Video: Non-GPS tracking

One purpose of 5G. It’s like a prison ankle bracelet.

“Oh!” you say, “I’m fine because my phone is 2G/3G/4G!”

Except they’re decommissioning those towers, turning prepper emergency phones into bricks.

(Whether it’s legal to decomm emergency phones? Nobody seems to care).

But sure, Boris, let the Chicoms know where almost every UK citizen is at all times.

U smart Etonian bro.

I’m sure this won’t be used to put political opponents in prison.

They also want to force you cashless or put chips into the cash.

This makes old “hoarded”* cash worthless and they can inflate away your PP while making you pay any additional “taxes” they made up that morning based on whatever you buy, instantly.

The i in iPhone stands for idiot.

Two things I don’t understand the libertarians wanna keep: 1. the religious concept of a “sin tax” and 2. state-funded RE classes (really Multicultural Studies 101).

So they can see where you are, what you’re doing, control what you’re buying and monitor what you think online by viewing stats, what you say through the microphone (no battery release option in newer phones) and say online.

Yeah, China itself is SO bad, right?

We lost a war.

*Under Communism, any ownership is hoarding.

Link: Intellectual Yet Idiot

View at Medium.com

medium.com/incerto/the-intellectual-yet-idiot-13211e2d0577

The IYI pathologizes others for doing things he doesn’t understand without ever realizing it is his understanding that may be limited. He thinks people should act according to their best interests and he knows their interests, particularly if they are “red necks” or English non-crisp-vowel class who voted for Brexit. When plebeians do something that makes sense to them, but not to him, the IYI uses the term “uneducated”. What we generally call participation in the political process, he calls by two distinct designations: “democracy” when it fits the IYI, and “populism” when the plebeians dare voting in a way that contradicts his preferences.

I’d call them false cardinals of the Cathedral but okay.

Intellectual is an endogenous quality they lack, a personality too (Charlton).

Midwits don’t learn from rules (they change them, magical thinking) or society (equalism or die) or experience. All they do is take tests and repeat dogma.

telling the rest of us 1) what to do, 2) what to eat, 3) how to speak, 4) how to think… and 5) who to vote for.

But the problem is the one-eyed following the blind: these self-described members of the “intelligentsia” can’t find a coconut in Coconut Island, meaning they aren’t intelligent enough to define intelligence hence fall into circularities — but their main skill is capacity to pass exams written by people like them. With psychology papers replicating less than 40%, dietary advice reversing after 30 years of fatphobia, macroeconomic analysis working worse than astrology, the appointment of Bernanke who was less than clueless of the risks, and pharmaceutical trials replicating at best only 1/3 of the time, people are perfectly entitled to rely on their own ancestral instinct and listen to their grandmothers (or Montaigne and such filtered classical knowledge) with a better track record than these policymaking goons.

I love Taleb.

But it’s mental martial law. Thinktank r smart, college r smart, expert r smart, you trust expert like priest, expert r good, follow expert.

Equalism is a death cult because their version of being wrong or failing is “I guess I’ll just die”.

The atomised late Roman

Does Stoicism Extinguish the Fire of Life?

An honor culture can only function in a society in which there is a shared code — clear rules, standards, and expectations for interaction and engagementand within a closed community of equals. But as the Roman Republic transformed into a sprawling, porous, far-flung empire, its society became increasingly large, complex, and diverse, and “The citizen of Rome became a citizen of the world,” this common, level playing field disintegrated.

In an honor culture, you can only be insulted by someone you consider an equal. But in Roman society, discerning who deserved this level of respect, and whose slights to take seriously, became increasing difficult and unclear. If someone possessed a different set of values, was a citizen still honor-bound to care what they thought?

relativism

Early Romans had shared rules of engagement — boundaries that checked their competitions and kept them civil. In the greater chaos of the empire, in the absence of shared norms, citizens made the rules up as they went. It was every man for himself. In fact, the less a man cared about honor, the more unable he was to be shamed, the more strategic advantage he gained. Early Romans had not played to win, but for the sake of engaging in a good fight; now, citizens were prepared to win at any cost.

cucks
the noble loser
the traitor
saving face
political gain > spiritual

Romans thus came to see contests as unequal and destructive. Those who engaged in competitions under the old assumption of participating on a level playing field, found instead that the odds were stacked, and this gap between expectation and reality engendered great bitterness. As did the fact that it seemed more and more men began receiving commendations, laurels of honor, who hadn’t actually earned them.

nepotism
favouritism
no meritocracy or scant

As a result, Romans became disillusioned and began to withdraw from the contest, from active engagement with their fellow citizens and civic life. “When competition was insupportable, then paralysis, the desire to hide, and the desire to be insensitive and autonomous became widespread cultural phenomena. With the loss of the good contest and the rules that framed it, cold, callous, brazen shamelessness became a cure for shame.”

apathy
nihilism
hopelesssness (a sin if you check with Catholics, despair)
self-sabotage
atomisation
casualisation
“individualism” ego rationalisation, vanity (good for self and appearance’s sake, not for thede)
mentacide

“Shamelessness” for the Romans did not necessarily mean, as it does for us, to be unvirtuous, but rather to literally be incapable of being shamed. That is, the shameless care nothing for what others think of them.

dullards
spiritually vapid celebrities or role models

It always starts with the men doesn’t it?

