4-point shitstorm

I keep seeing broad predictions of no practical use.

Note: this is the shortest timeline, as soon as possible.

More useful is to understand how a process can unfold.

Based on history, here is how any Trouble would likely arise.

  1. A big flagship company (e.g. Tesla) would be subject to market forces and tank. Economy would get shitty for a while. It could be a national thing in the international banking system e.g. Venezuela, Italy using its guns to defend its culture and the collapse of the EU – same result from black swan.
  2. The economy would get shittier after a numb time of optimism and market shock because the same con artists are in charge while most flee to Israel, Russia, bunkers, whatever. Internet and other communications would go down and we rely on those for news. People would bank run, making it worse. Banks would close, a few minor attacks on bankers. Public workers lose money, including police. Loyalty becomes frayed. Margin call, Universities lose bargaining power. MSM flails like a dead fish.
  3. The infrastructure would crack and reveal the rotting crumbling edifice propped up fiat fake fun money e.g. pension funds go, NHS implodes, EBT crashes, nuclear power meltdowns, EMP from piss-taking panicking China maybe. A lot of basic functions would go to shit. Big one? FOOD SECURITY. Starts all riots.
  4. Still entitled, many groups would expect special treatment. Being thieves, that’s when your violence and civil wars would start. WW3 would likely be a WorldWide Civil War.

Timeline, depends on bailouts, to be perfectly honest.

I didn’t think so much QE was possible.

Some countries might opt to default early e.g. Italy, to save themselves at the expense of the system that screwed them with odious debt.

2019-2021, previously mentioned by me. I predicted by 2022, much will have changed about the basic ways the world operates. Much of it worse but more principled, maybe?

I can’t discuss rebuild before the tower falls.

Again, predicting something isn’t the same as wanting it to happen.

In 2019, stock volatility of Stage 1. Speed of progression after that hard to say.

I doubt there are enough high IQs in the Valley to operate out of such a mess.

These people got paid in stock.

And electronic, not emergency TP.

Could be wrong but I’ve called a lot of things before. The timeline is blurry because I’m honest.

I can’t say, ah, it’s September 3rd, 2019, can I?

January 25 2020.

August 12 2020.

April 18 2021.

There are simply too many factors.

It won’t be 2030 though, Vox. I know that.

(No, I’m not hinting those dates).

The legal serfs

https://www.britishconstitutiongroup.com/content/legal-fiction-how-they-control-us

“The answer to that dilemma is simple. The system can be used for our overall benefit. The bad guys have taken control of it and they are quite deliberately using it for their benefit at our expense. They are using it to fine us excessively and needlessly to feed their greed, to tax and persecute us; keeping us on a tread mill of servitude and making our lives a misery in the process. We have a right to take the benefits and reject the liabilities when the balance has been distorted to our detriment – which clearly it is.”

“We, the British people have right to govern ourselves, we have a natural instinct to want to preserve our sovereignty and our independence… but we have been lulled into thinking that we need the permission of a powerful elite to secure it… we do not.”

Why aren’t men fighting for the West?

They’re drugging themselves with male victory soma – steroids.
If they feel the complacency (and entitlement) of the victor, why bother?

(The testosterone released by compulsive masturbators has the same effect, teenage boys used to have more motivation when it was discouraged, SJWs noticed).

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-02904-7_12

Testosterone is the dominant hormone in both male and female brains.

regulates the turnover of the social monoamines, dopamine and serotonin.

They’re happy pills, indirect happy pills.
For people too proud to admit they’re depressed.

The hormone also has many other actions in the brain; thus the social brain’s main chemical, without exaggeration, is testosterone

Peterson told you none of this.

 investigate social dominance and trustworthiness behaviors

Whatever I say, they’ll insult me.

Losers.

….

Actually, why do I care what they think? Who else does?

Fine. If you need to get energy from drugs, and don’t see that as a problem to be dropped at some point, you’re as bad a degenerate as the people you insult. Why do you think they’re doing it??

(Also: why r-types do drugs. There’s nothing intellectual about it. To avoid negative consequences, they get high or drunk or laid again, to avoid the experience’s outcome and the need to learn from it).

Guardian test, they’re doing it. For the “energy” = narc supply.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/mar/31/rise-in-middle-aged-men-taking-steroids-to-feel-more-youthful-experts-say

But women don’t care about looks, huh….. keep telling yourself that.

At best, you’re the Beautiful Ones. Still unfit and not masculine.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9624002?dopt=Abstract

Studies in animals have implicated the amygdala in emotional and social behaviours, especially those related to fear and aggression. Although lesion and functional imaging studies in humans have demonstrated the amygdala’s participation in recognizing emotional facial expressions, its role in human social behaviour has remained unclear. We report here our investigation into the hypothesis that the human amygdala is required for accurate social judgments of other individuals on the basis of their facial appearance. We asked three subjects with complete bilateral amygdala damage to judge faces of unfamiliar people with respect to two attributes important in real-life social encounters: approachability and trustworthiness. All three subjects judged unfamiliar individuals to be more approachable and more trustworthy than did control subjects.The impairment was most striking for faces to which normal subjects assign the most negative ratings: unapproachable and untrustworthy looking individuals. Additional investigations revealed that the impairment does not extend to judging verbal descriptions of people. The amygdala appears to be an important component of the neural systems that help retrieve socially relevant knowledge on the basis of facial appearance.

r-types

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12948440

Basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex are implicated in cue-outcome learning. In this issue of Neuron, Schoenbaum et al. show that, following basolateral amygdala lesions, cue-selective neurons in orbitofrontal cortex are more sensory driven and less sensitive to the motivational value of an outcome, suggesting that predictive value coding in orbitofrontal cortex is dependent on input from basolateral amygdala.

They’re conditioning themselves for pathological altruism.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/05/06/why-does-shunning-make-locusts-leave/

By making your brain happy, you make it dumber.

It’s the illusion of safety. Your body assumes the threat is dead.

Your body also produces less of a thing when you supplement. Basic biology.
So men and women shouldn’t take any sex hormones unless they produce zero.

If your levels are normal (for your AGE, Peter Pan), you’re poisoning yourself.

https://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/cognoculture/testosterone_and_human_aggression_or_180520

 Yet others still have suggested that hypogonadal males (a.k.a low testosterone-producing males) who had their testosterone increased saw no jump in aggressive behaviour, and in fact became more friendly, energetic and, well, happy.

Cucks.

If you’re being treated badly, the chemical suffering is vital to fixing that. It’s like cutting off nerves, they’ve deadened their sense of injustice.

Notice how when men get power, they become over-friendly and obliging?

Ah, they say, but wouldn’t this also occur in women?

 The result: the women who had received testosterone without knowing became fairer, more generous and had increased efficiency in social interactions, while the other group (those who had been told that they were receiving testosterone) behaved much more unfairly. In sum: one group acted they way they thought testosterone should affect humans (and it wasn’t pretty). But the reality was much different. Case and point, ladies and gentlemen.

Notice how many pathological altruist women are high-T? And middle-class?

You’re buying the chemical fake equivalent of class. I cannot think of anything more indicative of a loser.

I used to think it was the broke guy with a sportscar.

If anyone’s doping T, it should be women. It makes us nicer and better looking. When we produce less naturally, no loss.

It’s always the “inferior” men who abuse women, isn’t it? They seem to be lacking in T.
In civilization, status is conferred to men who cooperate. Killers get wiped out quickly.