Q gets it

But you missed the point. It’s a basic logic gate function through premise after premise.

True = 1

False = 0

Resources exist to exploit (capitalism) = 1

Powerful people exist = 1
Powerful people are above mortal or mundane laws in a nation = 1
Powerful people are above international law = 1 look at Blair
Powerful people have similar goals = 1 “international relations”?
Powerful people know one another = likely.

Combine them.
There’s your conspiracy = authority + evil intent to use it.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

You can prove the first part, the second must be deduced.

OT

Medicine is eugenic, transhumanism is dysgenic (undue power, unnatural). Classism goes unmentioned by name. Don’t look at the rich people. No connection to power there. A little moral Communism – for the “greater good” with no good absolute and no greater Godhead. It’s about decreasing independence and increasing the number of dependents, a simple ratio.

Ask simple probability questions and observe reality:

How many cows does the cattle farmer want in future: more, the same or fewer?
What are the odds no rape gang has abused a Jewish child?
How is the economy still running with fewer producers than ever?
What is the plan for population density as food production plummets?

Nootropics and neurotoxins are an existing chemical example. Who gets what?

best comment
Maybe the population should never be this big. When you have this many people alive on earth your basically inviting the smartest of those people to get together and find out a way to conspire against those below them. Forcing their hands into doing things and thinking about things that should never be done. All in the name of damage control. It just seems like a lot.

There is no noblesse oblige and they would resent the parasite load.

They’re locked into their investment (“Human Resources”, the scariest term in the English language) for certain, until they switch over to 100% robots. They’ll keep chopping up those transhumanist-loving chumps until there’s only machine. It reminds me of Hannibal where he’s eating the brain.

No, thanks.

The body is sacred.

We already consume ourselves with the social construct and financial fiction of debt. Debt requires a bondage, homogeneity and has confines e.g. jubilee years.

Power isn’t IQ, that’s what they want you to think because it deters challenge. If you assumed you were gonna lose, you wouldn’t try to rebel. They’d lie about their IQ. I’m getting Assassin’s Creed flashbacks: nothing is true, everything is permitted. OG Fake News meme.

Now, how many people own the media channels?

Is a little paranoia justified upon noticing things?

Personal SHTF

The dependency network is interesting.

On the one hand, they shame you into getting 401ks, an IRA, ISA, “rainy day fund”, “emergency money”…

oh, but don’t you call it prepping!

I think it’s the mindset of fear against self-reliance.

If you learn too much independence as a citizen, including Fuck You money or untaxable savings (e.g. growing herbs and not buying), the fear vanishes. That fear is their power over you.

Our ancestors had freer speech because they had fuller wallets.

Why were women shamed for managing and working in the home? They couldn’t tax us. They couldn’t brainwash us. They couldn’t control us. Corporate laws in many ways act like an overbearing husband – turn up 9 to 5 even if you can do all the work 2-6.

Think of all the false economies of kicking women from their domain. Instead of one efficient, untaxable wife you need: cleaner, cook, nanny, builder, shopper, chauffeur, prostitute (theoretically)… Marriage is immensely efficient division of labour for both sexes, no wonder the Powers That Be try to make it seem like a bad deal.

The convenience economy relies on us: our dependence.

If we snapped back to 1900 levels of marriage by point of a shotgun, the economy would instantly depress – half the labour force, half the tax revenue and half the job opportunities at least. Supply/demand.

Eternal growth has another name

it’s called a cancer.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-23/end-growth

Much like this post.

I’m completely in love with this world and with being alive in it. I love the beauty of Nature and all of its life forms, each beautiful and complete in its own way, just like this dragonfly:

I would ask if Tyler is high but always assume yes.

These posts imply this milking wasn’t planned.

Oh sweet Summer child.

And it isn’t a milking of a system but the humans in it.

Remember that.

Very Matrix.

It’s a simple transfer, largely inter-generational.

When the youth feed the old, everybody dies.
It’s perverse, unnatural, impossible.

You “won” WW2, now what?