Weak personal morals/actions of men, appeal to exception and excuses, weak moral authority > no honour > loss of respect to other men and all women, no social power, nobody listens. The levy breaks, the dam bursts. “If it’s okay when they do, why not me?” Monkey see, monkey do. Children don’t listen what you say, they witness you.

A hierarchy of modern men would rank far below late Romans, but how often do they virtue signal against men who’d at least risked death in battle? Like, STFU. They could build houses and fires. They were useful. Women hate gammas for the fake signals like that. The snarky “I’m so much better” – then DO something, DO anything useful!

Fathers should stick around to tell their sons this, it isn’t women’s business and we resent this novel pressure to kinda ‘mansplain’ to boys what they should already know as adults – STANDARDS.

Women who complain about the manchild are 100% right, there shouldn’t be a word! Nor mantrum! We shouldn’t understand what it means nor see it!

While today we tend to admire this kind of radical indifference to public opinion, to the Romans unbounded autonomy was the mark of a man whose energy had been drained, whose being had been destroyed;

libertarians are lazy, in practice

excuses to do less, altogether

as Cicero put it: “To take no heed of what other people think of you is the part not only of an arrogant man but, to be sure, of a dissolutus.” How could someone who remained unmoved even in the face of legitimate criticism, who refused to be ashamed even when confronted with their culpability, ever be trusted?

the shameless man, the attention-seeking psychopaths as role models based on short-term results

high time pref parasitism on society

[see Hare’s work]

Still, even Cicero, though himself a political leader, was sympathetic to the impulse to become callously disengaged, rhetorically asking, “what spirit trained in these times, ought not to become insensitive?” Elsewhere he quotes a line of Euripides: “If this mournful day were the first to dawn for me, had I not long sailed in such a sea of troubles, then there would be reason for anguish like that felt by a colt when the reins are first imposed and he bridles at the first touch of the bit. But now, broken by miseries, I am numb.”

it isn’t an excuse

it’s egocentric to assume the world must care about your trivial problems or bow to your whims, princess

Social media has even made men princesses who “need” their coffee and “need” a chest wax and “need” to take a selfie. Is all that really a need or are you an entitled brat?

Hollywood tells us stuff magically happens. That’s why people pay – to see the FICTION.

Reality doesn’t allow escapism but genetic suicide comes close. Moral self-destruction.

The Bible warns about disconnection of the spirit, it’s the ideal condition the Devil wants, all you have left is the animal body, hedonism. There’s no judgement or conscience or sense of higher things, basically Nietzsche’s abyss wasn’t death, it was hedonism. It leads to excuses for oneself – a form of moral relativism.

In this self-imposed withdrawal and “the collapse of conditions for healthy competition in ancient Rome . .  . various strategies [had to be] devised by the Romans for creating a new emotional economy and redefining their spirit.” Said another way, “With the loss of the rules and conditions of the good contest, the entire language of honor ‘imploded’ and had to be ‘reconstructed.’”

oh yay critical theory

This reconstruction process would involve nothing less than a complete inversion of values, and produce multiple radiating effects on Roman society.

pride from shame
free from diseased
individual from alone

Honor centered around control, constraint, consistency; the ideal man becomes he who is poised, tranquil, disengaged. The passive values were elevated above the active.

Good for a society of strong defences, death for a society of weak ones, permitting invasion for shekels.

Virtue < Virtue signal

e.g.

I can be a slut, if I criticize sluts.

Moral hypocrisy, hallmark of degeneracy. The bottom of honour’s barrel. Drunken chambering.

Soldier becomes selfish slutty peacock, basically. It’s Calhoun but IRL. Needn’t be slutty with the opposite sex either, people forget that. The homosexuality rates are an outcrop of this noxious social weed where we don’t expect successful men to marry faithfully.

Shame is GOOD and JUST and NECESSARY for civilization.

“judge not lest ye be judged” refers to using the same societal standard for the entire society i.e. NO exceptions based on class, wealth, sob story etc etc

It does NOT say “never judge” – notice that?

Double standards are the first weakness e.g. cheating in sports.

Read the rest yourself, it’s jarring.

Fifth, as Romans collectively withdrew from participating in a contest culture, they ironically began to lionize the individual who continued to play the game, and did so with a “winner-take-all” disregard for the old rules. The “man not prepared to lose” was idolized.

