Reminds me of Taoism.
Taoism doesn’t actually have sexual practices (however some have twisted it to try and claim they do) for that reason. It is the spiritual overcoming the physical. To “de-base” yourself again completely extinguishes the work already built on. Monasteries and nunneries were rooted in this idea.
The wise men don’t want to be drained (and by strangers) and be thrown off with bad karma (like a creative block or stumped feeling, apathy or obstacle event). Action —> Result. You choose one, you choose the other.
Historically a promiscuous man is considered weak in all religions (except Satanism, you’ll note*) because the male path of enlightenment involves impulse control, that’s the male power. Think of a military general. A promiscuous woman gives up something that is (because of her chosen condition) worth nothing, quite a disgusting notion to people who believe in sanctity, and promiscuous men also don’t value their energies as special either, so their own influence disappears from themselves like morning dew (and they typically blame women for ‘tempting them’, projecting the problem is typical). This leads to a permanent dissolving of willpower (death of will) eventually, they call it “player burnout” online but it’s really like tapping your own veins and draining your blood then wondering why you’re weak. Idiots with scant self-awareness had little influence to spare in the first place, and so drain themselves into a curious blend of melancholy, apathy and furious self-pity faster than other, hardier men. Celibate men were respected in saner times because they had power (of the self) and this produced a laser-like focus and it’s no coincidence so many geniuses did their best work while surrendering sexually to no women.
How much bland art was clearly made by a degenerate who slept with the subjects?
How much great art was made by homosexual men, who couldn’t possibly be tempted by a woman? (or married hetero men for other reasons).
How does the art of each make you feel? Typically, the first makes people feel unclean but the latter a strange purity.
Women seen as inspiration on a collective level strengthens a man.
To surrender sexually to an improper woman or to be an improper man individually is draining (like the trail of bad luck following degeneracy that can even be seen in statistics like suicide risk). At best, the man tries to take on a female role (Lord Byron hoovering up muse figures, Wilde the same with men) and this is repellent to those who believe that men should be masculine (most men, back then) and stand firm in their principles. This is the ultimate cause of those principles and as you can see, it isn’t a double standard at all. If women aren’t meant to sleep around, that implies directly men aren’t meant to either, otherwise they’d have to become homosexual. Patriarchies protect men from wasting themselves by masturbating inside various women (it’s a loveless union) although when it overdoes this or for unclear reasons lost over time, the subjects assume it’s keeping them away from the “fun” (a child’s assumption) because they don’t understand the risk or threat to themselves. It goes beyond themselves individually too; to family name, personal social reputation, family estate and fortune, future marriage prospects, shaming their friends with bad company and associations and so on. At minimum, it lumbers others with awkwardness, selfishly. A man’s responsibilities in society forbid dalliance with the underworld elements. It always resurfaces somewhat with the degenerate, sin sticks to them, however they might appear unscathed to shallow people. If everyone ate from the cookie jar, the tragedy of the commons would pretty much provide what we consider a Third World society. It would be unruly and the individuals selfish, feral and uncivilized. We’re well on that course because, since women can’t rein the men in (and some are Satanic, hating men and encouraging their destruction**) then who is supposed to play father to men who shunned that powerful leadership role of their own sex? Men are too PC with one another and standards died as a result. It’s a youth cult that makes them wish they were Peter Pans, never changing or learning or taking on duties, stuck in a hedonic purgatory, like being dutiful is shameful and up is down. The manchild doesn’t rebel so this shift was planned. Where is the honour in such people? Natural slaves.
They don’t have dignity to value themselves beyond a performing phallus, integrity to choose their hobbies and friends wisely, they don’t know the value of hard work (bitching on twitter is not work) nor the satisfaction of being useful to your kin and the relief that duty brings the salt of the earth character.
They assume everyone is jealous of them (projection) because they cannot comprehend how lower impulses can disappear entirely when you realize their illusory nature (best known in Buddhism but Jesus embodies it too).
Most modern men would surrender to Satan in the desert after one hour for a glass of cold water and a shiny car.
