Minority status and voter dilution

To wet your whistle.

http://courses.math.tufts.edu/math19/duchin/dilution.pdf

Explains why they screech in excitement or sob with crocodile tears about everything demographic. It’s just vote-rigging. Bringing in fake voters (not actually with any birth right to decide the outgroup’s infrastructure and historical matters*) is comparable to a false military (terrorists, importing terrorists is also treason) since it’s the two ways to gain power – the status (political positions, MP, PM, POTUS, AG) and the might (enforcement with force -or else- and violence and little considered but critical¬†intimidation i.e. common example, Western girls scared to wear more feminine AND Western clothing in multicultural areas, who has the balls to do that study?). [has to be both for clear signal value]

Political correctness is the tyranny of cultural intimidation.

*e.g. if they wouldn’t go to the draft, they have no opinion on the draft or the possibility of war. They’d be forced though. Playing victim doesn’t mean acting like an hysterical woman come draft time would work. I’d go to any version of the draft I’d be physically capable of so weak men have no excuse. I heard it described thusly: Do you wait for them to stab you warm in your bed hiding under a blanket or meet death like a man?¬†‘Like a man’ there referring to physical courage, what modern men sorely lack as they ‘work on’ abs and chest waxes and spray tans. The Hysterical Left can’t expect to always get rescued by the Honourable Loser Right. Actually, a smart general puts the weaker men on the front line knowing they’re A useless (I’d like to see a study on male health status markers for military purposes and IQ**) and B will get picked off anyway… this isn’t mean, and actually less sexist, since it’s good for the war effort*** and the overall fitness of Men as a category. If you spare the feeble men like prize inbred birds in a climate controlled room, as in WW1, you… should look up all the stupid socialist bullshit that got in shortly thereafter. Weak men make weak voting decisions. The best men died on the field, literally. Older and smaller wars, prior to the World ones, were highly eugenic for the male genome and the nomination system of medals for valour etc. reflect this incentive structure. They don’t hand out medals for a good pregnancy because surviving that condition is very random, no precise behaviours really change the outcome and it can have nothing to do with fitness e.g. sepsis****. Military medals handed out all the time make no sense, that’s the arrogance, and medals for mothers only make sense for a high number AND quality of children. We give children (pre-teen and under) medals when logically it should go to the family and strengthen that unit.

**This study is interesting and verging closer but I’ll add it separately.

***A statistic is quantitative whereas the genome is qualitative. If you had a binary choice between your country losing an inferior quality specimen (we are animals) and a far, far better one of its kind, who would you rather help with the rebuilding effort after the war? It’s like weeding a garden, this is so obvious.

****The future is bound to suck with antibiotic resistance AND escalating non-European population, there will be a pandemic. At some point. Mathematical inevitability.

The politicians don’t want the immigrants to know: A passport is a license to draft.

That’s literally what it is, legally, what it’s always been and why they became a big deal in WW2. In the event of a war while abroad, you could be identified with your country of military subscription. I’d love to see a Freedom of Information request on this, what a passport legally enshrines as a duty to the holder. It’s an international symbol of citizenship so burning it won’t make a bit of difference, you agreed and signed over XYZ. Why else would you sign your own passport? You must ensure the person crossing your border is signed on as a friend/ally and not a current enemy (military invasion). Why do passport inspectors ask why you’re there, for legal reasons?

Argh! I give up explaining this point.

The census is about food security, part of national security. Older ones were all about farms.

Back to voter dilution related “problems.”

It’s insane we have foreign nationals who think a passport is something they’ll never need to repay. It isn’t like a blank cheque, the hand-rubbing politicians see you as currency, you as a person. It’s a legal document binding you to the fate of a country, including its national debt, so to ruin that country or prefer your real “home” in policy decisions won’t actually work out for them? Just saying.

Sinking a ship you’re on and celebrating because you hated the captain.

If I’m a bitch, my name is foresight.

It’s a trifecta of stupidity. Citizenship is a noose, and you want dual?
[Actually, why don’t dual citizens pay twice the taxes? No, that would be fair, wouldn’t it? Can’t have that. ‘Fair’ is racist. nb Logically, they get twice the citizenry benefits and effectively pay half the tax for same. The politicians sell pig-shit thick celebrities on dual citizenships by appealing to their ego, which tells you everything you need to know.]

Pissing off the people who helped you (1) with a more advanced military (2) and higher native IQ (3)?

I foresee this ending well… how will we go after them for their share of the debts?

[inc. odious debt, hours of fun on that one]

Libertarians are stupid because they assume immigrants have common sense and act in their own and their home’s best interests. Haha no.

And the people who think being nice to the outgroup means that group will treat them any better or more stupidly, make them leader of the foreigners?! (See Labour leader contention for that last, no they won’t accept a foreign leader either. If Labour wants to be the ethnic party, it cannot have a white leader any more).