Instead of competition being something in which every average citizen took part, the masses mounted the bleachers, to cheer on, and live vicariously through, the few “gladiators” still in the arena. As spectators, they both worried over and felt excited by the rise of would-be tyrants who were willing to crush anyone who stood in their way; the thrill of the cult of victory,

infantilising the criminal

siding with the anti-hero

sports substitute for war

idolatry cult – celebrity role models

Cult of voyeurism, we even have that with fucking now.

There was a rarely mentioned line in Fight Club, “this isn’t love, it’s sports-fucking”.

That’s it, right there. That is the essence of the degenerate. The sick men who look up to the unreal Tyler ignore the fact it’s satire, it’s mocking them. But they are shameless. They make all sacred things worldly.

Teenagers are brainwashed but anyone older who views it feels a little disgust, if their conscience, moral compass functions. Tyler says “God hates us”, he means himself. His God is the Narrator, and does hate the impossible fake* ideal. Tyler is Ikea Model Man, a product of society and NOT a person. Americans in particular miss all this subtle irony, since it’s like an ego play. He remodels his kitchen, then his reputation. It’s ridiculous, a morality play. If you could be transplanted into the “perfect” body of a warrior, you’d still be a coward. It’s your soul, your character.

How many buff gym dudes with tatts nowadays would refuse the draft more than the scrawniest Boomer?

Some Boomer-bashing comes from weaker men. Would Tyler go to war? But he runs a military cult.

Tyler knew he was a character, from wall breaks, and would be destroyed in the end like a Devil on the shoulder.

A mannequin of postmodern immoral “manliness”. A man with the appearance of a God and the low morals of a Devil.

*worldly, hedonistic, materialistic, VAPID, Tyler is all-looks

Vapid: I don’t need women ….but here’s Marla, fuck capitalism ….but start a business, I have depression and no purpose ….except I’m energetic and obsessed**, who cares about appearances but punch my face, he’s basically a bloody thot, come on. Well ‘ard, he call them here, like a chav. Can you imagine what he’d do alone? Nothing, he has nothing. It’s like James Bond, if he can’t shoot it or seduce it, he isn’t interested.

Edgy McEdgelord, Puncheyface Champion.

Shocked he didn’t get Marla to strangle him during sex with apron-strings.

Print it, Hollywood!

A chav with better threads.

Modern men are sports-fucking civilization to death. No love, totally sterile of meaning. All about the cult of victory and selfies. Muh “men invented civilization” bullshit is proof, number 1 white men (and women) and 2 get off your arse then and at least maintain it!

It’s like the son of a famous gardener standing before a pile of weeds and bracken, pontificating how it’s HIS garden and it won awards and it’s HIS HIS ALL HIS.

On behalf of all women: STFU.

Be useful and still, STFU.

Be Spartan with your words, please.

** fucking uwu lad

Redpill 101

This may be reproduced elsewhere freely on the understanding there is no distortion, editing, credit-stealing or profit.

If I could talk to every thirteen year-old, here is what I would tell them, anonymously. Because God knows, we need primers. Sincere, accurate primers. 3,500 words approx. Here’s what you need, to get up to speed.

You are a slave. You may not believe but your prison is money. You do not need a birth certificate, it is a deed of ownership. The filigree paper betrays its bond status and the ‘government’ representing your owners are entitled with it to take out debt (the hallmark of a serf) on the basis of your future labour. You do not need to consent, you were born to them so they own you. You can never escape this, they own your children too. Your birth certificate is assigned a number. It may not be burned into your arm but it defines you and your entire life.

‘Net worth’ is an illusion, that number is everything.

Do your owners have birth certificates and numbers? Nobody knows. You cannot check because you are not allowed to know their full names, they stay conspicuously off every ‘rich’ list and you wouldn’t know their face if you passed them in the street. But you’re so smart, right?

Well, if you’re reading this, I think you are.