No wonder women don’t respect that and ignore it for distractions like career, hoping it’ll go away and they’ll police their own standards in their sex eventually. Like, stop wearing your trousers round your ankles, for one. That’s an easy one. Women by definition cannot play father to a man and guide him like this, playing mother is enabling (and sexually repulsive) and the smarter ones don’t want to encourage it unless they hate men.
Corruption is the rotten apple spoiling the barrel. When it comes to rampant hypersexualization in society, consider the source. Do you think various pajama boys would get away with it, if they didn’t get the biological kick of orgasms as a reward (from porn or a woman in person)? What you reward, you encourage. We encourage indolence, insolence and weakness (this was the intentional product of the ‘Sexual Revolution’ in destroying Western Men). A man loyal to more than one nation is a traitor, what is a man loyal to more than one woman?
…Useless to either, at best. A burden, like an overgrown child.
Like the self-proclaimed family man avoiding his wife and children for a ‘mistress’. I’m sure that doesn’t mess them up at all….
Male power involves as much discernment as the female, for different reasons, throughout all religions. Chastity benefits men in their personal life more than women although it is a virtue for both (power for the male, discernment for the female). Lust is a deadly sin especially for men although modernity has encouraged you to forget this and disturbingly, treat it as the ultimate virtue of a man (to lose himself). They never expressly say what form Satan assumed in the desert to tempt Jesus, I assume female (although the energy of all Devil figures is very destructive and not at all nurturing). I think the #MeToo stuff is triggering the weaker men because it exposes their loss of control which they had believed was cunning concealed from women. Logically, they claim they want tougher punishments on all criminals, including hanging and I’m sure they’d change their tune if it involved their mother/sister/daughter. To personally identify with various types of rapist (including those who target men or boys) shows how weak the modern character is. Everyone gets tempted by things from time to time. So what?
It’s a test, you’re supposed to be strong. These are the defective ‘beautiful ones’ who believe gym gains and sickly cologne make up for their defective and subhuman nature. Metrosexuals don’t survive various societal corrections. Their first impulse on seeing beauty is corruption and degeneracy, much like the rapists they empathize with (instead of their victims like a man with a conscience would).
If you transported them back to the 50s they sexually fantasize about, where the streets were apparently full of young, thin and femininely dressed women, they’d be Ted Bundy. “But they looked really sexy!” level of retarded entitlement. They actually think tease is an insult (women are supposed to look like it) and temptation is an excuse for crime.
Your lust is your business. Picture a fat person blaming cake. Just because you’re triggered doesn’t give you any rights or privileges to get what you want. If so, every time I walk past a jewelry shop and they don’t shower me in diamonds, they must be taunting me. I want it, they’ve got it, what’s the problem? Why can’t I always get what I want? (Women want more from life than men so this is a very good example, nesting instinct means men would still come out with less). It’s just an excuse for anger, popping off like an irritable toddler, it’s the sexual equivalent of road rage. (Ragequitting from women, expressed in hatred of becoming a husband, is actually funny to women – they’re complaining they’d make a bad husband who’d make a bad choice of wife). Mantrums are embarrassing, they’re announcing, proudly how unfit they are. It’s like misogynistic Trigglypuff. They act like women are chasing after them down the street with a veil and false pregnancy positive.
If it’s so bad, get castrated. Honestly, if being horny provokes so much suffering or you are so self-destructive as to hand a rope to a misandrist in fucking one. Chemical castration seems to be a popular option nowadays. They assume women and their hormonal profile don’t feel temptation (HA) and by the time they come to the truth that the problem is them (and not all men) they want to switch back because men get away with more weakness (boys will be boys, weak men turn a blind eye to one another). Eventually they’ll get swept up in a war, probably civil war.
nb *Because Satanism isn’t a religion, it’s anti-religion, it intends to destroy men by encouraging their weakness and worst impulses. Rationalizations are the best way to accomplish this, stupid men are very gullible to any idea that makes them feel strong or impressive, because this way they can delude themselves and appear to have their cake and eat it.
**Remember when the SJWs openly screeched that Trump supporters wouldn’t sleep with them? It’s the witch with the poison apple, come on. It’s the only way they can corrupt and influence men, wasting their energy that could be put toward MAGA and other greatness.