You know the show about dragons. That’s more plausible. This would never happen.

They’d rape her to death in about a day. This is medically possible.

No, your skin is your uniform whether you accept it or not, if you research their cultural psychology, even within the group itself they have caste systems. Multiple. And whitey is on the bottom of that scale too. History doesn’t change because you smiled at someone.

WW1 was the photo war, WW2 was the film. What’s the medium of WW3, memes?

Video: Smartphone addiction

That was the intention.

It’s the new TV and it lives in your bed. Purpose: political brainwashing (propaganda).

The idiot block.

It’s replacing Church or other moral instruction. With “buy on credit, free hedonism forever!”

The banks are behind it and national debt behind that. Conspicuous consumption must rise simply to keep par.

How many people with ADD just refuse to admit they’re internet addicts? Regardless of whether it’s porn or reddit, doesn’t matter.

I drop internet/screen use for long periods of time without any physical symptoms, why don’t they? That can’t be evolution, can it?

Read a book.

It isn’t about the information, that’s an excuse for your format addiction.

Your brain is in lust with your phone. It’s as attentive as a spouse over the honeymoon.

A side effect?

If the kids all act high time preference, IQ differences seem to disappear.

I bet Apple will end up being sued for retarding children.

Shall we all go back to the humble Crackberry? (Best Apple rumour ever).

Q gets it

But you missed the point. It’s a basic logic gate function through premise after premise.

True = 1

False = 0

Resources exist to exploit (capitalism) = 1

Powerful people exist = 1
Powerful people are above mortal or mundane laws in a nation = 1
Powerful people are above international law = 1 look at Blair
Powerful people have similar goals = 1 “international relations”?
Powerful people know one another = likely.

Combine them.
There’s your conspiracy = authority + evil intent to use it.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

You can prove the first part, the second must be deduced.

OT

Medicine is eugenic, transhumanism is dysgenic (undue power, unnatural). Classism goes unmentioned by name. Don’t look at the rich people. No connection to power there. A little moral Communism – for the “greater good” with no good absolute and no greater Godhead. It’s about decreasing independence and increasing the number of dependents, a simple ratio.

Ask simple probability questions and observe reality:

How many cows does the cattle farmer want in future: more, the same or fewer?
What are the odds no rape gang has abused a Jewish child?
How is the economy still running with fewer producers than ever?
What is the plan for population density as food production plummets?

Nootropics and neurotoxins are an existing chemical example. Who gets what?

best comment
Maybe the population should never be this big. When you have this many people alive on earth your basically inviting the smartest of those people to get together and find out a way to conspire against those below them. Forcing their hands into doing things and thinking about things that should never be done. All in the name of damage control. It just seems like a lot.

There is no noblesse oblige and they would resent the parasite load.

They’re locked into their investment (“Human Resources”, the scariest term in the English language) for certain, until they switch over to 100% robots. They’ll keep chopping up those transhumanist-loving chumps until there’s only machine. It reminds me of Hannibal where he’s eating the brain.

No, thanks.

The body is sacred.

We already consume ourselves with the social construct and financial fiction of debt. Debt requires a bondage, homogeneity and has confines e.g. jubilee years.

Power isn’t IQ, that’s what they want you to think because it deters challenge. If you assumed you were gonna lose, you wouldn’t try to rebel. They’d lie about their IQ. I’m getting Assassin’s Creed flashbacks: nothing is true, everything is permitted. OG Fake News meme.

Now, how many people own the media channels?

Is a little paranoia justified upon noticing things?

Personal SHTF

The dependency network is interesting.

On the one hand, they shame you into getting 401ks, an IRA, ISA, “rainy day fund”, “emergency money”…

oh, but don’t you call it prepping!

I think it’s the mindset of fear against self-reliance.

If you learn too much independence as a citizen, including Fuck You money or untaxable savings (e.g. growing herbs and not buying), the fear vanishes. That fear is their power over you.

Our ancestors had freer speech because they had fuller wallets.

Why were women shamed for managing and working in the home? They couldn’t tax us. They couldn’t brainwash us. They couldn’t control us. Corporate laws in many ways act like an overbearing husband – turn up 9 to 5 even if you can do all the work 2-6.

Think of all the false economies of kicking women from their domain. Instead of one efficient, untaxable wife you need: cleaner, cook, nanny, builder, shopper, chauffeur, prostitute (theoretically)… Marriage is immensely efficient division of labour for both sexes, no wonder the Powers That Be try to make it seem like a bad deal.

The convenience economy relies on us: our dependence.

If we snapped back to 1900 levels of marriage by point of a shotgun, the economy would instantly depress – half the labour force, half the tax revenue and half the job opportunities at least. Supply/demand.