Go forth and multiply was the one job! ONE JOB.

Instead they chose abortions. Okay, you chose to retire on a cat food diet.

It isn’t as harsh as the people who came later with no choice about the globalist mess.

Who would you have been, what life would you lead, if they’d done their duty?

The matriarchs and patriarchs have always had a duty to their children.
Not the other way around. You can’t re-write the social contract.

Obamacare et al is an attempt at that.

Nature lives or fails.

When the insects go, the food supply with it.

Look at real estate. Rich people think it will hold. They’re stupid.

A house is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it.

If it is in an area of increasing diversity, crime and public prayer, it’s worthless.

You don’t invest in the soil, it’s the people enriching it. Shit would be more valuable to land than some people.

There are three types of traitor in this.

  1. globalists
  2. the self-loathing fifth column
  3. often forgotten, the parents who sold their children.

Without 3, the others would have failed.

Selfish individual materialism killed the West, it’s the new old religion.

The magic lamp of fiat. You can have anything you desire, says the Devil, if you give me your firstborn.

You can only live in one house, Boomers with a spare. The taxes for property speculation are kept artificially low.
They see smart people making investments (inc. landed gentry) and assume it’s 1. easy and 2. easy money. Managing anything is hard and while they’ve been fine for decades, there will be a short, sharp, sudden equity release like the tulip craze.

Every time you introduce globalized competition, competing with the world, the price shoots up.

(or down for wages)

Weren’t the natives owed their national resources first?

International education – look at tuition fees now.

International living – look at property prices as multiculturalism was “experimented”.

How are dual passports legal?

International entertainment – say, how much is a cinema ticket?

It’s staring you in the face.

Multiculturalism and encouraged non-European overpopulation are the cause of inflation.

Supply/demand.

Compare the CPI to global population. See for yourself.

The new citizens cannot afford to live here and as soon as special treatment disappears, they will mostly leave.

In the same way a weak harvest attracts few locust.

Why are we expected to be white saviour and pay for the wages of others’ sin?

#2 Every race has a duty to be sustainable in and of itself.

If an organism cannot self-regulate, it perishes.

Look at India’s water problem recently.

We gave them contraception and they didn’t use it.

Mouths to feed is not an advantage when resources contract back to NORMAL levels.

This is the utopia. It doesn’t feel like it because the pie is shared between billions of people. If all populations were at 1900 levels, we’d all be living like KINGS.

The new level is lower than anything we know. Standard of living won’t stop dropping.

Lower, lower, think lower…lower. There ya go.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the world returns to subsistence level for a while.

The foreign aid communism is worse than a war. We will have to pay the sins of our fathers.

The Malthusian trap is already closing, why do you think Africans (and Asians) are coming to Europe, instead of Asia?

If you want to see the truly successful, look who attracts the most parasites.
They still have the British Empire belief that white people will always protect and feed them.

Not the socialists.

Africa is “leapfrogging” and highly fragile. Taleb shakes his head.

Demographic transition was supposed to happen 50 years ago. They’ll never adjust.
Heck, they won’t grow their own food.

Race doesn’t exist and we’re all equal = we owe them nothing but they owe us trillions in centuries of development money. Hey, if Israel can hold long debts, so can we.

Africa can’t even be used as slaves to work it off, China wants to replace them with robots.

Heck, it’s worse than that because we didn’t just fail to regulate ourselves; we just ignored the math. 

We?

Here are some simple math problems we could have easily seen coming, but chose not to:

Simple math says more people trying to eat dwindling fossil fuels is a predicament.  Who’s actually doing anything serious about that on the world stage right now?

Tesla tried warning you but they bankrupted him.

Even easier math says that our pension and entitlement promises to ourselves cannot ever be met. What’s realistically being done about any of that?  Nothing as far as I can tell.

Useful idiots of the left.

At least if they murder the golden goose, they too will die.

We’re really more the age of aluminium or the era of Soros.
Both toxic intrusions we allowed for mercantile profiteering.