Explaining shit like that.
There’s wasting time, then there’s a Margaret Thatcher colouring book.
Why do they think female rapists exist and the Bible says to avoid seductive women? Whether you think you want them or not, they’re sexual predators. Of course they’ll ruin your life if you let them, that’s what predators do! Stop encouraging them.
This post also clarifies this section of the Bible.
God made femininity and not to have something to shame or corrupt.
Don’t skip this one. If you eat, this is important.
That is a national security issue.
You need the food supply for your own nation.
I’ve yet to hear any politician here say this is a problem. For the whole West.
Britain is doing it too, as covered with our heritage pork industry but here’s America.
This is a plot.
“These are not Russian communists. They like Americans.”
Traitors, traitors everywhere.
Casual Russophobia, the shell game of politics.
“Chinese companies, at the urging of their government, have launched a global buying spree, a new phase in their unprecedented economic experiment. And they’re targeting a resource that climate scientists, economists, the U.S. government, even Wall Street, all forecast will become dangerously scarce in the coming decades: food.”
“Food is poised to become the oil of the 21st century, with scarcity and demand creating a situation ripe for wars, riots and uprisings.
“We have a situation in the world food economy today where the growth in demand is exceeding the supply,” said Lester Brown, a food economist and founder of the Earth Policy Institute.
Food – namely crops such as soy, wheat and corn from which most other food products, such as pasta, bread and livestock meat, are derived – is in dwindling abundance as the world’s population grows ever larger, adding 220,000 mouths to feed every day.”
Need I say I told you so or is that Malthus’ place?
Thessalonians comes to mind.
“It is part of the transition from an age of surplus to one of scarcity,” Brown said.’
“The world is set for a geopolitical struggle over food.”
Those trigger war, we need a pandemic.
“The Chinese government already is dealing with looming food shortages within its own borders as tens of millions are eating more as they move from poverty into the middle class. The government is pushing Chinese businesses – both state-owned and privately held – to gobble up agricultural resources from around the world, including Africa, Europe and the United States.”
That should be illegal as part of national security.
Food security, clue is in the name.
“With the Smithfield purchase, a Chinese company now owns 1 in 4 pigs raised in the U.S.”
But I’m imagining things and why do prices keep going up?
You’re funding fat Chinese citizens. To learn who rules over you….
“The question for U.S. lawmakers is: Did the Smithfield takeover represent business as usual for international commerce, or did it signal a concerted effort to control food supplies by one of the world’s most powerful governments?”
“If the Chinese government was involved in the 2013 deal, some influential U.S. lawmakers say they need to take action to protect against foreign intervention in a vital U.S. resource.”
It’s more vital than stealing weapons technology in colleges.
“He testified to Congress that the Chinese government has no management control over Shuanghui.
That, however, is not the case.”
Ooooof course it is.
“a research lab that had genetically engineered the leanest pigs on earth”
Why modern pork isn’t as healthy as real pork. You can’t even get fatback anymore.
Bacon is a traditional Saxon meal, it merits legal protected status.
He goes on to blame the ‘shareholders’. No, put on your big boy pants and do the difficult job of telling them No.
“And Colaco knew Pope’s interest in buying a 20 percent stake in China’s largest meat company, Shuanghui International.”
How? Spying. And that’s bribery, the exchange ‘offer’.
“The Chinese already consume half of the world’s pork,
and they are growing wealthier and hungrier for meat every year. In a single generation, China’s fast-growing wealth has transformed a nation of impoverished rice and noodle eaters into the world’s largest middle class, which can increasingly afford meat in its diet.”
Any vegan who starts on the West instead of China doesn’t understand math. They calculate per person (wrong) but when you consider volumes, Asia is clearly starving out the rest of the world, including their precious Africa.
Most Westerners have been priced out of their birthright because suppliers are allowed to sell to foreigners first, rich ones.
Remember how the Chinese are eating most of it for the gaslighting lower down.
“Wan had transformed a government-owned slaughterhouse, where he was appointed manager in 1984, into China’s largest meat company”
Coincidence, I’m sure.