The government is not the representative of the People, the government is a representative of the private banks. As it stands and this is self-evident. The government produces nothing, neither does any bank. Fountain pen money is a fantasy, an illusion, utterly imaginary. Your entire system of ‘work’ is based on a lie. There is no such thing as a public bank, they made it illegal. Regulations stifle more honest competition. We live in a plutocracy pretending to be a meritocracy, otherwise you’d revolt at the blatant classism. You’ve probably never heard that word before, you’re not allowed to know it. The talking heads on TV and Twitter cannot use it. They fear it though, they’re deathly chilled if you bring it up and speak of it in hushed tones, privately. I heard them. These people are not your intellectual betters. Look at their mess of a private life, they’re useful idiots. They are often your moral inferiors. This applies all the way up to the top, your owners and theirs, for they are Plato’s natural slaves. Education is not IQ and they own academia, they are not better than you. They need those barriers to oppress you. Without the advantages their children inherit (read: not money, but power) they would demonstrate inferiority to you, hard workers. The leech resents the host. You hold up their pyramid, the original pyramid scheme.
If you were ever to realise this, you would severely reduce consumption of their poison products, the ones they make because they hate you. Every single mention or sighting of a consumer product in a video or article is an advert. This is an open secret. Fight Club mocked it. Influencers don’t discover a product all at once by chance, they’re like drug pushers with shitty candles. Do you think spending like the indebted will get you socially accepted? They rely on that feeling to control you and it is control, to coerce you into convincing yourself. If truly influential and hence worth befriending, they are not spending their money, but their great-great grandparent’s. You are not spending the same money. The first piggy at the trough gets the most grain and the core banks trickle down their nonsense to the lesser and down through the classes until the poor’s purchasing power is almost nil. The journalists faint on a well-placed couch and bemoan why, oh why don’t they have savings? Their parents were exploited too, through many generations. Records of banking families from the time of bubonic plague show the same names as today, what regression to the mean? Don’t read Galton. They cannot simply give you a fair (minus verbal section) IQ test age 12 (SATs are now banned here) and be done with it, their rotten fruit would suffer. Their weak seed would wither and die. The game is rigged. Glamour and luxury are illusions pushed by people who think a few zeros will make happy. But a zero is empty. Hollywood people are miserable, in a mansion. They lie for a living and their spouse is homosexual and cheating. This applies to your owners too. The faux elite, as they encourage you to call them. The real secret is that there is nothing elite about them. If you spoke to them at a bar, they would not dazzle you with poetic phrasings or the calibre of their intellect. They are over-educated morons, parroting things you’ve been culturally indoctrinated by their parents to believe are important – abstract ‘art’, wine, moral relativism and white walls barren as their personality. They mock things they use to gain advantage, used by God himself as signs to us of divine providence like the birth of Jesus but do not wish you to notice nor use these gifts yourself, as the early Christians did. For example, astrology has better predictive outcomes when studied scientifically than therapy. You are not told this. They time their money movements and wars to this. Most therapy exists to shame you for your existence or to trap those noticing the evil of this system (a gas-lighting effort) and push, you guessed it, more poison products. The poisoned apple to our Snow White. The longer you go to therapy, the more likely you are to kill yourself. Freud’s talking cure worked on no genuine pathology (and he was a doctor) but he was trying to fix his hereditary neuroses via intellectualisation and projection, things all congenital idiots do. Obviously, the problem is never them, just their life. It’s a confounding coincidence. Jung was right to leave him and his narrow, inapplicable “Jewish psychology” as he called it, that encouraged self-loathing (they are the only modern matriarchal culture) instead of cultural love and self-culture, as it was called. It’s been rebranded as individualism and self-improvement to sell you overpriced shit in January. To keep you feeling alone and vulnerable, atomised and adrift. Gyms exist to encourage an eating disorder, you do not need a homoerotic gym cult to exercise. Gym products can be more expensive than child support. This is the tip of a huge iceberg of deceptions, they trade in lies, quite literally. They tax your existence and claim to own the very air you dare breathe. It isn’t bad unless they can tax it. You tune into The News (not some news, or a selection of news, THE news) to find out what’s bad, admit it. You tune in for your chosen frequency of brainwashing because, relatively, it’s a short term relief. That’s how they “make” the BIG bucks. Big zero.

Big zero > little zero, you see. Gold stars for grown-ups. ‘Net’ worth, because you’re a big fish, aren’t you?

But… the “most powerful nation on the face of the Earth” – source, has no savings. Hmm. People with savings have power. People with savings can tell corporate masters to do one. People with savings get to look around and notice the way society is going. People with savings have options.

You’re not allowed to have options.

Vote for Liar A or Liar B. Buy rank poison cola A or B. Breed with useless eater A or B. Wear short polyester in style A or B. People in concentration camps weren’t suffering the indignity of polyester.

Do everything you’re supposed to. You’re so individual!

Your teachers tell every kid they have potential. Yes, the potential to fund their unearned retirement.

Normies have a shit quality of life because they trusted these people, the enemy. The enemy of the people. Know them by their fruit.

“National” debt – not “politician promises”. Cultural Marxists lie with language, including Master-Suppression techniques.

Papers and radio are propaganda, they dumbed down the language and what was discussed. Watered-down communications. Families used to talk to one another. Wartime conveniently encouraged them to gather round the radio instead. Storytelling made us loyal to one another as a culture, online this is called a chan. When the ancient philosophers gave speeches, who ever said they weren’t funny? Could you listen for hours to something that wasn’t funny? Did they walk miles for something that wasn’t funny? They’re more George Carlin than anything if you learn how to read them. It’s the same with plays. What we find funny hasn’t really changed in two thousand years, the ‘media’ limits our self-culture by force-feeding us bullshit and clipping our critical wings. People have urges and are lied to about why. Sexual arousal can never be based on fear or disgust, they say to men, you must secretly want it. This is gaslighting. To women, you want to watch this cooking show online not because you miss your mother but because it’s trendy. …Food is a trend now.

They have fully monetised food.

“You can’t eat that!” “Are you sure you should eat that?” “I read you shouldn’t eat that!”

