sent his own children to a high league table lily white place of homogenous culture expressly to keep those people out! they even hold interviews, like a job!!!
  79. people with nothing to say (parrots) pretend to speak from experience and e-celebs are cancer ecelebs
  80. the fake journalist, internet celebrity title needs to die, like the Youtube ‘Artist’
  81. when the young want to ‘grow up’ they’re called dangerous for questioning the obviously broken system
  82. ego threat is like physical violence, sticks and stones aren’t as bad as a naughty word
  83. the parents inherited much, the children will inherit debt, is this right?
  84. the people in power are the people blaming everyone else
  85. the public speakers have a strange shortage of solutions, but they want your money anyway
  86. the people who have lost their power are told they have all the power to justify special treatment of historical enemies, who still bear a grudge and want to kill us, is this healthy?
  87. the rite of passage is systemic hardship without end
  88. the history of the world didn’t begin and end with the 60s, the music wasn’t the best, the politics was riding off the gravy train of world-war dead and those same cowards refused to fight later
  89. the young are blamed for things that happened before our birth – these were liberal policies
  90. noticing things make you evil, and the things you notice, like growing pedophilia acceptance, are supposedly fine? slippery slope doesn’t apply to legal precedent opening doors to shifts in moral trends contained in attitude surveys
  91. the young are gaslighted into believing they are evil/the worst when their future is objectively worse than the old people complaining
  92. when abuse victims snap out of it, they are very, very angry. bear in mind this is collective abuse taking advantage of the rotten fruits of both globalism and the sexual revolution – both expanded the labour force, a single-use cheat code to free money.
  93. universal suffrage isn’t the problem – the permanently enabled ability to be useless as a stereotypical teenager* is the problem (can’t get a good job? we’ll pay you an allowance like pocket money for being maladapted to the job market the state trained you 11 years for, slut around? taxpayer rescues you with free shots that stop working for normal people, divorced three times? you can still get married as many times as you want, made kids you couldn’t afford? for your stellar decision making you get to keep them and we’ll pay you to make more!) *teens cannot work at full wages/hours despite being adults paying full taxes and are kept from the workforce, from contributing to their household, while they should be training… for the workforce
  94. the people who want tax money for votes are the least likely to be paying tax, which pays for politicians who need votes, so ideally you want to splinter the vote of the useless while paying lip service to their causes (cucking), which isn’t hard since they’re so stupid and think they’re principled for being lazy on social media
  95. maths says the rich literally can’t pay more or you’ve just halal’d the golden goose, morons
  96. the stupid are supported for life because they’re predictable, the intelligent are told you didn’t build that to justify betrayal (human rights abuse, that denial) and won’t be predictable when they slowly all twig this, with the ability, as the intelligent, to do something about it – the stuff of revolutions seems trivial beforehand
  97. babies are born in debt and this will redpill them pretty hard about the bill of socialism as a metaphor for slavery to dead people
  98. robots won’t kill us all, they’ll kill us all who cannot retrain and their way of life (free riders)
  99. the eugenics of abortion will bear fruit as leftists begin to die out, going by recent neuroscientific evidence of inheritance in political persuasion
  100. expertise is rare, you can’t be paid an expert wage when you couldn’t pay attention in one class at school and that’s totally fair. if you’re lazy, you deserve to get less.
  101. reality hates people who prefer to live in social media/video game/school bubble fantasies
  102. there is no ladder to work up, corporations outsourced the hierarchy and the lower class can do nothing but watch ‘reality’ tv that mocks them and eat lotuses
  103. credentialism – where requirements are literally a piece of paper that promises you can do the thing, possibly
  104. overqualified is a handy excuse to treat smarter people like shit
  105. the controlled opposition of minimum wage movements, instead of banning totally unpaid labour
  106. you can’t play good old days and in my day it was harder – the true answer is the former, nobody eats their parental-gifted iphone but we all know ramen
  107. sob stories are more important than the reality of ability, because failure isn’t considered permanent, society will always forgive you however much you fuck it over with antisocial behaviour and indaquate results
  108. victim culture is a social distraction from the compounding social problems of debt crisis caused by a crooked finance sector
  109. generic advice is bad because it causes an unnatural oversaturation based on greed than genuine desire e.g. law degrees
  110. society isn’t full of smart people making the best decisions, it’s full of people who don’t care for giving unless they can take, there is a ratio and the scale is long since tipped
  111. without foreign overpopulation flooding Europe, we’d have better prosperity than ever thanks to supply/demand and so on, k-selected results to k-selection under-breeding patterns, those losses are going somewhere, to people who will flee when these countries need them (don’t let them, responsibility is with the family for immigrating with a mind to thieving)
  112. The Labour Party offer rent controls but never tuition controls
  113. let’s nationalize it and complain when it fails and the Tories need to sell it
  114. ambition is a dirty word and genetic competition is the truth behind the lie of diversity, we are beginning to notice
  115. the elder generation is supposed to bail out the younger, not the other way around. if you fail young, it’s from naivete, if you ‘fail’ old, it’s from white collar criminality
  116. they talk about cost of living but never the stagflation behind it (impossible by their Keynesian economics, deny literal reality)
  117. related: they talk about cost cutting but never national debt and who will pay for it
  118. they appeal to a social contract to excuse slave labour (earn your place in society) but cut out the boomer generation (them) who obviously earned all their inequality despite hopping into jobs from high school
  119. they have ‘hate studies’ usually hate whitey, blame whitey and variations of shitposting studies with a narrow vision of the devil and self-flagellation rituals to boot (pathological altruism).
  120. This was preventable, many conservatives warned and predicted these things. These people didn’t listen.

There are many more causes to our societal decay, cultural decline and moral degeneration.

You think of some, I’m tired.

It isn’t the terrible parenting – it’s the terrible parents.

This is considered cool for a reason, it's the reaction of a person who can handle their shit