“Pope proposed to Wan that they take a 20 percent stake in each other’s companies. Smithfield would gain a powerful ally in Wan, who is politically connected to China’s top leaders and also a member of the National People’s Congress.”
Is Trump going to move on any of this?
“The partnership would be equal, reflecting the fact that although Smithfield Foods generated more than twice the revenue and was far more advanced in terms of global reach and pork technology than Shuanghui, growth rates in China were far higher.”
Doesn’t sound equal. That actually sounds like a downside, demand side loses in capitalism.
“It was a match made in free-market heaven.”
‘Libertarians’ are whores for the richest foreigner.
Using the word free while selling out your country. For shame.
If libertarians didn’t sell the farm (cough) to China after WW2 their population would’ve stabilized as well and we wouldn’t have these problems.
And since when do we care so much about rich Chinese over our own people? That’s their Government’s problem, not ours. The rank classism of this reeks.
“Pope picked up the phone. Colaco cut straight to the deal. The Chinese were ready, he said. But it wasn’t a partnership they wanted.”
Classic manipulation tactic and the greedy piggy fell for it. Modern men are weak.
I’d have laughed and slammed the phone down.
“Smithfield is not for sale,” Pope shot back.’
Sure he did – and everybody clapped.
“But I do like this discussion,” he finished.’
Crooked CEOs are worse than politicians. The latter you can vote out and hang.
“Both Pope and Colaco told me that they remembered the call as cordial and succinct.”
You agreed to sell a part of your country’s history quickly?
“The Chinese didn’t want to save him. They wanted to buy him.”
Well, he is a whore. They were right.
New Money, they think if they buy the world they ‘win’ and become the new dominant Empire.
Treat everyone like a whore for sale is their MO.
“The U.S. Treasury Department was in the midst of reviewing the takeover for any national security risks. That review, by an obscure office within the department, was to remain classified per U.S. law.”
It should’ve been cancelled, simple as.
Here’s the part I mentioned before, Americans priced out of America.
“Two years earlier, the Chinese government had signaled its strong desire for overseas agriculture. It had unveiled its five-year plan, which amounts to the Communist Party’s roadmap for the country’s economy. A major focus of this plan: buying up overseas farmland and foreign food companies.
Why is American homesteading land so expensive, Americans?
In 2011, the year the five-year plan was announced, Chinese nationals owned $81 million worth of U.S. farmland.
Repatriate it, simply refuse to acknowledge their ownership claim as valid due to foreign security issues. We do it all the time.
By the end of 2012, the Chinese owned $900 million in U.S. farmland – a 1,000 percent increase – making them the largest buyers that year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
You should’ve known when they changed the soldier breeding programme to two children despite over-population.
The Smithfield deal included another $480 million in U.S. farmland, which would push the Chinese stake to nearly $1.4 billion in less than two years.”
Successful nations don’t sell land or companies to outsiders.
This should be the law, it needs to be enforced. It’s a type of border control.
“He testified that the Chinese government had absolutely no management control in Shuanghui.”
He lied, was he under oath?
“Pope explained that the deal would create jobs in the U.S., not destroy them. Shuanghui’s plan to import more American pork would ramp up production at Smithfield’s 460 hog farms, creating more money for farmers and more jobs at the slaughterhouses.”
And more food to a foreign army to kill all the people you ‘gave’ jobs.
Don’t work with Commies, eventually they’ll shoot you too.
“I think it is good for America. I think this is the opportunity America has been looking for to import jobs.”
“Stabenow pushed back. She wanted to know why Smithfield could not increase its sales to China as an American company and why only a takeover by a Chinese firm would open the doors to the world’s largest pork market. The Chinese government was unfairly blocking American hog farmers from exporting there, she said.”
A patriot. They ignored her, didn’t they?
She was right, so they did.
“American grain companies had supported the deal. In the past five years, China has become their biggest foreign customer.”
You say ‘American’.
Is it (((American)))?
“Roberts lampooned criticism of the deal, asking Pope, “Did you realize you were the victim of a Chinese communist plot?”
Laughter broke out in the hearing. Pope chuckled.”
They know it’s treason.
“For Wan, who had served as a foot soldier in Mao Zedong’s army….”
Was he one of the cannibals?