And they have the nerve to lecture you on the evils of shaming and ‘body positivity’.

Yes, they’re very pozzed alright. The only non-sinful pleasure we must take daily. The only response to “Why are you eating that?” should be “I need it to live, fuck you.”

The Little Hitlers are party cogs, aware of it or not. The gestapo was nothing without informants, the papers have nothing without SJWs whipping out their phones to film half an argument. They are never named for their ‘service’.

There are seven million views on a woman poaching an egg, clearly something is very wrong here.

They turn you against one another with petty irrationalities as a distraction, a red herring from the system. Mentacide precedes bodily genocide. You fall over one another internationally, begging to be exploited.

Does America have a military without Israel’s guns?

The over-educated aspect has merely trickled down in the middle-class ‘journalist’ class to the point it becomes noticeable. The sarcastic ‘elite’ are mediocre after many generations of incest at best, and usually below average. It’s pissed away by the third generation under ordinary selection pressures (money, fame etc) because decadence sets into the second generation and degeneracy into the third. Degeneration is in the germline, it’s epigenetic. It would be game over (game: they are playing us for fools) for their long line of sociopaths.

Go Galt, avoid debt. Don’t buy tat, happiness comes from your cultural heritage. Those ‘luxury brands’ were all made in the same Chinese factory by child slaves, the difference is branding. Shame the Left for their slave phone, their slave-picked coffee, their slave-grown drugs. They own more slaves by volume than any plantation merchant. They have no virtue as consumers. Tim Cook fucks little boys (and suffers from a case of Podesta face) but they still buy Apple products. There are more slaves alive today than ever, yet they gaslight these rape victims as ‘sex workers’ to supply their Weinsteins, ignoring the suicide rate and abuse histories. The market is owned by merchants and merchants cannot turn a profit unless they convince you not to seek out the goods yourself. They must be the middle man, they cannot work. Meaningless bland items belonging nowhere will make you miserable. Burn your Ikea furniture, it’s illegally sourced from Ancient European forests anyway. Watch that scene in Fight Club, they’ve been mocking you this entire time. Faux rebellion is the worst thing you can do. Rebellion in this system isn’t buying shit. It’s buying less of their shit.
They are trying to snare you into giving up various self-reliances e.g. carpentry, from harvesting your own water to growing your own food. You need them, says the abusive spouse.


They have been doing this for generations, it’s well documented. They want you totally enslaved before they replace you with machines. You think those machines will work for you? Why? The sum value of your organs doesn’t touch that thing. At this point, your life becomes redundant to them, they’ve been selectively breeding you for obedience over two world wars and many smaller incidents, including the civil war they propagandise as ‘terrorism’.
Do not fund people who hate you. This is most important when it comes to the food supply. Buy the best or the cheapest profit margin at the smallest local brand. Do NOT fund them. Every penny of your productivity into their siphon is a drop of blood signing your death warrant. A cow that produces no milk infuriates the farmer. Why have adverts been getting aggressive? They resent you for their need of you and are actively using their funds to replace you – this includes genetic engineering. Give them no genetic blueprint of you, your DNA contains your family’s abilities. They are thieves of time and talent.
They want you to distrust your kin. Do they distrust their own? They want you to believe in a global brotherhood or sisterhood but you are not related to those people, they have different aspirations for the world you must live in. Would you want to live in their country? If not, you are not kin. Culture is genetic, wherever we go we carry our ancestors with us.
They have been selectively breeding us like racehorses since at least the time of Darwin. They are Social Darwinists of the worst order by their action and dehumanisation of us all. They profit from your sons dying on the battlefield, they take a cut when they push poison into your baby’s formula. They will steal the best (genetic combinations) and cull the rest with no guilt whatsoever. All their talk of sustainability bars discussion of population size, density and national IQs. You are not allowed to notice. You are not allowed to think for yourself, any more than a farm animal questioning the farmer.
Theft, called debt, called usury, is the primary weapon. Fractional reserve is the con, the system of your slavery. This tune is winding down and there aren’t enough chairs. Do not attack one another, they want you to pick yourselves off, go after the people who set this up, who designed the system and did this to you. Inflation doesn’t exist, it’s a myth. There’s no “miracle” in compound interest – they breed and steal from the poor. It’s slavery, work to live, slaves paid ‘income tax’. Mortality is used as a weapon to weaken the workers. You earned water and they put a hole in your cup, to drain it for themselves. They don’t work and they certainly don’t pay tax to themselves!

Do not permit leeches wherever possible and guard your food from poison. This is very simple.