Cancerous growth is the theory of Communist growth. They must be imperialists (see China buying Africans) and expand, to absorb more humans and milk those too.

In practice, the productive lose heart like a lion in a cage.

The English lion’s been in a cage about a century.

“Demoralization is actually a realistic response under certain conditions.”

It’s a response to genocidal conditions that suppress life and ability to thrive.

Nothing else makes biological sense, c.

They want you to self-hate, to be apathetic and to lose hope/faith.

Do the exact opposite.

The only plan of any government is to grow its economy and secure more power for itself.”

Nationalism.

AKA the only system proven to work.

Look at IQ fluctuations too, that’s a barrel of laughs.

As for the people who deny all of this statistical fact:

Source: DFP

comment

  • innovation is dead
  • productivity non-existent
  • future growth sacrificed for urgent pleasure
  • derivatives derived from derivatives
  • nature pushes back – a very finite Earth
  • new wealth streams into pockets of old wealth
  • truly virtuous people are laughable freaks

A world of spoiled children.

4-point shitstorm

I keep seeing broad predictions of no practical use.

Note: this is the shortest timeline, as soon as possible.

More useful is to understand how a process can unfold.

Based on history, here is how any Trouble would likely arise.

  1. A big flagship company (e.g. Tesla) would be subject to market forces and tank. Economy would get shitty for a while. It could be a national thing in the international banking system e.g. Venezuela, Italy using its guns to defend its culture and the collapse of the EU – same result from black swan.
  2. The economy would get shittier after a numb time of optimism and market shock because the same con artists are in charge while most flee to Israel, Russia, bunkers, whatever. Internet and other communications would go down and we rely on those for news. People would bank run, making it worse. Banks would close, a few minor attacks on bankers. Public workers lose money, including police. Loyalty becomes frayed. Margin call, Universities lose bargaining power. MSM flails like a dead fish.
  3. The infrastructure would crack and reveal the rotting crumbling edifice propped up fiat fake fun money e.g. pension funds go, NHS implodes, EBT crashes, nuclear power meltdowns, EMP from piss-taking panicking China maybe. A lot of basic functions would go to shit. Big one? FOOD SECURITY. Starts all riots.
  4. Still entitled, many groups would expect special treatment. Being thieves, that’s when your violence and civil wars would start. WW3 would likely be a WorldWide Civil War.

Timeline, depends on bailouts, to be perfectly honest.

I didn’t think so much QE was possible.

Some countries might opt to default early e.g. Italy, to save themselves at the expense of the system that screwed them with odious debt.

2019-2021, previously mentioned by me. I predicted by 2022, much will have changed about the basic ways the world operates. Much of it worse but more principled, maybe?

I can’t discuss rebuild before the tower falls.

Again, predicting something isn’t the same as wanting it to happen.

In 2019, stock volatility of Stage 1. Speed of progression after that hard to say.

I doubt there are enough high IQs in the Valley to operate out of such a mess.

These people got paid in stock.

And electronic, not emergency TP.

Could be wrong but I’ve called a lot of things before. The timeline is blurry because I’m honest.

I can’t say, ah, it’s September 3rd, 2019, can I?

January 25 2020.

August 12 2020.

April 18 2021.

There are simply too many factors.

It won’t be 2030 though, Vox. I know that.

(No, I’m not hinting those dates).

The legal serfs

https://www.britishconstitutiongroup.com/content/legal-fiction-how-they-control-us

“The answer to that dilemma is simple. The system can be used for our overall benefit. The bad guys have taken control of it and they are quite deliberately using it for their benefit at our expense. They are using it to fine us excessively and needlessly to feed their greed, to tax and persecute us; keeping us on a tread mill of servitude and making our lives a misery in the process. We have a right to take the benefits and reject the liabilities when the balance has been distorted to our detriment – which clearly it is.”

“We, the British people have right to govern ourselves, we have a natural instinct to want to preserve our sovereignty and our independence… but we have been lulled into thinking that we need the permission of a powerful elite to secure it… we do not.”