“Shuanghui is now China’s largest meat company, and with the addition of Smithfield Foods, it has become the world’s largest producer of packaged meats, pumping out millions of tons of hot dogs and sausages every year.”
As American as your hot dogs?
Armies need protein.
The signs were there.
“The campus also has a massive refrigerated warehouse larger than a football field. It houses something found only in China: a national pork reserve. Much as the U.S. government maintains a strategic oil reserve, China stashes away vast amounts of frozen pork in case of price inflation or war. The mammoth warehouse I was staring at housed 110 million pounds. It is one of the many pork-reserve warehouses that Shuanghui operates for the government across China.”
Hoping you won’t notice. But we did.
“He said Smithfield’s processing equipment was three times faster.”
Great deal for them – America not so much.
“It also stated something surprising. Shuanghui is required to adhere to Beijing’s five-year plan, the Communist Party’s national economic agenda. And the document was clear. Shuanghui meets its obligations and follows the path laid out by the Communist Party.”
Are you surprised? I’m not.
“Despite its public listing in Hong Kong, Shuanghui answers to the Chinese government – going beyond regulatory compliance. It receives directives from Beijing, and it follows them. The company’s candidness surprised me, especially because U.S. senators had been sparring over this exact topic a year earlier. Here was conclusive proof.”
Is the sell-out in jail? No? Wow, almost like a Cabal is protecting him.
“He broke it down for me. The Chinese government acts like a de facto board of directors for the country’s domestic industries – even for publicly traded companies like Shuanghui. The Communist Party issues the five-year plan, and Shuanghui is expected to follow that direction. The government can say it wants the Chinese meat industry to employ certain strategies, and all domestic companies are expected to adhere. Yet the day-to-day management of the company, how it chooses to carry out those directives, is left to the company’s management. And if there is no directive, the company is free to proceed as it views best.”
“For helping carry out the government’s agenda, Shuanghui received a $4 billion loan to take over Smithfield. The loan was approved in a single day.”
“I asked Robert Wan why the government was so interested in Shuanghui’s business.
“Pork is considered a national security issue in China,” he said.”
oh, but the guy acting white was really gracious? He was laughing at you.
You can’t spend their fake money if you’re dead.
“They are entering a new phase of development, one that is taking them outside of China’s borders as they look to acquire companies and farmland overseas.”
How was WW2 won? Farms.
Watch the farms.
“The jobs will remain. But they will be lower-quality, lower-paid jobs of hog slaughtering and hog breeding,” she said. “The higher-paid, higher-value-added jobs that deal with marketing the products, processing the food, the technology development, that will go.”
Again, Libertarians are whores. Free market is code for globalist. We used to just call those traitors.
“With its five-year plan in 2011, the Chinese government identified meat processing as a strategically important industry, and with the Smithfield purchase, the country gained access to the world’s most advanced animal rearing, slaughtering and meat processing and distribution technology, she said.”
National security, you’ve boosted theirs.
“Haley has testified before Congress several times on how China’s growth is damaging the U.S. economy.”
They ignored her.
“The Chinese will quickly import Smithfield’s technology to China”
“The United States increasingly will become a large hog farm for the Chinese”
Think of the cost if they included the oil barrels to ship. Why isn’t that law?
Globalization will fail for that reason, spending $20 to send a product halfway around the world and ‘save’ 20 cents is doomed to fail.
“Hog farming is one of the most polluting industries in the world, and so that will occur in Smithfield and elsewhere, the 400-plus farms that Smithfield and now Shuanghui owns around the United States,”
Well at least America gains in pollution.
“But here it is in its simplest form: Haley has found that China begins by importing the technological know-how and raw materials from the U.S. Then Chinese businesses use cheap labor to manufacture products for export back to the United States – offering lower prices in direct competition with established businesses in the U.S. This part of her theory is obviously not new.
But here is where she advances the conversation: She has found that even in industries in which the labor cost of the final product is relatively low, meaning it accounts for 2 to 7 percent of the total, Chinese companies still are able to sell the product for 25 to 30 percent less than their American competitors. In other words, China’s big advantage is not just the cheaper labor.