Saving for retirement means nothing if you waste it in a hospital or die young. Most disease is caused by the bad diet from foods their relatives produce and design to be appetizing to you, like force-feeding a duck or a pig. They know this because they bought out or, by corporate espionage, forced out the competition to dominate the medical market. Which country owns all the biotech? Which country is holding humanity hostage?
Deny them their ‘gender war’. You need family, they need family too. The corruption and evil is intergenerational. Family loyalty frightens them in the commoner. They incite child and teenage rebellion, sowing seeds of discord for years. Teenage rebellion was invented in the 20th century, vital for GDP. If you don’t listen to the experienced, you’ll make costly mistakes that could’ve been avoided. There is nothing more cliche than a teenager who irrationally hates their parents. Do not be a worthless stereotype, they lose. The life outcome studies on bullies and ‘popular kids’ are clear. They were completely average and conformity got them ….nothing, as they merit.

Popular – film propaganda speak for bland, immoral, stupid and average.

Popularity isn’t love, it’s Pleasure Island. They told you. Hedonists are losers. They are asses, sold as slaves by psychopathic foxes and Satanists, then working until they die. They told you. The Devil is in the details and, after all, you must consent to sell your soul. Evil cannot be undone.

You need your kin to survive and their propaganda will cause you to deny any preservation instinct at the cost of indebting yourself to them. ‘Rich’ people are allowed to think they’re successful. They are given more ‘money’ the more they seem to have. People say this makes no sense. Why give them a bigger line, the less they need? All the more rope to hang you by, dear!

Why bait a hook with an especially large, juicy morsel? It’s the same principle.

They know how you think, observation is part of the breeding process. Kipling was a Freemason, a religion of male witches who share a hatred and womb envy of women with Orthodox Jews.
Yet, there is no Biblical (lawful, by divine law) debt without a debt jubilee. A car without wheels is just a seat.
A creditor will allow a debtor to take on as much “debt” as they like, so long as they pay it back in real labour i.e. mortality, hours worked. That is the reason. Understand that and you understand the whole system.

You cannot win, it is rigged. It kills you.

Formal alternatives are not allowed but self-reliance terrifies them.
How does one scare a leech? Go on a diet. Rely on what is local to you and proximate spiritually.
Naming the Beast gives them legal power (crony government) but starving the Beast is free and cannot be traced. Disappear off their radar, for the most part. More importantly, talk about things that matter, things that exclude them, debunk them, things they haven’t the wit to care about. Isolate them and they’ll shrivel up and die.

Why is there never a trend for reading past a 7th grade level? Why are children given “YA fiction” with “political themes” instead of the classics? It’s so awful there are new ones every year. If every parent sat down and read their child the Iliad, they’d brick it. Treasure Island is a safer in.

Every attempt you make at true improvement is free. It makes you a little bit better than their heirs. Nothing terrifies them more. This isn’t limited to children, friends too. Note and improve the quality of your conversations. Do you talk about people like some embittered town gossip? Why do they sell smartphones to minors, knowing the medical damage? Their curiosity will divert from art and the classics to a Hollywood whore’s tits.

They do not get to tell us what is important, yet we obey what they offer us. We allow them to act as a moral authority. People who brag to us they do not believe in morality (absolutes like good). They instruct, we obey.

Do not obey. Do not allow it to pollute your life.

Do not believe their lies. Do you think Kylie Jenner is a billionaire? They also feed off of your attention. They feed off of it in ways you cannot imagine. They are living rent free in your head, providing significant opportunity cost to your personal prosperity in life and draining you spiritually with this parody of life they call materialism. If we all stopped treating them as equals, they’d have to create something for themselves. They cannot do this. The Left (media) cannot meme, they can only imitate – poorly. They are too stupid to know the score from within that bubble or have a sense of humour. You cannot fix stupid, so strike. Do not hold or continue a conversation with a leftie. They are not adults.

They are overgrown children. They fully support their own murder (euthanasia, death care pathways).

If they cannot answer the following questions, they are not adults.

Is the Federal Reserve federal? What is it backed by? [faith in men] Is it constitutional -to have private monies?

Does the Bank of England belong to the English people? What is it backed by? [faith in men] Why was Cromwell’s corpse dragged through the street by the English? Why did our best modern financial system involve a currency of sticks amongst workers? [high trust, workers only] Why did the BoE step in to replace this? [war, national debt]

If they cannot explain the ROOT of the thing they use everyday, they are children. They are ignorant by choice, which is worse than being stupid, it is malice.
Love of money is the ROOT of all evil, look for the root in all things. Cui bono? Follow the money. The root of all evil is exploiting human beings made by the true God (creator) to make a ‘profit’. Capitalism, by definition, is consensual and from an even keel of countrymen.

Use their stolen tools in ways they cannot corrupt. Be the better man (or woman). They allowed us online to ruin our families with pornography (adultery, according to Jesus! hypofrontality damage, according to addiction science) and social media to encourage conflict between people we rely on in real life.

There is no pithy ending. Don’t be the problem. The traitors get guillotined too.
Values are delusions if you keep making excuses to never act on them. They rely on your weak character.

Fun fact: Before the French were socialists, they hated the rulers because their children often went missing from Paris or were picked up as vagrants by the French King’s police, never to be seen again. Rumours of purple baths circulated. Is it a coincidence they moved the court to a hunting lodge (all things labelled lodge are a hunting lodge) where captured prey is brought to be consumed in secret? Nowadays, they’re a tad more civilized, it’s called a ‘care home‘, or ‘modelling’ or a ‘club’.

[What do Tim Cook and Henry Cavill have in common? They both enjoy deep explorations of Asian minor.]

Link: There is no neutrality

https://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2019/03/not-that-theres-anything-wrong-with-that.html

You may not care about Cultural Marxists.

They certainly feel entitled to control you.

Nowadays, everyone feels entitled to social approval.

I’ve had strangers brag to me about their sexual conquests and, when met with repulsion, they complained.*

Only your doctor needs to know your bodily functions, I don’t want to picture it.

9/10, they only sleep around to signal about it.

We encourage or discourage degeneracy in our everyday lives.

Most commonly with SPEECH.

How often do you sing a rap song without knowing?

Identification is required for behaviourism control.

*But they never mentioned it again and started sleeping around less, questioning it.

The book Nudge might explain why.

Female power in the occult

https://www.clairenakti.com/articles/what-is-the-real-essence-of-beauty


Reminds me of Taoism.
Taoism doesn’t actually have sexual practices (however some have twisted it to try and claim they do) for that reason. It is the spiritual overcoming the physical. To “de-base” yourself again completely extinguishes the work already built on. Monasteries and nunneries were rooted in this idea.

The wise men don’t want to be drained (and by strangers) and be thrown off with bad karma (like a creative block or stumped feeling, apathy or obstacle event). Action —> Result. You choose one, you choose the other.
Historically a promiscuous man is considered weak in all religions (except Satanism, you’ll note*) because the male path of enlightenment involves impulse control, that’s the male power. Think of a military general. A promiscuous woman gives up something that is (because of her chosen condition) worth nothing, quite a disgusting notion to people who believe in sanctity, and promiscuous men also don’t value their energies as special either, so their own influence disappears from themselves like morning dew (and they typically blame women for ‘tempting them’, projecting the problem is typical). This leads to a permanent dissolving of willpower (death of will) eventually, they call it “player burnout” online but it’s really like tapping your own veins and draining your blood then wondering why you’re weak. Idiots with scant self-awareness had little influence to spare in the first place, and so drain themselves into a curious blend of melancholy, apathy and furious self-pity faster than other, hardier men. Celibate men were respected in saner times because they had power (of the self) and this produced a laser-like focus and it’s no coincidence so many geniuses did their best work while surrendering sexually to no women.

How much bland art was clearly made by a degenerate who slept with the subjects?

How much great art was made by homosexual men, who couldn’t possibly be tempted by a woman? (or married hetero men for other reasons).

How does the art of each make you feel? Typically, the first makes people feel unclean but the latter a strange purity.

Women seen as inspiration on a collective level strengthens a man.

To surrender sexually to an improper woman or to be an improper man individually is draining (like the trail of bad luck following degeneracy that can even be seen in statistics like suicide risk). At best, the man tries to take on a female role (Lord Byron hoovering up muse figures, Wilde the same with men) and this is repellent to those who believe that men should be masculine (most men, back then) and stand firm in their principles. This is the ultimate cause of those principles and as you can see, it isn’t a double standard at all. If women aren’t meant to sleep around, that implies directly men aren’t meant to either, otherwise they’d have to become homosexual. Patriarchies protect men from wasting themselves by masturbating inside various women (it’s a loveless union) although when it overdoes this or for unclear reasons lost over time, the subjects assume it’s keeping them away from the “fun” (a child’s assumption) because they don’t understand the risk or threat to themselves. It goes beyond themselves individually too; to family name, personal social reputation, family estate and fortune, future marriage prospects, shaming their friends with bad company and associations and so on. At minimum, it lumbers others with awkwardness, selfishly. A man’s responsibilities in society forbid dalliance with the underworld elements. It always resurfaces somewhat with the degenerate, sin sticks to them, however they might appear unscathed to shallow people. If everyone ate from the cookie jar, the tragedy of the commons would pretty much provide what we consider a Third World society. It would be unruly and the individuals selfish, feral and uncivilized. We’re well on that course because, since women can’t rein the men in (and some are Satanic, hating men and encouraging their destruction**) then who is supposed to play father to men who shunned that powerful leadership role of their own sex? Men are too PC with one another and standards died as a result. It’s a youth cult that makes them wish they were Peter Pans, never changing or learning or taking on duties, stuck in a hedonic purgatory, like being dutiful is shameful and up is down. The manchild doesn’t rebel so this shift was planned. Where is the honour in such people? Natural slaves.

They don’t have dignity to value themselves beyond a performing phallus, integrity to choose their hobbies and friends wisely, they don’t know the value of hard work (bitching on twitter is not work) nor the satisfaction of being useful to your kin and the relief that duty brings the salt of the earth character.