So what is it? Heavy subsidies from the Chinese government, she says.”
War. Trade war.
The Trojan Horse of Trade.
When you think about it, globalism is really a way of saying international Marxism because it erases national borders and fulfills the “to each according to his ability…” dogma.
“Chinese businesses are able to undercut the prices of American producers and begin to control a larger and larger share of the market.”
You need to shame people for buying Chinese.
The oil barrels used to ship, the slave labour, lots of ways to go about it.
The quality argument, they did knowingly sell toxic baby formula.
“In two to five years, we will start noticing major changes in the United States. China will be in many agricultural sectors, not just pork. China will start acquiring much larger farms, for example. China will start consolidating,” she said. “So, in these oligopolistic industries, such as pork, where four manufacturers control over 75 percent of the American pork industry, there will be much price cutting, layoffs, etc., as competitors start feeling the hot breath of China on their necks.”
Good luck MAGA with that millstone.
I don’t hate China, as some shills have claimed, I love my people in America. If America fails, we’re on the block next.
China is oppressing them in the most under-handed ways in a manner tantamount to a declaration of war. Stealing food supply? Super-villain territory.
BTW, you’re still paying China foreign aid.
““The Chinese, in my opinion, are behaving rationally. Food is in short supply in China. It’s a source of unrest in China,” Haley said. “They have OK’d the acquisition of agriculture in the United States to further Chinese interests.”
“China and the U.S. are roughly the same size geographically – about 3.7 million square miles. But China has more than four times as many people to feed.
r-selection ends predictably
the checks won’t clear eventually
And it has less arable land than the U.S.”
As in, without buying America’s food security, they’d instantly lose a war.
It’s cheaper for them to buy America itself than buy from America every year.
“Moving toward a meat-centric diet has put an incredible strain on China’s agriculture system. Simply put, Chinese farmers can no longer keep up.”
By buying from China, you’re directly supporting the Chinese Communist government.
Communists make the best slavers, they actually believe they’re doing good.
‘Chinese officials only recently have recognized the futility of their long-cherished national goal of food self-sufficiency, said Fred Hu, former head of Goldman Sachs for greater China.
Not high IQ then. As if the Marxism didn’t give it away.
“China will have to import a large quantity of foods from all over the world,” said Hu, a Chinese national who helped raise funds for Shuanghui and now advises his government.
Until we blockade it. Which we’ll have to, to feed our own people.
He agreed with Haley that food is increasingly a matter of political stability for the Chinese government.
“We have a one-party state, and the Communist Party depends on its ability to deliver economic prosperity and consumer satisfaction,” Hu said. “In that way, for the severe shortage of any particular food item, or very significant price inflation, that could be a source of public discontent.”’
The way to beat China is ruthless capitalism, stop buying from them and jack up the prices.
“The government also ordered its domestic food producers to scour the globe, buying foreign companies and agricultural resources that China could control in the coming decades”
During a war, your enemy owns your food. Who wins?
Seige warfare on vulnerable domestic civilians is sneaky little ratbag warfare. Typical r-types. Attack the children, elderly and sick. They suffer first under food supply disruptions.
“China is securing food supplies – increasingly, high-end food such as meat – for its middle class.”
You said national security, that means military.
“The U.S. still enjoys probably the highest living standards in the world,” he said. “My advice for you in the West, after your criticisms, is that you probably should eat less meat to control weight and to stay healthy, right?”
Gaslighting microdick. That’s a Mean Girls tier insult.
He just tried to neg white people. They’re really insecure, huh?
Actually eating meat is healthier and Americans are fat due to processed carbs, they know this.
Trump should specially stamp every product from China or a Chinese company so people have informed consent when buying.
That’s the best, simplest solution. Totally legal, more legal than the current labelling.
PRODUCT OF CHINA in huge letters on the front with the Marxist symbol in blood red.
So other people can see you’re buying it too.
After all, informed consent. People should know which government and ideology their money supports.
Actually, why isn’t there a public list of companies that seem domestic but are actually foreign owned? People have a right to boycott if they please.
“Everyone wants to see China succeed. It’s an old civilization,” she said.