They assume everyone is jealous of them (projection) because they cannot comprehend how lower impulses can disappear entirely when you realize their illusory nature (best known in Buddhism but Jesus embodies it too).

Most modern men would surrender to Satan in the desert after one hour for a glass of cold water and a shiny car.

No wonder women don’t respect that and ignore it for distractions like career, hoping it’ll go away and they’ll police their own standards in their sex eventually. Like, stop wearing your trousers round your ankles, for one. That’s an easy one. Women by definition cannot play father to a man and guide him like this, playing mother is enabling (and sexually repulsive) and the smarter ones don’t want to encourage it unless they hate men.

Corruption is the rotten apple spoiling the barrel. When it comes to rampant hypersexualization in society, consider the source. Do you think various pajama boys would get away with it, if they didn’t get the biological kick of orgasms as a reward (from porn or a woman in person)? What you reward, you encourage. We encourage indolence, insolence and weakness (this was the intentional product of the ‘Sexual Revolution’ in destroying Western Men). A man loyal to more than one nation is a traitor, what is a man loyal to more than one woman?

…Useless to either, at best. A burden, like an overgrown child.

Like the self-proclaimed family man avoiding his wife and children for a ‘mistress’. I’m sure that doesn’t mess them up at all….

Male power involves as much discernment as the female, for different reasons, throughout all religions. Chastity benefits men in their personal life more than women although it is a virtue for both (power for the male, discernment for the female). Lust is a deadly sin especially for men although modernity has encouraged you to forget this and disturbingly, treat it as the ultimate virtue of a man (to lose himself). They never expressly say what form Satan assumed in the desert to tempt Jesus, I assume female (although the energy of all Devil figures is very destructive and not at all nurturing). I think the #MeToo stuff is triggering the weaker men because it exposes their loss of control which they had believed was cunning concealed from women. Logically, they claim they want tougher punishments on all criminals, including hanging and I’m sure they’d change their tune if it involved their mother/sister/daughter. To personally identify with various types of rapist (including those who target men or boys) shows how weak the modern character is. Everyone gets tempted by things from time to time. So what?

It’s a test, you’re supposed to be strong. These are the defective ‘beautiful ones’ who believe gym gains and sickly cologne make up for their defective and subhuman nature. Metrosexuals don’t survive various societal corrections. Their first impulse on seeing beauty is corruption and degeneracy, much like the rapists they empathize with (instead of their victims like a man with a conscience would).

If you transported them back to the 50s they sexually fantasize about, where the streets were apparently full of young, thin and femininely dressed women, they’d be Ted Bundy. “But they looked really sexy!” level of retarded entitlement. They actually think tease is an insult (women are supposed to look like it) and temptation is an excuse for crime.

Your lust is your business. Picture a fat person blaming cake. Just because you’re triggered doesn’t give you any rights or privileges to get what you want. If so, every time I walk past a jewelry shop and they don’t shower me in diamonds, they must be taunting me. I want it, they’ve got it, what’s the problem? Why can’t I always get what I want? (Women want more from life than men so this is a very good example, nesting instinct means men would still come out with less). It’s just an excuse for anger, popping off like an irritable toddler, it’s the sexual equivalent of road rage. (Ragequitting from women, expressed in hatred of becoming a husband, is actually funny to women – they’re complaining they’d make a bad husband who’d make a bad choice of wife). Mantrums are embarrassing, they’re announcing, proudly how unfit they are. It’s like misogynistic Trigglypuff. They act like women are chasing after them down the street with a veil and false pregnancy positive.

If it’s so bad, get castrated. Honestly, if being horny provokes so much suffering or you are so self-destructive as to hand a rope to a misandrist in fucking one. Chemical castration seems to be a popular option nowadays. They assume women and their hormonal profile don’t feel temptation (HA) and by the time they come to the truth that the problem is them (and not all men) they want to switch back because men get away with more weakness (boys will be boys, weak men turn a blind eye to one another). Eventually they’ll get swept up in a war, probably civil war.

nb *Because Satanism isn’t a religion, it’s anti-religion, it intends to destroy men by encouraging their weakness and worst impulses. Rationalizations are the best way to accomplish this, stupid men are very gullible to any idea that makes them feel strong or impressive, because this way they can delude themselves and appear to have their cake and eat it.

**Remember when the SJWs openly screeched that Trump supporters wouldn’t sleep with them? It’s the witch with the poison apple, come on. It’s the only way they can corrupt and influence men, wasting their energy that could be put toward MAGA and other greatness.

Explaining shit like that.

There’s wasting time, then there’s a Margaret Thatcher colouring book.

Why do they think female rapists exist and the Bible says to avoid seductive women? Whether you think you want them or not, they’re sexual predators. Of course they’ll ruin your life if you let them, that’s what predators do! Stop encouraging them.

This post also clarifies this section of the Bible.

God made femininity and not to have something to shame or corrupt.