No, if they win, you lose. Zero sum. They’re heartless monsters, their culture is one of torture.
“But it is our government’s prerogative and our government’s responsibility to look out for the interests of U.S. consumers and U.S. industry, just as the Chinese are looking out for their industry and their customers.”
trans. Do your job. You’re not Mother Theresa.
Sen. Debbie Stabenow, who asked Haley to testify before the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, said the U.S. government needs to do more to protect U.S. agriculture.
She is calling on the Treasury Department, which reviews foreign acquisitions of major U.S. businesses, to expand the definition of national security to include food. Such a change could prevent future takeovers of America’s farm and food companies.
Food is too vital an industry for the American people to allow it to be undercut by the Chinese government in the way that it has happened in other industries, Stabenow said when I visited her office in Washington.
“Food security is national security,” she said. “It’s as much a threat for Americans if we don’t control our own food supply as it is if another country gets some kind of defense secret.”
Food production is a defense secret.
In tiny text again: “Food is poised to become the oil of the 21st century, with scarcity and demand creating a situation ripe for wars, riots and uprisings.”
Pope still denies the Government connection, meaning he knew all along.
“But for the first time, he publicly acknowledged the Chinese government’s five-year plan.”
“In many respects, this is carrying out the government’s five-year plan, which is to improve the quality and the security of their food supply,”
“Pope said Smithfield Foods now is transferring its technology to China”
Maybe Pope giving a blowjob under the table to the Chinese Government.
“It will process the meat in China and sell it under the Smithfield brand, according to the company.”
How many American brands have been gutted?
Do the American people not have a right to know in the labeling?
It’s false advertising to use an American brand for a non-American company.
Cultural appropriation is serious business. Especially when it’s used to subvert the culture in question.
“I handed him the Bank of China document that stated the government’s financial support for the deal.”
“I think the concern that others should have is that there’s going to be more foreign companies wanting to buy U.S. companies,” Pope said. “We need to have a bit of concern that what we’ve got, others value more than we do.”
Your choice, America. Label your products correctly or allow foreign governments to literally buy your food over you.
Currently, a lot of “your” food is reserved for a Chan or Wan. The good stuff.
Oh, and stop remittance. That’s an easy one. You hemorrhage money there. Tax it to the hilt.
To wet your whistle.
Explains why they screech in excitement or sob with crocodile tears about everything demographic. It’s just vote-rigging. Bringing in fake voters (not actually with any birth right to decide the outgroup’s infrastructure and historical matters*) is comparable to a false military (terrorists, importing terrorists is also treason) since it’s the two ways to gain power – the status (political positions, MP, PM, POTUS, AG) and the might (enforcement with force -or else- and violence and little considered but critical intimidation i.e. common example, Western girls scared to wear more feminine AND Western clothing in multicultural areas, who has the balls to do that study?). [has to be both for clear signal value]
Political correctness is the tyranny of cultural intimidation.
*e.g. if they wouldn’t go to the draft, they have no opinion on the draft or the possibility of war. They’d be forced though. Playing victim doesn’t mean acting like an hysterical woman come draft time would work. I’d go to any version of the draft I’d be physically capable of so weak men have no excuse. I heard it described thusly: Do you wait for them to stab you warm in your bed hiding under a blanket or meet death like a man? ‘Like a man’ there referring to physical courage, what modern men sorely lack as they ‘work on’ abs and chest waxes and spray tans. The Hysterical Left can’t expect to always get rescued by the Honourable Loser Right. Actually, a smart general puts the weaker men on the front line knowing they’re A useless (I’d like to see a study on male health status markers for military purposes and IQ**) and B will get picked off anyway… this isn’t mean, and actually less sexist, since it’s good for the war effort*** and the overall fitness of Men as a category. If you spare the feeble men like prize inbred birds in a climate controlled room, as in WW1, you… should look up all the stupid socialist bullshit that got in shortly thereafter. Weak men make weak voting decisions. The best men died on the field, literally. Older and smaller wars, prior to the World ones, were highly eugenic for the male genome and the nomination system of medals for valour etc. reflect this incentive structure. They don’t hand out medals for a good pregnancy because surviving that condition is very random, no precise behaviours really change the outcome and it can have nothing to do with fitness e.g. sepsis****. Military medals handed out all the time make no sense, that’s the arrogance, and medals for mothers only make sense for a high number AND quality of children. We give children (pre-teen and under) medals when logically it should go to the family and strengthen that unit.
**This study is interesting and verging closer but I’ll add it separately.
***A statistic is quantitative whereas the genome is qualitative. If you had a binary choice between your country losing an inferior quality specimen (we are animals) and a far, far better one of its kind, who would you rather help with the rebuilding effort after the war? It’s like weeding a garden, this is so obvious.
****The future is bound to suck with antibiotic resistance AND escalating non-European population, there will be a pandemic. At some point. Mathematical inevitability.
The politicians don’t want the immigrants to know: A passport is a license to draft.
That’s literally what it is, legally, what it’s always been and why they became a big deal in WW2. In the event of a war while abroad, you could be identified with your country of military subscription. I’d love to see a Freedom of Information request on this, what a passport legally enshrines as a duty to the holder. It’s an international symbol of citizenship so burning it won’t make a bit of difference, you agreed and signed over XYZ. Why else would you sign your own passport? You must ensure the person crossing your border is signed on as a friend/ally and not a current enemy (military invasion). Why do passport inspectors ask why you’re there, for legal reasons?
Argh! I give up explaining this point.
The census is about food security, part of national security. Older ones were all about farms.
Back to voter dilution related “problems.”
It’s insane we have foreign nationals who think a passport is something they’ll never need to repay. It isn’t like a blank cheque, the hand-rubbing politicians see you as currency, you as a person. It’s a legal document binding you to the fate of a country, including its national debt, so to ruin that country or prefer your real “home” in policy decisions won’t actually work out for them? Just saying.
Sinking a ship you’re on and celebrating because you hated the captain.
If I’m a bitch, my name is foresight.
It’s a trifecta of stupidity. Citizenship is a noose, and you want dual?
[Actually, why don’t dual citizens pay twice the taxes? No, that would be fair, wouldn’t it? Can’t have that. ‘Fair’ is racist. nb Logically, they get twice the citizenry benefits and effectively pay half the tax for same. The politicians sell pig-shit thick celebrities on dual citizenships by appealing to their ego, which tells you everything you need to know.]
Pissing off the people who helped you (1) with a more advanced military (2) and higher native IQ (3)?
I foresee this ending well… how will we go after them for their share of the debts?
[inc. odious debt, hours of fun on that one]
Libertarians are stupid because they assume immigrants have common sense and act in their own and their home’s best interests. Haha no.
And the people who think being nice to the outgroup means that group will treat them any better or more stupidly, make them leader of the foreigners?! (See Labour leader contention for that last, no they won’t accept a foreign leader either. If Labour wants to be the ethnic party, it cannot have a white leader any more).
You know the show about dragons. That’s more plausible. This would never happen.
They’d rape her to death in about a day. This is medically possible.
No, your skin is your uniform whether you accept it or not, if you research their cultural psychology, even within the group itself they have caste systems. Multiple. And whitey is on the bottom of that scale too. History doesn’t change because you smiled at someone.
WW1 was the photo war, WW2 was the film. What’s the medium of WW3, memes?
That’s how they do it.
That was the intention.
It’s the new TV and it lives in your bed. Purpose: political brainwashing (propaganda).
The idiot block.
It’s replacing Church or other moral instruction. With “buy on credit, free hedonism forever!”
The banks are behind it and national debt behind that. Conspicuous consumption must rise simply to keep par.
How many people with ADD just refuse to admit they’re internet addicts? Regardless of whether it’s porn or reddit, doesn’t matter.
I drop internet/screen use for long periods of time without any physical symptoms, why don’t they? That can’t be evolution, can it?
Read a book.
It isn’t about the information, that’s an excuse for your format addiction.
Your brain is in lust with your phone. It’s as attentive as a spouse over the honeymoon.
A side effect?
If the kids all act high time preference, IQ differences seem to disappear.
I bet Apple will end up being sued for retarding children.
Shall we all go back to the humble Crackberry? (Best Apple rumour ever).